2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumNY Post Pushes Dubious Claim That Clinton Aides Improperly Circumvented Email Classification System
In his January 24 report, Paul Sperry, a visiting media fellow at the right-wing Hoover Institution, reported that "former State Department security officials" say that the Federal Bureau of Investigations (FBI) is "investigating whether members of Hillary Clinton's inner circle 'cut and pasted' material from the government's classified network so that it could be sent to her private e-mail address." Sperry gave no indication how the unnamed former officials would have access to information about FBI investigations.
Citing no sources at all, Sperry claimed that the FBI is "zeroing in on" former Clinton State Department aides Cheryl Mills, Huma Abedin, and Jake Sullivan for their alleged involvement in improperly circumventing government classification systems.
The bulk of Sperry's piece consists of speculation from retired State Department Diplomatic Security agent Ray Fournier, who reportedly "says it's clear from some of the classified e-mails made public that someone on Clinton's staff essentially 'cut and pasted' content from classified cables into the messages sent to her." Fournier theorizes that "Clinton's staff would have simply retyped classified information from the systems into the non-classified system or taken a screen shot of the classified document"; he concludes, "either way, it's totally illegal."
http://mediamatters.org/blog/2016/01/24/ny-post-pushes-dubious-claim-that-clinton-aides/208136
Iliyah
(25,111 posts)Thank the heavens Media Matters is on it.
grasswire
(50,130 posts)Did you not know that?
riversedge
(70,197 posts)are to be dissed and demeaned. Lets try to remember that media matters has always worked for the truth. --primarily against Fox and the RW.
grasswire
(50,130 posts)Since David Brock has put his thumb on the scale, I can no longer trust what MM might report regarding polilticians and elections and anything that might affect Democrats.
I have defended Brock for many years. No more.
murielm99
(30,735 posts)Never mind that it has been a go-to source on DU for years.
leveymg
(36,418 posts)MMFA. Also noted that the substance of this article, similar to others published in recent days, isn't challenged or disproved by any facts.
grasswire
(50,130 posts)I used to have a lot of respect for that watchdog site, until he started lying for Hillary.
EdwardBernays
(3,343 posts)Is run by David Brock and has long held ties to Hillary's campaign chairman... He even gave them their first office space. Hillary was also an official advisor to Media Matters.
grasswire
(50,130 posts)Very sad.
Recursion
(56,582 posts)It's an example of how broken and Byzantine our classification system is. In the Marines we had interview notes that were unclass in their notebooks but the very same text was classified when entered into the company's laptop. We still in 2016 have a classification system that is primarily about documents rather than the information they contain.
RiverLover
(7,830 posts)The Hill
Former AG: Clinton should be charged over classified emails
http://thehill.com/policy/national-security/266691-former-ag-charge-clinton-for-mishandling-classified-docs
In his op-ed, Mukasey points to those revelations as well as indications that Clintons staffers rejected the idea of a State Department-run email address and that she asked an aide to send a secure fax via email.
As the number of disclosed classified messages from Mrs. Clintons server has climbed above 1,300, her explanations have come to look increasingly improvisational and contrived, he wrote.