Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

reformist2

(9,841 posts)
Mon Feb 8, 2016, 12:04 PM Feb 2016

If Hillary doesn't release her Goldman Sachs speeches, someone will leak them.

Sorry, but Hillary is an idiot for not getting out in front of this. And her campaign tactic of attacking everyone else who ever collected a speaking fee, it's fairly ugly, and only makes us wonder all the more what she said that she doesn't want us to hear.

13 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
 

HassleCat

(6,409 posts)
4. I don't know about "idiot"
Mon Feb 8, 2016, 12:11 PM
Feb 2016

But she is making a mistake. You're right in saying they will be revealed. In the mean time, there is all this speculation about what she said. It will probably turn out to be some typical mutual appreciation remarks, but her refusal makes people think there is more to it than that.

Deny and Shred

(1,061 posts)
5. Embracing the lack of transparency
Mon Feb 8, 2016, 12:11 PM
Feb 2016

That is the issue. Perhaps there is something unsavory in the speeches, perhaps not. It certainly looks like she is hiding something, and that can't help the 'progressive' image she is trying to cultivate.

It is yet another issue that could pop up during the GE if some were leaked and there was somethging damning.

PoliticAverse

(26,366 posts)
6. Leak them how? The only transcript was given to her as part of her contract apparently.
Mon Feb 8, 2016, 12:13 PM
Feb 2016

The contract apparently also prohibited any recording.

Also see this DU thread: http://www.democraticunderground.com/12511169727

 

NorthCarolina

(11,197 posts)
8. How can they be leaked if Hillary is the only one with copies?
Mon Feb 8, 2016, 12:35 PM
Feb 2016

I think all she would have to say if something is leaked is that it's a deliberate forgery to make her look bad as only SHE has access to actual transcriptions. I could see her crew immediately turning any "leak" into a Bernie attack.

PoliticAverse

(26,366 posts)
10. Indeed. A released transcript could be easily be faked. The reason the leaked Romney '47%'
Mon Feb 8, 2016, 12:49 PM
Feb 2016

thing was so effective was that it was actual video.

 

NorthCarolina

(11,197 posts)
12. and No Video was allowed at any of her speeches.
Mon Feb 8, 2016, 12:55 PM
Feb 2016

Of course the same was true with the Romney speech that later turned up in video on YouTube, but I'm not sure the chances are great of a repeat of that event...but who knows?

I do think it would have to be an actual video though to have any effect beyond the damage that has already transpired because written material can be denied whether verbatim or not...no real way to prove otherwise other than hearsay.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»If Hillary doesn't releas...