Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Lorien

(31,935 posts)
Thu Jan 28, 2016, 04:30 AM Jan 2016

WaPo: Hillary Clinton’s desultory campaign is sinking

Even with all the drama of the 2016 Republican contest for the presidential nomination, it is impossible not to notice the slow-motion train wreck that is the Hillary Clinton campaign.

The campaign is beset by four woes that don’t seem to have any quick remedy. The only way forward for the Democratic front-runner is to hunker down, slog it out and win ugly. Since “malaise” is an overused word in politics, I’ll categorize Clinton’s campaign as “desultory” – or, “lacking a plan or enthusiasm.”

Clinton’s four problems are obvious: Her performance as a candidate, her opponent’s viability, a growing scandal that could lead to the indictment of the former first lady and possibly a few of her closest aides, and the rejection of her legitimacy as a feminist leader.

More:

https://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/post-partisan/wp/2016/01/27/hillary-clintons-desultory-campaign-is-sinking/

57 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
WaPo: Hillary Clinton’s desultory campaign is sinking (Original Post) Lorien Jan 2016 OP
Ed Rogers, an opinion writer for the Washington Post, offering commentary from a conservative still_one Jan 2016 #1
Shocked and outraged, eh??? catnhatnh Jan 2016 #43
Anyone who uses opinions from the Lee Atwater school, speaks volumes. Just a few days ago I saw still_one Jan 2016 #46
Maestro, if you please: Proserpina Jan 2016 #2
Why are you applauding for a Rethug writer who worked for Reagan and Bush? n/t pnwmom Jan 2016 #14
I'm merely acknowledging the obvious Proserpina Jan 2016 #15
Bernie's campaign just asked his supporters to treat Hillary with respect, pnwmom Jan 2016 #17
Truth is not hate. I'm really sorry if you can't handle truth with dignity and grace, Proserpina Jan 2016 #19
The article is full of mudslinging and lies. n/t pnwmom Jan 2016 #22
We will know in 6 weeks or so Proserpina Jan 2016 #23
The election won't prove anything about this article. It's full of Rethug mudslinging, pnwmom Jan 2016 #24
I personally wouldn't waste my breath. Ironically they think this kind of garbage helps their still_one Jan 2016 #47
A more effective argumentation technique would be to point out and refute the lies Fumesucker Jan 2016 #35
why don't we just cut out the middleman bigtree Jan 2016 #36
Along with Stormfront too, yes? Fumesucker Jan 2016 #51
Please stop making up stuff about Senator Sanders. You're embarrassing yourself. merrily Jan 2016 #27
This writer who was mentored by Lee Atwater. Really pathetic still_one Jan 2016 #37
not just mentored, he was Lee Atwater's senior deputy bigtree Jan 2016 #39
Yup, as bad as it gets still_one Jan 2016 #41
HILLARYOUS! CorporatistNation Jan 2016 #34
isn't that Bush's crony? bigtree Jan 2016 #3
The one and the same. riversedge Jan 2016 #5
the post is highlighted on the front page bigtree Jan 2016 #6
And this happens immediately after Sanders' spokesperson asks supporters pnwmom Jan 2016 #11
it's their raison d'être bigtree Jan 2016 #12
Truth hurts, sometimes. And sometimes, even the GOP has a portion of the truth Proserpina Jan 2016 #16
It's just Rethug PR, eagerly lapped up by some Bernie supporters. n/t pnwmom Jan 2016 #18
did you know Rogers was the senior deputy to the master of wedge politics, Lee Atwater? bigtree Jan 2016 #38
reality bigtree Jan 2016 #20
It takes an amazing amount of willful blindness to insist that this man's observations Proserpina Jan 2016 #21
it takes even more gall to bring this right-wing tripe here bigtree Jan 2016 #25
Seems you can't resist trying to make Sanders your assistant poster. merrily Jan 2016 #28
I wish I could say I was surprised at yet another right-wing source posted in order to bash HRC. DanTex Jan 2016 #4
Why not? We get a lot of right wing spin against Sanders...From Democrats Armstead Jan 2016 #42
Ed Rogers is a prominent RETHUG. Why not post Trump's opinion of Hillary's pnwmom Jan 2016 #7
I love the way supporters are still reccing the tripe bigtree Jan 2016 #8
Not one of them is smart enough to read to the bottom of the article pnwmom Jan 2016 #9
the content should have clued them in bigtree Jan 2016 #10
Lol! zappaman Jan 2016 #13
But its ok when right wing commentators trash Bernie Sanders you are the first to congradulate them INdemo Jan 2016 #26
She should have hired a saltpoint Jan 2016 #29
One of the mental blocks on this website is black/white thinking Proserpina Jan 2016 #30
Black and white thinkers are always fighting the previous battle. FlatBaroque Jan 2016 #50
Ed Rogers. LOL... SidDithers Jan 2016 #31
Why do posters attribute an editorial to the paper it's written in and not the person who wrote it? DemocratSinceBirth Jan 2016 #32
The WaPo paid for it, did they not? Proserpina Jan 2016 #33
It is the opinion of Ed Rogers and not the Washington Post. DemocratSinceBirth Jan 2016 #40
The entire group protesting this op-ed catnhatnh Jan 2016 #44
Oh my. Ed Rogers In_The_Wind Jan 2016 #45
Washington Post is busy attacking our candidates--HRC "sinking" and Bernie's plans full of fiction" book_worm Jan 2016 #48
Lordy... one_voice Jan 2016 #49
I doubt it. She wins Iowa and for me, she's probably won the nomination LittleBlue Jan 2016 #52
Lies and propaganda workinclasszero Jan 2016 #53
For the life of me, I can't see what's untrue about this summation... libdem4life Jan 2016 #54
Obamacare is a "calamity" according to the same Republican source saynotoplutocrats Jan 2016 #55
The fact that you tried to piggy-back on WP's reputation, and disguise the fact that DanTex Jan 2016 #56
Note that I made NO COMMENTS pro or con about this article Lorien Jan 2016 #57

still_one

(92,116 posts)
1. Ed Rogers, an opinion writer for the Washington Post, offering commentary from a conservative
Thu Jan 28, 2016, 04:56 AM
Jan 2016

perspective.

It is just so gratifying that some find it necessary to utilize right wing propaganda.

This is an "asshole" who according to his own words worked with some of the republican greats such as Lee Atwater.

You remember Lee Atwater, the guy who Karl Rove used as his mentor, and helped formulate the Southern Strategy.

Oh yeah, good ole Ed Rogers. Using him as a source of opinion is shameful:

"I have been involved in Republican politics since I was a kid in Hoover, Ala., in the 1970s. I have worked with and for some of the great Republican leaders of our time, including, from 1987 to 1991, White House Chief of Staff John Sununu and President H. W. Bush's campaign manager, Lee Atwater. After that, I could have opened a business called Difficult Personalities, Inc. If you were a challenging personality and needed a young, worried-looking yes-man to follow you around, I was your guy. Instead, I started a lobbying and public relations firm with my friend and another of my former White House bosses, Haley Barbour; it was just the two of us. Now we have grown to be BGR Group. Very smart people work there, and we now have overhead in Washington and London. "

https://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/the-insiders/post/about-ed-rogers/2011/10/20/gIQApAbO4L_blog.html

That some so-called Sanders' supporters think that using a right winger's opinion hit pieces against Hillary help their candidate is quite revealing.

With this kind of BS, if Sanders gets the nomination, do some Sanders' supporters really think they can win a general election without Hillary supporters?

Keep this right wing garbage flowing, and see how that works out

A Lee Atwater hack. Shameful and disgusting. Right from the pages of Karl Rove.


catnhatnh

(8,976 posts)
43. Shocked and outraged, eh???
Thu Jan 28, 2016, 10:22 AM
Jan 2016

I find that completely disingenious coming from someone who's candidate is actively coordinating with a superpac run by David Brock. Perhaps you should run to a mirror before finger-pointing and yelling "shame!"...And unless you can prove Sanders is coordinating with Ed Rogers it is your candidate alone leaving behind a trail of slime.

still_one

(92,116 posts)
46. Anyone who uses opinions from the Lee Atwater school, speaks volumes. Just a few days ago I saw
Thu Jan 28, 2016, 11:16 AM
Jan 2016

posts from a supposed Sanders' supporter justifying the trashing of the PP FB page, by using sources from extreme right wing anti-aborion links.

and that isn't the only ones where certain supporters seem to find the need to use right wing opinions or links to trash Hillary.

I guess in their infinite wisdom they feel that if Bernie wins the nomination, they don't need Clinton supporters, otherwise why would they be so arrogant to use such sources.

pnwmom

(108,973 posts)
17. Bernie's campaign just asked his supporters to treat Hillary with respect,
Thu Jan 28, 2016, 07:05 AM
Jan 2016

and posting hate articles on her written by Rethugs is an example of something Bernie wouldn't approve of.

Not that you care.

 

Proserpina

(2,352 posts)
19. Truth is not hate. I'm really sorry if you can't handle truth with dignity and grace,
Thu Jan 28, 2016, 07:07 AM
Jan 2016

but it's not my job nor anyone else's to wrap the world in cotton wool for you.


There's going to be a winner and a loser. It's time to start practicing.

pnwmom

(108,973 posts)
24. The election won't prove anything about this article. It's full of Rethug mudslinging,
Thu Jan 28, 2016, 07:14 AM
Jan 2016

regardless of what happens in the next 6 weeks.

still_one

(92,116 posts)
47. I personally wouldn't waste my breath. Ironically they think this kind of garbage helps their
Thu Jan 28, 2016, 11:20 AM
Jan 2016

client.

bigtree

(85,986 posts)
36. why don't we just cut out the middleman
Thu Jan 28, 2016, 08:58 AM
Jan 2016

...and let Ed Rodgers and his pals Haley and Shrub post here directly?

But hell, they probably already are.

Maybe we could get them a front-page, side column to provide a daily rebuttal to our Democratic candidates.

Fumesucker

(45,851 posts)
51. Along with Stormfront too, yes?
Thu Jan 28, 2016, 04:45 PM
Jan 2016

I mean Stormfront was posted here by a Hillary supporter to slam Bernie with antisemitic memes..

bigtree

(85,986 posts)
3. isn't that Bush's crony?
Thu Jan 28, 2016, 05:52 AM
Jan 2016

Ed Rogers,Vice Chairman of Barbour Griffith & Rogers and Diligence, LLC as well as a onetime deputy assistant to President George H.W. Bush?

He mentions 'one good thing Trump has done,' namely, bash Hillary for her opponent's benefit, dem and republican.

You should delete this before it gets locked.

pnwmom

(108,973 posts)
11. And this happens immediately after Sanders' spokesperson asks supporters
Thu Jan 28, 2016, 06:25 AM
Jan 2016

not to contribute to the venom against Hillary.

But they just can't resist.

 

Proserpina

(2,352 posts)
16. Truth hurts, sometimes. And sometimes, even the GOP has a portion of the truth
Thu Jan 28, 2016, 07:04 AM
Jan 2016

It's not venom to acknowledge reality.

bigtree

(85,986 posts)
38. did you know Rogers was the senior deputy to the master of wedge politics, Lee Atwater?
Thu Jan 28, 2016, 09:15 AM
Jan 2016

Rogers had been deputy assistant to the president and assistant to the White House chief of staff. He also was the senior deputy to the master of wedge politics, Lee Atwater.

bigtree

(85,986 posts)
20. reality
Thu Jan 28, 2016, 07:07 AM
Jan 2016

...you're drafting off of one of the most pernicious republican hacks outside of Rove. Rodgers was also in bed with Haley Barbour.

You must be so proud.

 

Proserpina

(2,352 posts)
21. It takes an amazing amount of willful blindness to insist that this man's observations
Thu Jan 28, 2016, 07:09 AM
Jan 2016

are false.

bigtree

(85,986 posts)
25. it takes even more gall to bring this right-wing tripe here
Thu Jan 28, 2016, 07:14 AM
Jan 2016

...shameless, really, to cheer it on.

This effort reflects on your candidate. While you and the op are getting hurrahs from the glut of Sanders supporters here, the reality is nothing less than the promotion of the republican campaign against our Democrats - something I'm almost certain is out of bounds at DU; not to mention sleazy and shameful.

DanTex

(20,709 posts)
4. I wish I could say I was surprised at yet another right-wing source posted in order to bash HRC.
Thu Jan 28, 2016, 06:10 AM
Jan 2016

Ed Rogers, really?

pnwmom

(108,973 posts)
7. Ed Rogers is a prominent RETHUG. Why not post Trump's opinion of Hillary's
Thu Jan 28, 2016, 06:15 AM
Jan 2016

campaign, while you're at it? Or Cruz's?

Rogers has a vested interest in discouraging the Dems about their candidates. Don't be played.

bigtree

(85,986 posts)
8. I love the way supporters are still reccing the tripe
Thu Jan 28, 2016, 06:17 AM
Jan 2016

...true colors.

Cue the solemn supporter denouncing Rodgers but claiming he speaks the truth (as if he even knows the meaning of the word).

pnwmom

(108,973 posts)
9. Not one of them is smart enough to read to the bottom of the article
Thu Jan 28, 2016, 06:18 AM
Jan 2016

to see who the writer is.

Or maybe they are and just don't care.

http://www.bgrdc.com/x-bios/bgr-rogers.html

Prior to co-founding BGR Group in 1991, Ed served in the White House as Deputy Assistant to the President and Executive Assistant to the Chief of Staff. Ed also served as Senior Deputy to Bush-Quayle Campaign Manager Lee Atwater from 1987 through the general election in 1988.

From 1985 through February of 1987, Ed worked in the Reagan White House in the Office of Political Affairs, where he served as Haley Barbour’s deputy as Special Assistant to the President and Deputy Director of the Office of Political Affairs. Since 2011, Ed has been an opinion writer for the Washington Post, where he writes about politics and the current state of affairs in Washington, D.C., from a Republican point of view.

bigtree

(85,986 posts)
10. the content should have clued them in
Thu Jan 28, 2016, 06:21 AM
Jan 2016

...but their attacks are sooo similar, they probably couldn't tell the difference between a right-wing attack and one from the supposed left.

Neither could I.

Let's see who recced this thing...the op recced their own post. Must think this is really good stuff!

INdemo

(6,994 posts)
26. But its ok when right wing commentators trash Bernie Sanders you are the first to congradulate them
Thu Jan 28, 2016, 07:21 AM
Jan 2016

Right?
Hillary Clinton is now campaigning using her unwritten slogan

"I have wanted this for over 30 years and BG no one or nothing is going to stop me"
"I am the anointed one and no one is going to take this away from me"

Now...wouldn't that summarize Hillary and her campaign?

http://www.democraticunderground.com/1017324734

saltpoint

(50,986 posts)
29. She should have hired a
Thu Jan 28, 2016, 07:45 AM
Jan 2016

speech writer early on after her boat sank in shallow water in 2008.

She didn't. And her public appearances are banal as a consequence.

Sanders' approval rating is sky-high. Hers are in the tank. There's more than one reason for that.

 

Proserpina

(2,352 posts)
30. One of the mental blocks on this website is black/white thinking
Thu Jan 28, 2016, 07:47 AM
Jan 2016
Black and White Thinking doesn't Work in a Gray World

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/byron-williams/black-and-white-thinking-_b_30747.html

To see the world in black and white is to live within the contours of extremism. This outlook neatly divides the world into right versus wrong, good versus evil, and yes versus no. This thinking is dependent upon such words as always and never. Especially in times of crisis, the black and white worldview is looked upon as strength and courage to the casual observer...Though appearing to be the best choice in the short term, black and white thinking can bring about long-term negative consequences.

The problem with black and white thinking is that it usually does battle in a world that is nuanced and gray.

Cognitive analysis begins in black and white terms, this is how children learn to use words and organize their thoughts. How many parents have provided their seven-year-old with a rule, only to later alter the decree ever so slightly and have the child retort with: "But you said?" In the world of Developmental Psychology this is called primitive thinking. As adults, we are prone to primitive thinking during moments of crisis and stress. Mark Sichel, author and psychotherapist, writes, "When the adult starts relying on the words "always" or "never," and seeing the world in black and white terms, they are slipping back to the way they saw the world as a child."

In the world of black and white we can become overwhelmed with the desire to find "the" answer. This is why church attendance grew across the country immediately following 9/11--folks looking for an answer, trying to understand the "why" question...For all of the obvious short- term reasons to embrace black and white thinking, there is definite a downside. Not only does black and white thinking show little appreciation for the world of gray it has even less for the concept of self-reflection. To self-reflect, especially after a decision has been made, could open one to the possibility of being wrong--which defeats the purpose of black and white thinking. Many psychologists maintain that black and white thinking actually exasperates mental health issues like depression and anxiety.

Black and white thinking is also flawed because it inherently assumes a static world. It is dependent upon everything and everyone maintaining the role that such thinking has already preordained...Failure becomes harder to confront because one tends to place an inordinate amount of energy being right. It is an unfortunate default against the complexities of the world.

Our political leadership has been at its best when those leaders have dared to enter into the world of gray. Imagine how America would be different had Washington, Lincoln, or Roosevelt maintained black and white thinking throughout their respective wars. Their greatness today is not measured simply by the end result but also by their ability to adapt in lieu of unsuspected challenges--some by their own making.

It requires far less courage to live in the black and white than it does to live in the gray. The world of gray requires that we show up and be present. It does not afford us the luxury of putting life on automatic pilot. Moreover, black and white thinking, though it may provide momentary comfort, is simply unrealistic to sustain. After all, even black and white photos come with their own varying shades of gray.
 

Proserpina

(2,352 posts)
33. The WaPo paid for it, did they not?
Thu Jan 28, 2016, 08:14 AM
Jan 2016

They profit by it, do they not?

Do you have a valid point there? I think not.

DemocratSinceBirth

(99,710 posts)
40. It is the opinion of Ed Rogers and not the Washington Post.
Thu Jan 28, 2016, 09:21 AM
Jan 2016
Do you have a valid point there? I think not.







I literally couldn't care less whether or not you think I have a valid point.



With all due respect,
DemocratSinceBirth

catnhatnh

(8,976 posts)
44. The entire group protesting this op-ed
Thu Jan 28, 2016, 10:27 AM
Jan 2016

are busy sliming Sanders supporters as if they had control of Rogers, while they ignore their candidates very real ties to David Brock...

book_worm

(15,951 posts)
48. Washington Post is busy attacking our candidates--HRC "sinking" and Bernie's plans full of fiction"
Thu Jan 28, 2016, 11:20 AM
Jan 2016

I assume they are ignoring O'Malley because they feel he isn't going anywhere.

one_voice

(20,043 posts)
49. Lordy...
Thu Jan 28, 2016, 11:36 AM
Jan 2016

I swear I just can't keep it straight...

Townhall & Ed Rogers.--are not only acceptable sources now, they're defended and their opinions are on point! YAY!

Dana Millbank and Joan Walsh--basically suck and their their opinions aren't worth a tinkers damn. Got it.

We don't have to agree on candidates but I thought we were all on board with keeping right wing trash out of our house.


 

LittleBlue

(10,362 posts)
52. I doubt it. She wins Iowa and for me, she's probably won the nomination
Thu Jan 28, 2016, 04:49 PM
Jan 2016

Bernie has to win NH (looking likely) and Iowa, IMHO. The latter is statistically in favor of Hillary.

Barring something like an indictment, I think an Iowa win gives her what she needs to win the nomination. She's a truly awful campaigner but her name recognition alone will carry her.

If he doesn't make it, not attacking Clinton was his fatal error.

 

workinclasszero

(28,270 posts)
53. Lies and propaganda
Thu Jan 28, 2016, 04:56 PM
Jan 2016

How's Bern gonna do from SC through super tuesday?

That's where Hillary locks up the nomination.

 

libdem4life

(13,877 posts)
54. For the life of me, I can't see what's untrue about this summation...
Thu Jan 28, 2016, 05:01 PM
Jan 2016

Clinton’s four problems are obvious:

1. Her performance as a candidate, (No rallies, mostly meting with rich donors...what "little people"?)

2. her opponent’s viability, (He's caught up and passing her)

3. a growing scandal that could lead to the indictment of the former first lady and possibly a few of her closest aides, (this is not rhetoric...it is deadly serious, even though Bernie tried to take it off the table. The FBI does not agree. Seems politics, i.e. the Justice Department, is trying to get it put off a few weeks, or maybe they haven't finished with the wiped servers of her top staff)

4. the rejection of her legitimacy as a feminist leader. (the unfortunate behavior of her husband ... many thinking she stayed for the power ... has a lot to do with this and her disdain for the poor and underemployed...heavily populated by women...)

She has these problems for a long time...all except the surprising #2 on the list.

 
55. Obamacare is a "calamity" according to the same Republican source
Thu Jan 28, 2016, 05:09 PM
Jan 2016

Obamacare is a "calamity" according to the same source, Republican partisan plutocrat Ed Rogers, who built his career kissing the ass of Haley Barbour.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/post-partisan/wp/2015/10/20/the-insiders-the-obamacare-calamity-cant-be-swept-under-the-rug/

Only a Republican troll would start a post with favorable review of an Ed Rogers article.

DanTex

(20,709 posts)
56. The fact that you tried to piggy-back on WP's reputation, and disguise the fact that
Thu Jan 28, 2016, 06:49 PM
Jan 2016

the writer is right-winger Ed Rogers, is particularly ironic given that less than 24 hours later, the actual Washington Post editorial board wrote a critical piece about Bernie, and now WP is under the bus.

Lorien

(31,935 posts)
57. Note that I made NO COMMENTS pro or con about this article
Fri Jan 29, 2016, 02:15 AM
Jan 2016

So stuff your attack the messenger bullshit and deal with the issues. If you disagree with it (and I do disagree with portions of it) then give us specifics. Whining and personal attacks alone do not a valid argument make.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»WaPo: Hillary Clinton’s d...