Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

cali

(114,904 posts)
Sat Feb 20, 2016, 12:11 PM Feb 2016

Evidently, Hillary supporters would have had no problem with Bernie running

as an independent.

Ah, for the halcyon days of May, when they commended him for running as a Democrat.

Now? Bernie shouldn't have been allowed to run as a Democrat.

Whatever can account for the change.

(And Debbie, the "Bernie isn't a Democrat" whiny crap coming from you, is particularly funny)

27 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Evidently, Hillary supporters would have had no problem with Bernie running (Original Post) cali Feb 2016 OP
Yes, and then he'd be attacked as pulling a Nader. TDale313 Feb 2016 #1
They're just pissed that someone is challenging the coronation. HooptieWagon Feb 2016 #8
Can you imagine the level farleftlib Feb 2016 #2
Except that he wouldn't brooklynite Feb 2016 #6
Oh I will farleftlib Feb 2016 #22
You're correct. All the more reason Democrats should be grateful instead of knocking him... Armstead Feb 2016 #25
At least Bernie was never a Republican. HooptieWagon Feb 2016 #3
oh, snap. nt restorefreedom Feb 2016 #20
Ouche Nite Owl Feb 2016 #26
They should be careful what they wish for. Beowulf Feb 2016 #4
Her supporters wanted a coronation not a primary. JRLeft Feb 2016 #5
YOU commended him. WE thought it was a terrible idea, and it was. nt ucrdem Feb 2016 #7
Why do you think that? Krytan11c Feb 2016 #9
He should have run as a spoiler and guaranteed a republican win? HooptieWagon Feb 2016 #10
Republicans love him, remember? ucrdem Feb 2016 #12
He made an agreement, which he'll keep. HooptieWagon Feb 2016 #16
Ahem, JohnnyLib2 Feb 2016 #11
Before he announced, they insisted that if he runs it MUST be as a Democrat, NorthCarolina Feb 2016 #13
Now they claim they never said those things. Unfuckingbelievable. cali Feb 2016 #14
At least their flip-flopping is consistent with Hillary's multiple positions. HooptieWagon Feb 2016 #18
everyone be sure and Ctrl+S the webpages before they self-delete MisterP Feb 2016 #23
Who insisted that? ucrdem Feb 2016 #15
I was here, I recall it as I'm sure several others do as well on this site. NorthCarolina Feb 2016 #17
Lots of that. Do a search. cali Feb 2016 #19
Exactly. ucrdem Feb 2016 #21
I don't think any Hillary supporters really wanted him to run as an independent thesquanderer Feb 2016 #24
I didn't want him to run indie gwheezie Feb 2016 #27

TDale313

(7,820 posts)
1. Yes, and then he'd be attacked as pulling a Nader.
Sat Feb 20, 2016, 12:14 PM
Feb 2016

Which he already is, even though he's not.

He shouldn't have run as a Den. He shouldn't run as an independent. Face it, to them, he shouldn't have run period.

 

HooptieWagon

(17,064 posts)
8. They're just pissed that someone is challenging the coronation.
Sat Feb 20, 2016, 12:18 PM
Feb 2016

And that challenger is getting yuuuge support from the left, Hillary's big weakness.

 

farleftlib

(2,125 posts)
2. Can you imagine the level
Sat Feb 20, 2016, 12:14 PM
Feb 2016

of apoplexy if he ran as an Independent and was pulling ahead like he is now? It makes the current level of hysteria seem like a trip to a Zen Buddhist temple.

brooklynite

(94,368 posts)
6. Except that he wouldn't
Sat Feb 20, 2016, 12:16 PM
Feb 2016

The polling where he's "pulling ahead" is for the Primary, where they only poll Democrats.

You have no basis for saying he'd be ahead in a 3-way race as an Independent.

But keep dreaming.

 

farleftlib

(2,125 posts)
22. Oh I will
Sat Feb 20, 2016, 12:44 PM
Feb 2016

me and the millions who are turning this into a real contest instead of a coronation.

Sorry that Hillary might have to work for her nomination instead of waltzing effortlessly to it.

She's got her work cut out, big time.

 

Armstead

(47,803 posts)
25. You're correct. All the more reason Democrats should be grateful instead of knocking him...
Sat Feb 20, 2016, 11:32 PM
Feb 2016

for running as a Democrat.

He probably could have tipped the balance to the GOP in the General as a 3rd party spoiler.

ucrdem

(15,512 posts)
12. Republicans love him, remember?
Sat Feb 20, 2016, 12:20 PM
Feb 2016

Yes, I think that would have been a much better idea. Now, no. But he's promised not to, remember, and politicians never break their promises, do they?

 

HooptieWagon

(17,064 posts)
16. He made an agreement, which he'll keep.
Sat Feb 20, 2016, 12:27 PM
Feb 2016

We'll have to see if DNC keeps up their end...not looking good so far.

 

NorthCarolina

(11,197 posts)
13. Before he announced, they insisted that if he runs it MUST be as a Democrat,
Sat Feb 20, 2016, 12:22 PM
Feb 2016

NOT a Nader style spoiler.

Go back at look at the numerous posts by Hillary supporters clamoring for just that. Of course at the time they assumed that it would be the best way to use the party mechanism to keep him marginalized. That, in retrospect, hasn't been working as they planned, so suddenly they're all like "why is he running as a Democrat"?

Seriously, you can't make this shit up.

 

HooptieWagon

(17,064 posts)
18. At least their flip-flopping is consistent with Hillary's multiple positions.
Sat Feb 20, 2016, 12:29 PM
Feb 2016

Have to keep a daily scorecard to keep track of them, though.

 

NorthCarolina

(11,197 posts)
17. I was here, I recall it as I'm sure several others do as well on this site.
Sat Feb 20, 2016, 12:28 PM
Feb 2016

Do your own homework. It's easily searchable if you really want to know "who", though I suspect you are well aware of it yourself anyway.

thesquanderer

(11,972 posts)
24. I don't think any Hillary supporters really wanted him to run as an independent
Sat Feb 20, 2016, 11:29 PM
Feb 2016

In a 3-way, he would split the dem vote and could possibly hand the republicans the presidency.

gwheezie

(3,580 posts)
27. I didn't want him to run indie
Sat Feb 20, 2016, 11:36 PM
Feb 2016

And I'm still glad he's running as a dem, although even if he just recently became one. I support HRC but if Bernie wins, so be it, I'm not going to get mad him because enough dems voted to make him the nominee, that would be a little irrational.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Evidently, Hillary suppor...