Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Gun Control & RKBA
Related: About this forumMaine law differs from 'stand your ground'
http://www.pressherald.com/news/maine-law-differs-from-stand-your-ground_2012-04-02.htmlFARMINGTON People frequently ask Andrew Robinson, a prosecutor in Franklin County, about Maine's self-defense laws.
<snip>
"Most of the case law makes it clear that the self-defense (law) is a shield and not a sword and intended to use the minimum amount of force to avoid the harm," Billings said.
Maine's self-defense laws, which require a person to try to avoid confrontations under most circumstances, differ from the "stand your ground" law in Florida and other states, he said.
In Maine, the laws say that if someone can retreat safely they are not authorized to use deadly force, unless they are inside their home and meet the criteria for that scenario, Billings said. Florida's stand your ground law says a person has no duty to retreat.
<more>
No vigilante for you in the Pine Tree State
yup
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
7 replies, 4264 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (4)
ReplyReply to this post
7 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Maine law differs from 'stand your ground' (Original Post)
jpak
Apr 2012
OP
Everyone should have to work through a flow-chart before engaging in defensive actions.
PavePusher
Apr 2012
#5
Tuesday Afternoon
(56,912 posts)1. excellent article
could do without your editorializing comments. thanks.
Hoyt
(54,770 posts)2. Makes a lot more sense than Florida type SYG laws.
gejohnston
(17,502 posts)3. please look up the word vigilante
and please avoid newspeak. Zimmerman was not a vigilante no matter how you look at it. Murderer maybe, but not vigilante.
MarianJack
(10,237 posts)4. As a Mainer, I say...
...Thank God!
PEACE!
PavePusher
(15,374 posts)5. Everyone should have to work through a flow-chart before engaging in defensive actions.
It'll save lives!!1!11!
ManiacJoe
(10,136 posts)6. See the law, not the newspaper.
http://www.mainelegislature.org/legis/statutes/17-A/title17-Asec108.html
Note the key wording:
This is all but equivalent of the SYG laws since the ability to retreat with complete safety is almost never possible.
Note the key wording:
C. However, a person is not justified in using deadly force as provided in paragraph A if:
...
(3) The person knows that the person or a 3rd person can, with complete safety:
(a) Retreat from the encounter, except that the person or the 3rd person is not required to retreat if the person or the 3rd person is in the person's dwelling place and was not the initial aggressor;
This is all but equivalent of the SYG laws since the ability to retreat with complete safety is almost never possible.
Florida's self-defense laws make it difficult to justify using deadly force under circumstances being argued in Florida.