First it was "I'll release the (Goldman Sachs speeches) transcripts when everybody else does."
And now it's "Sure, if everybody does it, and that includes the Republicans, because they know they made a lot of speeches...blah, blah, blah.
We don't care if republicans gave speeches to Goldman Sachs because they're just that, Republicans. We care if you do because you're running as a Democrat and as such, we care about what you told GS.
It wasn't that long ago, 2012, to be exact, that everyone here was asking why hadn't Mitt Romney released five years worth of his tax returns. Almost all of DU was asking that how can anyone trust a politician that had something to hide.
Hillary doesn't want to release her transcripts of her paid speeches to Goldman Sachs, and now some people (and I think you know who you are) that were saying that Mitt should release his tax returns are okay with Hillary not releasing her transcripts. WTF?
What is Hillary trying to hide, and why is she upping the ante for releasing her transcripts.
Hillary insists she's honest, why doesn't she prove she's honest with the American public by releasing her transcripts with no strings attached, no excuses, and just get it over with. Only then will we see how truly honest she is.
= new reply since forum marked as read
