Should religion be considered the property of conservative believers if it turns out that they

[Htom Sirveaux]

constitute a majority of religious people?

[hrmjustin]

1. No.

[cbayer]

2. No.

[Jackpine Radical]

3. I suppos if they ever get powerful enough for long enough,

they can always amend the Constitution to fashion whatever they want--like a theocracy, for example.

[On the Road]

4. If Relilgion is Not Being Conceded to the Conservatives,

the current scorched-earth policy might turn out to be unwise.

[safeinOhio]

5. They, really don't agree among themselves.

It is really easy to bring up their differences and keep them aware of them.

[okasha]

6. No.

And how are you defining "majority of religious people?" For that matter, what kind of "conservative" are you referring to?

[trotsky]

7. The "property"? What does that even mean? n/t

[AtheistCrusader]

8. I'm guessing Trademark or IP law angle here.