2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumYesterda, Bernie lost AL by 61, AR by 36, GA by 43, TX by 32, TN by 34, and VA by 29...
Realistically, which of the remaining states can Bernie win by 30-40 points to offset these landslide losses in the southern states.
He needs to earn delegates, not states. And the only way for him to do that is to win big in delegate heavy states.
Sid
GoldenThunder
(300 posts)This race is going the distance.
SidDithers
(44,228 posts)Sid
mahina
(17,616 posts)SidDithers
(44,228 posts)it was done before massive Clinton wins in the South.
"Sanders needs to beat the right column targets to win the nomination"
He needed to lose TN by no more than 4 points.
He lost by 34.
He needed to lose VA by no more than 9 points.
He lost by 29.
He needed to lose AR by no more than 20 points.
He lost by 36.
He needed to lose TX by no more than 20 points.
He lost by 32.
He needed to lose GA by no more than 24 points.
He lost by 43.
He needed to lose AL by no more than 27 points.
He lost by 59.
The results last night threw that rosy projection onto the scrap heap.
Sid
leveymg
(36,418 posts)The only one that's a possible is VA, and the Dem turnout in the VA primary was 20% lower than in 2008. Overall, our turnout was 32% below 2008 levels in Super Tuesday states, while the GOP upturned 60 percent in the same states. The more conservative the state, generally the better Hillary did. But, proportionately, she failed to turn out the Democratic vote there. Looks like the Right don't like her any better than the Left, and the Independents either stay home or go Trump. If this is taste of things to come, forget it. See, below.
Photo of Chuck Ross
Chuck Ross
Reporter
10:31 AM 03/02/2016
The number of Democrats who voted in Super Tuesday states this cycle was down 32 percent this year compared to 2008, according to a Daily Caller analysis of primary and caucus results.
Meanwhile, GOP turnout was up a monstrous 61 percent in Super Tuesday states compared to 2008 and up 73 percent compared to 2012.
The huge disparity is further evidence of the so-called enthusiasm gap that is a growing cause of concern for Democrats. In the first four primaries and caucuses, Democratic turnout was down 26 percent compared to 2008. Democratic party leaders as well as the campaign of prospective nominee Hillary Clinton are worried that the trend will continue through to the general election in November. (RELATED: Democratic Voter Turnout Is Down A Whopping 26% In 2016 Compared To 2008)
Overall, 5.8 million Democrats voted in 11 Super Tuesday primaries and caucuses. Thats well off the 8.56 million that hit the polls in those same states in 2008, which saw a new wave of Democratic registrants eager to cast a vote for then-Illinois Sen. Barack Obama.
Turnout virtually cratered in Texas, which Clinton won in both cycles. There, just over 1.4 million voted this go-round compared to 2.87 million in 2008. The 51 percent slide is the steepest of any of the contests held Tuesday.
Turnout was also down significantly in Alabama, Arkansas, Georgia and Tennessee. It fell 28 percent, 34 percent, 29 percent, and 41 percent in those states, respectively.
The upside for Clinton, who won seven of the 11 Super Tuesday states that were up for grabs, is that the states with the largest drop in turnout are red and are unlikely to select a Democrat come November.
But turnout also dipped significantly in Virginia, a key battleground state. In 2008 just over 986,000 voted in the primary. This year, around 780,000 showed up, marking a 21 percent decline.
Read more: http://dailycaller.com/2016/03/02/democratic-turnout-down-32-in-super-tuesday-states-compared-to-2008/#ixzz41m8fvHzx
mahina
(17,616 posts)Welcome to DU!
Agreed 100%, Bernie said he's in for the whole race and the thing about him I love is, he means ust what he says
JaneyVee
(19,877 posts)And this doesnt even include Florida where shes up big
TCJ70
(4,387 posts)...shouldn't you be concerned about Hillary's performance in blue states?
SidDithers
(44,228 posts)Sid
VT, NH, MN, CO. You know, the ones that will win us the GE?
onenote
(42,585 posts)That's hysterical.
You probably thought that Obama would lose California to McCain in 2008 since Obama lost the California primary by 7 points.
(For the record, Obama won California in the GE by 14).
I'm sure that wasn't missed by the right.
JaneyVee
(19,877 posts)Agschmid
(28,749 posts)Don't mention Mass. It ruins the narrative.
firebrand80
(2,760 posts)auntpurl
(4,311 posts)but that made me laugh so hard.
Capn Sunshine
(14,378 posts)and welcome to DU new guy.
HooptieWagon
(17,064 posts)Outside the Deep South, she barely managed to pick up 3 states. Doesn't appear to be an electable candidate in the GE.
SidDithers
(44,228 posts)Sid
HooptieWagon
(17,064 posts)The only region where he's had double digit losses is the GOP voting Deep South, which has been pushed to the front of the primary schedule.
NWCorona
(8,541 posts)But Bernie locking Hillary out of VT was huge. Even if it's his home state.
Hillary's weakness shouldn't be overlooked
SidDithers
(44,228 posts)Hillary's landslide in GA earned her 42 more delegates than Bernie.
That's 2 1/2 x Vermont.
Sid
NWCorona
(8,541 posts)I'm aware of the math but the question was landslide and that's what happened in VT.
Avalux
(35,015 posts)Bernie did much better than I expected last night and I'm thrilled with his delegate take at this point. Soon Hillary will exhaust the south.
I hear she needs money too, so is holding a fundraiser with NRA lobbyists. Will she stop speaking out about gun violence now?
This ain't over until the convention.
mindem
(1,580 posts)and what amazing miracle is Clinton going perform to carry the south in the general. It I a moot argument.
NWCorona
(8,541 posts)Bernie either for that matter.
7wo7rees
(5,128 posts)I'm feeding birds today.
SidDithers
(44,228 posts)Lets work the scenarios.
Posters keep saying that after March 15, the states are more favourable to Bernie.
Which ones are the landslides?
Sid
7wo7rees
(5,128 posts)And Oklahoma went.
Try to give it a rest.
Agnosticsherbet
(11,619 posts)It isn't impossible for Sanders, but as long as she is competitive in most states, she will win in the end. And if she continues to win blowouts, it will soon reach the point where a Sanders win becomes impossible, even if he goes all the way to the Convention.
SDJay
(1,089 posts)to see updated polling for CA, OR and WA. If SBS's statistical trend mirrors what happened in some other states, he'll clean up out here. The last CA poll I saw was around the first of the year and it had HRC up by 11, I believe. Much has happened since then, and we've all seen how Bernie has closed huge gaps in other places.
CA could be very interesting. OR and WA could be also.
angrychair
(8,678 posts)That is a lock.
seaotter
(576 posts)angrychair
(8,678 posts)Logical
(22,457 posts)SidDithers
(44,228 posts)You know the delegate math is bad. Bernie needs landslides to counter the landslide losses last night.
Are there states where Bernie can make up great clumps of delegates all at once?
I don't think there are.
Does anyone really think he's going to beat Clinton by 20 pts in California? And even a 20 pt victory means he picks up maybe 95 delegates.
He'll be down 300ish by next week.
Sid
Jackie Wilson Said
(4,176 posts)plans once she is nominated, and she probably will be.
The idea that we are going to go another 8-16 years without universal healthcare makes me sick.
angry
etc
Logical
(22,457 posts)Does it make? Money still flowing in and he can hammer home points hillary is ignoring.
morningfog
(18,115 posts)Sanders will win some more states, and some even by decent margins. But, HIllary will win more states and by larger margins and will add to her lead.
It's a simple question of how to make up the difference and the Southern state results have made it damn near impossible.
A Bernie nomination, considering the true state of the race, depends on a significant game-changing event. It would have to be a scandal, a health issue or an unexpected withdrawal from the race of HIllary.
One of the 99
(2,280 posts)All big states.
Vinca
(50,236 posts)I've been trying to guess Bernie's strategy and that's my first guess. I doubt he can overcome Hillary's lead when the superdelegates are thrown in, but I still think it's possible to equalize the awarded delegates. If he should end up with a majority of the awarded delegates and the superdelegates don't flip, there will be hell to pay.
SidDithers
(44,228 posts)what do you think is a realistic win for Bernie.
20 points? 30?
Even at 30 points, he's only picking up 18 delegates.
How about Washington. Can he win by 20 points?
A 20 point win, and he picks up 20 delegates.
Clinton's delegate margin in Texas is going to be 90 or more when all is said and done.
The math doesn't lie.
Sid
One of the 99
(2,280 posts)SidDithers
(44,228 posts)And upwards of 80% of the AA vote in the southern states.
How much do you realistically think Bernie can win CA by?
Realistically.
Sid
ThePhilosopher04
(1,732 posts)are African Americans and older white women. She will get run off the map by Trump.
BreakfastClub
(765 posts)lunamagica
(9,967 posts)SoLeftIAmRight
(4,883 posts)Those God fearing states have some problems with reality
Surprised that you feel so at home with those ideas
BreakfastClub
(765 posts)Scurrilous
(38,687 posts)amborin
(16,631 posts)SidDithers
(44,228 posts)Those are Democrats living in red states that cast those votes. And their primary votes are just as legitimate as the primary votes cast in MN or VT or NY or CA.
Which of the remaining states will Sanders win by landslides?
Sid
amborin
(16,631 posts)look your states up and see if the Dem candidate gets any elec coll votes
SidDithers
(44,228 posts)In the US, there is a process called the Primary, where voters in every state cast ballots, or caucus, to select a person to be their parties nominee in the General Election.
Those state by state elections award delegates that are proportional to the votes cast for each candidate in that particular state, and then the candidate with the most delegates becomes the party nominee.
Once the party nominee has been selected, that nominee competes for electoral college votes against the nominee from other parties.
Sid
Hortensis
(58,785 posts)What's Bernie's path to victory if the Pacific states break off into the ocean before they vote? He wouldn't need to win over Californians then.
Csainvestor
(388 posts)Bernie will also win washington state and oregon.
Bernie will do VERY WELL in places like Brooklyn and Queens, NY and California are in play for Bernie.
Florida is winnable for Bernie, Alan Grayson is currently winning the primary for senate in FL and He just endorsed Bernie.
sweetloukillbot
(10,972 posts)He needs to blow Clinton out with victory margins similar or greater than his margin in New Hampshire. That might happen in some of the Western caucus states, but it's not going to happen in New York, Florida, California, Illinois, Michigan or Ohio. He might win them, but not enough to significantly dent her lead.
Csainvestor
(388 posts)As long as he stays close to Hillary, he can beat her at the end in NY and CA.
sweetloukillbot
(10,972 posts)That's what he needs to do. Narrow or even a 10-point victory won't do it. He just won't get enough delegates. If we were winner-take-all, it would make a big difference, but because it's proportional he needs to skunk her. I don't see that happening.
Csainvestor
(388 posts)he will pick up delegates in the west and the north.
by the time he gets to CA and NY he won't need landslides to win it.
sweetloukillbot
(10,972 posts)Even with landslides in the Pacific Northwest, there aren't enough delegates in the states he's favored to make up for the deficit he's in without big wins in delegate rich states.
NCTraveler
(30,481 posts)Response to SidDithers (Original post)
Name removed Message auto-removed
SidDithers
(44,228 posts)Sid