HomeLatest ThreadsGreatest ThreadsForums & GroupsMy SubscriptionsMy Posts
DU Home » Latest Threads » Forums & Groups » Retired » Retired Forums » 2016 Postmortem (Forum) » Who's on the WP Editorial...

Thu Jan 28, 2016, 11:58 AM

Who's on the WP Editorial Board?

After two scathing editorials about Bernie maybe it's time we figure exactly who these people are.

So.

Here you go:

Fred Hiatt

Several media commentators have expressed the view that The Post's editorial position under Hiatt has moved towards a neoconservative position on foreign policy issues. Human rights attorney Scott Horton in a blog post for Harper's Magazine, writes that Hiatt has presided over a "clear trend" towards neoconservative columnists.[18] Jamison Foser, a senior fellow at the progressive media watchdog group Media Matters for America, has said that The Post's editorial stance under Hiatt is now neoconservative on foreign affairs and is no longer liberal on many domestic issues.[19] News anchor and political commentator Chris Matthews stated on his program Hardball that The Post is "not the liberal newspaper it was", but has become a "neocon newspaper".[20]

 https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fred_Hiatt

Jackson Diehl

As an editor and columnist, Diehl advocated the 2003 invasion of Iraq, and the Post's early tenor of approval for the war has been attributed to his influence.

 https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jackson_Diehl

Jo-Ann Armao

“Will you ever run for president again? Yes or no,” Curry asked.

“No,” said Clinton, according to the account by the Post’s Anne E. Kornblut.

Part of the excitement of last year’s presidential contest was the possibility of a woman being elected president. I suspect that women like me -- baby boomers approaching 60 -- felt it more keenly; it was something we wished for but never really saw as doable. Clinton -- who has made a career out of confounding expectations (as evidenced by the litany of the positions she has held) -- changed all that. It was easy to imagine her president; if you've any doubt, just ask her enemies.

 http://voices.washingtonpost.com/postpartisan/2009/10/no_president_hillary.html?hpid=opinionsbox1

Jonathan Capehart

Regularly works with the Center for American Progress, which was founded by Clinton's campaign chairman. Also was a speechwriter for Michael Bloomberg.

Charles Lane

Has a history of trashing Bernie:

 https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/could-the-billionaire-class-be-more-progressive-than-sanders-says/2016/01/20/09c214e8-bf90-11e5-83d4-42e3bceea902_story.html

Stephen Stromberg

Has a long history of trying to defend Wall St:

http://m.huffpost.com/us/entry/iwapois-stephen-stromberg_n_191813.html

__________


I'd like to congratulate Bernie on not getting those people's praise.

8 replies, 1336 views

Reply to this thread

Back to top Alert abuse

Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum
Replies to this discussion thread
Arrow 8 replies Author Time Post
Reply Who's on the WP Editorial Board? (Original post)
EdwardBernays Jan 2016 OP
merrily Jan 2016 #1
EdwardBernays Jan 2016 #4
Jarqui Jan 2016 #2
beam me up scottie Jan 2016 #3
cascadiance Jan 2016 #5
closeupready Jan 2016 #6
TwilightGardener Jan 2016 #7
EdwardBernays Jan 2016 #8

Response to EdwardBernays (Original post)

Thu Jan 28, 2016, 12:05 PM

1. Kudos. I knew WAPO has been RW for a while, but I never broke it down. Also

In 2013, longtime owners the Graham family sold the newspaper to Jeff Bezos for US$250 million in cash.[1][2][9] The newspaper is owned by Nash Holdings LLC, a holding company Bezos created for the acquisition.


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Washington_Post

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to merrily (Reply #1)

Thu Jan 28, 2016, 12:18 PM

4. Don forget

While SOS Clinton was in charge of choosing Jeff's Kindle as part of some global education Yada Yada... The contract was worth over 15m.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to EdwardBernays (Original post)

Thu Jan 28, 2016, 12:06 PM

2. I looked at what they wrote in depth last night and it was

pathetically bad BS

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to EdwardBernays (Original post)

Thu Jan 28, 2016, 12:08 PM

3. Excellent research, that explains everything. Thank you.


Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to EdwardBernays (Original post)

Thu Jan 28, 2016, 12:23 PM

5. A testament to corporatized media wanting to pay back the Clinton family for Telecom Act...

 

... that Bill Clinton signed in to law under his watch that helped give us a BOUGHT media run by only a few large companies instead of the diverse "free press" that our founding fathers wanted in our constitution.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to EdwardBernays (Original post)

Thu Jan 28, 2016, 12:28 PM

6. Thanks for the head's up. This is so typical.

 

K&R

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to EdwardBernays (Original post)

Thu Jan 28, 2016, 01:25 PM

7. Neocons.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to TwilightGardener (Reply #7)

Thu Jan 28, 2016, 01:43 PM

8. To paraphrase Indiana Jones

Neocons. Why'd it have to be neocons?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink

Reply to this thread