AP calls Massachusetts for SANDERS.

[Barack_America]

Holy shit!

http://www.nytimes.com/elections/results/massachusetts?action=click&pgtype=Homepage&clickSource=story-heading&module=span-abc-region&region=span-abc-region&WT.nav=span-abc-region

[morningfog]

1. Interesting. What a night!

[AzDar]

2. GTFO!!!

[New Earth]

3. I wonder why?

Everyone else called it for Hillary...

[morningfog]

5. And the numbers still show Hillary leading. Something happened.

[saltpoint]

4. Didn't they call it for HRC? Inquiring

minds want to know WTF's going on.

[redwitch]

6. I'm confused here.

Thrilled if it's so but the numbers show Hillary has more votes so ??????

[redwitch]

10. They just fixed it.

Too bad. So close though!

[Barack_America]

12. They just took it back. Maybe NYT screwed up?

That was insane. The check was by Bernie's name for a moment, then nothing.

[redwitch]

17. Somebody screwed up for only a minute or so. nt

[morningfog]

18. Now it is a check for Hillary. Too bad. That was fun for a minute.

[seaglass]

7. I saw that. Vote count doesn't reflect the call.

They just pulled the call.

[Barack_America]

16. Okay, so I'm not hallucinating?

[seaglass]

22. Lol, no I saw it before you posted and couldn't figure it out. n/t

[JaneyVee]

8. They put the checkmark in wrong place.

[JackRiddler]

9. It's weird and probably a mistake...

but now you're going to keep me up. Damn.

(That's what's on Google, apparently from the AP feed. Sanders, 48.3, "won" but Clinton with 50.5. 90% reporting. A glitch, surely? Or not?!)

[JackRiddler]

19. A minute later, gone again...

no winner called, 91%, same numbers.

[Mnpaul]

13. Look at the map

Clinton wins metro areas, Bernie rural. Most of the unreported look rural.

[Bucky]

14. Nope, not anymore

While I was looking at it, they deleted the green "called for" box and little green check. Both before and after the totals were Clinton-51 to Sanders-48.

I think it was an error

[Agschmid]

15. It says they called it for Hillary...

[Zorra]

20. Mistake by AP? nt

[MelissaB]

21. The Guardian did the same thing, but it is corrected now.

[New Earth]

23. for the hell of it

here's a screenshot of when Bernie won Mass....it was an exciting 2 minutes LOL

Still very strange? And then changing it to "Clinton ahead by 2 points" and now to her winning.

Didn't Bernie win the Mass exit Polls? I don't get it.

[link:|

[ProudToBeBlueInRhody]

25. Despite giving him the "checkmark" the numbers never showed him ahead.

It was likely a computer glitch as they were calling it.

[alcibiades_mystery]

29. I've been watching the returns all night on the Boston Globe site

Clinton's been ahead, pretty much since they started counting Boston Metro. A couple of big precinct clusters were not being reported (Worcester with 23,000 votes, Amherst, 66-33 to Bernie, Cambridge with 28,000 votes). Once those came in, it was all over. Clinton had a lead fluctuating between 24,000 and 29,000 for the last several hours. You can see some convo on this between me and Cobalt_Violet (an awesome Bernie supporter) in this thread:

http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1251&pid=1389193

[alcibiades_mystery]

24. Hope springs eternal

https://apps.bostonglobe.com/election-results/2016/primary/democratic/massachusetts/?p1=BG_election_results

[TDale313]

31. Don't be an ass. The site mistakenly had the checkmark wrong for a few minutes.

Congrats to HRC on her wins tonight. Well earned.

[bkkyosemite]

26. Hmmmmm Bernie carried the majority of the state. Bill being there I am suspicious

[Barack_America]

28. I'm about to say a dirty word...

...Provisional ballots. With over 1 million Dems voting, I wonder how many are out there?

[Merryland]

30. It's possible that his visiting those precincts

subverted the vote.

[rufus dog]

27. MSNBC says it is Clinton

20k vote lead with all reported in.

[rabid_nerd]

32. Did Bernie win MA?

The wrong call by the NYT said "according to AP"

When they fixed it, those words were gone.

My computer decided to do windows updates right NOW..

BUT I someone posted a breakdown by congressional district that showed Bernie 46, Hillary 45.

This is due to a big Bernie win in CD2 meaning +2 delegates

Hillary won in four DISTRICTS for +1 each, Bernie in three districts for +1 each.

All the others even split.

So Bernie ends up +1.

Can anyone confirm?

[Barack_America]

34. ^^^Can anyone answer this?

I saw him with 3 less in MA.

[Cheese Sandwich]

33. AP is trolling the Bernie fans. They know millions of us are hitting refresh every 5 seconds