Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

Vote2016

(1,198 posts)
Sat Feb 6, 2016, 03:36 PM Feb 2016

Clinton - "To be honest I wasn't -- I wasn't committed to running" in 2013.

In the CNN town forum this week, Clinton had the following exchange with Anderson Cooper:

"You were paid $675,000 for three speeches. Was that a mistake? I mean was that a bad error in judgment?" Cooper asked.
"Look. I made speeches to lots of groups. I told them what I thought. I answered questions," Clinton said Wednesday night at a Democratic forum moderated by CNN.
"But did you have to be paid $675,000?" Cooper pressed the Democratic presidential hopeful.
"Well, I don't know. That's what they offered," Clinton responded.
Attempting to explain away the Wall Street speeches, Clinton said she didn't know whether she was running for president again.
"To be honest I wasn't -- I wasn't committed to running," Clinton said about the circumstances and timing of the speeches. "I didn't know whether I would or not."
"You didn't think you were going to run for president again?" Cooper asked.
"I didn't
," Clinton said. "You know when I was secretary of State several times I said you know I think I'm done. And you know, so many people came to me, started talking to me."

The quote underlined above has received so much negative attention that is drawn focus away from the whopper in bold, which I am curious about.

Is there even one single person on the planet who believes that Hillary didn't anticipate running for president in 2013? Really? Anyone?
42 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Clinton - "To be honest I wasn't -- I wasn't committed to running" in 2013. (Original Post) Vote2016 Feb 2016 OP
She didn't commit until April 2015 6chars Feb 2016 #1
That was more due to rules about money and not creating too long a campaign season. artislife Feb 2016 #21
And there is this. Uncle Joe Feb 2016 #29
A Message From Hillary tomm2thumbs Feb 2016 #31
What a massive fucking lie. kath Feb 2016 #2
+1.....flat bald faced lie. And that is the biggest reason she will never win the Presidency. yourout Feb 2016 #27
I'm a solid Bernie supporter ejbr Feb 2016 #3
"To Be Honest" is one more lie. nt Nanjeanne Feb 2016 #4
"To be honest" laruemtt Feb 2016 #5
Exactly. What a tell. Who feels the need to preface the truth with "to be honest." She must think we Vote2016 Feb 2016 #9
Best tell of liars Iggy Knorr Feb 2016 #14
I would also bet that 840high Feb 2016 #6
Me. Seriously, in 2103 I didn't think she'd run. I didn't think she had another campaign in her. ancianita Feb 2016 #7
She was directly involved with the SuperPac Ready For Hillary in 2013 cali Feb 2016 #13
Okay, fair enough. I'll take your word for it. I wasn't keeping close track of her then. ancianita Feb 2016 #15
You don't need to take my word for it. Sorry, I forgot the link cali Feb 2016 #17
Thanks. I was probably thinking about her hospitalization around that time. ancianita Feb 2016 #20
"comfortable retirement"???? basselope Feb 2016 #28
the breathless attack dog anger of the Bernie people here really disappoints me. AlbertCat Feb 2016 #35
I remember Hillary from her days in the White House. I don't see her as you do. ancianita Feb 2016 #38
She had made her choice in 2013. And that's OK. Cash in. But she should not thereismore Feb 2016 #8
The pollsters understood she was going to run in 2013 but we're to believe it hadn't occurred to her? Vote2016 Feb 2016 #10
IIRC she was hospitalized the last day of 2012, she could be referring to HereSince1628 Feb 2016 #11
That should be a disclaimer whenever she speaks SwampG8r Feb 2016 #37
Hmm... cyberswede Feb 2016 #12
Oh yeah... all those Ready for Hillary memes artislife Feb 2016 #22
In 2009, when she became SoS, I was expecting this run for president. NT Eric J in MN Feb 2016 #16
Of course. It was a resume builder. frylock Feb 2016 #25
Notice the specific term she used was "committed" DefenseLawyer Feb 2016 #18
Interesting take 6chars Feb 2016 #24
Thankfully we have you here to translate lawyerspeak for us! frylock Feb 2016 #26
She knew she was running. That's why she owns all her transcripts, and no recording of speeches was ViseGrip Feb 2016 #19
Hell no! frylock Feb 2016 #23
Her emails to her buddy Lenny azmom Feb 2016 #30
I believe her Dem2 Feb 2016 #32
Who would want to volunteer for that? Clinton has been angling for it for a pretty long time. Attorney in Texas Feb 2016 #36
Oh, she knew. She just thought that the nomination was in the bag...never saw Bernie coming AzDar Feb 2016 #33
She is a funny lady... SoLeftIAmRight Feb 2016 #34
When you start with, "To be honest..." Fairgo Feb 2016 #39
I would love to play poker with someone who preceded each bluff with "to be honest..." Vote2016 Feb 2016 #40
It's a good thing she doesn't have a Pinocchio nose. Vinca Feb 2016 #41
No, she has a Pinocchio Wall Street donor list. It grows longer every time she tells a lie (or maybe Vote2016 Feb 2016 #42
 

artislife

(9,497 posts)
21. That was more due to rules about money and not creating too long a campaign season.
Sat Feb 6, 2016, 05:29 PM
Feb 2016

But if Hillary hadn't run, we all would have been in a state of shock.


Come on, be honest. We all knew she was counting the days to when would be the right time to declare.

No shame in that, at all. Ambition is not bad. Pretending is not that admirable, though.

And she did everything correctly, if she were running in 2000. But we have had 15 years of effing hard in this country and the people are tired of being ground down.

Uncle Joe

(58,349 posts)
29. And there is this.
Sat Feb 6, 2016, 05:47 PM
Feb 2016


First of all, it’s important to point out that the Hillary Clinton political fundraising machine started a full two years before she declared she was running for president. (At least, the one actually associated with her name did.)

On Jan. 25, 2013, Ready for Hillary formally organized by filing paperwork with the FEC. Clinton was directly involved with the super PAC at that point — you may remember the “Ready for Hillary” bus? Clinton was promoting her new book “Hard Choices” at that time (much like Ben Carson is promoting his book "Gifted Hands" now) and doing speaking events around the country.

Between January 2013 and when Clinton announced her intention to run for president in April 2015, Ready for Hillary raised about $12.9 million and spent $12.1 million. It ended the year in 2014 with $748,469 cash on hand.


(snip)

On its website, 270 Strategies documents its involvement in Ready for Hillary and offers it as case study in “tapping into organic grassroots energy around a potential Hillary Clinton presidential run.” It notes various steps taken during the 2014 campaign to “get out the vote” and to recruit volunteers to create “a movement nearly 4 million strong.”

https://sunlightfoundation.com/blog/2015/12/01/super-pacs-dark-money-and-the-hillary-clinton-campaign-part-1/

kath

(10,565 posts)
2. What a massive fucking lie.
Sat Feb 6, 2016, 03:50 PM
Feb 2016

She has been running for president for at least 16 years, some think much longer than that.

ejbr

(5,856 posts)
3. I'm a solid Bernie supporter
Sat Feb 6, 2016, 03:55 PM
Feb 2016

and even I was daydreaming about casting my vote for her in 2013! Still, one cannot pretend to read her mind, but if I were to bet....

 

Vote2016

(1,198 posts)
9. Exactly. What a tell. Who feels the need to preface the truth with "to be honest." She must think we
Sat Feb 6, 2016, 04:21 PM
Feb 2016

are all complete idiots.

ancianita

(36,023 posts)
7. Me. Seriously, in 2103 I didn't think she'd run. I didn't think she had another campaign in her.
Sat Feb 6, 2016, 04:18 PM
Feb 2016

As for the speech fees, it is just as easy for me to believe that she wanted a comfortable retirement.

I don't believe that she's a crook or a liar, either.

I'm a Bernie supporter but -- yep, the "but" -- the breathless attack dog anger of the Bernie people here really disappoints me.

Y'all need to chill and take this primary with more perspective. As long as a Democrat wins, the country isn't going to hell.

 

cali

(114,904 posts)
17. You don't need to take my word for it. Sorry, I forgot the link
Sat Feb 6, 2016, 05:20 PM
Feb 2016

On Jan. 25, 2013, Ready for Hillary formally organized by filing paperwork with the FEC. Clinton was directly involved with the super PAC at that point — you may remember the “Ready for Hillary” bus? Clinton was promoting her new book “Hard Choices” at that time (much like Ben Carson is promoting his book "Gifted Hands" now) and doing speaking events around the country.

<snip>

https://sunlightfoundation.com/blog/2015/12/01/super-pacs-dark-money-and-the-hillary-clinton-campaign-part-1/
 

basselope

(2,565 posts)
28. "comfortable retirement"????
Sat Feb 6, 2016, 05:42 PM
Feb 2016

She didn't need those speaking fees to ensure a comfortable retirement.

 

AlbertCat

(17,505 posts)
35. the breathless attack dog anger of the Bernie people here really disappoints me.
Sat Feb 6, 2016, 06:23 PM
Feb 2016

So what should we do when Sanders is accused of being corrupt because he was one of a number of hosts for a Democratic fund raiser?

Or that he's a kibbutz Kommie?

Or that he just doesn't get black people....and doesn't care about them.

or he's from VT...a state that is apparently not in the US or represents it in any way shape or form...

or there are only Berniebro's .... and the young dumb chicks who adore them?


Pointing out her record and when she talks out of both sides of her mouth is not an angry dog attack. Saying so is playing into the "he's so angry" lie.

ancianita

(36,023 posts)
38. I remember Hillary from her days in the White House. I don't see her as you do.
Sat Feb 6, 2016, 09:03 PM
Feb 2016

You can latch on and scoff at her language of "pragmatism" or distrust her all you like. But I believe that she's been privy to knowledge about geopolitics that leads her to take the positions she does.

Actually, given the breadth of her name recognition and work domestically and internationally -- which I think is important for this country's credibility before the international community -- and given the less time she'll need for "on the job" training as president, I won't have much trouble voting for her.

My reading of DU since the Iowa debate is that the passion has turned not just for Bernie but against her. I think it's beneath our heft and dignity as a party to run this primary using the rhetoric and lack of respect and perspective one hears from Republicans. I'm not buying it, and you'll not win me over with any justifications for it.

I'm with Mineral Man here, even as a Bernie supporter.

DU Bernie people just have to dial it down.

Let's resolve to make this party more domestically hard working in the FDR sense.

Let's just build our case for the next level of party debate without the rancor.

thereismore

(13,326 posts)
8. She had made her choice in 2013. And that's OK. Cash in. But she should not
Sat Feb 6, 2016, 04:20 PM
Feb 2016

be running for President now. You can't have it all, as Sen. Sanders often says.

 

Vote2016

(1,198 posts)
10. The pollsters understood she was going to run in 2013 but we're to believe it hadn't occurred to her?
Sat Feb 6, 2016, 04:34 PM
Feb 2016

HereSince1628

(36,063 posts)
11. IIRC she was hospitalized the last day of 2012, she could be referring to
Sat Feb 6, 2016, 05:05 PM
Feb 2016

what she was thinking on January 1st 2013 laying in at the hospital.

Many of her 'lies' are artful depictions of real events.

SwampG8r

(10,287 posts)
37. That should be a disclaimer whenever she speaks
Sat Feb 6, 2016, 07:07 PM
Feb 2016

What you are about to hear is an artful depiction of real events.

cyberswede

(26,117 posts)
12. Hmm...
Sat Feb 6, 2016, 05:11 PM
Feb 2016
First of all, it’s important to point out that the Hillary Clinton political fundraising machine started a full two years before she declared she was running for president. (At least, the one actually associated with her name did.)

On Jan. 25, 2013, Ready for Hillary formally organized by filing paperwork with the FEC. Clinton was directly involved with the super PAC at that point — you may remember the “Ready for Hillary” bus? Clinton was promoting her new book “Hard Choices” at that time (much like Ben Carson is promoting his book "Gifted Hands" now) and doing speaking events around the country.

http://sunlightfoundation.com/blog/2015/12/01/super-pacs-dark-money-and-the-hillary-clinton-campaign-part-1/

frylock

(34,825 posts)
25. Of course. It was a resume builder.
Sat Feb 6, 2016, 05:39 PM
Feb 2016

I think her appointment to SoS was a deal made as part of her concession in 2008.

 

DefenseLawyer

(11,101 posts)
18. Notice the specific term she used was "committed"
Sat Feb 6, 2016, 05:22 PM
Feb 2016

Don't think for a second that wasn't a carefully crafted response. It conveys what she wants to convey which was "I wasn't planning to run at the time", which was probably false. But by saying she wasn't "committed" to run (by formally entering the race or publicly announcing that intention) she is technically telling the truth. Of course Bill Clinton was also technically telling the truth when he said "I did not have sexual relations with that woman", given the specific definition of "sexual relations" used in that lawsuit. Didn't come across well for him either.

 

ViseGrip

(3,133 posts)
19. She knew she was running. That's why she owns all her transcripts, and no recording of speeches was
Sat Feb 6, 2016, 05:24 PM
Feb 2016

allowed. Of course she knew she was running.

Dem2

(8,168 posts)
32. I believe her
Sat Feb 6, 2016, 05:54 PM
Feb 2016

Reading 75% of the posts here, I can see why. Who would want to volunteer for that?

Whereas Bernie will now be the favorite any day now, he too will learn that it can be a withering experience (being a Presidential candidate in the lead.)

 

AzDar

(14,023 posts)
33. Oh, she knew. She just thought that the nomination was in the bag...never saw Bernie coming
Sat Feb 6, 2016, 06:08 PM
Feb 2016

in hot from the LEFT.

 

Vote2016

(1,198 posts)
42. No, she has a Pinocchio Wall Street donor list. It grows longer every time she tells a lie (or maybe
Sun Feb 7, 2016, 07:56 PM
Feb 2016

I've got that backwards - maybe she tells a lie every time her Wall Street donor list grows).

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Clinton - "To be honest I...