Religion
Related: About this forumA Global Bill of Rights
Here's something the UN should do. Craft a universal Bill of Rights. Individual countries would not be required to adopt them, but those that don't should be regarded as backwards and detrimental to world peace. Eventually, peer pressure should bring them in line.
A. Freedom of speech
B. Religious freedom. No apostasy laws
C. Freedom of self. No anti LGBT laws
D. Racial and Sexual equality
Of course there could be more, but let's keep it simple. I've tried to limit it to the individual. Are there other issues to consider?
AtheistCrusader
(33,982 posts)I'm fond of some of our other rights, trial by jury of peers, equal protection under the law, barring unreasonable search and seizure, due process, etc.
Cartoonist
(7,309 posts)But like I said, let's start out with the basics.
Also, some of those are too wordy and subject to interpretation. We have them in this country but don't always find them observed or applied equally.
AtheistCrusader
(33,982 posts)But we don't have them because they are enforced perfectly. We have them for the purpose of attaining that goal.
I would include the 2nd amendment as well, but that is going to be a contentious issue. I see the means of self-defense as a fundamental right of any living creature, and as a tool-using mammal, it's high on my list. Not so high for others. I know some that prefer the UK's right set, they don't protect our access to arms, and that's desirable to some, but they don't protect freedom of speech like we do either. I don't think any one nation has ever nailed it, stem to stern.
A higher priority for me would be that I'd like to codify a right around reproductive freedom, in line with your item on sexual identity/freedom of self.
Yorktown
(2,884 posts)A. Freedom of speech. No blasphemy laws
B. Religious freedom. No apostasy laws
C. Freedom of self. No anti-LGBT or adultery laws.
D. Racial and Sexual equality. No slavery.
Cartoonist
(7,309 posts)I really hate that this is still going on.
muriel_volestrangler
(101,265 posts)...
Article 2.
Everyone is entitled to all the rights and freedoms set forth in this Declaration, without distinction of any kind, such as race, colour, sex, language, religion, political or other opinion, national or social origin, property, birth or other status. Furthermore, no distinction shall be made on the basis of the political, jurisdictional or international status of the country or territory to which a person belongs, whether it be independent, trust, non-self-governing or under any other limitation of sovereignty.
...
Article 18.
Everyone has the right to freedom of thought, conscience and religion; this right includes freedom to change his religion or belief, and freedom, either alone or in community with others and in public or private, to manifest his religion or belief in teaching, practice, worship and observance.
Article 19.
Everyone has the right to freedom of opinion and expression; this right includes freedom to hold opinions without interference and to seek, receive and impart information and ideas through any media and regardless of frontiers.
http://www.un.org/en/universal-declaration-human-rights/
Nothing in there about LGBT rights, which isn't a surprise for something that old, so it could do with updating. But I think this shows that peer pressure doesn't have that much effect on governments.
Cartoonist
(7,309 posts)At least 19 articles with too many words. Small wonder that it went into the circular file.
Who signed on to it? What kind of support did it receive?
muriel_volestrangler
(101,265 posts)while the USSR and puppet governments, apartheid South Africa, and Saudi Arabia, didn't.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Universal_Declaration_of_Human_Rights#Adoption
It was highly influential in the drafting of the European Convention on Human Rights, which governs basic human rights in nearly all European countries - for instance, British courts (or the European court which acts as the final court of appeal) can find a British law to be in contravention of it, which means the government has to rewrite the law.