HomeLatest ThreadsGreatest ThreadsForums & GroupsMy SubscriptionsMy Posts
DU Home » Latest Threads » Forums & Groups » Topics » Justice & Public Safety » Gun Control & RKBA (Group) » Texas boy dead, allegedly...

Mon Apr 16, 2012, 10:02 AM

Texas boy dead, allegedly shot self with mom's gun

http://www.statesman.com/news/texas/texas-boy-dead-allegedly-shot-self-with-moms-2307927.html

TYLER, TEXAS Investigators believe the 4-year-old son of an East Texas law officer had used her gun to fatally shoot himself.

Tyler police say Jaylen Johnson died Sunday afternoon in the apparent accidental shooting.

Smith County sheriff's Chief Deputy Bobby Garmon told KLTV-TV (http://bit.ly/HJ5GHE ) that the shooting happened in Officer Andrea Johnson's personal vehicle. She works at the Smith County jail but was not on duty at the time of the accident.

Authorities say the boy was dead on arrival at a Tyler hospital.

<more>

99 replies, 12810 views

Reply to this thread

Back to top Alert abuse

Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum
Replies to this discussion thread
Arrow 99 replies Author Time Post
Reply Texas boy dead, allegedly shot self with mom's gun (Original post)
jpak Apr 2012 OP
otohara Apr 2012 #1
ileus Apr 2012 #2
Doctor_J Apr 2012 #11
Meiko Apr 2012 #3
otohara Apr 2012 #4
gejohnston Apr 2012 #8
otohara Apr 2012 #10
gejohnston Apr 2012 #12
Doctor_J Apr 2012 #13
gejohnston Apr 2012 #15
Doctor_J Apr 2012 #21
Hoyt Apr 2012 #32
Common Sense Party Apr 2012 #36
Tuesday Afternoon Sep 2012 #94
X_Digger Apr 2012 #34
Doctor_J Apr 2012 #46
X_Digger Apr 2012 #47
Doctor_J Apr 2012 #88
X_Digger Apr 2012 #89
gejohnston Apr 2012 #44
Tuesday Afternoon Sep 2012 #93
Tuesday Afternoon Sep 2012 #92
Jenoch Sep 2012 #99
Starboard Tack Apr 2012 #22
gejohnston Apr 2012 #26
Starboard Tack Apr 2012 #29
gejohnston Apr 2012 #45
TheCowsCameHome Apr 2012 #24
ellisonz Apr 2012 #30
Atypical Liberal Apr 2012 #85
Atypical Liberal Sep 2012 #98
ZombieHorde Apr 2012 #5
TheCowsCameHome Apr 2012 #6
gejohnston Apr 2012 #9
TheCowsCameHome Apr 2012 #20
Starboard Tack Apr 2012 #23
discntnt_irny_srcsm Apr 2012 #28
X_Digger Apr 2012 #7
Loudly Apr 2012 #14
fightforfreedom123 Apr 2012 #16
rl6214 Apr 2012 #52
gejohnston Apr 2012 #17
AH1Apache Apr 2012 #18
Loudly Apr 2012 #48
AH1Apache Apr 2012 #49
Loudly Apr 2012 #50
AH1Apache Apr 2012 #53
Loudly Apr 2012 #58
AH1Apache Apr 2012 #59
Loudly Apr 2012 #61
AH1Apache Apr 2012 #64
PavePusher Apr 2012 #63
AH1Apache Apr 2012 #68
beevul Apr 2012 #77
PavePusher Apr 2012 #62
Loudly Apr 2012 #67
AH1Apache Apr 2012 #69
Loudly Apr 2012 #70
AH1Apache Apr 2012 #72
gejohnston Apr 2012 #74
Loudly Apr 2012 #75
gejohnston Apr 2012 #76
AH1Apache Apr 2012 #78
PavePusher Apr 2012 #71
gejohnston Apr 2012 #73
beevul Apr 2012 #55
AH1Apache Apr 2012 #57
rDigital Sep 2012 #90
Simo 1939_1940 Sep 2012 #91
Tuesday Afternoon Sep 2012 #95
X_Digger Apr 2012 #19
Starboard Tack Apr 2012 #25
Callisto32 Apr 2012 #27
Hoyt Apr 2012 #33
ellisonz Apr 2012 #31
X_Digger Apr 2012 #35
ellisonz Apr 2012 #37
X_Digger Apr 2012 #38
ellisonz Apr 2012 #39
X_Digger Apr 2012 #40
ellisonz Apr 2012 #41
X_Digger Apr 2012 #42
Straw Man Apr 2012 #60
ileus Apr 2012 #43
rl6214 Apr 2012 #51
fightthegoodfightnow Apr 2012 #54
AH1Apache Apr 2012 #56
fightthegoodfightnow Apr 2012 #80
AH1Apache Apr 2012 #81
PavePusher Apr 2012 #65
Straw Man Apr 2012 #66
fightthegoodfightnow Apr 2012 #79
Straw Man Apr 2012 #82
fightthegoodfightnow Apr 2012 #83
Straw Man Apr 2012 #84
rl6214 Apr 2012 #87
X_Digger Apr 2012 #86
Tuesday Afternoon Sep 2012 #96
4th law of robotics Sep 2012 #97

Response to jpak (Original post)

Mon Apr 16, 2012, 10:13 AM

1. Another Light Goes Out

 

in America.

RIP little one

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to jpak (Original post)

Mon Apr 16, 2012, 10:37 AM

2. Another firearm accident.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to ileus (Reply #2)

Mon Apr 16, 2012, 11:20 AM

11. More like another negligent homicide

 

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to jpak (Original post)

Mon Apr 16, 2012, 10:45 AM

3. She should be charged

 

with child endangerment or child abuse. She is obviously negligent in the death of this child, and I really don't want to hear "hasn't she been through enough"? It is way past time that people who leave guns and kids together unattended should be punished. Enough already.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Meiko (Reply #3)

Mon Apr 16, 2012, 10:54 AM

4. No, No, No

 

it was an "accident" !

She's a law enforcement officer - responsible gun owner.

Besides, the gun lobby will tell you more kids die choking or playing football, and that's supposed to make you feel better. Let's keep things in perspective folks. Kids killed by guns in America - meh!

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to otohara (Reply #4)

Mon Apr 16, 2012, 11:12 AM

8. if she was a cop

is she a gun owner, or was the gun issued?

Well, the CDC says more kids do die from choking and playing football. But, only shootings are tragic according to the antis.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to gejohnston (Reply #8)

Mon Apr 16, 2012, 11:18 AM

10. The CDC

 

doesn't use the statistics to smooth out the numbers of kid gun deaths.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to otohara (Reply #10)

Mon Apr 16, 2012, 11:22 AM

12. no, but it does

put it in perspective.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to gejohnston (Reply #8)

Mon Apr 16, 2012, 11:23 AM

13. Please stop with the Straw Men

 

only shootings are tragic according to the antis.


Please point to a post/article/blog entry that says that.

They're all tragic. Most of the gun deaths are preventable. that's a major difference

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Doctor_J (Reply #13)

Mon Apr 16, 2012, 11:30 AM

15. why only the emphisis on

"gun deaths"
"gun suicides"
"gun violence"
"gun murders"?
because it serves their political purpose.

Most of the gun deaths are preventable.

and most of the rope, knife, etc. deaths are not?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to gejohnston (Reply #15)

Mon Apr 16, 2012, 12:49 PM

21. The next time a 4-year-old gets ahold of his parent's rope

 

and kills himself with it, post about it and I'll lead the outrage parade.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Doctor_J (Reply #21)

Mon Apr 16, 2012, 02:18 PM

32. Me too.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Hoyt (Reply #32)

Mon Apr 16, 2012, 02:29 PM

36. No, you won't.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Hoyt (Reply #32)



Response to X_Digger (Reply #34)

Mon Apr 16, 2012, 07:31 PM

46. Close, but no cigar

 

gej was posting about weapons being accidentally obtained and then inflicting harm. If you seriously are trying to conflate a jump rope accident with a 4-year-old getting his hands on a gun (or knife) and killing himself or a playmate, we're at an impasse. My reasoning and yours cannot coexist in the same discussion.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Doctor_J (Reply #46)

Mon Apr 16, 2012, 07:37 PM

47. Feel free to set those goalposts down, they must be heavy.

You said..

The next time a 4-year-old gets ahold of his parent's rope and kills himself with it


A shade cord, a jump rope, a cord attached to a treadmill, a rope tied to a tree.. all of those qualify.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to X_Digger (Reply #47)

Wed Apr 18, 2012, 09:59 AM

88. Surely there is a difference between a jump rope accident and a firearm

 

Are these considered equivalent by the NRA? I have always considered them a little wacky, and getting more so as time goes by, but even they must be able to distinguish between these two.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Doctor_J (Reply #88)

Wed Apr 18, 2012, 10:10 AM

89. Is the child any less dead?

That's what confuses me- that a kid killed with a gun is somehow more dead than one who strangled on a shade cord.

I'm still waiting for you to lead the charge on dangerous rope outrage.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Doctor_J (Reply #21)

Mon Apr 16, 2012, 04:30 PM

44. I will post the link and press release when

VPC actually gives a shit about Violence regardless of means.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to gejohnston (Reply #44)

Fri Sep 14, 2012, 11:33 PM

93. ge -- tell me what group will you post it in. I want to see this. thanks.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Doctor_J (Reply #21)

Fri Sep 14, 2012, 11:30 PM

92. that OP would be locked in this group for being Off Topic

as well it should be. With that being the case where do you suggest one post such articles?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Doctor_J (Reply #21)

Sun Sep 16, 2012, 10:28 PM

99. Maybe not 4-year olds, but other

 

children are killed by the equivalent of ropes. Blind cords have caused the deaths of numerous children worldwide.

http://abcnews.go.com/US/story?id=95133&page=1#.UFaYk0ZjhN0

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to gejohnston (Reply #8)

Mon Apr 16, 2012, 01:00 PM

22. Statistically insignificant?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Starboard Tack (Reply #22)

Mon Apr 16, 2012, 01:23 PM

26. you missed the larger point

why do we let kids play a violent game that kills more kids than gun accidents, yet freak if some school has a rifle club or shooting team? Freak about rifle teams but not archery.
Then we wonder why Germans, Swiss, and Koreans laugh their asses off.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to gejohnston (Reply #26)

Mon Apr 16, 2012, 01:59 PM

29. No I didn't miss it. We don't let them, we make them, like gladiators.

All deaths of children are tragic. I think American football has morphed into an incredibly barbaric sport. I remember watching high school games 30 years ago that were great, but the idea then was to score points, not to damage the other side. Rifle clubs and archery clubs are healthy outlets for kids primal energies. Much healthier than running in the street playing C&R, or C&I, or WW2 with toy guns.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Starboard Tack (Reply #29)

Mon Apr 16, 2012, 04:32 PM

45. That I agree

Much healthier than running in the street playing C&R, or C&I, or WW2 with toy guns.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to gejohnston (Reply #8)

Mon Apr 16, 2012, 01:03 PM

24. Soooo predictable.....

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to gejohnston (Reply #8)

Mon Apr 16, 2012, 02:03 PM

30. "But, only shootings are tragic according to the antis."

That's way over-the-top.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Meiko (Reply #3)

Tue Apr 17, 2012, 12:49 PM

85. Do you have children?

 

Do you have children?

Can you imagine a punishment for a normal parent worse than the loss of their child?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Meiko (Reply #3)

Sat Sep 15, 2012, 08:53 AM

98. Do you have children?

 

Let me tell you, as a parent: There is no punishment you could do to me than the loss of one of my children.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to jpak (Original post)

Mon Apr 16, 2012, 11:02 AM

5. Sad. nt

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to jpak (Original post)

Mon Apr 16, 2012, 11:10 AM

6. What does a gun have to do with this?

That's what the loonies will ask.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to TheCowsCameHome (Reply #6)

Mon Apr 16, 2012, 11:14 AM

9. given it was a cop

often it belongs to the department and not the officer who it is issued to. Some departments require you to buy your own.
She may not be a "gun owner".

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to gejohnston (Reply #9)

Mon Apr 16, 2012, 12:26 PM

20. See?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to TheCowsCameHome (Reply #6)

Mon Apr 16, 2012, 01:01 PM

23. Guns don't kill. Glove compartments kill.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Starboard Tack (Reply #23)

Mon Apr 16, 2012, 01:57 PM

28. I think you just...

...passed the Wayne La Pierre fan club entry test! congrats

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to jpak (Original post)

Mon Apr 16, 2012, 11:10 AM

7. Yet police are the only ones who should have guns, right?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to X_Digger (Reply #7)

Mon Apr 16, 2012, 11:29 AM

14. That reads as though

 

you think the public needs guns to do battle with the cops.

The cops might not need guns if the populace didn't have them.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Loudly (Reply #14)

Mon Apr 16, 2012, 11:31 AM

16. Guns don't kill people

 

People do.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to fightforfreedom123 (Reply #16)

Mon Apr 16, 2012, 09:32 PM

52. Should we respond to people who have been ppr'd?

 

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Loudly (Reply #14)

Mon Apr 16, 2012, 11:35 AM

17. gangsters would still have them

that is why Japanese cops carry them and UK has SWAT teams with machine guns.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Loudly (Reply #14)

Mon Apr 16, 2012, 11:38 AM

18. So I'll ask you again Shares

 

How do you keep firearms out of the hands of criminals who have already demonstrated complete disregard for laws?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to AH1Apache (Reply #18)

Mon Apr 16, 2012, 08:54 PM

48. Make them scarce.

 

If you don't mind me answering instead.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Loudly (Reply #48)

Mon Apr 16, 2012, 09:03 PM

49. How do you keep other countries from making them scarce

 

and how do you keep them from coming across the border?
We can't even stop the smuggling of humans and drugs and guns are alot smaller.
I would just love to hear your solutions to these scenarios.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to AH1Apache (Reply #49)

Mon Apr 16, 2012, 09:18 PM

50. Smuggling is a miniscule part of the problem.

 

Legal manufacturing, importation and retail sales are the low hanging fruit.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Loudly (Reply #50)

Mon Apr 16, 2012, 09:33 PM

53. Miniscule? Really? Are you fucking for real? Tell that to the drug cartels and the human smugglers

 

So are you doing anything to further your cause, like circulating petitions to amend or repeal the 2A, which we all know will never happen, or are you just another keyboard kommando who just bitches and moans but does nothing.
Also, how do you stop the criminals from acquiring firearms as they wouldn't give two shits about gun laws. All you've managed to acccomplished is to disarm the law abiding.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to AH1Apache (Reply #53)

Mon Apr 16, 2012, 10:00 PM

58. How is stopping the introduction of new units disarming anyone?

 

It's a decades long struggle to raise consciousness, marginalize those who perversely rejoice in the epidemic of guns and ammo in the hands of the public, staff the courts with judges who will narrow the meaning of any such "right," and allow natural attrition to work its magic.

It's exactly like the civil rights movement. Heighten awareness of racial discrimination, ostracize those who engage in it, staff the courts with judges who will shape the law to discourage provincialism, and allow the integration mandate to work it magic.

And just like Jim Crow, America's gun problem is home grown. Not some sinister lunacy smuggled in from abroad.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Loudly (Reply #58)

Mon Apr 16, 2012, 10:05 PM

59. And yet more and more states

 

are loosening their gun laws. Yours is a pipe dream that will never come true.
But you still didn't answer my question.
We can't stop drugs or humans from coming across our borders and I can tell you right now that if guns became scarce domestically, a black market would spring up overnight to supply that product and if you think otherwise, I've got a bridge for sale in S.F., cheap.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to AH1Apache (Reply #59)

Mon Apr 16, 2012, 10:11 PM

61. What can I tell you? You're part of the problem.

 

Seek enlightenment.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Loudly (Reply #61)

Mon Apr 16, 2012, 10:15 PM

64. C'mon SharesUnited

 

do you really think you are fooling anyone here?
Do try not to be so obvious.
I am most definitely not part of the problem, and I most definitely am enlightened

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to AH1Apache (Reply #59)

Mon Apr 16, 2012, 10:13 PM

63. Someone wants Prohibition III....

 

...'cause the first two worked out so well.

Only this time, we'll do it longer, harder, faster and deeper.What could possibly go wrong?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to PavePusher (Reply #63)

Mon Apr 16, 2012, 10:19 PM

68. Yeah your right

 

cause we all know how well the WOD has worked out using those same tactics.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Loudly (Reply #58)

Mon Apr 16, 2012, 11:04 PM

77. "It's exactly like the civil rights movement."

 

No, its exactly the opposite of the civil rights movement.

The civil rights movement strove to increase the rights of people.

You on the other hand, are proposing to descrease them.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Loudly (Reply #50)

Mon Apr 16, 2012, 10:11 PM

62. Smuggling alcohol was a miniscule problem....

 

until it became an enormous industry, and solidified the position of organized crime.

And you want to do the same... with guns? Insanity....

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to PavePusher (Reply #62)

Mon Apr 16, 2012, 10:19 PM

67. Speaking of organized crime.

 

Epidemic of gang shootings in Chicago right now.

McDonald decision. Bad medicine and precisely the wrong message to send to society.

Now THAT's insanity.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Loudly (Reply #67)

Mon Apr 16, 2012, 10:24 PM

69. But how can that be

 

guns were banned for a long time before the McDonald ruling and people were still getting shot. So how do you account for that.
Oh thats right, it's all the fault of other states and their lax gun laws.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to AH1Apache (Reply #69)

Mon Apr 16, 2012, 10:28 PM

70. Chicago sits right on the Indiana state line.

 

That's where the fireworks came from too.

But let's face it. The optics post McDonald are horrible for your inexplicable cause.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Loudly (Reply #70)

Mon Apr 16, 2012, 10:35 PM

72. Check this out

 

Loudly-Chicago
SharesUnited-Chicago
Coincidence, I think not.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Loudly (Reply #70)

Mon Apr 16, 2012, 10:42 PM

74. Ever heard of the Gun Control Act of 1968?

The politicians who blame Indiana, Idaho, etc have. They know that "going to the next state" is a federal crime, but are dishonest about it anyway.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to gejohnston (Reply #74)

Mon Apr 16, 2012, 10:52 PM

75. You are simply making the case for scarcity

 

from sea to shining sea.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Loudly (Reply #75)

Mon Apr 16, 2012, 11:02 PM

76. I fail to see how

given many are probably are community guns, some purchased from NYC cops.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Loudly (Reply #75)

Mon Apr 16, 2012, 11:05 PM

78. And another golden oldie

 

brought to you by SharesUnited aka Loudly

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Loudly (Reply #67)

Mon Apr 16, 2012, 10:29 PM

71. You are going to have to diagram that set of links.

 

The McDonald decision has enabled criminals to shoot each other... just like they were doing before the case? Ummm... speaking of insanity....

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Loudly (Reply #50)

Mon Apr 16, 2012, 10:39 PM

73. ready for a history lesson?

to a time and place where the good guys had the illegal guns? It was issued to UK and Canadian armies. Many were made in bicycle shops in Denmark, Poland, France, Norway. Some of the Polish ones were used during the Warsaw uprising.


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sten#Foreign-built_variants_and_post_1945_derivatives
http://www.historyofwar.org/articles/weapons_sten_machine_carbine.html

Here is one for those who don't like the British
http://www.gemsinisrael.com/e_article000012009.htm

Now for the more modern bad guys.
http://www.theage.com.au/articles/2004/07/22/1090464799535.html
http://weaponsman.com/?p=300
http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk/2008/aug/28/ukcrime.ukguns


Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Loudly (Reply #48)

Mon Apr 16, 2012, 09:53 PM

55. Brokenrecords incorporated is proud to present - Sharesunited LIVE, at the DU!

 

Another chart topping hit "make them scarce"!!


"Make them scarce". loudly

http://www.democraticunderground.com/117231145#post48

"Make 'em scarce." sharesunited - tombstoned.

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=118&topic_id=418178&mesg_id=418194

"Making them scarce should be the objective" sharesunited - tombstoned.

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=118&topic_id=354250&mesg_id=354267

"Make them scarce." sharesunited - tombstoned.

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=439&topic_id=150741&mesg_id=150842

"make 'em scarce." sharesunited - tombstoned.

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=118&topic_id=404949&mesg_id=404991

"Make them scarce" sharesunited - tombstoned.

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=118&topic_id=340072&mesg_id=340107

"Make them scarce" sharesunited - tombstoned.

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=118&topic_id=330396&mesg_id=330499

"Make them scarce" sharesunited - tombstoned.

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=118&topic_id=314231&mesg_id=314234

"Making them scarce is the way to go." sharesunited - tombstoned.

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=118&topic_id=399453&mesg_id=399486


Also included with your tickets to the show, are these previously released box sets:


"bullets enter our bodies" loudly

"bullets enter our bodies" sharesunited - tombstoned.

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=118&topic_id=352368&mesg_id=352380

"bullets enter our bodies" sharesunited - tombstoned.

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=118&topic_id=330396&mesg_id=330436

"bullets enter our bodies" sharesunited - tombstoned.

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=102&topic_id=4883889&mesg_id=4884177

"bullets enter our bodies" sharesunited - tombstoned.

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=118&topic_id=353141&mesg_id=353175

"bullets enter our bodies" sharesunited - tombstoned.

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=118&topic_id=354632&mesg_id=354680

"bullets enter our bodies" sharesunited - tombstoned.

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=118&topic_id=354632&mesg_id=354668





And then theres the old favorite "Guns and ammo in the hands of the public":

"Guns and ammo in the hands of the public" - loudly

http://www.democraticunderground.com/117228705#post1

"...guns and ammo in the hands of the general public..." sharesunited - tombstoned

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=118&topic_id=266391&mesg_id=266468

Guns in the hands of the public..." sharesunited - tombstoned

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=118&topic_id=429419&mesg_id=429448

"...guns in the hands of the public" sharesunited tombstoned

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=389&topic_id=9656775&mesg_id=9656987

"...guns in the hands of the public..." sharesunited - tombstoned.

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=389&topic_id=6126985&mesg_id=6127253

"guns in the hands of the public" sharesunited - tombstoned.

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=118&topic_id=330395&mesg_id=330399

"Guns and ammo in the hands of the general public" sharesunited - tombstoned.

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=118&topic_id=266806&mesg_id=266851

"guns and ammo in the hands of the public" sharesunited - tombstoned.

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=118&topic_id=355994&mesg_id=357367

"guns and ammo in the hands of the public" sharesunited - tombstoned.

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=118&topic_id=378992&mesg_id=379112

"Guns in the hands of the public." sharesunited - tombstoned.

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=118&topic_id=419892&mesg_id=419894

"Guns in the hands of the general public" sharesunited - tombstoned.

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=439&topic_id=1027267&mesg_id=1027975

"guns in the hands of the public" sharesunited - tombstoned.

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=118&topic_id=398802&mesg_id=398850

"Guns in the hands of the general public" sharesunited - tombstoned.

http://sync.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=389&topic_id=8337353&mesg_id=8337845

"guns and ammo in the hands of the public." loudly

http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1172&pid=31170



And that chart topper "carrying on dying":

"...carrying on dying ..." loudly

http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1172&pid=25553

"...carry on dying..." sharesunited - tombstoned

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=118&topic_id=415412&mesg_id=415468

"...Carry On Dying..." sharesunited - tombstoned

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=118&topic_id=301410&mesg_id=301490

"...Carry On Dying..." sharesunited - tombstoned

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=118&topic_id=275477&mesg_id=275523






And who can forget the classic "Guns cloud judgment":

"Guns cloud judgment". loudly

http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1002&pid=459071

"As I have said before... guns cloud judgment." sharesunited - tombstoned

http://election.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=118&topic_id=308595&mesg_id=308612

"guns cloud judgment" sharesunited - tombstomned

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php/www/:/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=118&topic_id=425955&mesg_id=426011

"Guns cloud judgment..." sharesunited - tombstomned

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=118x313652

"Guns cloud judgment." sharesunited - tombstomned

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=389&topic_id=7446027&mesg_id=7446273

"Guns cloud judgment." sharesunited - tombstomned

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=389&topic_id=8132723&mesg_id=8132925

"guns cloud judgment" sharesunited - tombstomned

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=118&topic_id=312691&mesg_id=312724

Guns cloud judgment..." sharesunited - tombstomned

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=118&topic_id=313651&mesg_id=313652






But wait, theres more! Also included is that old favorite "bullets in your hide" - with slight variations so you'll never tire of it:

"By murdering your stubborn hide." loudly.

http://www.democraticunderground.com/117223802#post14

"By killing your hide." sharesunited - tombstoned

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=118&topic_id=277573&mesg_id=277577

"By killing that wooly hide of yours." sharesunited - tombstoned

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=118x252047#252251

"Now, let's weigh her hide against the 2A dead." sharesunited - tombstoned

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=118x267127#267178

"...by killing your insistent and misguided hide." sharesunited - tombstoned

http://upload.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=118&topic_id=281789&mesg_id=282313

"And that means bullets in innocent bodies, including your old hide." sharesunited - tombstoned (a double hit, "bullets in bodies, AND "your hide" all in one!)

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=118&topic_id=415908&mesg_id=415919

"So is not having bullets enter your hide." sharesunited - tombstoned

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=118&topic_id=400631&mesg_id=400663

"You CAN force me to take a bullet in my hide." sharesunited - tombstoned

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=102x4294235#4295239

"...bullets should GO in their hide?" sharesunited - tombstoned

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=118&topic_id=378807&mesg_id=379353






And then theres "the modernity shuffle!":

"Until the nation was dragged kicking and screaming into modernity on the subject." loudly

http://www.democraticunderground.com/117223802#post28

Once again, the federal courts will need to bring the People kicking and screaming into modernity. sharesunited - tombstoned

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=118&topic_id=352368&mesg_id=352462






And, for a short time only, if you order within the next ten minutes, you'll also recieve "comparing guns to child porn":


"There is a demand for child porn too, but that is being dealt
with." loudly

http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1172&pid=23811

"And child pornography should go unchecked because people have young children they can photograph." Sharesunited -tombstoned.

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=118&topic_id=416312&mesg_id=416380

"You may as well come out in favor of child pornography as protected by the first amendment." Sharesunited -tombstoned.

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=118&topic_id=379235&mesg_id=379303

"Public policy against the mere possession of child pornography illustrates what is possible." Sharesunited -tombstoned.

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php/counterpunch.org/bcnews.go.com/Blotter/www.leftyblogs.com/cgi-bin/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=118&topic_id=425726&mesg_id=425747

"Over the counter access to morphine and over the internet access to child pornography." Sharesunited -tombstoned.

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=118&topic_id=421906&mesg_id=422022

How did the crusade against child pornography begin? Public policy. Sharesunited -tombstoned.

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=118&topic_id=415367&mesg_id=415768


This is a special deal folks, only those that call within the next hour will recieve everything we're about to tell you about.

Take advantage of these hits NOW!

Remember, the one order per customer restriction has been lifted! You can now order as many copies as you like!

Thats right folks, order as many as you like!


Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to beevul (Reply #55)

Mon Apr 16, 2012, 09:58 PM

57. You now owe me a new laptop

 

I just spit my milk all over my laptop keyboard.
Bravo

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to beevul (Reply #55)

Fri Sep 14, 2012, 05:06 PM

90. Wow, completely and totally owned. How's it going shares? Why were you PPRed again? nt

 

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to beevul (Reply #55)

Fri Sep 14, 2012, 07:50 PM

91. Sir -- that was simply.........BRILLIANT!!!










Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to beevul (Reply #55)

Fri Sep 14, 2012, 11:39 PM

95. Masterpiece Theatre at its finest -- I am in awe! Bravo and well played!





Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Loudly (Reply #14)

Mon Apr 16, 2012, 11:48 AM

19. Then you need to get better glasses. n/t

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Loudly (Reply #14)

Mon Apr 16, 2012, 01:08 PM

25. I think the cops and the robbers might set an example

Then the populace would have no reason to carry. Oops no, I forgot, some will always come up with a reason like fighting off the US military and 2A and killing rabid dogs and shooting naked guys with bows and killing kids who wear hoodies.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Starboard Tack (Reply #25)

Mon Apr 16, 2012, 01:50 PM

27. That's funny on like...3 levels.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Loudly (Reply #14)

Mon Apr 16, 2012, 02:19 PM

33. Good point.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to X_Digger (Reply #7)

Mon Apr 16, 2012, 02:05 PM

31. Are you suggesting "Second Amendment Remedies" might be neccessary? n/t

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to ellisonz (Reply #31)

Mon Apr 16, 2012, 02:28 PM

35. Kindly remove your fingers from my mouth, eh?

You can read what I suggest when I suggest it.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to X_Digger (Reply #35)

Mon Apr 16, 2012, 02:37 PM

37. Your statement was cryptic...

...it seemed to suggest that either you believe the police are incapable of protecting you, incapable of keeping public order, or could be used to enforce dictatorship? Considering some of the rhetoric that comes out of the gun culture it's a reasonable question. So what were you saying exactly?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to ellisonz (Reply #37)

Mon Apr 16, 2012, 02:46 PM

38. Only cryptic if your intent was to intentionally misinterpret.

And no, your false choices don't fit, either. Better luck next time.

No, I was deriding the idiots who want only cops to have access to firearms. This child would *still* be dead.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to X_Digger (Reply #38)

Mon Apr 16, 2012, 02:52 PM

39. Who are these "idiots" that you are deriding and why do you believe you ought to deride them? n/t

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to ellisonz (Reply #39)

Mon Apr 16, 2012, 03:00 PM

40. If you haven't seen them, you're not paying attention (or willfully covering your eyes).

But no, I won't do a call-out, even if juries tend to ignore them on DU3. I think that rule should have been carried over from DU2.

As to why? For a multitude of reasons. First, it's a constitutionally protected right, so they'd have to be morons to think that a constitutional amendment such as would be required would pass. Second, such idiots don't foresee the unintended consequences of their actions- such a disarmament would only affect those predisposed to follow the law. Criminals? Not so much. Third, even the whiff of such a stupid effort from our party would guarantee rethuglican federal electoral victories for a generation.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to X_Digger (Reply #40)

Mon Apr 16, 2012, 03:03 PM

41. So basically you're barking up a tree? Gotcha. n/t

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to ellisonz (Reply #41)

Mon Apr 16, 2012, 03:11 PM

42. Whatever makes you happy. n/t

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to ellisonz (Reply #31)

Mon Apr 16, 2012, 10:08 PM

60. That's quite a stretch ...

... even for you.

No, he was talking about the mantra that private citizens can't be trusted with guns but police can.

No points for totally missing the point in your quest for a low blow.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to X_Digger (Reply #7)

Mon Apr 16, 2012, 03:16 PM

43. The only LEO and gov types never get sarcasm.

To them you statement is true...

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to jpak (Original post)

Mon Apr 16, 2012, 09:27 PM

51. Holy shit, let's call for a ban on all law enforcement officers having guns...

 

despicable as usual but don't let that stop you.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to rl6214 (Reply #51)

Mon Apr 16, 2012, 09:46 PM

54. HOLY SH*T - LET'S CALL FOR A BAN ON STUPID POSTS

....like yours.

Officers are presumably TRAINED on gun safety and if this family can have an accident ANY family can regardless of the training.

They are going to have some dark days and I hope they get through them.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to fightthegoodfightnow (Reply #54)

Mon Apr 16, 2012, 09:53 PM

56. Most cops only shoot once a year when they have to re-qualify

 

and most cops never draw their gun in anger during their entire career. How do I know this, because my brother is a cop and he says that most cops are lousy shots compared to those of us who have CHL and those that do alot of recreational shooting.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to AH1Apache (Reply #56)

Mon Apr 16, 2012, 11:32 PM

80. Got It

Cops are lousy shots......making guns effective in abating a crime?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to fightthegoodfightnow (Reply #80)

Mon Apr 16, 2012, 11:37 PM

81. That doesn't even make any sense

 

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to fightthegoodfightnow (Reply #54)

Mon Apr 16, 2012, 10:16 PM

65. Ummm... but we'd never hear from you again... (makes sad). n/t

 

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to fightthegoodfightnow (Reply #54)

Mon Apr 16, 2012, 10:17 PM

66. I wouldn't be so careless with the word "stupid" ...

... if I were you.

HOLY SH*T - LET'S CALL FOR A BAN ON STUPID POSTS

....like yours. Officers are presumably TRAINED on gun safety and if this family can have an accident ANY family can regardless of the training.

Trained. Presumably. Oh yeah.

I took a handgun class alongside an NYPD plainclothes cop who couldn't get his pistol back in his holster because his t-shirt tail kept getting stuck in with it. This was not a safe situation. He was a numb-nut. Numb-nuts exist, and they are impervious to training. The suggestion that because a numb-nut does something, anybody is likely to do it is ... stupid.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Straw Man (Reply #66)

Mon Apr 16, 2012, 11:28 PM

79. Got It

Guns are dangerous even for those trained.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to fightthegoodfightnow (Reply #79)

Tue Apr 17, 2012, 12:21 AM

82. You didn't get it at all.

Got It

Guns are dangerous even for those trained.

No. Some people are untrainable.

Nevertheless, some of us keep trying.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Straw Man (Reply #82)

Tue Apr 17, 2012, 08:02 AM

83. And yet they still have guns

........even when they are not trained on how to use them as you point out.

And that makes them dangerous........

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to fightthegoodfightnow (Reply #83)

Tue Apr 17, 2012, 11:01 AM

84. You missed the point again.

And yet they still have guns

........even when they are not trained on how to use them as you point out.

And that makes them dangerous........

We were talking about police here, remember? Are you saying they shouldn't be armed?

If you're advocating increased firearms training with a higher required threshold of proficiency for police, then I'm with you 100%.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to fightthegoodfightnow (Reply #54)

Tue Apr 17, 2012, 05:33 PM

87. No more stupid than the "guns for all" posts

 

but you never let that stop you.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to jpak (Original post)

Tue Apr 17, 2012, 02:20 PM

86. Interesting use of the passive voice.

I bet if it weren't a cop, the headline would read, "Mom's gun allegedly used by Texas boy to shoot self." or "Texas boy allegedly shot self with mom's gun."

No, when it's a police officer, that passive voice comes out.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to jpak (Original post)

Fri Sep 14, 2012, 11:41 PM

96. My condolences to the Johnson family on the loss of their son. Sad and tragic. n/t

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to jpak (Original post)

Sat Sep 15, 2012, 08:50 AM

97. Wouldn't she be one of those trained professionals that we can always trust to have guns?

 

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink

Reply to this thread