Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Religion
Related: About this forumSex offenders sue, cite Indiana's religious objections law
Source: Associated Press
Sex offenders sue, cite Indiana's religious objections law
By TOM DAVIES
2 hours ago
INDIANAPOLIS (AP) A lawsuit filed on behalf of two registered sex offenders cites Indiana's new religious objections law in arguing they've been wrongly prohibited from worshipping at churches that have schools on the same property.
The American Civil Liberties Union of Indiana filed the lawsuit Wednesday on behalf of two unnamed sex offenders, one of whom belongs to a Fort Wayne church and another who has attended an Elkhart church.
The lawsuit claims that a new state law banning many sex offenders from going onto school property at any time presents an unjustified burden on the men's religious liberties under the Religious Freedom Restoration Act.
Ken Falk, the ACLU of Indiana's legal director, called the additional sex offender restrictions absurd.
"The Legislature passes a law which says sex offenders cannot go into schools and it is being applied to people who are going to church or other religious observances during a time that there's no school in session," Falk said. "The law prohibits them from walking on that property it's a felony to do so."
[font size=1]-snip-[/font]
By TOM DAVIES
2 hours ago
INDIANAPOLIS (AP) A lawsuit filed on behalf of two registered sex offenders cites Indiana's new religious objections law in arguing they've been wrongly prohibited from worshipping at churches that have schools on the same property.
The American Civil Liberties Union of Indiana filed the lawsuit Wednesday on behalf of two unnamed sex offenders, one of whom belongs to a Fort Wayne church and another who has attended an Elkhart church.
The lawsuit claims that a new state law banning many sex offenders from going onto school property at any time presents an unjustified burden on the men's religious liberties under the Religious Freedom Restoration Act.
Ken Falk, the ACLU of Indiana's legal director, called the additional sex offender restrictions absurd.
"The Legislature passes a law which says sex offenders cannot go into schools and it is being applied to people who are going to church or other religious observances during a time that there's no school in session," Falk said. "The law prohibits them from walking on that property it's a felony to do so."
[font size=1]-snip-[/font]
Read more: http://news.yahoo.com/sex-offenders-sue-cite-indianas-religious-objections-law-215311563.html
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
3 replies, 723 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (0)
ReplyReply to this post
3 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Sex offenders sue, cite Indiana's religious objections law (Original Post)
Eugene
Jul 2015
OP
The more you tighten your grip, the more star systems will slip through your fingers.
AtheistCrusader
Jul 2015
#1
AtheistCrusader
(33,982 posts)1. The more you tighten your grip, the more star systems will slip through your fingers.
They just don't understand they can't shelter their religious bigotry with legal statutes without giving cover to all sorts of shenanigans.
Because religion isn't unique, special, or important in any way that can be distinguished from an opinion.
longship
(40,416 posts)2. Well put, AC.
You've hit the crux of their argument. Like most things, absolute ideologies have blow back.
cbayer
(146,218 posts)3. Very interesting cases.
I think the ACLU has a good position here. If the school is not in session, why should they be restricted from the property?