2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumHillary Clinton Defends Speaking Fees Paid by Wall Street Firms
Hillary Clinton defended her paid speeches to Wall Street firms, rejecting the idea that the millions of dollars she earned in fees would sway her views on financial firms.
On the heels of repeated attacks from Senator Bernie Sanders, who has seized on the fees to portray Mrs. Clinton as out of touch with ordinary Iowans and other voters, Mrs. Clinton gave an interview this week in Iowa to The Des Moines Register, saying she had no regrets. Anybody who thinks they can buy me doesnt know me, Mrs. Clinton said, in the article published Friday.
She described her paid speaking which spanned events for financial firms and a number of other trade associations and businesses, which typically paid fees of around $225,000 per speech as a chance for business leaders to hear about her views on world events.
What they were interested in were my views on what was going on in the world, Mrs. Clinton said. And whether youre in health care, or you sell automobiles, or youre in banking theres a lot of interest in getting advice and views about what you think is happening in the world.
http://www.nytimes.com/politics/first-draft/2016/01/22/hillary-clinton-defends-speaking-fees-paid-by-wall-street-firms/
thereismore
(13,326 posts)hootinholler
(26,449 posts)Might it be because she already agrees with them? She wouldn't have to change her views then.
Either way ain't good.
thereismore
(13,326 posts)CorporatistNation
(2,546 posts)She is megalomaniacal in her opinion of herself! Canned Speech=$225K! Nice... Nothing owed to anybody... Just pop bu have a little lunch, talk for an hour and ... CA4H THE EFFING CHECK! She thinks that we are all morons... Which is even worse...
daleanime
(17,796 posts)then Hillary is admitting that she's in the wrong on this. That's refreshingly honest coming from her.
Katashi_itto
(10,175 posts)Fast Walker 52
(7,723 posts)retrowire
(10,345 posts)with all that money, and as easy as it was for her to earn it... we can't have Medicare for All?
Fast Walker 52
(7,723 posts)CharlotteVale
(2,717 posts)closeupready
(29,503 posts)What a joke.
Mnpaul
(3,655 posts)working as a historian for Freddie Mac. Yeah, not buying this one either.
Fast Walker 52
(7,723 posts)doing it. And how many times do they really need to hear her views?
sadoldgirl
(3,431 posts)global1
(26,003 posts)Last edited Sat Jan 23, 2016, 12:45 AM - Edit history (1)
she needs to be pressed on this. I think as an American that will have to make a voting decision that I have the right to know whether she is saying one thing to us 99%er's and another thing to the 1%er's.
Voice for Peace
(13,141 posts)Absolutely
arcane1
(38,613 posts)With Dems like these...
Indepatriot
(1,253 posts)Kentucky Fried Jesus does she think we're all fucking stupid?
Katashi_itto
(10,175 posts)retrowire
(10,345 posts)cali
(114,904 posts)Live and Learn
(12,769 posts)nc4bo
(17,651 posts)NorthCarolina
(11,197 posts)That's how DC operates. Hillary is no different than just about every legislator in DC save for very few. The denial is silly. Companies don't fork over millions to ANY politician just because they want to hear their "world views". Hillary camp must think the entire country has the mental acuity of a two year old.
7wo7rees
(5,128 posts)Dems to Win
(2,161 posts)She made those speeches knowing she was going to be running for Prez, knowing it would be an enormous turn-off to many members of the 99%.
Dems will have a hard time winning without the enthusiastic support of the OWS young people. It's just one of the reasons I'm supporting Bernie.
Uncle Joe
(60,401 posts)shelling out $225,000.
Do these business leaders have no T.V. no Internet, no connections to government?
She described her paid speaking which spanned events for financial firms and a number of other trade associations and businesses, which typically paid fees of around $225,000 per speech as a chance for business leaders to hear about her views on world events.
Thanks for the thread, Katashi_itto.
thesquanderer
(12,430 posts)Just proves these firms have too much cash lying around.
WillyT
(72,631 posts)EndElectoral
(4,213 posts)If they cant' buy you why are the transcripts of those speeches not for the public to view?
FlatBaroque
(3,160 posts)retrowire
(10,345 posts)And the answer is basically, "People paid me for my advice and views."
fuck my life. *facepalm*
Armstead
(47,803 posts)pangaia
(24,324 posts)Well, why didn't you just send them a WORD DOC?
Wilms
(26,795 posts)elias49
(4,259 posts)catnhatnh
(8,976 posts)and a great example of the invisible hand of the free market. Just the other day a guy said to me "Penny for your thoughts?" and I took it...
Jefferson23
(30,099 posts)Frank-Dodd did not go far enough, so she may want to stop saying
that WS can't and hasn't bought influence..the record says otherwise.
I don't now why Sanders voted yes on the deregulation bill Clinton
keeps talking about..but he should if he hasn't already get to it and
explain it.
That act was tucked in a 11,000 page report and he may have screwed up
and not read it. Bill Clinton at the time was saying to the press he wasn't
for deregulation but the truth is now known he was lobbying for it behind
the scenes.
tokenlib
(4,186 posts)Wall Street and Hillary..the gift that keeps on giving....
wavesofeuphoria
(525 posts)She is running for the Dem nomination. As a voter, shouldnt I hear her view of the world?
Release transcripts of these speeches, before Iowa.
While at it, release your damned climate plan, too.