BEFORE Citizens United what average Americans wanted have a near zero impact upon public policy.
A study published in the fall of 2014 by Princeton professor Martin Gilens and Northwesterns Benjamin Page reveals the scale of the challenge.
Gilens and Page analyzed 1,799 policy issues in detail, determining the relative influence on them of economic elites, business groups, mass-based interest groups, and average citizens.
Their conclusion: The preferences of the average American appear to have only a minuscule, near-zero, statistically nonsignificant impact upon public policy.
Instead, lawmakers respond to the moneyed interests those with the most lobbying prowess and deepest pockets to bankroll campaigns.
Its sobering that Gilens and Pages data come from the period 1981 to 2002, before the Supreme Court opened the floodgates to big money in its Citizens United and McCutcheon decisions. Their study also predated the advent of super PACs and dark money, and even the Wall Street bailout.
If average Americans had a near-zero impact on public policy then, their impact is now zero.
http://robertreich.org/post/138036377515