Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

delrem

(9,688 posts)
Thu Feb 25, 2016, 10:54 PM Feb 2016

I think some people want a continuation of the Clinton years

as if the Obama years did not happen.

Except for the email scandal. Except for Hillary.

In my opinion the difference between Obama's first and second administration is like night and day.

In his second administration Obama orchestrated a rapprochement with Cuba, and began a rapprochement with Iran.

This would not have happened if Hillary Clinton hadn't been fired.

43 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
I think some people want a continuation of the Clinton years (Original Post) delrem Feb 2016 OP
I think it happened radical noodle Feb 2016 #1
I think it happened because John Kerry + Barack Obama is positive, delrem Feb 2016 #4
And she wasn't fired either radical noodle Feb 2016 #9
So you're giving Hillary credit for Obama and Kerry's work. Cool. delrem Feb 2016 #14
Actually radical noodle Feb 2016 #17
Ah, you're just passing the credit along. But not owning it. Cool. delrem Feb 2016 #19
I wasn't there radical noodle Feb 2016 #22
Everyone knows the change in policy to Cuba has been worked on for many years. bettyellen Feb 2016 #32
Everyone knows that Obama and Kerry worked it out. delrem Feb 2016 #38
That's just goofy BeyondGeography Feb 2016 #2
link, please, that she was fired DrDan Feb 2016 #3
I used the term "fired" just to get your response. delrem Feb 2016 #5
Welcome to General Discussion Primaries (Fiction) 72DejaVu Feb 2016 #6
I didn't say that it wasn't my opinion, my friend. delrem Feb 2016 #7
Saying somebody was fired is a statement if fact. It is not a matter of opinion. DemocratSinceBirth Feb 2016 #11
Prove she wasn't fired. delrem Feb 2016 #15
No, it's not "OK" DemocratSinceBirth Feb 2016 #16
+1000 eom radical noodle Feb 2016 #18
Think of the implications DemocratSinceBirth Feb 2016 #23
We could say anything we wanted about someone radical noodle Feb 2016 #25
Our friend seems to be basking in this elementary lapse of logic, and more importantly fairness. DemocratSinceBirth Feb 2016 #28
It seems to be a pretty common problem in GD-P these days eom radical noodle Feb 2016 #31
we're evil, I tell you. Evil! delrem Feb 2016 #41
ooooh! That's not how we roll in America, delrem! delrem Feb 2016 #20
I wear your patronizing of me like a crown. DemocratSinceBirth Feb 2016 #27
Cut the melodrama DemocraticSinceBirth. delrem Feb 2016 #30
No melodrama, sir DemocratSinceBirth Feb 2016 #34
Heh. OK! She wasn't fired. I lied. delrem Feb 2016 #35
I don't believer you are a liar. That's unduly harsh. I do believe you got carried away. DemocratSinceBirth Feb 2016 #37
thanks. I did. delrem Feb 2016 #39
She should have been fired. John Poet Feb 2016 #21
OK, I admit it, I was throwing bait with that line. delrem Feb 2016 #26
Maybe... deathrind Feb 2016 #8
People in general aren't that shallow. delrem Feb 2016 #12
I just like her approach and her competence MaggieD Feb 2016 #10
cool. delrem Feb 2016 #13
Keystone pipeline was rejected too after Hillary left Cheese Sandwich Feb 2016 #24
Yes. A president is as good as the people in the inner circle. delrem Feb 2016 #33
We would definitely not be making peace agreements like Kerry is. onecaliberal Feb 2016 #29
I think Obama got tired of being treated like a back-door guest at the WH snowy owl Feb 2016 #36
I don't like your post. delrem Feb 2016 #40
That's okay. I'm not looking for like. snowy owl Feb 2016 #42
I agree that Obama has greatly improved recently. PowerToThePeople Feb 2016 #43

delrem

(9,688 posts)
4. I think it happened because John Kerry + Barack Obama is positive,
Thu Feb 25, 2016, 11:02 PM
Feb 2016

whereas Hillary Clinton + anyone is negative.
Because she's a warmonger in the pay of investment bankers. She isn't good news.

Just my opinion.

radical noodle

(8,000 posts)
9. And she wasn't fired either
Thu Feb 25, 2016, 11:21 PM
Feb 2016

DEC 18, 2014 12:28 PM EST
By Josh Rogin
Although President Barack Obama is taking the credit for Wednesday’s historic deal to reverse decades of U.S. policy toward Cuba, when Hillary Clinton was secretary of state, she was the main architect of the new policy and pushed far harder for a deal than the Obama White House.

From 2009 until her departure in early 2013, Clinton and her top aides took the lead on the sometimes public, often private interactions with the Cuban government. According to current and former White House and State Department officials and several Cuba policy experts who were involved in the discussions, Clinton was also the top advocate inside the government for ending travel and trade restrictions on Cuba and reversing 50 years of U.S. policy to isolate the Communist island nation. Repeatedly, she pressed the White House to move faster and faced opposition from cautious high-ranking White House officials.

More at link...

http://www.bloombergview.com/articles/2014-12-18/hillary-clinton-secretly-pushed-cuba-deal-for-years

radical noodle

(8,000 posts)
17. Actually
Thu Feb 25, 2016, 11:43 PM
Feb 2016

It was Josh Rogin at Bloomberg View who wrote that, not me.

As far as you trashing her service as Secretary of State, President Obama said asking her to be his SoS was one of the best decisions in his presidency. But I'm sure you're far better equipped to know than he is.

radical noodle

(8,000 posts)
22. I wasn't there
Thu Feb 25, 2016, 11:49 PM
Feb 2016

nor were you. I did find a White House document that said they'd been working on changes in Cuba since 2009, long before SoS Clinton resigned.

delrem

(9,688 posts)
38. Everyone knows that Obama and Kerry worked it out.
Fri Feb 26, 2016, 12:16 AM
Feb 2016

I mean, let's put credit where it's truly due. OK?

delrem

(9,688 posts)
5. I used the term "fired" just to get your response.
Thu Feb 25, 2016, 11:03 PM
Feb 2016

Because everyone knows that she was going to run for POTUS in '16.
So it was a joke.
OK?

delrem

(9,688 posts)
7. I didn't say that it wasn't my opinion, my friend.
Thu Feb 25, 2016, 11:10 PM
Feb 2016

It's my opinion. Whether you call it "fiction" or not.

I say that Hillary Clinton didn't do the country a service in her missions as "friend of" Libya and Syria, for example. She did the Obama admin a disservice compared to what was done after she was gone. Like -> gone.

Night and day.

Not that my opinion could ever change your mind

DemocratSinceBirth

(99,710 posts)
11. Saying somebody was fired is a statement if fact. It is not a matter of opinion.
Thu Feb 25, 2016, 11:23 PM
Feb 2016

This would not have happened if Hillary Clinton hadn't been fired.


Please provide a link or we are well within out rights to believe it is a prevarication.

Thank you in advance.

delrem

(9,688 posts)
15. Prove she wasn't fired.
Thu Feb 25, 2016, 11:35 PM
Feb 2016

She fired her own ass out of there because she was aiming to run for POTUS 2016.
But I don't care how we call her departure.
I think we can call her departure miraculous.
I think we can call it wonderful.
OK?

DemocratSinceBirth

(99,710 posts)
16. No, it's not "OK"
Thu Feb 25, 2016, 11:41 PM
Feb 2016
"Prove she wasn't fired."



That's not how we roll in America, delrem. We don't accuse folks of things, without evidence, and then expect them to defend themselves. That's what they do in regimes that that don't abide by the rule of law, am I right?

DemocratSinceBirth

(99,710 posts)
23. Think of the implications
Thu Feb 25, 2016, 11:50 PM
Feb 2016

Think of the implications of a person accusing another person of something without evidence and putting the onus on them to defend themselves.


delrem

(9,688 posts)
41. we're evil, I tell you. Evil!
Fri Feb 26, 2016, 12:41 AM
Feb 2016

eta: I think the night/day difference is exactly the same as war/co-existence, in this context.

I think this is important. I wish you did too.

delrem

(9,688 posts)
30. Cut the melodrama DemocraticSinceBirth.
Fri Feb 26, 2016, 12:05 AM
Feb 2016

It's cloying.

Quoting your own lines isn't good repartee? I'll agree with that.
But do you want to talk about issues?

I know, you're four-square standing with Hillary Rodham Clinton on every military adventure that Hillary Rodham Clinton can imagine, and then some. You can always find an excuse.

Do I want to debate with that? No. I don't.
I'm just going to let that go.

But all the rest of it? The war profiteering?

Doesn't it make you even the least little bit queasy?

DemocratSinceBirth

(99,710 posts)
34. No melodrama, sir
Fri Feb 26, 2016, 12:11 AM
Feb 2016

You made an allegation, ergo:


This would not have happened if Hillary Clinton hadn't been fired.


I asked you to prove it and this was your response:

Prove she wasn't fired.


I merely pointed out the lapse in logic and fundamental unfairness of your demand.

No need to get upset.

delrem

(9,688 posts)
26. OK, I admit it, I was throwing bait with that line.
Thu Feb 25, 2016, 11:55 PM
Feb 2016

But look what happened in the threads. Some people wanting to give Hillary Clinton credit for what John Kerry did.
That's a fact - just read upthread.
But none of them addressing the issue, of war and war profiteering, of the difference between that and trying to pursue peaceful co-existence.

Jeez.

The fools.

deathrind

(1,786 posts)
8. Maybe...
Thu Feb 25, 2016, 11:21 PM
Feb 2016

I think it is more that people just want to be able to say that they were a part of history by voting for and seeing the first woman president, no matter where she stands on issues.

It really is confounding to me. For the first time in my life of 40+ years we in the Democratic Party actually have a candidate who is campaigning on the issues that have been central to the Dem platform for decades. Healthcare for all, education for all, economic equality, environment, civil liberties, immigration etc, etc. A candidate who wants to change the status quo and gain back some of the losses the middle class has lost to the right in the last 40yrs. One would think the DNC would be doing everything it could to advance those issues but it has done the exact opposite. The contrast between Clinton and Sanders is amazing in position and track record yet. none of this seems to matter, all because of a couple of chromosomes. Republicans routinely vote against their best interests...this will be the first time I have seen the Dem's do it.

 

Cheese Sandwich

(9,086 posts)
24. Keystone pipeline was rejected too after Hillary left
Thu Feb 25, 2016, 11:51 PM
Feb 2016

She encouraged the President to pursue regime change policies in Libya and Syria as well. That was another huge oopsie.

delrem

(9,688 posts)
33. Yes. A president is as good as the people in the inner circle.
Fri Feb 26, 2016, 12:10 AM
Feb 2016

What I most dislike about the "private server" business is that it cut Obama from her own circle.

She was not positive.

onecaliberal

(32,836 posts)
29. We would definitely not be making peace agreements like Kerry is.
Fri Feb 26, 2016, 12:01 AM
Feb 2016

Not when there are weapons to sell and countries to invade.

snowy owl

(2,145 posts)
36. I think Obama got tired of being treated like a back-door guest at the WH
Fri Feb 26, 2016, 12:14 AM
Feb 2016

He's showing some gumption. Had he but shown it earlier.

 

PowerToThePeople

(9,610 posts)
43. I agree that Obama has greatly improved recently.
Fri Feb 26, 2016, 01:17 AM
Feb 2016

He has not dropped all his right wing ways yet though.

TPP

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»I think some people want ...