Science
Related: About this forumDinosaur find: Velociraptor ancestor was 'winged dragon'
By Victoria Gill
Scientists have discovered a winged dinosaur - an ancestor of the velociraptor - that they say was on the cusp of becoming a bird.
The 6ft 6in (2m) creature was almost perfectly preserved in limestone, thanks to a volcanic eruption that had buried it in north-east China.
And the 125-million year-old fossil suggests many other dinosaurs, including velociraptors, would have looked like "big, fluffy killer birds".
But it is unlikely that it could fly.
more
http://www.bbc.com/news/science-environment-33510288
DetlefK
(16,423 posts)The colors in the artist's depiction are incorrect. So far, the only identified colors on dinosaur-feathers are white, shades of grey, black and shades of brown.
TeeYiYi
(8,028 posts)That's a ceremonial dinosaur headdress covering the dinosaur's embarrassing gray feathers. Duh.
TYY
bvf
(6,604 posts)LOL!
starroute
(12,977 posts)The scientists are still arguing about the technical end of the reconstructions. But one of the strongest arguments is that non-flying dinosaurs would most likely have had feathers for purposes of display -- and that suggests they were every bit as colorful as present-day birds.
See for example http://motherboard.vice.com/read/what-colors-were-dinosaur-feathers
DetlefK
(16,423 posts)That's like finding the damaged remains of a black&white TV and deducing that it was capable of showing colors because it was clearly used to show realistic images.
starroute
(12,977 posts)... with the glass lenses all knocked out out and concluding that it had three identical bulbs that differed only in their positions.
Feathers exist today. In the majority of birds, they are brightly colored and elaborately patterned and serve purposes of display as well as flight and insulation. And concluding that the ancestors of birds were limited to shades of black, white, and brown -- even though they couldn't fly and in many cases had no apparent need for insulation -- seems like prioritizing science over common sense.
DetlefK
(16,423 posts)Common sense tells us that the world is flat, that we are at the center of the universe, that we are God's chosen master-race with the rest of creation at our discretion to use and destroy as we see fit, that matter has no quantum-nature, that light-speed is infinite, that wearing a totem gives us its qualities...
There's a difference between common sense and logical thinking.
HereSince1628
(36,063 posts)I don't really know which is why I'm asking.
I do know that some color in bird feathers, particularly blue, isn't due to pigment but a consequence of structure.
Does the fossil evidence reveal enough information across enough fossils to preclude structural colors or is that a conservative conclusion based on a lack of evidence for structural color in the limited samples available?
DetlefK
(16,423 posts)Light creates a plasmon-resonance in the nanostructure which in turn creates light of a specific color.
Well, I found was this:
http://www.jsg.utexas.edu/news/2012/03/dinosaur-feathers-evolved-to-attract-mates/
"Information on feather color of a variety of dinosaurs has recently come to light, since the first color map of an extinct dinosaur showed black and white spangles, red coloration and gray body color in a species called Anchiornis in 2010."
HereSince1628
(36,063 posts)within the feather barbules that are responsible for optical phenomena such as iridescence and also blue color of bird feathers.
AlbertCat
(17,505 posts)..... more frightening than Spielberg's.
enlightenment
(8,830 posts)My grandmother had a parrot that reminds me of that dinosaur. She called him Petey. His favorite line was "Petey wants a finger!"
He was completely serious about that.
trusty elf
(7,385 posts)[img][/img]
KamaAina
(78,249 posts)for a wider audience.
Response to n2doc (Original post)
cstanleytech This message was self-deleted by its author.