Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumWhich candidate will improve our standing in the Democracy Index and how?
The Economist Intelligence Units Democracy Index 2015
Democracy in an age of anxiety
The Economist Intelligence Units Democracy Index provides a snapshot of the state of democracy worldwide for 165 independent states and two territoriesthis covers almost the entire population of the world and the vast majority of the worlds states (micro-states are excluded). The Democracy Index is based on five categories: electoral process and pluralism; civil liberties; the functioning of government; political participation; and political culture. Based on their scores on a range of indicators within these categories, each country is then itself categorised as one of four types of regime: full democracies; flawed democracies; hybrid regimes; and authoritarian regimes.
This is the eighth edition of the Democracy Index. It reflects the situation in 2015, a year in which democracy was tested in the face of war, terrorism, mass migration and other crises, and, in some cases, suffered serious setbacks. The title of this years report reflects the threat to democracy emanating from the fearful mood of our times, which informs the reactions of ordinary people and political elites alike. An increased sense of personal and societal anxiety and insecurity in the face of diverse perceived risks and threatseconomic, political, social and securityis undermining democracy, which depends on a steadfast commitment to upholding enlightenment values (liberty, equality, fraternity, reason, tolerance and free expression) and fostering democratic institutions and a democratic political culture.
In many democracies, political elites worry about their inability to relate to the electorate and fear the challenge that populist parties pose. In some cases, established parties have colluded to exclude or marginalise the populists. In the face of terrorist threats, democratic governments have reacted in anti-democratic ways, calling into question freedom of speech or adopting draconian laws. In non-democratic countries, authoritarian political elites fear the threat from the masses and seek to bolster their rule by imprisoning opponents, restricting the media, limiting popular freedoms and repressing protest. Meanwhile, electorates are ever more anxiousabout economic insecurity, about their personal safety, about the consequences of immigration, about the threat of terrorismand angry that their concerns are not being represented by the established parties. This mood of fear and insecurity represents one of the main threats to democracy today.
Almost one-half of the worlds countries can be considered to be democracies, but, in our index, the number of full democracies is low, at only 20 countries; 59 countries are rated as "flawed democracies. Of the remaining 88 countries in our index, 51 are authoritarian and 37 are considered to be hybrid regimes. As could be expected, the developed OECD countries dominate among full democracies; there are two Asian countries, one Latin American country (Uruguay) and one African country (Mauritius), which suggests that level of development is not a binding constraint, but is a constraint, nevertheless. Slightly less than one-half (48.4%) of the worlds population lives in a democracy of some sort, although only 8.9% reside in full democracies. Around 2.6bn people, more than one-third of the worlds population, still live under authoritarian rule (with a large share being, of course, in China).
Flawed democracies are concentrated in Latin America, eastern Europe and Asia...
Democracy in an age of anxiety
The Economist Intelligence Units Democracy Index provides a snapshot of the state of democracy worldwide for 165 independent states and two territoriesthis covers almost the entire population of the world and the vast majority of the worlds states (micro-states are excluded). The Democracy Index is based on five categories: electoral process and pluralism; civil liberties; the functioning of government; political participation; and political culture. Based on their scores on a range of indicators within these categories, each country is then itself categorised as one of four types of regime: full democracies; flawed democracies; hybrid regimes; and authoritarian regimes.
This is the eighth edition of the Democracy Index. It reflects the situation in 2015, a year in which democracy was tested in the face of war, terrorism, mass migration and other crises, and, in some cases, suffered serious setbacks. The title of this years report reflects the threat to democracy emanating from the fearful mood of our times, which informs the reactions of ordinary people and political elites alike. An increased sense of personal and societal anxiety and insecurity in the face of diverse perceived risks and threatseconomic, political, social and securityis undermining democracy, which depends on a steadfast commitment to upholding enlightenment values (liberty, equality, fraternity, reason, tolerance and free expression) and fostering democratic institutions and a democratic political culture.
In many democracies, political elites worry about their inability to relate to the electorate and fear the challenge that populist parties pose. In some cases, established parties have colluded to exclude or marginalise the populists. In the face of terrorist threats, democratic governments have reacted in anti-democratic ways, calling into question freedom of speech or adopting draconian laws. In non-democratic countries, authoritarian political elites fear the threat from the masses and seek to bolster their rule by imprisoning opponents, restricting the media, limiting popular freedoms and repressing protest. Meanwhile, electorates are ever more anxiousabout economic insecurity, about their personal safety, about the consequences of immigration, about the threat of terrorismand angry that their concerns are not being represented by the established parties. This mood of fear and insecurity represents one of the main threats to democracy today.
Almost one-half of the worlds countries can be considered to be democracies, but, in our index, the number of full democracies is low, at only 20 countries; 59 countries are rated as "flawed democracies. Of the remaining 88 countries in our index, 51 are authoritarian and 37 are considered to be hybrid regimes. As could be expected, the developed OECD countries dominate among full democracies; there are two Asian countries, one Latin American country (Uruguay) and one African country (Mauritius), which suggests that level of development is not a binding constraint, but is a constraint, nevertheless. Slightly less than one-half (48.4%) of the worlds population lives in a democracy of some sort, although only 8.9% reside in full democracies. Around 2.6bn people, more than one-third of the worlds population, still live under authoritarian rule (with a large share being, of course, in China).
Flawed democracies are concentrated in Latin America, eastern Europe and Asia...
http://64.37.52.189/~parsifal/EIU2015.pdf
They rank the US 20th out of 20 in their set of "full democracy" nations.
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
0 replies, 444 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (1)
ReplyReply to this post