Thu Mar 28, 2013, 07:56 PM
Lordquinton (7,879 posts)
If an Atheist is judged
By the actions of a few (Christopher Hitchens, misinterpretation of Dawkins, etc) then why is is not OK for Christians to be judged by the actions of, say Ray Comfort and Kirk Cameron (though there are multitudes to choose from).
Just a thought that came to me in the shower.
|
10 replies, 1677 views
![]() |
Author | Time | Post |
![]() |
Lordquinton | Mar 2013 | OP |
skepticscott | Mar 2013 | #1 | |
Curmudgeoness | Mar 2013 | #2 | |
Phillip McCleod | Mar 2013 | #3 | |
Curmudgeoness | Mar 2013 | #4 | |
Phillip McCleod | Mar 2013 | #5 | |
Curmudgeoness | Mar 2013 | #6 | |
Phillip McCleod | Mar 2013 | #7 | |
Trajan | Mar 2013 | #8 | |
Lordquinton | Mar 2013 | #9 | |
Rob H. | Mar 2013 | #10 |
Response to Lordquinton (Original post)
Thu Mar 28, 2013, 08:27 PM
skepticscott (13,029 posts)
1. Because atheists were judged
Before anyone ever heard of Dawkins or Hitchens...
|
Response to Lordquinton (Original post)
Thu Mar 28, 2013, 08:35 PM
Curmudgeoness (18,219 posts)
2. The minority opinion is always stifled.
Besides that, it is easier to bully the minority than to pick fights with the majority.
It is a slow process to gain acceptable for a minority, so we have a long way to go. |
Response to Curmudgeoness (Reply #2)
Thu Mar 28, 2013, 11:55 PM
Phillip McCleod (1,837 posts)
3. that's a fact and a problem.
b/c i'm not feeling patient, again.
maybe i should meditate more. i find 'quiet mind' practice heps put things in perspective. like standing on a mountaintop or on the white cliffs of dover for a few minutes. me 'n my big mouth. |
Response to Phillip McCleod (Reply #3)
Fri Mar 29, 2013, 05:30 PM
Curmudgeoness (18,219 posts)
4. We could probably all use more mountain top views
and less religion discussions. Or we should just get drunk.
![]() |
Response to Curmudgeoness (Reply #4)
Fri Mar 29, 2013, 05:35 PM
Phillip McCleod (1,837 posts)
5. end of the workaday and ima gonna tie one on.
i'll raise my glass to all you heathens on this terrible friday.
|
Response to Phillip McCleod (Reply #5)
Fri Mar 29, 2013, 05:43 PM
Curmudgeoness (18,219 posts)
6. Just don't go baiting Christians while you are drunk. nt
Response to Curmudgeoness (Reply #6)
Fri Mar 29, 2013, 09:19 PM
Phillip McCleod (1,837 posts)
7. very good advice which i'd best keep in mind.
it being 'good' friday n'all.
|
Response to Lordquinton (Original post)
Sat Mar 30, 2013, 07:08 PM
Trajan (19,089 posts)
8. When I think of possible bifurcation fallacies of Theist/Atheist subjects ...
The false dilemma between Hitchens\Dawkins vs. Comfort\Cameron falls somewhere near last on my list .....
|
Response to Trajan (Reply #8)
Sat Mar 30, 2013, 07:42 PM
Lordquinton (7,879 posts)
9. It was merely an example
I have seem many times "Well Dawkins said this, so I'm gonna assume all atheists are like it" and they then flip out when you say something like "Well, you claim you're a staunch catholic, so I'm gonna question your views on x" you're being bigoted.
I was thinking the specific Dawkins/Comfort duality because both are taken out of context, and neither represent all Atheists/Christians. Kinda pointing out how silly it would be for them to say "Well, I heard Dawkins said X so all atheists are assholes" (not quite an actual quote) Maybe if they got compared in an equally bizarre manner it would seep in. |
Response to Lordquinton (Original post)
Sat Mar 30, 2013, 09:59 PM
Rob H. (5,051 posts)
10. Because Comfort and Cameron aren't True Christians™, silly
![]() |