Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

DainBramaged

(39,191 posts)
Fri Jul 19, 2013, 10:09 PM Jul 2013

Confirmed: F-1 engine salvaged from ocean floor is from Apollo 11 rocket

Back in March, we reported on Amazon.com founder Jeff Bezos' company Bezos Expeditions, which raised a significant amount of Saturn V F-1 engine components from the floor of the Atlantic ocean. Bezos Expeditions suspected that many of the components they had recovered belonged to not just any Saturn V, but to SA-506—the rocket that carried three men to humankind's first moon landing in July of 1969.

In a blog post this morning, Bezos Expeditions confirmed that careful analysis has revealed a faintly visible serial number stamped on several parts of one of the recovered thrust chambers. That serial number—2044—corresponds with F-1 engine number F-6044, which was installed in the center position as engine #5 in SA-506.

Confirmed: F-1 engine salvaged from ocean floor is from Apollo 11 rocket
Timely discovery coincides with 44th anniversary of first lunar landing tomorrow.
by Lee Hutchinson - July 19 2013, 1:25pm EDT

Space54 Back in March, we reported on Amazon.com founder Jeff Bezos' company Bezos Expeditions, which raised a significant amount of Saturn V F-1 engine components from the floor of the Atlantic ocean. Bezos Expeditions suspected that many of the components they had recovered belonged to not just any Saturn V, but to SA-506—the rocket that carried three men to humankind's first moon landing in July of 1969.

In a blog post this morning, Bezos Expeditions confirmed that careful analysis has revealed a faintly visible serial number stamped on several parts of one of the recovered thrust chambers. That serial number—2044—corresponds with F-1 engine number F-6044, which was installed in the center position as engine #5 in SA-506.



Bezos ExpeditionsRecovery of anything from three miles beneath the ocean's surface is a significant achievement, of course, but the very rocket engines that flew humans to their first lunar landing are obviously of particular historical importance. Bezos and his company plan to restore the components to construct at least one museum-quality engine for public display.

The F-1 remains a monumental technical achievement, and one that is still being studied today. Each of the Saturn V's first stage F-1 engines gulped one ton of fuel and two tons of oxidizer per second, and they produced a staggering 1.5 million pounds of thrust. At peak thrust, the Saturn V's five F-1 engines together produced the equivalent of 60 gigawatts of energy—roughly equal to the peak electricity demand of the entire United Kingdom.

http://arstechnica.com/science/2013/07/confirmed-f-1-engine-salvaged-from-ocean-floor-is-from-apollo-11-rocket/

8 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Confirmed: F-1 engine salvaged from ocean floor is from Apollo 11 rocket (Original Post) DainBramaged Jul 2013 OP
It is staggering how much power these things produced... awoke_in_2003 Jul 2013 #1
Probably DainBramaged Jul 2013 #2
Very true... awoke_in_2003 Jul 2013 #3
The Russians were willing to take big risks. But they had technological and organizational hurdles Warren DeMontague Jul 2013 #5
The Soviets took many risks muriel_volestrangler Jul 2013 #8
That the answer is only "probably" is a shame. (NT) Heywood J Jul 2013 #6
True, science is a scary thing to Republicans DainBramaged Jul 2013 #7
Oh, so now Amazon.com is part of the conspiracy, too? Wednesdays Jul 2013 #4

DainBramaged

(39,191 posts)
2. Probably
Fri Jul 19, 2013, 10:38 PM
Jul 2013

but I think solid fuels are much safer now. How we avoided more accidents during the era astoishes me.

Warren DeMontague

(80,708 posts)
5. The Russians were willing to take big risks. But they had technological and organizational hurdles
Sat Jul 20, 2013, 12:28 AM
Jul 2013

For one, korolev and the other guy - glushko? Didnt get along or work well together, so in essence they were running two parallel programs. And while korolev was a genius on the order of von braun, certainly, he died at an inopportune moment for the russian program.

And the russians never made the technological advances needed beyond their early lead in heavy lifting capability. Gemini was a far more advanced craft than anything they put into orbit until the soyuz came into its own.



muriel_volestrangler

(101,307 posts)
8. The Soviets took many risks
Sat Jul 20, 2013, 02:08 PM
Jul 2013

That picture Warren put above is the N1 rocket - which they hoped to send to the Moon.



http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/N1_%28rocket%29

4 flights:

February 21, 1969: The rocket exploded at 12,200 m altitude, 69 seconds after liftoff

July 3, 1969: 5-9 seconds after liftoff at 150-200 meters above the pad, a loose bolt was ingested into an oxygen pump, which exploded. [9] After detecting the inoperative fuel pump, the automatic engine control shut off 29 of 30 engines, which caused the rocket to fall. The rocket exploded 23 seconds after shutting off the engines, destroying the rocket and launch tower.[10] The destroyed complex was photographed by American satellites, disclosing that the Soviet Union was building a Moon rocket.[8] The rescue system saved the dummy spacecraft again. After this flight, fuel filters were installed in later models.[8]It also took 18 months to rebuild the launch pad and delayed launches. This is one of the largest artificial non-nuclear explosions in human history.

June 26, 1971: the vehicle was destroyed 51 seconds after liftoff at 1 km altitude

November 23, 1972: the engines ran for 106.93 seconds after which pogo oscillation of the first stage (a problem also encountered on the US Saturn V second and eighth flights, but ultimately solved) caused engine cutoff at 40 km altitude; a programmed shutdown of some of the engines to prevent over-stressing of the structure led to an explosion of the oxygen pump on engine number 4.[8] The vehicle disintegrated.

And that was after earlier disasters, like:

The Nedelin catastrophe or Nedelin disaster was a launch pad accident which occurred on 24 October 1960 at Baikonur test range (of which Baikonur Cosmodrome is a part), during the development of the Soviet ICBM R-16. As a prototype of the missile was being prepared for a test flight, an explosion occurred when second stage engines ignited accidentally, killing many military and technical personnel working on the preparations. Despite the magnitude of the disaster, news of it was completely blanketed out for many years and the Soviet government did not acknowledge the event until 1989. The disaster is named after Air Marshal Mitrofan Nedelin (Russian: Митрофан Иванович Неделин , who was killed in the explosion. As commanding officer of the Soviet Union's Strategic Rocket Forces, Nedelin was head of the R-16 development program.

On 23 October, the prototype R-16 was installed on launching pad 41 (Russian: ТП-41, техническая позиция 41) awaiting final tests before its firing. The missile was over 30 m long, 3.0 m in diameter and had a launch weight of 141 tons. The rocket was fueled with Devil's Venom — hypergolic UDMH-nitric acid with dinitrogen tetroxide — which was used because of the high boiling temperatures and hence storability of the fuel and oxidizer despite being extremely corrosive and toxic. These risks were accounted for in the safety requirements of the launch procedures, but Nedelin's insistence on performing tests before November 7th (anniversary of the Bolshevik Revolution) resulted in extreme schedule pressure, with numerous safety procedures being ignored in order to economize time.

A short circuit in the replaced main sequencer caused the second stage engines, while being tested before launch, to fire inadvertently. This detonated the first-stage fuel tanks directly below, destroying the missile in an enormous explosion. Automatically activated cameras set around the launching pad filmed the explosion. People near the rocket were instantly incinerated; those farther away were burned to death or poisoned by the toxic fuel component vapors. Andrei Sakharov described many details—as soon as the engines were fired, most of the personnel there ran to the perimeter but were trapped inside the security fence and then engulfed in the fireball of burning fuel. The resultant explosion incinerated Nedelin, a top aide, the USSR's top missile guidance designer, and seventy-one other officers and engineers.[2] Missile designer Mikhail Yangel and test range commanding officer survived only because they had left to smoke a cigarette behind a bunker a few hundred yards away.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nedelin_catastrophe

Latest Discussions»Culture Forums»Science»Confirmed: F-1 engine sal...