2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumSouth Carolina black voters say they know Hillary Clinton well enough to pass on Bernie Sanders
His hands caked in grime from his repair job, Walter Brown coughed out a laugh when asked for his thoughts about Bernie Sanders, whose insurgent presidential campaign has electrified liberals around the country.
Who is Bernie Sanders? he said while sitting on a bench during an afternoon break. Brown, 59, is already leaning toward Hillary Clinton and doesnt plan to start researching other options.
I dont have time, he said, gesturing toward the downtown building where hes been working. Im here all day.
Sanders effort to broaden his appeal beyond white progressives and young people has run into a roadblock here in the form of black working-class voters, who in interviews here this week repeatedly voiced their longtime loyalty to Clinton. Several echoed Browns point that they dont have time to explore an alternative nor interest in learning about Sanders, a U.S. senator from Vermont who was practically unknown in South Carolina before launching his presidential bid.
more: http://www.latimes.com/politics/la-na-sanders-black-voters-20160226-story.html
William769
(55,142 posts)lunamagica
(9,967 posts)William769
(55,142 posts)lunamagica
(9,967 posts)I'll be there late today
TheBlackAdder
(28,167 posts).
So, it's good that people don't objectively research matters before voting?
That constitutes trustworthy judgment?
.
R. Daneel Olivaw
(12,606 posts)I can understand how some see the appeal.
Carlo Marx
(98 posts)Matt Karp, writing in the Jacobin, looked at polling data from the fall and found that 35% of black voters in south carolina thought a "Sanders administration would favor the rich." 12% though Sanders favored the poor. Only 10 % thought a Clinton administration would " favor the rich." Democrats have their own low information voter problems. The media blackout up until the Iowa caucus along with Clinton and her surrogate lies and propaganda have really worked in the south.
sufrommich
(22,871 posts)HerbChestnut
(3,649 posts)It's pretty clear there's many people out there who *still* don't know where Bernie stands on the issues. The person you responded to posted statistics that demonstrated that problem. It had nothing to do with race and you know it.
R. Daneel Olivaw
(12,606 posts)Orsino
(37,428 posts)A primary fight with a candidate whose superior platform is getting better known with each passing week is a bit more of a challenge. Time is on Sanders' side...if there's enough of it.
DCBob
(24,689 posts)Most are happy with Hillary.. why even look for an alternative?
pangaia
(24,324 posts)DCBob
(24,689 posts)If Bernie was more active and leading the way on issues that African Americans consider important they might have a different feeling about him.
Number23
(24,544 posts)Thank you. Just doing my part to set the facts straight around here.
bettyellen
(47,209 posts)Cali_Democrat
(30,439 posts)Clearly he hasn't done a good enough job of reaching out to the African American community.
HerbChestnut
(3,649 posts)You don't really believe that do you? The guy who was practically ignored by the DNC and the Media until Iowa? The guy who, despite winning NH and coming damn close in IA and NV, is still not known by 10-20% of the population? Come on...
DrDan
(20,411 posts)seems to me that falls to the candidate
jfern
(5,204 posts)didn't do everything they could to either have Bernie ignored or take him down, things would be different.
LexVegas
(6,024 posts)HerbChestnut
(3,649 posts)This is an honest question. Can you list her accomplishments?
SwampG8r
(10,287 posts)2 different lists one is long one is short
Broward
(1,976 posts)Just not in the way you were suggesting.
artislife
(9,497 posts)Just like the rest of us.
AZ Progressive
(3,411 posts)Aren't you proud, Hillary supporters?
all american girl
(1,788 posts)Lizzie Poppet
(10,164 posts)It's right there in the OP...
sufrommich
(22,871 posts)LexVegas
(6,024 posts)William769
(55,142 posts)And they wonder why their candidate is in the toilet.
sufrommich
(22,871 posts)contain themselves now.
Purveyor
(29,876 posts)AUTOMATED MESSAGE: Results of your Jury Service
Mail Message
On Fri Feb 26, 2016, 12:17 PM an alert was sent on the following post:
So Hillary is relying on low information voters in order to win
http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1251&pid=1344951
REASON FOR ALERT
This post is disruptive, hurtful, rude, insensitive, over-the-top, or otherwise inappropriate.
ALERTER'S COMMENTS
This is incredibly racist. Just stop it!
You served on a randomly-selected Jury of DU members which reviewed this post. The review was completed at Fri Feb 26, 2016, 12:22 PM, and the Jury voted 3-4 to LEAVE IT.
Juror #1 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #2 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #3 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: I'm definitely NOT a low information voter. Stop insulting fellow Democrats.
Juror #4 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: Oh you!
Juror #5 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #6 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #7 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: freedom to express an opinion
Thank you very much for participating in our Jury system, and we hope you will be able to participate again in the future.
sufrommich
(22,871 posts)farleftlib
(2,125 posts)The injured innocent routine, really? That's about as believable as Trump's combover.
AlbertCat
(17,505 posts)Proud??? What a stupid question.
But it's fair.
Or do you suppose there are zero low information voters in the black community?
I imagine there are low info women voters too.... and low info white voters.... and low info gay voters.... and any set of humans you care to name.
Race card, anyone?
When you want low info voters to be a block of your supporters, you hire people like Brock.
DCBob
(24,689 posts)Blue_Adept
(6,393 posts)Example laid out clear here.
Starry Messenger
(32,342 posts)I'd say we all have adequate information at this point about both Sanders and his coalition to not find it a desirable alternative.
Better luck next time.
grossproffit
(5,591 posts)MrWendel
(1,881 posts)that they don't give a shit about Bernie Sanders? Low information =/= POC
Live and Learn
(12,769 posts)SidDithers
(44,228 posts)Bernie's tryiing to do the same thing in a matter of weeks.
Not gunna happen.
Sid
Chakab
(1,727 posts)based purely on name recognition.
JI7
(89,239 posts)NurseJackie
(42,862 posts)Apparently Bernie has been making a hurried and perfunctory appeal to POC with tv and radio interviews, but it seems unlikely that it's going to have any meaningful effect on what we (and he, presumably) anticipate will happen in the coming days.
Go, Hillary! We love you!
Beartracks
(12,797 posts)A free slogan for her campaign!
Hey, if people plan to vote for her because they don't have time to look into the other options, that's no crime. This economy keeps people busy trying to make ends meet. At any rate, she clearly must be "good enough" or else they'd just plan to stay home.
It's rather hollow support, though.
===================
mwrguy
(3,245 posts)Response to mwrguy (Reply #29)
Post removed
sufrommich
(22,871 posts)"In the future, when there isn't much sympathy for a large portion of the black base in the
Democratic party from the on the left wing that you're directing this nonsense at, I hope that none of you act like you're surprised."
Saved for posterity.
JI7
(89,239 posts)And these are supposed to be progressives who care about people ?Especially those who have it the toughest.
MaggieD
(7,393 posts).... and probably worse. That's how they roll.
Lizzie Poppet
(10,164 posts)There's nothing I can say about that attitude that some clown wouldn't alert on...
MaggieD
(7,393 posts)And then expect them to flock to you. It doesn't work that way.
thereismore
(13,326 posts)Gothmog
(144,919 posts)The premise of the OP appears to be that it is the fault of the voters that his message is not getting through which is sad. Again, it is not just South Carolina where the Sanders revolution is failing to catch on. No one has seen any evidence of the so-called Sanders revolution https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/wonk/wp/2016/02/10/sorry-bernie-sanders-there-is-zero-evidence-of-your-political-revolution-yet/
To succeed, Sanders might have to drive Americans who don't normally participate to the polls. Unfortunately for him, groups who usually do not vote did not turn out in unusually large numbers in New Hampshire, according to exit polling data.
https://img.washingtonpost.com/wp-apps/imrs.php?src=&w=1484
...As for Sanders, he credited his victory to turnout. "Because of a huge voter turnout -- and I say huge -- we won," he said in his speech declaring victory, dropping the "h" in "huge." "We harnessed the energy, and the excitement that the Democratic party will need to succeed in November."
In fact, Sanders won by persuading many habitual Democratic primary voters to support him. With 95 percent of precincts reporting their results as of Wednesday morning, just 241,000 ballots had been cast in the Democratic primary, fewer than the 268,000 projected by New Hampshire Secretary of State William Gardner last week. Nearly 289,000 voters cast ballots in the state's Democratic primary in 2008.
To be sure, the general election is still seven months away. Ordinary Americans might be paying little attention to the campaign at this point, and if Sanders wins the nomination, he'll have the help of the Democratic Party apparatus in registering new voters. The political revolution hasn't started, though, at least not yet.
Without this revolution, I am not sure how Sanders proposes to advance his unrealistic agenda
Number23
(24,544 posts)line from the "progressives" who love to scream the loudest about how liberal and loving they are.
Sanders built his whole campaign on revolution. He was going to awaken the masses, help them swarm to the polls and together, we'd all sweep in a new era of... something. Problem is, even after 30 years in Congress, too many people have absolutely no idea who he is and the masses that he was supposed to awaken are not coming out to vote. Dem primary turnout is SIGNIFICANTLY lower than it was 8 years ago and it is widely acknowledged that his resounding win in NH came on the backs of Republicans and not Democrats.
Some will continue to blame all of this on black folks, but just because we aren't as easily fooled as others doesn't make us the problem.
Arazi
(6,829 posts)and chosen HRC for her positions.
They haven't heard of Sanders
BreakfastClub
(765 posts)loyalsister
(13,390 posts)People who ignore politics do it because they don't want to ruin their day. I can totally understand why someone would want to tune it out while they carry on with the hard work of living. But, this is not SUPPORT, it's the kind of lukewarm support that could turn on a dime.
I think Hillary's surrogates are overestimating.
arcane1
(38,613 posts)pdsimdars
(6,007 posts)That's a good one.
(Hope you don't have anyone you know in jail, thanks to Clintons)