![]() |
Author | Time | Post |
![]() |
whatchamacallit | Feb 2016 | OP |
Punkingal | Feb 2016 | #1 | |
Ferd Berfel | Feb 2016 | #7 | |
whatchamacallit | Feb 2016 | #10 | |
m-lekktor | Feb 2016 | #11 | |
Rosa Luxemburg | Feb 2016 | #17 | |
840high | Feb 2016 | #93 | |
CorporatistNation | Feb 2016 | #54 | |
MissDeeds | Feb 2016 | #61 | |
NV Whino | Feb 2016 | #2 | |
DanTex | Feb 2016 | #3 | |
whatchamacallit | Feb 2016 | #6 | |
Arazi | Feb 2016 | #13 | |
DanTex | Feb 2016 | #21 | |
Arazi | Feb 2016 | #24 | |
DanTex | Feb 2016 | #26 | |
Arazi | Feb 2016 | #28 | |
DanTex | Feb 2016 | #29 | |
Arazi | Feb 2016 | #34 | |
DanTex | Feb 2016 | #39 | |
Arazi | Feb 2016 | #43 | |
DanTex | Feb 2016 | #44 | |
Arazi | Feb 2016 | #46 | |
DanTex | Feb 2016 | #47 | |
Android3.14 | Feb 2016 | #73 | |
thucythucy | Feb 2016 | #113 | |
kath | Feb 2016 | #48 | |
NowSam | Feb 2016 | #27 | |
winterwar | Feb 2016 | #57 | |
DanTex | Feb 2016 | #58 | |
winterwar | Feb 2016 | #62 | |
DanTex | Feb 2016 | #65 | |
winterwar | Feb 2016 | #68 | |
ybbor | Feb 2016 | #81 | |
DanTex | Feb 2016 | #82 | |
ybbor | Feb 2016 | #94 | |
azurnoir | Feb 2016 | #86 | |
DanTex | Feb 2016 | #88 | |
azurnoir | Feb 2016 | #90 | |
DanTex | Feb 2016 | #91 | |
azurnoir | Feb 2016 | #92 | |
Blue_Tires | Feb 2016 | #109 | |
Duckhunter935 | Feb 2016 | #4 | |
NorthCarolina | Feb 2016 | #5 | |
Vinca | Feb 2016 | #8 | |
Rosa Luxemburg | Feb 2016 | #16 | |
LonePirate | Feb 2016 | #9 | |
artislife | Feb 2016 | #15 | |
LonePirate | Feb 2016 | #19 | |
artislife | Feb 2016 | #38 | |
libdem4life | Feb 2016 | #59 | |
Agschmid | Feb 2016 | #41 | |
whatchamacallit | Feb 2016 | #63 | |
Agschmid | Feb 2016 | #64 | |
whatchamacallit | Feb 2016 | #66 | |
Agschmid | Feb 2016 | #67 | |
thucythucy | Feb 2016 | #80 | |
MrMickeysMom | Feb 2016 | #12 | |
Rosa Luxemburg | Feb 2016 | #14 | |
CoffeeCat | Feb 2016 | #18 | |
kath | Feb 2016 | #49 | |
Skwmom | Feb 2016 | #20 | |
in_cog_ni_to | Feb 2016 | #22 | |
procon | Feb 2016 | #23 | |
Tierra_y_Libertad | Feb 2016 | #25 | |
still_one | Feb 2016 | #30 | |
MariaThinks | Feb 2016 | #31 | |
still_one | Feb 2016 | #32 | |
whatchamacallit | Feb 2016 | #35 | |
MariaThinks | Feb 2016 | #105 | |
whatchamacallit | Feb 2016 | #108 | |
MariaThinks | Feb 2016 | #115 | |
Romulox | Feb 2016 | #33 | |
kath | Feb 2016 | #50 | |
Renew Deal | Feb 2016 | #36 | |
whatchamacallit | Feb 2016 | #40 | |
Renew Deal | Feb 2016 | #42 | |
Arazi | Feb 2016 | #45 | |
kath | Feb 2016 | #51 | |
Arazi | Feb 2016 | #55 | |
sarge43 | Feb 2016 | #78 | |
Avalux | Feb 2016 | #37 | |
Odin2005 | Feb 2016 | #52 | |
HassleCat | Feb 2016 | #53 | |
AzDar | Feb 2016 | #56 | |
CharlotteVale | Feb 2016 | #112 | |
TBF | Feb 2016 | #60 | |
silvershadow | Feb 2016 | #69 | |
PatrynXX | Feb 2016 | #70 | |
Dem2 | Feb 2016 | #71 | |
Stand and Fight | Feb 2016 | #76 | |
amborin | Feb 2016 | #72 | |
sarge43 | Feb 2016 | #74 | |
Ed Suspicious | Feb 2016 | #75 | |
amborin | Feb 2016 | #77 | |
HassleCat | Feb 2016 | #79 | |
whatchamacallit | Feb 2016 | #83 | |
HassleCat | Feb 2016 | #87 | |
wilt the stilt | Feb 2016 | #84 | |
whatchamacallit | Feb 2016 | #85 | |
Post removed | Feb 2016 | #96 | |
H2O Man | Feb 2016 | #97 | |
ViseGrip | Feb 2016 | #89 | |
senz | Feb 2016 | #95 | |
passiveporcupine | Feb 2016 | #98 | |
jhart3333 | Feb 2016 | #99 | |
Spitfire of ATJ | Feb 2016 | #100 | |
whatchamacallit | Feb 2016 | #101 | |
Spitfire of ATJ | Feb 2016 | #102 | |
TeddyR | Feb 2016 | #103 | |
cherokeeprogressive | Feb 2016 | #107 | |
guillaumeb | Feb 2016 | #104 | |
Motown_Johnny | Feb 2016 | #106 | |
Live and Learn | Feb 2016 | #110 | |
bigwillq | Feb 2016 | #111 | |
Bernblu | Feb 2016 | #114 |
Response to whatchamacallit (Original post)
Sat Feb 6, 2016, 02:48 PM
Punkingal (9,522 posts)
1. Shamelessly politicize a tragic situation?
Response to Punkingal (Reply #1)
Sat Feb 6, 2016, 02:55 PM
Ferd Berfel (3,687 posts)
7. Any other explaination is BS
and triangulated excuses
a cynical photo-op from the person that Championed Fracking and Keystone TPP (some of which she has triangulated out of for the time being) Is this her attempt at redemption? This is OK: ![]() ![]() But this isn't 'eh? ![]() Yeah, she's got my back. ![]() |
Response to Punkingal (Reply #1)
Sat Feb 6, 2016, 03:04 PM
whatchamacallit (15,558 posts)
10. If I was a Hillary supporter I wouldn't draw attention to this
Apparently no debased ploy is too low.
|
Response to Punkingal (Reply #1)
Sat Feb 6, 2016, 03:04 PM
m-lekktor (3,675 posts)
11. She has no shame!
![]() |
Response to m-lekktor (Reply #11)
Sat Feb 6, 2016, 03:21 PM
Rosa Luxemburg (28,627 posts)
17. Pander queen
Response to Punkingal (Reply #1)
Sat Feb 6, 2016, 04:06 PM
CorporatistNation (2,546 posts)
54. ABSOLUTELY... "Never Let A Tragedy Go To Waste... When i could Use It To My Political
ADVANTAGE..."
![]() ![]() |
Response to Punkingal (Reply #1)
Sat Feb 6, 2016, 04:28 PM
MissDeeds (7,499 posts)
61. Yep
And I can see the new ad coming: "Sec. Clinton was in Flint, addressing the horrific water situation and listening
to the needs of the people while Sen. Sanders was in New York, laughing it up on SNL". Just wait. ![]() |
Response to whatchamacallit (Original post)
Sat Feb 6, 2016, 02:51 PM
NV Whino (20,886 posts)
2. Exposure
Face in front of cameras. All that sort of stuff.
|
Response to whatchamacallit (Original post)
Sat Feb 6, 2016, 02:52 PM
DanTex (20,709 posts)
3. To raise the profile and put pressure on state politicians to do something.
The mayor of Flint praised her for doing it. The people bothered by this are Bernie fans on the internet that don't live anywhere near Flint.
|
Response to DanTex (Reply #3)
Sat Feb 6, 2016, 03:16 PM
Arazi (5,934 posts)
13. Why isn't she exposing the plight of fracking victims with tainted water?
You know, you're another Hillary supporter whose studiously ignoring her vote to support cluster bombs.
This thread... http://www.democraticunderground.com/12511140849 |
Response to Arazi (Reply #13)
Sat Feb 6, 2016, 03:27 PM
DanTex (20,709 posts)
21. I fail to see what cluster bombs have to do with her visit to Flint.
And from what I understand, the Flint water crisis has to do with lead contamination from old pipes and pollution from the Flint river, and not fracking.
|
Response to DanTex (Reply #21)
Sat Feb 6, 2016, 03:35 PM
Arazi (5,934 posts)
24. She's hypocritical grandstanding in Flint yet unconcerned about cluster bombs
Im not surprised you don't see the connection.
If she were concerned about the plight of tainted water for people, then she'd also be standing up for those whose water is being contaminated by fracking. Oh but she supports fracking...so inconvenient that. And she's a war hawk She's only "concerned" when it's politically attractive. It's not heartfelt or she'd have a consistent message on everything. |
Response to Arazi (Reply #24)
Sat Feb 6, 2016, 03:37 PM
DanTex (20,709 posts)
26. Aha. So I guess we should also conclude that Bernie doesn't care about the hunger
crisis in Chad. Why doesn't he talk about that? Does he not think hunger is a problem?
|
Response to DanTex (Reply #26)
Sat Feb 6, 2016, 03:42 PM
Arazi (5,934 posts)
28. She voted for cluster bombs
Has Bernie voted for starve children in Chad?
I'll wait |
Response to Arazi (Reply #28)
Sat Feb 6, 2016, 03:43 PM
DanTex (20,709 posts)
29. That has nothing to do with the Flint thing.
It's just a random Hillary-bash.
|
Response to DanTex (Reply #29)
Sat Feb 6, 2016, 03:46 PM
Arazi (5,934 posts)
34. It's all of a piece. She "cares" so much for the people of Flint
she has to rush there (even though this has been going on since 2014 and the PEOPLE of Flint don't want her there)
Yet she supports fracking that's responsible for tainting the drinking water aquifers of several states! Because she's beholden to special interests that pay her big bucks. You don't see her rushing off to Oklahoma to help those folks And fucking cluster bombs because she's a war monger be holding to the MIC that pays her big bucks. Hillary supporters wonder why, why, why we don't trust her. Here's a classic example yet you refuse to even acknowledge it - it's "just Hillary bashing". Sorry, it's not. It's deadly serious and we're pissed |
Response to Arazi (Reply #34)
Sat Feb 6, 2016, 03:51 PM
DanTex (20,709 posts)
39. Evidently she disagrees with you on a few issues that have nothing to do with Flint.
Who cares? Nothing to do with the issue at hand.
|
Response to DanTex (Reply #39)
Sat Feb 6, 2016, 03:54 PM
Arazi (5,934 posts)
43. Still avoiding the issue that Hillary supports cluster bombs I see
Response to Arazi (Reply #43)
Sat Feb 6, 2016, 03:55 PM
DanTex (20,709 posts)
44. I'm sticking to the topic of the OP. You're trying to change the subject.
Response to DanTex (Reply #44)
Sat Feb 6, 2016, 03:58 PM
Arazi (5,934 posts)
46. No, I see them as connected. I've already outlined why
Response to Arazi (Reply #46)
Sat Feb 6, 2016, 04:00 PM
DanTex (20,709 posts)
47. Well I don't see them as connect. Guess we disagree.
Response to DanTex (Reply #47)
Sat Feb 6, 2016, 04:46 PM
Android3.14 (5,402 posts)
73. That had to hurt.
I almost felt sorry for you.
|
Response to Arazi (Reply #28)
Sat Feb 6, 2016, 11:57 PM
thucythucy (7,528 posts)
113. Then again, Bernie DID vote to fund the F-35 fighter.
Cluster bombs aren't delivered by mail you know, or shipped through Amazon. They're generally dropped from planes. The F-35 will most assuredly be a part of whatever air campaign drops those cluster bombs you so rightfully condemn, bombs that will no doubt kill some children. Maybe in Chad, maybe somewhere else.
So, when Bernie talks about peace, is he being a hypocrite? BTW, I'm a Bernie supporter. His F-35 vote is one of his stands (along with his vote providing exceptional protection to the big gun companies--which got him praise from Wayne LaPierre) that make me cringe. But I'll vote for him anyway, because by and large I agree with him more than I do with Hillary. But if I were to use your brand of litmus on him, I'd probably just give up and stay home. Then again, maybe that's the point of some of the folks here who are so vitriolic. It's long past time for the most vituperative of the supporters on both sides to tone it down. All you're doing, at this point, is providing ammunition for the GOP to use in the general. Then again, it could be that's the whole point. |
Response to Arazi (Reply #24)
Sat Feb 6, 2016, 04:00 PM
kath (10,565 posts)
48. "She's only "concerned" when it's politically attractive. It's not heartfelt or she'd have a
Consisten message on everything"
This describes her to a T. |
Response to DanTex (Reply #21)
Sat Feb 6, 2016, 03:40 PM
NowSam (1,252 posts)
27. The nation's resources starved
To pay for endless wars. That is what they have to do with it.
|
Response to DanTex (Reply #3)
Sat Feb 6, 2016, 04:15 PM
winterwar (210 posts)
57. How many people from Flint do you know?
My best friend is from Flint, I grew up an hour from there. My Flint people are for Bernie Sanders. They don't like the Clintons. Flint was destroyed by Reagan, and the Clinton years was more of the same for Flint. You ever been there?
|
Response to winterwar (Reply #57)
Sat Feb 6, 2016, 04:17 PM
DanTex (20,709 posts)
58. I'm sure there are people in Flint of all ideological persuasions.
But the person they elected to represent them, the mayor, has praised Hillary for her efforts.
|
Response to DanTex (Reply #58)
Sat Feb 6, 2016, 04:30 PM
winterwar (210 posts)
62. So what?
I had Prick Snyder as my Governor in MI before I moved, that doesn't mean he represents me. WE didn't elect him, he doesn't represent me. Hell I worked on both campaigns against him. The mayor may represent those who elected her, and she may like the Clintons. I don't care about her opinion of Clinton, and none of my friends in Flint care for the Clintons. Flint is a city of auto workers. We know what was done during the Clinton years helped destroy the auto industry. If you say the word NAFTA around someone from Flint, be ready to hear some shit talking! People don't forget when their lucilius livelihood is ruined by terrible trade agreements. You had better believe my Flint people (especially the few who are lucky enough to have an autoworker job) care about TPP. Don't get me started on what the crack cocaine sentencing, welfare "reform", and mandatory minimums did to this city. But you didn't answer the question, do you know anybody in Flint?
|
Response to winterwar (Reply #62)
Sat Feb 6, 2016, 04:32 PM
DanTex (20,709 posts)
65. So the people you know there aren't representative. It's anecdotal.
Hillary's going there to help, and the mayor has praised her for it. Are there going to be some people upset? Of course. People get upset all the time.
|
Response to DanTex (Reply #65)
Sat Feb 6, 2016, 04:39 PM
winterwar (210 posts)
68. So you don't know anybody who lives in Flint.
Is it anecdotal to say that the only people who are bothered by Mrs. Clinton are Bernie fans who live nowhere near Flint? I told you that people in Flint, especially autoworkers, don't like the Clintons. This is from my people in Flint. But you, in Texas I assume, speak on the internet about it. I've been delivering water with the local UAW all week to Flint. 20 TONS of water, from my former local. But how about NAFTA? What do the people of Flint think about that?
|
Response to DanTex (Reply #3)
Sat Feb 6, 2016, 05:09 PM
ybbor (1,530 posts)
81. As a Flint native
I find your speaking for us disgusting. Although I don't live in the city anymore I have siblings, other family, and friends that do. They feel exactly as the OP describes. So take your bullshit elsewhere, for you don't know shit!
|
Response to ybbor (Reply #81)
Sat Feb 6, 2016, 05:11 PM
DanTex (20,709 posts)
82. I'm not speaking for you, I'm listening to your mayor. Your friends there have a chance to vote
her out if they are offended by this.
|
Response to DanTex (Reply #82)
Sat Feb 6, 2016, 05:28 PM
ybbor (1,530 posts)
94. No
You said the only people bothered by this "are people on DU who live no where near Flint". So you are wrong again, as I have noticed is pretty on par for you.
So have a nice day in spite of yourself. |
Response to DanTex (Reply #3)
Sat Feb 6, 2016, 05:19 PM
azurnoir (45,850 posts)
86. The mayor of Flint wants Snyder to stay in office
Flint Mayor Karen Weaver says she will not call for Michigan Gov. Rick Snyder's resignation over the water crisis in her city.
Asked at the U.S. Conference of Mayors meeting in Washington, D.C., what repercussions Snyder should face, she said Snyder needs to remain in place to provide "the services and the money, the funds that we need to address the population." Flint's water became contaminated with too much lead when its water source was switched in a cost-cutting measure in 2014. Protesters called for the governor's resignation as he delivered his State of the State speech Tuesday night. Weaver refused to join those calls, saying she is staying focused on what she can get from the governor to resolve the crisis. http://bigstory.ap.org/article/38ec7c52c4a84fc7a5ac4c56fa8bb60f/latest-flint-mayor-wont-call-snyder-step-down |
Response to azurnoir (Reply #86)
Sat Feb 6, 2016, 05:20 PM
DanTex (20,709 posts)
88. Sounds like her first priority is fixing the water crisis. But you might as well throw
her under the bus with the rest of them.
|
Response to DanTex (Reply #88)
Sat Feb 6, 2016, 05:22 PM
azurnoir (45,850 posts)
90. yep and exactly what is Snyder doing for Flint? oh ya reduced water prices
that'll fix stuff alright
|
Response to azurnoir (Reply #90)
Sat Feb 6, 2016, 05:23 PM
DanTex (20,709 posts)
91. Hopefully with exposure and added political pressure that Hillary brings, Flint will
be able to get more from the state. It's unfortunate that some people are trying to use this against Clinton and against the mayor of Flint for political reasons.
|
Response to DanTex (Reply #91)
Sat Feb 6, 2016, 05:25 PM
azurnoir (45,850 posts)
92. I would think Obama has it already :)
Response to whatchamacallit (Original post)
Sat Feb 6, 2016, 02:53 PM
Duckhunter935 (16,974 posts)
4. exploit the little people
You know she will not spend any of her hundreds of millions in speaking fees.
|
Response to whatchamacallit (Original post)
Sat Feb 6, 2016, 02:54 PM
NorthCarolina (11,197 posts)
5. Facetime.
eom
|
Response to whatchamacallit (Original post)
Sat Feb 6, 2016, 02:55 PM
Vinca (49,749 posts)
8. To film a campaign commercial.
Hillary will be holding a glass of orange water high in the air, then it'll cut to Bernie on SNL. As Larry David might write - yada, yada, yada. Is anyone here a marine biologist?
|
Response to Vinca (Reply #8)
Sat Feb 6, 2016, 03:20 PM
Rosa Luxemburg (28,627 posts)
16. The anti-fracking people should run an ad
saying where you now Clinton?
|
Response to whatchamacallit (Original post)
Sat Feb 6, 2016, 03:03 PM
LonePirate (13,199 posts)
9. Why is this sort of name calling against Democrats allowed here on DU?
I have no qualms if people don't like Hillary for whatever reason, but the name calling is beneath the dignity and purpose of this board.
|
Response to LonePirate (Reply #9)
Sat Feb 6, 2016, 03:19 PM
artislife (9,497 posts)
15. She is for Fracking...I found it within the realm of okay. nt
Response to artislife (Reply #15)
Sat Feb 6, 2016, 03:25 PM
LonePirate (13,199 posts)
19. So by your logic, Gun Nut King is an acceptable name for Bernie. How about using restraint on DU?
Response to LonePirate (Reply #19)
Sat Feb 6, 2016, 03:51 PM
artislife (9,497 posts)
38. Just giving my opinion. nt
Response to LonePirate (Reply #19)
libdem4life This message was self-deleted by its author.
Response to LonePirate (Reply #9)
Sat Feb 6, 2016, 03:52 PM
Agschmid (28,749 posts)
41. Because... Revolution.
Who knew a revolution could be so revolting.
|
Response to Agschmid (Reply #41)
Sat Feb 6, 2016, 04:30 PM
whatchamacallit (15,558 posts)
63. Everyone knows
They are usually violent, bloody affairs, and often the only path to change.
|
Response to whatchamacallit (Reply #63)
Sat Feb 6, 2016, 04:32 PM
Agschmid (28,749 posts)
64. Woohooo. Can't wait.
Love those usually violent and bloody affairs, they do great things to help win the White House.
Meanwhile both our candidates come out damaged and Kasich or Rubio waltz into the White House and we all get exactly what we didn't want. |
Response to Agschmid (Reply #64)
Sat Feb 6, 2016, 04:34 PM
whatchamacallit (15,558 posts)
66. The White House was won a while ago
by entities that have little to do with you or I.
|
Response to whatchamacallit (Reply #66)
Sat Feb 6, 2016, 04:35 PM
Agschmid (28,749 posts)
67. Yah, sure.
Response to LonePirate (Reply #9)
Sat Feb 6, 2016, 05:08 PM
thucythucy (7,528 posts)
80. Because hating Hillary is evidently more salient
than ANY attempt to bring attention to the horror that GOP politics have caused in Flint.
I'm getting really tired of having to say, "I support Bernie, but..." after another example of the maliciousness of some of his supporters on DU. Okay, now come all the Bernie supporters to tell me how stupid, corrupt, phony, misguided I am. What a sad spectacle this place has become, and what lovely ammo it's going to provide the GOP, no matter which candidate wins. |
Response to whatchamacallit (Original post)
Sat Feb 6, 2016, 03:08 PM
MrMickeysMom (20,453 posts)
12. Some call to calm it down here...
I wouldn't charge Hillary Clinton to be a frack queen. There are plenty of other people I'd give that title to.
|
Response to whatchamacallit (Original post)
Sat Feb 6, 2016, 03:18 PM
Rosa Luxemburg (28,627 posts)
14. Someone should ask her about her love of fracking
Response to whatchamacallit (Original post)
Sat Feb 6, 2016, 03:25 PM
CoffeeCat (24,411 posts)
18. Pose like a shameless poser for some photo ops!
Hillary is exploiting a tragedy, in hopes that she's gain a few points in the polls.
Her lows have no floor. Gotta pose with some victims. Even hug a few. Poisoned children make great props, in Hillary's world. What she's doing is selfish and sick. |
Response to CoffeeCat (Reply #18)
Sat Feb 6, 2016, 04:02 PM
kath (10,565 posts)
49. reminds me a bit of the 30 Rock episode where the Congresswoman wanted to pose with poisoned orange
children.
|
Response to whatchamacallit (Original post)
Sat Feb 6, 2016, 03:27 PM
Skwmom (12,685 posts)
20. You won't see Maddow visiting a town like this.
Response to whatchamacallit (Original post)
Sat Feb 6, 2016, 03:29 PM
in_cog_ni_to (41,600 posts)
22. She's exploiting poisoned men, women and children for political purposes. SHAMEFUL exploitation!
PEACE
LOVE BERNIE |
Response to whatchamacallit (Original post)
Sat Feb 6, 2016, 03:30 PM
procon (15,805 posts)
23. It would seem that one of the most obvious reasons would be to
target the Republicans who orchestrated the water crisis and have been criminally negligent in mitigating the damages or repairing the lives of their constituents. It also lets the residents see who actually comes to their town to listen to their problems... which is a good way to get voter attention.
If this is new to you, politicians have always taken advantage of their gravitas and powerful brand recognition to focus media attention on areas that highlight their concerns or policies that might be of particular interest to the community. Back in the day, we used to call it "consciousness raising", and anything that makes the GOP look bad and Democrats look good, is a handy tool to use. |
Response to whatchamacallit (Original post)
Sat Feb 6, 2016, 03:37 PM
Tierra_y_Libertad (50,414 posts)
25. To look concerned at the photo op.
Response to whatchamacallit (Original post)
Sat Feb 6, 2016, 03:44 PM
still_one (89,216 posts)
30. Are Sander's supporters really proud of OPs like this? Do they think this
kind of trash really helps their candidate?
and of course some of the comments that follow only amplify the OPs Do you think Sander's is really proud of his supporters making posts like this? Obviously there are some who believe they don't need Clinton supporters if Bernie wins the nomination |
Response to whatchamacallit (Original post)
Sat Feb 6, 2016, 03:44 PM
MariaThinks (2,495 posts)
31. Hillary will bring more attention to a tragic situation. I guess doing SNL is more humanitarian
again, the offensive things Bernie supporters say will cause me to turn off him as a candidate.
|
Response to MariaThinks (Reply #31)
Sat Feb 6, 2016, 03:45 PM
still_one (89,216 posts)
32. That they don't realize how this reflects on their candidate is astounding
Response to MariaThinks (Reply #31)
Sat Feb 6, 2016, 03:47 PM
whatchamacallit (15,558 posts)
35. So we'll make up your mind for you?
Not the issues or platforms or candidates themselves? Way to vote!
|
Response to whatchamacallit (Reply #35)
Sat Feb 6, 2016, 06:27 PM
MariaThinks (2,495 posts)
105. keep it up. You realize we're both democrats?
or maybe you're not?
|
Response to MariaThinks (Reply #105)
Sat Feb 6, 2016, 08:23 PM
whatchamacallit (15,558 posts)
108. Vote how you wish
but own it. If you don't feel voting for Bernie is in your interest, great, vote for Hillary. But threatening internet forum posters you're going to withhold or change your vote because you don't like their tone, is absurd.
|
Response to whatchamacallit (Reply #108)
Sun Feb 7, 2016, 11:19 AM
MariaThinks (2,495 posts)
115. i think i'm definitelly going way over your head. Good bye.
Response to whatchamacallit (Original post)
Sat Feb 6, 2016, 03:46 PM
Romulox (25,960 posts)
33. Pander. Clintonian "Free Trade" is what devastated Flint in the first place. nt
Response to Romulox (Reply #33)
Sat Feb 6, 2016, 04:03 PM
kath (10,565 posts)
50. YES.
That should not be forgotten.
|
Response to whatchamacallit (Original post)
Sat Feb 6, 2016, 03:48 PM
Renew Deal (81,383 posts)
36. The Mayor of Flint invited the person she thought could get something done.
Response to Renew Deal (Reply #36)
Sat Feb 6, 2016, 03:52 PM
whatchamacallit (15,558 posts)
40. The only thing Hillary will get done is some campaigning n/t
Response to whatchamacallit (Reply #40)
Sat Feb 6, 2016, 03:53 PM
Renew Deal (81,383 posts)
42. And that alone was enough to finally bring attention to the issue
Hillary deserves a lot of credit for the attention Flint has been receiving the last two weeks.
|
Response to Renew Deal (Reply #36)
Sat Feb 6, 2016, 03:56 PM
Arazi (5,934 posts)
45. The people of Flint don't want her there
http://www.democraticunderground.com/12511156958
They obviously smell a blatant photo op like the rest of us |
Response to Arazi (Reply #45)
Sat Feb 6, 2016, 04:04 PM
kath (10,565 posts)
51. Yep, just because people are poor, doesn't mean they are stupid.
I hope this backfires on her. it reinforces the idea that she is a huge phony.
|
Response to kath (Reply #51)
Sat Feb 6, 2016, 04:07 PM
Arazi (5,934 posts)
55. It reinforces that she's a phony to me, definitely
And obviously I'm not the only one who sees it that way
|
Response to Renew Deal (Reply #36)
Sat Feb 6, 2016, 04:52 PM
sarge43 (28,865 posts)
78. Psst, she's a private citizen.
Unless she ponys up a couple of million she's made speechifying to banksters, what exactly can she get done?
|
Response to whatchamacallit (Original post)
Sat Feb 6, 2016, 03:49 PM
Avalux (35,015 posts)
37. Exploit the people there to benefit herself politically.
She will do anything to win at this point. Going to Flint is intended to show everyone how much she cares, but it's transparent as hell and I hope it backfires.
|
Response to whatchamacallit (Original post)
Sat Feb 6, 2016, 04:05 PM
Odin2005 (53,521 posts)
52. To lie to people.
That is all she does, LIE.
|
Response to whatchamacallit (Original post)
Sat Feb 6, 2016, 04:06 PM
HassleCat (6,409 posts)
53. She should go. So should Sanders.
For the benefit of the people who live there. It's important that Democrats show up in places where the government failed to safeguard the people, and talk about what happened and how to fix it. Our party stands for the idea that government can do things for people, so we need to back that up.
|
Response to whatchamacallit (Original post)
Sat Feb 6, 2016, 04:15 PM
AzDar (14,023 posts)
56. Shameless Photo-Op
Response to whatchamacallit (Original post)
Sat Feb 6, 2016, 04:27 PM
TBF (31,869 posts)
60. She's worth M$32 - maybe she will bring them some water. nt
Response to whatchamacallit (Original post)
Sat Feb 6, 2016, 04:43 PM
silvershadow (10,336 posts)
69. To show sympathy? Bernie shows empathy in everything about his entire life. nt
Response to whatchamacallit (Original post)
Sat Feb 6, 2016, 04:43 PM
PatrynXX (5,668 posts)
70. probably to pull a Sean Penn and try to help nobody after Katrina
photo op gone south
|
Response to whatchamacallit (Original post)
Sat Feb 6, 2016, 04:45 PM
Dem2 (8,164 posts)
71. Threads like this
Make people not want to support Sanders.
Why? Are you secretly pro-Hillary? I don't get it. |
Response to whatchamacallit (Original post)
Sat Feb 6, 2016, 04:45 PM
amborin (16,631 posts)
72. K&R Bernie had courage to demand Mich Gov resign, but Hillary chooses a photo op
Response to whatchamacallit (Original post)
Sat Feb 6, 2016, 04:48 PM
sarge43 (28,865 posts)
74. Use the people of Flint as wallpaper for a political spiel
Hell, her handlers have all but admitted she's doing it to make a warm and fuzzy for Democratic women in NH.
|
Response to whatchamacallit (Original post)
Sat Feb 6, 2016, 04:50 PM
Ed Suspicious (8,879 posts)
75. Going to drink in her husband's NAFTA legacy?
Response to whatchamacallit (Original post)
Sat Feb 6, 2016, 04:52 PM
amborin (16,631 posts)
77. photo op & she wants to cover up fact she STILL hasn't demanded the Mich gov resign:
Hillary Clinton is seizing the political moment on Flint ... |
Response to whatchamacallit (Original post)
Sat Feb 6, 2016, 04:53 PM
HassleCat (6,409 posts)
79. Read the responses
The only people who really condemn this are those who believe Clinton is evil incarnate. The rest of us realize it's probably a good thing. I think both candidates should go. This is what Democrats do. We listen to people who are in trouble, and we try to figure out ways to help them. We are not Republicans.
|
Response to HassleCat (Reply #79)
Sat Feb 6, 2016, 05:14 PM
whatchamacallit (15,558 posts)
83. I'm honestly not sure
what Hillary is. But that's me. If you think she's actually doing this out of a desire to help, that's fine.
|
Response to whatchamacallit (Reply #83)
Sat Feb 6, 2016, 05:19 PM
HassleCat (6,409 posts)
87. We will know
By what her campaign does after she appears there.
|
Response to whatchamacallit (Original post)
Sat Feb 6, 2016, 05:15 PM
wilt the stilt (4,528 posts)
84. I've been on DU for over 10 years
and there is a band of Bernie supporters who are just assholes.
|
Response to wilt the stilt (Reply #84)
Sat Feb 6, 2016, 05:19 PM
whatchamacallit (15,558 posts)
85. The sleeper awakens!
Whatever you say, wilt.
![]() |
Response to whatchamacallit (Reply #85)
Post removed
Response to wilt the stilt (Reply #84)
Sat Feb 6, 2016, 05:37 PM
H2O Man (72,243 posts)
97. Be that as it may,
those who advocate fracking are supporting a process that poisons very real human being's water supplies.
|
Response to whatchamacallit (Original post)
Sat Feb 6, 2016, 05:21 PM
ViseGrip (3,133 posts)
89. Exactly, frack queen who endorses such polluting go to help and she hold no office to do so.
Response to whatchamacallit (Original post)
Sat Feb 6, 2016, 05:29 PM
senz (11,945 posts)
95. To "appear concerned," of course.
Her aides thought it might work.
|
Response to whatchamacallit (Original post)
Sat Feb 6, 2016, 05:38 PM
passiveporcupine (8,175 posts)
98. It's all theater!
![]() |
Response to whatchamacallit (Original post)
Sat Feb 6, 2016, 05:39 PM
jhart3333 (332 posts)
99. I can't explain it but here's a kick and a recc for you
Response to whatchamacallit (Original post)
Sat Feb 6, 2016, 05:43 PM
Spitfire of ATJ (32,723 posts)
100. You will know when she claims Bernie doesn't care enough to go.
Response to Spitfire of ATJ (Reply #100)
Sat Feb 6, 2016, 05:46 PM
whatchamacallit (15,558 posts)
101. Her surrogates on DU have been working that angle all day
But yeah, I'm sure it'll get worked into the campaign's rhetoric somehow.
|
Response to whatchamacallit (Reply #101)
Sat Feb 6, 2016, 05:48 PM
Spitfire of ATJ (32,723 posts)
102. This is 2008 all over again.
Response to whatchamacallit (Original post)
Sat Feb 6, 2016, 05:51 PM
TeddyR (2,493 posts)
103. When did it become ok
On a website supporting the Democratic party to refer to a Democratic candidate for president as the "Frack Queen"? Any person that would use such slurs isn't a true Democrat and can take their slurs and their bullshit to the Tea Party.
|
Response to TeddyR (Reply #103)
Sat Feb 6, 2016, 07:32 PM
cherokeeprogressive (24,853 posts)
107. You're not going to have much success telling longtime DUers who and who isn't a "true" Democrat.
Response to whatchamacallit (Original post)
Sat Feb 6, 2016, 05:54 PM
guillaumeb (42,641 posts)
104. Putting a spotlight on Flint:
Clinton hopes the trip with shine a spotlight on the tainted water crisis plaguing the city, where officials did not properly treat water being pumped into homes, leaving people exposed to lead and other contaminants.
Clinton, according to aides, "intends to use her trip to Flint to urge the Republican-controlled Senate to approve the Senate Democrats' $600 million amendment to help Flint." The announcement comes on the same day that Senate Democrats blocked an energy bill over funding for Flint.......... Clinton has made Flint a focus of her campaign since the contaminated water issue was discovered, arguing that if the crisis had happened in a rich Detroit suburb, the response would have been faster and more effective. http://www.cnn.com/2016/02/04/politics/hillary-clinton-flint-michigan-water-crisis/ Exposing the racism in this situation is a good thing. |
Response to whatchamacallit (Original post)
Sat Feb 6, 2016, 06:32 PM
Motown_Johnny (22,308 posts)
106. Praise Flint as an example of NAFTA's success.
![]() |
Response to whatchamacallit (Original post)
Sat Feb 6, 2016, 09:09 PM
Live and Learn (12,769 posts)
110. To tell the water to "Cut it out."
Response to whatchamacallit (Original post)
Sat Feb 6, 2016, 09:16 PM
bigwillq (72,790 posts)
111. Frack Queen
![]() ![]() |
Response to whatchamacallit (Original post)
Sun Feb 7, 2016, 02:29 AM
Bernblu (441 posts)
114. NAFTA and other neoliberal economic policies supported by her and her husband
are partly responsible for what happened to Flint. If she does not denounce NAFTA and the other policies her trip to Flint is a meaningless photo-op meant to win her votes.
|