Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

rug

(82,333 posts)
Tue Sep 16, 2014, 03:25 PM Sep 2014

10 religious leaders you may not know about

Tuesday, September 16, 2014
Compiled by Herb Scribner

Pope Francis has been America’s darling for more than a year now.

Most American Catholics (68 percent) approve of the pope, according to CBS News. And he’s even reached the hearts of an Argentinean soccer team that wants to name its new stadium after him, BBC News reported.

Similarly, the Dalai Lama has been in the news, saying in not so many words that he thinks he should be the last Dalai Lama, and that the Buddhist religion should change once he’s gone, The Wall Street Journal reported.

But these are just two religious leaders of the more than 4,000 religions that make up the world’s spiritual environment. With that, here’s a look at some of the religious leaders you may not know about.

http://national.deseretnews.com/article/2349/10-religious-leaders-you-may-not-know-about.html

The article profiles leaders in UU, Scientology, Evangelicals, Druze, Judaism, Falun Gong, Thai Buddhism, Bahai, Jedism - and Sam Harris.

26 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
10 religious leaders you may not know about (Original Post) rug Sep 2014 OP
Two clear omissions underpants Sep 2014 #1
I think Satanism was slighted. rug Sep 2014 #3
Yes underpants Sep 2014 #5
I knew it! rug Sep 2014 #6
BTW "Godless believers"??? underpants Sep 2014 #7
It brings up too many memories of Ledger. rug Sep 2014 #8
I never thought Atheism or Sientology was a religion. demosincebirth Sep 2014 #2
Atheism isn't but Scientology meets the objective criteria. rug Sep 2014 #4
"Open wallet, look the other way"? AtheistCrusader Sep 2014 #9
That's an unkind thing to say about Sam. rug Sep 2014 #10
I was speculating about 'objective criteria'. AtheistCrusader Sep 2014 #11
Cult of personality. LiberalAndProud Sep 2014 #13
Less so in this venue but AtheistCrusader Sep 2014 #14
We all take shortcuts. LiberalAndProud Sep 2014 #15
Oh, I absolutely do it too. AtheistCrusader Sep 2014 #16
That linked site has popup scripts on exit, just FYI. AtheistCrusader Sep 2014 #12
What's a popup script? A popup ad? rug Sep 2014 #17
Basically it's a script that runs when you try to exit a web page. AtheistCrusader Sep 2014 #18
I just got the message when I exited this time. rug Sep 2014 #19
Something is wrong with one of their advertisers. AtheistCrusader Sep 2014 #20
Do you have some kind of software tracking? That post is impresssive as hell. rug Sep 2014 #21
No, not at all. You can get to that stuff in most or all browsers. AtheistCrusader Sep 2014 #22
Thanks for that info. I have to look into it. rug Sep 2014 #23
It's funny, because we have one thing on our side. Visibility. AtheistCrusader Sep 2014 #24
Three days later... AtheistCrusader Sep 2014 #25
I'm glad somebody's keeping an eye on this. rug Sep 2014 #26

underpants

(182,788 posts)
5. Yes
Tue Sep 16, 2014, 03:39 PM
Sep 2014

The Waffalabists are heavily funded by the Saudi Royals. Sort of their "weird cousins" if you will.

Satan doesn't pasta or pancakes. Very hard to get the temperature right. Always overdone.

 

rug

(82,333 posts)
4. Atheism isn't but Scientology meets the objective criteria.
Tue Sep 16, 2014, 03:37 PM
Sep 2014

Harris is, well, Harris, sui generis.

AtheistCrusader

(33,982 posts)
11. I was speculating about 'objective criteria'.
Tue Sep 16, 2014, 03:58 PM
Sep 2014

However, I would not put that past Harris, as a possibility. Nor of any other cult of personality.

LiberalAndProud

(12,799 posts)
13. Cult of personality.
Tue Sep 16, 2014, 05:02 PM
Sep 2014

Do you think that applies either to Harris or to Dawkins? Seeing as how atheists tend to cling to the freethinking side of the spectrum, you're characterization surprises me.

AtheistCrusader

(33,982 posts)
14. Less so in this venue but
Tue Sep 16, 2014, 05:20 PM
Sep 2014

I have observed what I would consider a cult of personality for certain members of the atheist 'community', sure. For instance, there are those who so wholly-subscribe to Hitchens, that at the time they could not be budged on any issue, even his rampant warmongering.

A distressing corner to see people painting themselves into.

There are certain elements of 'cult of perosonality' that I can self-critically see myself subscribing to. Susan Blackmore would be an example. She could be talking about what she had for lunch, and I'd probably warrant listening to it.

Edit: And this is not limited to religion. Politics too. There are factions here on DU for whom Obama can do no wrong, and yet more for whom Obama can do no right.

LiberalAndProud

(12,799 posts)
15. We all take shortcuts.
Tue Sep 16, 2014, 05:57 PM
Sep 2014

If I find I agree with a person on many ideas, and can honestly say they speak for me in so many areas, it's easy to fall into the trap of thinking they are right about everything. That is, in my opinion, how the likes of Rush Limbaugh manage to change general public sentiment so quickly. Begin with passionate oration in areas where we agree; move on from there. We can certainly find examples of this phenomenon among church congregations.

The longer I live the more I find that I agree with absolutely no one on absolutely everything, probably especially including Obama and the late, great Christopher Hitchens. I do experience profound disappointment, though, when I discover that to be the case. I'm sure atheists are not immune, but I think I am particularly averse to cultishness precisely because of my distaste for religiosity.

Is that arrogant of me? I suppose it is. Yet, there it is.

AtheistCrusader

(33,982 posts)
16. Oh, I absolutely do it too.
Tue Sep 16, 2014, 06:02 PM
Sep 2014

We probably all do. And most if not all of us, probably make a conscious effort to be wary, so we aren't getting hoodwinked by people we maybe accept/put too much trust in.

AtheistCrusader

(33,982 posts)
12. That linked site has popup scripts on exit, just FYI.
Tue Sep 16, 2014, 04:48 PM
Sep 2014

Is Deseret News a Mormon thing? Sounds like their bookstores.

 

rug

(82,333 posts)
17. What's a popup script? A popup ad?
Tue Sep 16, 2014, 06:22 PM
Sep 2014

The paper is owned by Deseret Management Corporation.

Deseret Management Corporation (DMC) is a for-profit arm of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints. All DMC companies operate under a unified mission, which is “to be a trusted source of light and knowledge reaching hundreds of millions of people worldwide.” DMC focuses on providing content and services through all of its media and service offerings that are consistent with this mission by treating all with dignity, respect, humility and integrity.

Deseret Management Corporation was organized in 1966. Today it owns and oversees life insurance, media, and hospitality businesses including Deseret News, KSL Television & Radio and Deseret Book.

http://deseretmanagement.com/about-us/

AtheistCrusader

(33,982 posts)
18. Basically it's a script that runs when you try to exit a web page.
Tue Sep 16, 2014, 06:24 PM
Sep 2014

Either by closing the page, or by following a link to another site. In this case, it is attempting to do something like throw a dialog 'are you sure you want to leave?'.

Not something most reputable sites do... Sometimes putting you in a click-loop so you can't get out without closing your browser entirely. Depending on what browser you are using, you may not be seeing it happen at all, or it may be discarded/not allowed.

AtheistCrusader

(33,982 posts)
20. Something is wrong with one of their advertisers.
Tue Sep 16, 2014, 06:34 PM
Sep 2014

This thing has cookies and analytics plugged in like you wouldn't believe. Google Analytics, Chartbeat, realmedia tracking, atmedia, smartadserver, ad advisor, turn, media math, betrad, doubleclick net, etc.

They are squeezing every ounce of analytics and advertising dollar per click out of that page as humanly possible. (And one of them is broken, hence the error on exit)

AtheistCrusader

(33,982 posts)
22. No, not at all. You can get to that stuff in most or all browsers.
Tue Sep 16, 2014, 06:59 PM
Sep 2014

In internet Explorer, debug mode is control-shift-F-12 on the keyboard, and you can start digging into how the page works. Each browser has ways of debugging and viewing what is happening to render the page. Whether that be javascript snippets, or references to other pages hosted on that server, or external data connections like google analytics.

It's just information not actively presented to the user. I tried to debug the error on exit, but it doesn't even work properly enough to see what it is trying to do.


I'd pick up a book on HTML coding. Learning a little about the browser, and how websites work could be useful in determining who is being paid by whom to present certain content to you.

AtheistCrusader

(33,982 posts)
24. It's funny, because we have one thing on our side. Visibility.
Tue Sep 16, 2014, 07:39 PM
Sep 2014

The advertisers have to inject this stuff into the page, so they can fairly get a report of how many clicks and from where, so they can pay the host appropriately for the clicking. That makes it visible to us, the user.

They can't trust the internal, unavailable to us reports of how many people click where, because the host could artificially inflate the numbers.

Greed gives us a tiny crack through which we can gain some visibility into what they are up to.

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Religion»10 religious leaders you ...