Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
43 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
The MVP of the townhall debate (Original Post) jillan Feb 2016 OP
He may be getting a 2 AM call tonight n/t SheenaR Feb 2016 #1
If you want a fight, real estate guy, you damn well will get one! n/t DefenseLawyer Feb 2016 #40
He was certainly the highlight for me. pacalo Feb 2016 #2
Gee, what a shame madamesilverspurs Feb 2016 #3
He was so soft-spoken and nice. Punkingal Feb 2016 #4
She's just awful. azmom Feb 2016 #7
She was jabbing her finger at him AgingAmerican Feb 2016 #23
From the picture of entitlement -> to angry jabbing self-adulating bullshit. delrem Feb 2016 #35
Should she release them? Yes. Do most undecided voters care about them? No. LonePirate Feb 2016 #5
ms. cleo...is that you? noiretextatique Feb 2016 #8
Undecided voters do not know what these transcripts are. LonePirate Feb 2016 #13
When the contents of the speeches are made available then the public will care. earthshine Feb 2016 #38
It speaks to an issue of trust, and people don't trust her. frylock Feb 2016 #16
But people don't care about things they don't know and many don't know about this transcripts debate LonePirate Feb 2016 #21
But people are learning about the trancripts now, aren't they? frylock Feb 2016 #24
I think we're arguing the same point but from different angles. LonePirate Feb 2016 #31
Yep, I think we're on the same page here. frylock Feb 2016 #43
Mitt Romney's 47% video Aerows Feb 2016 #19
Those of us here at DU have our suspicions as to why they have not been released. LonePirate Feb 2016 #28
Hey, if nobody cares Aerows Feb 2016 #32
When did I say that only a few people care about their release? LonePirate Feb 2016 #33
The transcripts are just a way to hang the question on her, about the $150 million in payoffs. delrem Feb 2016 #36
No one cared about Romney's 47% speech either, until they heard it DefenseLawyer Feb 2016 #41
Constant attention to her Wall Street paid speeches really annoys her... tokenlib Feb 2016 #6
(M)ost (V)icious (P)lant. Gets two questions AND got sassy. oasis Feb 2016 #9
Umm, it wasn't *him* that was the vicious one in that back-and-forth. reformist2 Feb 2016 #10
He questioned her integrity. What would you call that? oasis Feb 2016 #11
courage. nt grasswire Feb 2016 #12
Exactly. Thank you. reformist2 Feb 2016 #14
Hill will go all Chris Christie on your ass if you get sassy. oasis Feb 2016 #15
Chris Christie is a bully. frylock Feb 2016 #17
There's a standard to aspire to. CharlotteVale Feb 2016 #25
If it's the "not taking any shit" standard, then yes. oasis Feb 2016 #27
She can go toe to toe with him not just on rhetoric, but on morals! n/t JonLeibowitz Feb 2016 #26
A lot of us question her integrity...and for good reason n/t tokenlib Feb 2016 #20
If Hillary lacks transparency now she would be only worse if she ever was president. avaistheone1 Feb 2016 #22
I'd advise you not to get in her face with it. oasis Feb 2016 #29
The gay man asking a legitimate question got sassy? myrna minx Feb 2016 #39
The young woman who was like wtf? KMOD Feb 2016 #18
Classic smackdown. oasis Feb 2016 #30
Do you even know what a Bernie Bro is? passiveporcupine Feb 2016 #34
Probably won't be released until all the good parts are redacted. Duckfan Feb 2016 #37
That Joe is my spirit animal Joe the Revelator Feb 2016 #42

madamesilverspurs

(15,799 posts)
3. Gee, what a shame
Fri Feb 19, 2016, 02:27 AM
Feb 2016

that they couldn't get Trey Gowdy there to bugger her about it, he's got sooo much practice . . .

delrem

(9,688 posts)
35. From the picture of entitlement -> to angry jabbing self-adulating bullshit.
Fri Feb 19, 2016, 04:39 AM
Feb 2016

In seconds.
Then back to being the absolute picture of entitlement.

All of it plumbing the depths of vacuousness.

LonePirate

(13,408 posts)
5. Should she release them? Yes. Do most undecided voters care about them? No.
Fri Feb 19, 2016, 02:30 AM
Feb 2016

Undecided voters care about many other things besides those transcripts. Some voters may care but the bulk of the undecided ones do not.

noiretextatique

(27,275 posts)
8. ms. cleo...is that you?
Fri Feb 19, 2016, 02:43 AM
Feb 2016

that's a real talent...you know what most undecided voters think...without a poll.

LonePirate

(13,408 posts)
13. Undecided voters do not know what these transcripts are.
Fri Feb 19, 2016, 02:55 AM
Feb 2016

They are likely to think they are related to the emails on her server. Anybody who thinks the typical undecided voter knows and cares about these transcripts is not in touch with undecided voters. Undecided voters, by and large, are low information voters. I know several people I consider to be high information voters who don't know what these transcripts are. It's absurd to think most undecided voters know or care about the transcripts.

 

earthshine

(1,642 posts)
38. When the contents of the speeches are made available then the public will care.
Fri Feb 19, 2016, 05:40 AM
Feb 2016

Just not the other way around.

LonePirate

(13,408 posts)
21. But people don't care about things they don't know and many don't know about this transcripts debate
Fri Feb 19, 2016, 03:18 AM
Feb 2016

And by people, I mean the masses of undecided and independent voters.

I agree with the OP that voters care about the transcripts, although I think that number is smaller than what others think that number is, especially with regard to undecided voters who know nothing about this transcripts debate. If you were to ask an undecided voter if she should release the transcripts, you will likely receive a question along the lines of "What transcripts?" How can someone care about those transcripts if they know nothing about them?

LonePirate

(13,408 posts)
31. I think we're arguing the same point but from different angles.
Fri Feb 19, 2016, 03:33 AM
Feb 2016

You're essentially saying (undecided) voters care about the transcripts once they learn of them. I'm saying they don't care about them because they don't know of them. I certainly agree that the undecided voters will care about the transcripts once they learn of them. Until that time comes, they simply do not care about things they do not know.

 

Aerows

(39,961 posts)
19. Mitt Romney's 47% video
Fri Feb 19, 2016, 03:10 AM
Feb 2016

torpedoed his campaign. After that was released, he was detested by people other than the people that already despised him.

That did more to illustrate what an entitled asshole he was than anything else, though he did say some truly crappy things.

I have the feeling that those transcripts would have the same effect, which is why she declines to release them.

LonePirate

(13,408 posts)
28. Those of us here at DU have our suspicions as to why they have not been released.
Fri Feb 19, 2016, 03:28 AM
Feb 2016

I certainly advocate for their release regardless of the reason.

I just think several people here are unaware of how little this transcripts issue currently resonates with undecided voters. Sure, they might care about them once they are released and the contents become publicized. Until that happens, the typical undecided voter is not tuned into this topic and therefore does not care about it. They need to be informed about them before they form an opinion about them.

It is wrong to think undecided voters care about something they are completely or largely unaware of. There are not throngs of undecided voters eagerly anticipating the release of these transcripts before making up their minds on which candidate to support. Anybody who knows about this issue has already made up their mind about it.

 

Aerows

(39,961 posts)
32. Hey, if nobody cares
Fri Feb 19, 2016, 03:34 AM
Feb 2016

there is no reason to refrain from releasing them.

Nobody cares and the people that do care, according to your opinion, are few in number.

Among the few who care, it might persuade some otherwise undecided voters of Hillary Clinton's sincerity.

What could she have possibly said at those speeches that would damage or even compromise her run for office?

LonePirate

(13,408 posts)
33. When did I say that only a few people care about their release?
Fri Feb 19, 2016, 03:46 AM
Feb 2016

I said most undecided voters do not know about this issue and they do not care about it (because they don't know about it). I'm not sure how you made the leap from that statement to the one you said I made about few people caring. I also have never argued against releasing them. In fact, I stated exactly the opposite as I think that they should be released.

We all know why most Bernie supporters want these transcripts released. There is no reason to pretend to be unaware of or surprised by what is likely in these transcripts. The only possible unexpected content in the transcripts would be if she essentially read them the riot act. Who honestly believes that happened?

delrem

(9,688 posts)
36. The transcripts are just a way to hang the question on her, about the $150 million in payoffs.
Fri Feb 19, 2016, 04:45 AM
Feb 2016

She could be reading "My Pet Goat" in the transcripts (and if they're released, they'll be doctored to show just that). That's beside the point that SHE AND HER HUSBAND WERE PAID OFF TO THE TUNE OF $150 MILLION, in total, straight to their account, in return for INFLUENCE. They had nothing else to sell.

 

DefenseLawyer

(11,101 posts)
41. No one cared about Romney's 47% speech either, until they heard it
Fri Feb 19, 2016, 07:41 AM
Feb 2016

Obviously whether people will care about it depends on what she said. From the way she is fighting to the death over it, one can assume she doesn't think they would play very well.

tokenlib

(4,186 posts)
6. Constant attention to her Wall Street paid speeches really annoys her...
Fri Feb 19, 2016, 02:37 AM
Feb 2016

...and since we already know from the leaks that she was "kissing their asses." It would be interesting to see the transcripts...but it is more important to not let this topic pass into the rearview mirror.

 

KMOD

(7,906 posts)
18. The young woman who was like wtf?
Fri Feb 19, 2016, 03:09 AM
Feb 2016

you didn't answer my question, Bernie.

And the Berniebros who had their asses handed to them by Hillary Clinton. Classic. Loved it!

Duckfan

(1,268 posts)
37. Probably won't be released until all the good parts are redacted.
Fri Feb 19, 2016, 05:03 AM
Feb 2016

Team Clinton is busy with their sharpie pens as we speak.

So we'll be stuck reading from something that looks like a secret CIA document of some kind.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»The MVP of the townhall d...