2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumBillionaire-Owned Observer Whines About Democratization of Media in 2016’s Worst Op-ed
*You can't make this stuff up
2/19/2016
Second only to glib equivalencies between Donald Trump and Bernie Sanders, 2016s most popular lazy media trope is the idea that rabid Sanders fans have unleashed dark populist forces that threaten our republic. Both are fairly common, and more or less write themselves if the author tosses coherence and intellectual honesty out the window. But its rare that both are on such stark display as with New York Observers editor-at-large Ryan Holidays recent op-ed (2/17/16).
The diatribe, The Cause of This Nightmare Election? Media Greed and Shameless Traffic Worship, poses as media criticism but is little more than petulant establishment gatekeeping. Lets begin with the thesis, or what passes for one, which is that the democratization of media has created a sub-prime market for the media. A superficially catchy hook but one that, upon further examination, makes little sense:
I am talking, of course, about our media system. A system in which tens of thousands of reportersbloggerschasing online traffic bonuses produce sensational, inflammatory and outright dangerous news at the expense of the public they are supposed to be serving. A system in which speculative, high-valence newswhether it starts as a tweet or a rumoris packaged, dissected, repacked and passed along from outlet to outlet until a thinking person can hardly follow what is real and what is fake.
Those damned bloggers (gasp!) are chasing online traffic. This is opposed to sometime in the past when ratings, newspaper sales and the ad revenue they generated didnt matter. But never mind that; this new breed of vague media system has created a monster:
Atypical candidates like Donald Trump and Bernie Sanders are effectively subsidized by the media in order to provide the storylines those outlets require to create the compelling spectacles they need to keep the cycle going and audiences hooked.
Here Holidayformerly the marketing director for American Apparel and, according to his bio, a media strategist and prominent writer on strategy and businesshas hatched a somewhat goofy conspiracy theory: that the media are intentionally propping up atypical candidates to keep audiences hooked. He begins by saying the the media (now morphed from bottom-feeding bloggers to major corporate media) disproportionately covered Trump and help feed his rise, which is empirically true. Trump, as the the Tyndall Report documented (Washington Post, 12/7/15), was the focus of 234 minutes of nightly network news coverage in the first 11 months of 2015more than twice as much airtime as the next-most-covered candidate, Hillary Clinton, at 113 minutes.
But he lumps Sanders in with Trump in a misreading of media coverage so off-base as to be hallucinatory. Over the same time period, Sanders got just ten minutes of coverageless than 5 percent of Trumps coverage, 10 percent of Clintons coverage and even a fifth as much as the 56 minutes given to Joe Biden and his protracted decision not to run for president.
To justify his complaint that even this minimal coverage was too much, he puts forth one of the more risibly elitist nuggets of political commentary of the 2016 campaign:
On the other end of the spectrum, the rise of Bernie Sanders simply doesnt pass the smell test. This is a candidate who Nate Silver shows is extremely unlikely to win, who would be 75 years old on Inauguration Day, who embraces, quite openly, the word socialist in a country that considers the word more dangerous politically than atheist, and who is drowning in headlines.
Of course, Sanders has not been drowning in headlines (emphasis in the original). His coverage did tick up after his poll numbers began to catch up to Clintonsbut even in 2016, as Sanders virtually tied in Iowa and beat Clinton by a wide margin in New Hampshire, he still got only 83 percent as many mentions as Clinton in the New York Times (and 75 percent as many as Trump).
in full: http://fair.org/home/billionaire-owned-observer-whines-about-democratization-of-media-in-2016s-worst-op-ed/
Erich Bloodaxe BSN
(14,733 posts)Has somebody else been getting mine and just not telling me about it?