Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

Trajan

(19,089 posts)
Sun Jul 8, 2012, 12:34 PM Jul 2012

WP: Dawkins: Don’t need God to be good … or generous

http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/guest-voices/post/dawkins-dont-need-god-to-be-good--or-generous/2012/07/06/gJQA4fvLSW_blog.html?tid=pm_national_pop

Dawkins: Don’t need God to be good … or generous

Freethinkers, atheists, agnostics, secular humanists – whatever name non-believers go under, are not America’s most popular minority. They are also, not a small minority. According to Gallup, in 2011, and Pew in 2012, they comfortably outnumber Mormons, Muslims, Jews, Hindus and Buddhists all put together. One reason for our unpopularity is the widespread belief that you need God in order to be good. Going along with that misconception is further belief that atheists are less generous than religious people, less philanthropic, less likely to donate to charity. Even if that were the case it would, of course, have no bearing on the truth of religious beliefs.

I would hypothesize that the difference in giving between the religion and nonreligious is negligible if you only count donations to pure charity and discount donations to atheist advocacy organizations, or to churches (including tithes) and “charities” that unscrupulously use their resources to proselytize rather than bestow real charitable benefits.

Incidentally, because churches are automatically classified as charities for taxation purposes is a disgrace. Nobody denies that some churches do charitable work. But that doesn’t mean that any organization should automatically qualify for tax-free status simply by calling itself a church. Each church organization separately should make the case that it does charitable work, just as anybody else has to when seeking tax exemption.

-snip-

2 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
WP: Dawkins: Don’t need God to be good … or generous (Original Post) Trajan Jul 2012 OP
Tithing is a tax mainly for the purpose of maintenance of the church and staff. LiberalFighter Jul 2012 #1
Since a church is tax exempt, isn't tithing really an anti-tax? Kennah Jul 2012 #2

LiberalFighter

(50,880 posts)
1. Tithing is a tax mainly for the purpose of maintenance of the church and staff.
Sun Jul 8, 2012, 12:50 PM
Jul 2012

There should be an accounting determining the usage of contributions showing how much stays with the church and how much is used for real charitable purposes.

Back in the early days with the Colonies and shortly after the Constitution there were states that tax everyone for the church and then handed the funds over to the approved church. Even if they were not members of the church or didn't attend church.

Latest Discussions»Alliance Forums»Atheists & Agnostics»WP: Dawkins: Don’t need G...