2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumUnivision Tracking Poll WITH LINK TO UNIVISION Sanders still winning
Last edited Thu Feb 11, 2016, 08:44 PM - Edit history (2)
Zaid Jilani ?@ZaidJilani 9m9 minutes ago
Univision Tracking Poll ("persuadable hispanic voters" going into Nevada
Poll from 2/3
[URL=.html][IMG][/IMG][/URL]
Edited to add easily found poll http://hispanic-vote.corporate.univision.com/hispanic-vote/wp-content/uploads/2016/01/PAG_Tracker_Jan_20_2016.pdf
thereismore
(13,326 posts)Jefferson23
(30,099 posts)be nonsense, or not good enough or something like that. lol
Thanks for posting!
nadinbrzezinski
(154,021 posts)and what I am hearing locally. I love analytics
99th_Monkey
(19,326 posts)Yet I have a question.
but (pardon my ignorance) I don't get why the % of support doesn't add up to 100%, it's way over ..
they add up instead to 120%.
Qutzupalotl
(15,172 posts)and thankfully both our candidates are over 50% in this category.
demwing
(16,916 posts)Each could, potentially, score a 100%
99th_Monkey
(19,326 posts)that makes it clear.
demwing
(16,916 posts)99th_Monkey
(19,326 posts)even if you're not Skinner.
Le Taz Hot
(22,271 posts)here in the San Joaquin Valley. I predict Hispanics and Asians will be a big part of his vote totals here in California.
JRLeft
(7,010 posts)padfun
(1,859 posts)My neighborhood too. It will be a landslide for Senator Sanders.
WillyT
(72,631 posts)Avalux
(35,015 posts)I also read elsewhere that Nevada turnout is expected to be heavier than normal. Also great news for Bernie!
MisterP
(23,730 posts)Divernan
(15,480 posts)And most of them bad!
Que Lástima, tan triste, se pierde, Hillary!
roguevalley
(40,656 posts)jillan
(39,451 posts)http://www.phoenixnewtimes.com/news/bernie-sanders-gets-more-endorsements-from-arizona-latino-leaders-8040287
I haven't seen any recent polling in Az but Az has pretty much gone to Bernie - so far. Our primary isn't until the end of March.
Dont call me Shirley
(10,998 posts)AtomicKitten
(46,585 posts)winter is coming
(11,785 posts)Apparently, Univision didn't listen to that bit of political wisdom.
jhart3333
(332 posts)retrowire
(10,345 posts)PatrynXX
(5,668 posts)He of course will still fight for them even if Hillary won't. But end game I could see this going this way. I don't see Bernie as pro ICE as Obama is and Hillary is to Obama's Right on many issues including ICE.
SoLeftIAmRight
(4,883 posts)Hillary can not make many more mistakes or she is toast - burnt
artislife
(9,497 posts)is kind of corporate vision and has ties to h.
I always thought if my people actually heard him, see him and get the feel of the man, he would resonate. Lots of older, grumpy radicals waving their arms and spraying spittle* for our people. He fits right in.
* I mean no disrespect, actually there is is a lot of love for the impassioned speakers of truth and justice
ram2008
(1,238 posts)While his support was lower than with whites, it was only a matter of time once Latino's learned more that they would embrace his message. If Bernie picks up the support of Latinos (we'll see in Nevada) he now has a winning coalition within the party.
Bernie coalition: Millenials, whites, latinos
Hillary: Older individuals, Southerners and African Americans
In the end Bernie's coalition has more votes.
DamnYankeeInHouston
(1,365 posts)I'm voting for Bernie.
roguevalley
(40,656 posts)TIME TO PANIC
(1,894 posts)Helen Borg
(3,963 posts)9/11, goddammit!
Kurovski
(34,657 posts)You're dark.
kath
(10,565 posts)That's pretty significant movement.
Yep, the more people learn about Bernie, the more they like him.
HRH, not so much.
.
TubbersUK
(1,441 posts)It touches on criminal justice issues, immigration, policy on Latin America, welfare reforms.
The Nation has published a piece by Michelle Alexander titled Why Hillary Clinton Doesnt Deserve the Black Vote, in which the author of The New Jim Crow describes how the policies Hillary has supported in the past have destroyed black communities from Baltimore to Oakland. As Alexander explains in the article and in her book Hillarys husband Bill oversaw an explosion of incarceration rates among blacks during his presidency. He denied Pell grants to inmates, backed the denial of federal student aid to drug offenders, and signed a bill placing a lifetime ban on welfare benefits for anyone convicted of a felony drug offense. He also supported sentencing that punished crack users much tougher than cocaine users, and was a fan of the three strikes rule that imposed life sentences on three-time offenders, further inflaming the racial disparity in incarceration rates.
http://www.latinorebels.com/2016/02/11/why-hillary-clinton-doesnt-deserve-the-latino-vote2/#sthash.Mt8lhJj1.dpuf
SunSeeker
(54,258 posts)Gore1FL
(22,058 posts)A: I voted against that piece of legislation because it had guest-worker provisions in it which the Southern Poverty Law Center talked about being semi-slavery. Guest workers are coming in, they're working under terrible conditions, but if they stand up for their rights, they're thrown out of the country. I was not the only progressive to vote against that legislation for that reason.
http://www.ontheissues.org/2016/Bernie_Sanders_Immigration.htm
TubbersUK
(1,441 posts)Senator Sanders is consistent in his immigration record to protect immigrant and worker rights and he could not vote for the Bush-backed immigration legislation that would have allowed multi-national corporations to bring workers without labor protections that undermine working conditions and wages for all Americans. Indeed, a Sanders administration would authorize and substantially increase funding for the Legal Services Corporation to provide legal representation to guest workers who have been abused at the hands of corporate-employers or outsourcing firms.
Indeed, the Senator as President has committed to renewing and expanding Executive Action programs that protect undocumented immigrants and will fight to mobilize millions of Americans to support comprehensive and humane immigration reform policy.
UglyGreed
(7,661 posts)I heard it or read it but it stated Hillary has never went up in the polls or in any elections. Always steady or her popularity has declined.
dorkzilla
(5,141 posts)But I refuse to turn on MSNBC or click on one of their videos but you can look it up.
Sorry I know that wasnt entirely helpful, but MSNBC is as much of a no-no for me as Walmart has ever been.
UglyGreed
(7,661 posts)just found that an interesting point
Blus4u
(608 posts)during MSNBC's post primary talkfest.
Peace
UglyGreed
(7,661 posts)where or when.
NoMoreRepugs
(10,800 posts)of his candidacy. Don't make the mistake of thinking most people get their information from the interweb.. it's teevee and radio for a whole bunch of 'Mericans. Now that his name recognition and more importantly his message is being heard by the masses we shall see what happens.
lunamagica
(9,967 posts)Nanjeanne
(5,480 posts)You can find it via Zaid Jilani's twitter account.
You probably know who he is, I would think but he's a staff reporter for The Intercept.
Autumn Colors
(2,379 posts)Would like to know why the total is 120%.
Nanjeanne
(5,480 posts)If you tweet him - perhaps he will respond.
Autumn Colors
(2,379 posts)Nanjeanne
(5,480 posts)jeff47
(26,549 posts)So each candidate has a separate 0-100%.
lunamagica
(9,967 posts)ETA. He was asked for a link, but hasn't provided one yet
Nanjeanne
(5,480 posts)lunamagica
(9,967 posts)Nanjeanne
(5,480 posts)lunamagica
(9,967 posts)of this poll?
Nanjeanne
(5,480 posts)If it was posted by some anonymous poster on the internet I would be suspicious. I trust Zaid not to compromise his cred as a journalist for a number of progressive sites.
But that's me.
George II
(67,782 posts)George II
(67,782 posts)Autumn Colors
(2,379 posts)The two purple percentages add up to 120%, not 100%. What am I missing in the details here?
Would love to know where the person who tweeted this got the graphic from.
ram2008
(1,238 posts)Which means they're technically out of 100% for each candidate.
Ex: Obama has 50% approval meaning 50% disapprove/dont know, Biden 45% approval, Ryan 35% among the electorate etc.
In this case Bernie's numbers have gone up and Hillary's have gone down.
Autumn Colors
(2,379 posts)jalan48
(14,601 posts)NightWatcher
(39,360 posts)SoapBox
(18,791 posts)the whole nomination.
And hey! Her campaign is doing that private fundraiser in Mexico City so, well, ya know...they are Latino!
Gore1FL
(22,058 posts)Arugula Latte
(50,566 posts)Very nice.
d_legendary1
(2,586 posts)EMPINGADO!
George II
(67,782 posts)....on Democratic Underground and Reddit.
Go to the Univision poll site itself, and this is all you get:
http://huelladigital.univisionnoticias.com/the-latin-vote/
Results of a poll last year.
I even googled that tiny "source" in the screen shot above, "univision political tracker". Nothing.
Any current reputable source for this poll?
uponit7771
(92,187 posts)George II
(67,782 posts)SoapBox
(18,791 posts)Oh...it's good!
https://mobile.twitter.com/ZaidJilani
uponit7771
(92,187 posts)George II
(67,782 posts)....direct source.
It's billed as a "tracking poll", but Univision doesn't conduct or contract out "tracking polls".
Further, google "Media Predict" (the so called collaborator with Univision), and this is what you get:
"Media Predict is a game where you can predict, well, anything."
http://www.mediapredict.com/
OilemFirchen
(7,179 posts)Or something, something as I read upthread. Because no one at The Intercept would ever, ever lie:
The Intercept Says Reporter Falsified Quotations
c. 2/2/16 BTW.
riversedge
(73,902 posts)Gore1FL
(22,058 posts)malokvale77
(4,879 posts)Back on 10/04/2015, I took some screenshots (5 pages) of comments on Jorge Ramos' Facebook page after he declared that Hillary had the Latino vote in her pocket.
He was very mistaken.
amborin
(16,631 posts)Perogie
(687 posts)If it was, then Hill fans will claim it was a couple BernieBros clicking nonstop on the Macs.
ProudToBeLiberal
(3,964 posts)I am seeing on twitter that this might be photoshopped. Anyone else find more concrete evidence?
lunamagica
(9,967 posts)have not reported on this.
I've searched and searched, and no one else is reporting this. Not Unvision, or anywhere else.
ProudToBeLiberal
(3,964 posts)In fact, it's a gaming site where you can predict future events and earn points.
lunamagica
(9,967 posts)amborin
(16,631 posts)Hillary against driver's licenses, said send children back to CA to the violence, etc.
https://www.americarisingpac.org/martin-omalley-hillary-clinton-represents-the-failed-thinking-of-the-past-on-immigration/
and more:
http://www.vox.com/2014/6/19/5819076/hillary-clinton-deport-send-back-message-asylum-unaccompanied-expedited-border
lunamagica
(9,967 posts)Also Voted YES on continuing federal funds for declared "sanctuary cities".
Voted NO on declaring English as the official language of the US government.
Voted YES on allowing illegal aliens to participate in Social Security.
Voted YES on giving Guest Workers a path to citizenship.
Sponsored bill covering child resident aliens under Medicaid.
Sponsored bill funding social services for noncitizens.
amborin
(16,631 posts)HCR voted against S. Amdt. 2620 in 2007, which called for increasing access to health care to low-income children based on need by adjusting for cost of living [source: U.S. Senate].
In 2007, Clinton voted against a measure (S. Amdt. 1197) that would have required health care be provided for nonresidents in the United States who hold Z visas [source: U.S. Senate].
Clinton voted in favor of Senate Amendment (S. Amdt.) 2797 in 2007, which prohibits the creation of any program that allows trucks from Mexico being operated beyond commercial zones near the border in the U.S. [source: U.S. Senate].
She voted in favor of H.R. 6061, the Secure Fence Act of 2006, which approved $1.2 billion for a 700-mile-long fence along the U.S./Mexico border [source: U.S. Senate].
Clinton voted against an unsuccessful amendment (S. Amdt. 1197) in 2007 that would have required health care coverage for holders of Z nonimmigrant visas [source: U.S. Senate].
amborin
(16,631 posts)lunamagica
(9,967 posts)the murderous racist militant minutemen.
These were more than words, this were actual votes, which did great harm the Latino comunity
amborin
(16,631 posts)lunamagica
(9,967 posts)Also Voted YES on continuing federal funds for declared "sanctuary cities".
Voted NO on declaring English as the official language of the US government.
Voted YES on allowing illegal aliens to participate in Social Security.
Voted YES on giving Guest Workers a path to citizenship.
Sponsored bill covering child resident aliens under Medicaid.
Sponsored bill funding social services for noncitizens.
Response to Nanjeanne (Original post)
lunamagica This message was self-deleted by its author.
ProudToBeLiberal
(3,964 posts)Univision Tracking Poll of Latino voters now has Bernie as more popular with the group than Hillary
http://www.democraticunderground.com/12511202023
REASON FOR ALERT
This post is disruptive, hurtful, rude, insensitive, over-the-top, or otherwise inappropriate.
ALERTER'S COMMENTS
It has been concluded that the tracking poll is photo shopped. The supposed tracking firm Media Predict is actually a game site. Go see for yourself at www.mediapredict.com. So, base on these new information, I think this post is in appropriate and spreading misinformation.
JURY RESULTS
A randomly-selected Jury of DU members completed their review of this alert at Thu Feb 11, 2016, 07:16 PM, and voted 3-4 to LEAVE IT ALONE.
Juror #1 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #2 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #3 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #4 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #5 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #6 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #7 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: Yawn. "I don't like this poll" "I don't like that poll" "Look at this poll, I like this one" When are you going to understand, you're not going to find the answer you're looking for in a poll?
William769
(56,490 posts)Guess we know why there's no link.
ProudToBeLiberal
(3,964 posts)DCBob
(24,689 posts)What are the real numbers?
DCBob
(24,689 posts)Not sure because its from some Twitter account.
https://twitter.com/ZaidJilani/status/692818532212543488
ProudToBeLiberal
(3,964 posts)DCBob
(24,689 posts)Thanks.
George II
(67,782 posts).....Sanders ahead by 87-13 or thereabouts in 50 states, so it's no surprise that we're now seeing fake poll results on twitter.
wyldwolf
(43,891 posts)Campaign puts out false campaign info, so do his followers.
DCBob
(24,689 posts)Go to the Univision site.. there is nothing about this. Only the poll from last year.
http://huelladigital.univisionnoticias.com/the-latin-vote/
Bernie supporters again pushing false information.
Autumn Colors
(2,379 posts)if it's really false. I'm not about to post this anywhere else, though, because I couldn't find anything other than that tweet either (and I'm a Bernie supporter).
DCBob
(24,689 posts)Right?
Response to DCBob (Reply #105)
Autumn Colors This message was self-deleted by its author.
Beacool
(30,338 posts)Where is the link to the actual poll?
bettyellen
(47,209 posts)Nanjeanne
(5,480 posts)Just went to Univision and searched their bi monthly tracking poll and downloaded it.
http://hispanic-vote.corporate.univision.com/hispanic-vote/wp-content/uploads/2016/01/PAG_Tracker_Jan_20_2016.pdf
No problem. I'm sure your over reactions are perfectly reasonable.
Jefferson23
(30,099 posts)wildeyed
(11,243 posts)It is some sort of game that pays you money to make predictions? I googled the poling company and this is what I got:
We give you real money to use in the game. Theres no risk. And if you make good predictions, the winnings are all yours!
http://www.mediapredict.com
And what are "persuadable voters"? Persuadables, in campaign parlance, have not yet made up their minds. They are undecided or weakly decided.
George II
(67,782 posts)....still not the real one.
Your graphic above shows the Hispanic ratings at:
Sanders 66, Clinton 54. (Sanders +12)
BUT, Slide 4 at your link shows the ratings at:
Sanders 62, Clinton 61. (Sanders +1!!!!)
And for the non-Hispanics, your graphic shows:
Sanders 50, Clinton 39
BUT, Slide 4 at your link shows:
Sanders 50, Clinton 42
But, you're getting closer.
wildeyed
(11,243 posts)What does this even mean? It gives you a market prediction and you make an over/under bet. That is not a poll. I dunno what that is.
http://www.mediapredict.com