2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumGuess what...the campaign didn't end on Super Tuesday.
Bernie did better overall than anyone really expected.
SidDithers
(44,228 posts)Sid
AZ Progressive
(3,411 posts)RobertEarl
(13,685 posts)Tonight it's more like water over the dam.
The Bern burned right thru that firewall.
Garrett78
(10,721 posts)Nevada was the beginning of the end, and Super Tuesday was a bad day for Sanders delegate-wise. Could it have been worse? Um, sure. But the next couple of Tuesdays and beyond are in Clinton's favor. Sanders is in a big hole, which is only going to get deeper.
TSIAS
(14,689 posts)I remember Hillary supporters saying he wouldn't win states other than VT and NH.
SidDithers
(44,228 posts)that the extra delegates awarded to Clinton more than offset the delegates gained by Sanders in the states he picked up.
In terms of delegates, which is really the only thing that matters, Sandrrs fell short of what he needed.
Sid
mhatrw
(10,786 posts)And nowhere else.
Democrats could literally not field a worse candidate than Hillary Clinton in terms of riling up the Republican base to vote against her while leaving the Democratic base stone cold. Nor could the Democrats find a single worse individual to nominate in terms of unfavorability ratings among independent voters.
Garrett78
(10,721 posts)and many will be won by Clinton. IL, MI, OH, PA, NY, MD, CA, etc., etc., etc.
Folks should stop denying that reality. The level of delusion I'm witnessing on this board tonight is unhealthy.
tk2kewl
(18,133 posts)This is where the pledged delegate count stands this morning
There are 4,051 total pledged delegates in the primary.
Clinton has 633 pledged delegates so far or 15.6% of the total.
Sander has 414 pledged delegates so far 10.2% or of the total.
With 74.2% of the pledged delegates and 34 more states remaining.
Those of us in those other 34 states representing 3/4 of the electorate plan on having a say in this.
SidDithers
(44,228 posts)Here are two versions of the target Sanders needed from Super Tuesday, to have a path a the nomination:
How many delegates do you think Sanders is going to get from yesterday, once all the delegates have been awarded?
Answer - fewer than either of these targets. He's at 284 from yesterday right now, with 128 delegates still to be portioned out. Note that 52 of those 128 are coming from Texas, where Clinton won big.
And where do you think Sanders is going to make up a 200+ delegate deficit? Which large states do you think he'll win by big margins to get big numbers of delegates all at once?
Oh, and don't say California. Clinton took 70% of the latino vote in Texas yesterday, which bodes well for her in California.
Sid
tk2kewl
(18,133 posts)3/4 of us have yet to vote...
your table doesn't mean much to me w/o a key and a source so i can understand what info it intends to convey to me
SidDithers
(44,228 posts)those numbers are purely pledged delegates from last night.
Here's where I got the table. There's a bit more explanation in this thread:
http://www.democraticunderground.com/12511384530
The numbers are pulled from these two sites:
http://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/election-2016/delegate-targets/democrats/
and
http://www.dailykos.com/stories/2016/3/1/1492717/-SC-Democratic-Primary-analysis-and-Super-Tuesday-preview-Dems-not-just-Sanders-have-a-big-problem
They're both long entries, but the data is in there.
Sid
tk2kewl
(18,133 posts)even if they are statistically significant.
I don't think any Bernie supporter is under the illusion that his path to the nomination is quite difficult. but the simple fact that i stated is that 3/4 of the electorate has yet to vote and the current delegate split is 15% to 10%.
we will continue until the convention
Cobalt Violet
(9,905 posts)He was only suppose to win VT.
RobertEarl
(13,685 posts)But this is the future. Bernie will keep gaining and keep surprising. I had to laugh at the TV pundits that last week were openly in wonder at the Bern. That, 9 months after we on DU were in wonder over this magnificent political force.
reformist2
(9,841 posts)SamKnause
(13,088 posts)Where are you getting your info. ???
I got mine from the front page of Huffington Post.
Overall he's won 5 states.
Wednesdays
(17,321 posts)In the 2008 race. So, if that's any indication, this is still VERY early in the season.
Garrett78
(10,721 posts)And people need to stop suggesting that there's a comparison. There isn't. The 2008 race was down to the wire between 2 very similar candidates. States that Obama won in 2008 are very Clinton-friendly in 2016. And most of the Clinton-friendly states from 2008 are still Clinton-friendly with few exceptions.
McCamy Taylor
(19,240 posts)LexVegas
(6,031 posts)Adrahil
(13,340 posts)538 actually predicted that he would get more delegates than he did.
He did better than I expected in OK ( I expected that to be a squeaker... it wasn't. I expected MA to be a squeaker lose for him. It was.
But Hillary's margins among AA's and Hispanics are stunning, leading to blowout victories int eh South. Bernie cannot win the nomination with those kinds of margins. You can't win the Dem nomination winning only with white people and young people.