HomeLatest ThreadsGreatest ThreadsForums & GroupsMy SubscriptionsMy Posts
DU Home » Latest Threads » Forums & Groups » Topics » Foreign Affairs & National Security » Veterans (Group) » Officials: 31 suspended i...

Thu Dec 20, 2012, 08:33 AM

Officials: 31 suspended in Army day care scandal

http://www.stamfordadvocate.com/news/article/Obama-calls-Army-secretary-over-day-care-scandal-4131412.php

Officials: 31 suspended in Army day care scandal
By LOLITA C. BALDOR, Associated Press
Updated 10:13 pm, Wednesday, December 19, 2012

WASHINGTON (AP) At least 31 people were suspended from two Army day care centers at Fort Myer, Va., last week after officials scrutinized their backgrounds and found criminal convictions including fourth-degree sexual assault and drug use, a defense official said Wednesday.

An earlier statement that the 31 people had been fired was erroneous, the official said. Suspension allows for the possibility of reinstatement or dismissal.

The escalating scandal surrounding the Fort Myer Child Development Center has triggered a review of hiring procedures, angered defense leaders, and prompted a late-night telephone call Tuesday from President Barack Obama to the Army secretary. In the call, Obama expressed concern and urged a speedy and thorough investigation.

Details of the scandal emerged this week, nearly three months after two workers were arrested on charges of assaulting children at the Fort Myer center. The slow pace of public revelations enraged Defense Secretary Leon Panetta, who on Tuesday ordered a worldwide review of hiring practices at all military child care centers, schools, youth centers and other facilities that involve children.

1 replies, 1699 views

Reply to this thread

Back to top Alert abuse

Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum
Replies to this discussion thread
Arrow 1 replies Author Time Post
Reply Officials: 31 suspended in Army day care scandal (Original post)
unhappycamper Dec 2012 OP
Sherman A1 Dec 2012 #1

Response to unhappycamper (Original post)

Thu Dec 20, 2012, 09:34 AM

1. Because these background checks could not have been

done prior to their being employed?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink

Reply to this thread