HomeLatest ThreadsGreatest ThreadsForums & GroupsMy SubscriptionsMy Posts
DU Home » Latest Threads » Forums & Groups » Topics » Justice & Public Safety » Gun Control & RKBA (Group) » Why do ammosexuals call p...

Thu May 5, 2016, 07:02 AM

 

Why do ammosexuals call people "thieves"? What's in it for them?

WATCH: Texas Ammosexual Tries To Execute A Purse Snatcher–Shoots At Him As He Runs Away (VIDEO)

In an absolutely ridiculous moment of vigilante Texas justice, a woman with a gun decided she would convict an alleged purse snatcher of a capital crime and attempt to execute him on the spot.

The man, who was being held by what looks like typical people trying to catch a crook, manages to get away and starts running when the woman fires her weapon, barely able to handle the recoil. The man fell to the ground but wasn’t hit, as the “hero” couldn’t control her weapon well enough to hit a target a mere few feet away. He was recaptured and arrested while the woman fled in her pickup truck.

Conservatives will take this same exact story and call this woman things like “Patriot” and “good guy (or girl) with a gun.” What she actually is, is much more difficult to describe, but here goes: She is a lunatic. She fired a weapon in a Walmart parking lot without regard for human life. She obviously couldn’t handle the gun, making her far more dangerous than an unarmed man who tried to jack a purse.

She’s lucky nobody was killed.

Watch raw video of a woman trying to execute a man for theft below:

http://www.ifyouonlynews.com/videos/watch-texas-ammosexual-tries-to-execute-a-purse-snatcher-shoots-at-him-as-he-runs-away-video/

98 replies, 5094 views

Reply to this thread

Back to top Alert abuse

Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum
Replies to this discussion thread
Arrow 98 replies Author Time Post
Reply Why do ammosexuals call people "thieves"? What's in it for them? (Original post)
stone space May 2016 OP
Puha Ekapi May 2016 #1
stone space May 2016 #2
Puha Ekapi May 2016 #4
Duckhunter935 May 2016 #5
stone space May 2016 #8
ileus May 2016 #14
stone space May 2016 #17
ileus May 2016 #19
Straw Man May 2016 #25
beevul May 2016 #30
stone space May 2016 #44
beevul May 2016 #52
stone space May 2016 #55
beevul May 2016 #62
stone space May 2016 #63
beevul May 2016 #65
DonP May 2016 #23
TeddyR May 2016 #24
Duckhunter935 May 2016 #29
Eleanors38 May 2016 #41
stone space May 2016 #71
oneshooter May 2016 #76
stone space May 2016 #77
ileus May 2016 #79
DonP May 2016 #80
beevul May 2016 #83
Duckhunter935 May 2016 #86
Duckhunter935 May 2016 #85
scscholar May 2016 #34
jmg257 May 2016 #3
braddy May 2016 #28
Press Virginia May 2016 #36
braddy May 2016 #37
Warpy May 2016 #6
ileus May 2016 #7
stone space May 2016 #12
ileus May 2016 #13
stone space May 2016 #15
ileus May 2016 #18
beevul May 2016 #32
CompanyFirstSergeant May 2016 #9
stone space May 2016 #10
CompanyFirstSergeant May 2016 #11
stone space May 2016 #72
DonP May 2016 #73
stone space May 2016 #74
DonP May 2016 #75
Duckhunter935 May 2016 #87
DonP May 2016 #16
Duckhunter935 May 2016 #33
beevul May 2016 #84
Duckhunter935 May 2016 #94
Lurks Often May 2016 #20
jmg257 May 2016 #21
stone space May 2016 #31
beevul May 2016 #35
stone space May 2016 #38
beevul May 2016 #40
stone space May 2016 #43
beevul May 2016 #45
stone space May 2016 #47
beevul May 2016 #50
stone space May 2016 #54
beevul May 2016 #59
Straw Man May 2016 #56
stone space May 2016 #57
Straw Man May 2016 #60
CompanyFirstSergeant May 2016 #46
stone space May 2016 #48
CompanyFirstSergeant May 2016 #49
stone space May 2016 #51
Straw Man May 2016 #58
stone space May 2016 #61
beevul May 2016 #64
Straw Man May 2016 #96
stone space May 2016 #97
Straw Man May 2016 #98
jmg257 May 2016 #39
Straw Man May 2016 #42
Nuclear Unicorn May 2016 #22
TeddyR May 2016 #88
Duckhunter935 May 2016 #95
Press Virginia May 2016 #26
braddy May 2016 #27
CompanyFirstSergeant May 2016 #53
CompanyFirstSergeant May 2016 #66
stone space May 2016 #67
CompanyFirstSergeant May 2016 #68
stone space May 2016 #69
CompanyFirstSergeant May 2016 #70
Duckhunter935 May 2016 #89
CompanyFirstSergeant May 2016 #93
TeddyR May 2016 #91
ileus May 2016 #78
Puha Ekapi May 2016 #81
beevul May 2016 #82
Duckhunter935 May 2016 #90
TeddyR May 2016 #92

Response to stone space (Original post)

Thu May 5, 2016, 07:13 AM

1. If you are going to use...

...strange and unusual terms, such as "ammosexual", it would be wise to actually define such terms so people know what in hell you are talking about. What in the wide world of sports is a "ammosexual"?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Puha Ekapi (Reply #1)

Thu May 5, 2016, 07:17 AM

2. Define "thief". Is anybody who runs from an ammosexual a thief? (nt)

 

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to stone space (Reply #2)

Thu May 5, 2016, 07:22 AM

4. I'm not the one throwing undefined terms around.

But since you asked, and because I'm a nice guy, here is a definition of "thief".

noun
1.
a person who steals, especially secretly or without open force; one guilty of theft or larceny
.


http://www.dictionary.com/browse/thief

Care to define "ammosexual"?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to stone space (Reply #2)

Thu May 5, 2016, 07:23 AM

5. A thief

 

Is a person who recieves a service then fails to pay. Like eating a meal and then skipping out on the bill.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Duckhunter935 (Reply #5)

Thu May 5, 2016, 07:51 AM

8. What if the person is simply running away from an armed ammosexal in a resturant?

 

A thief Is a person who recieves a service then fails to pay. Like eating a meal and then skipping out on the bill.


Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to stone space (Reply #8)

Thu May 5, 2016, 08:39 AM

14. he/she's being paranoid?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to ileus (Reply #14)

Thu May 5, 2016, 08:43 AM

17. But does running away from an ammosexual make one a "thief"?

 

And if it does, what rights does this give the ammosexual?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to stone space (Reply #17)

Thu May 5, 2016, 09:05 AM

19. I'd suppose the ammosexual has the same natural rights as anyone else?

Life, Liberty, Pursuit of happiness.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to stone space (Reply #17)

Thu May 5, 2016, 12:08 PM

25. Yes, if one hasn't paid for one's food.

But does running away from an ammosexual make one a "thief"?

Generally the courts don't recognize "but I was going to pay later" as an excuse for theft of services unless a verifiable emergency had been in progress. So what is your hypothetical emergency?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to stone space (Reply #17)

Thu May 5, 2016, 12:58 PM

30. No, its the faliure to pay the bill that makes one a thief.

 

Running away from an "ammosexual" just makes it more obvious how much regard for reality you have.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to beevul (Reply #30)

Thu May 5, 2016, 01:43 PM

44. Why are you trying to bully people into risking their lives?

 

No, its the faliure to pay the bill that makes one a thief.

Running away from an "ammosexual" just makes it more obvious how much regard for reality you have.


We're not thieves.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to stone space (Reply #44)

Thu May 5, 2016, 02:06 PM

52. Why are you accusing me of something I'm not doing?

 


We're not thieves.


If you run out of an eatery and fail to pay the bill because of a holstered firearm, yeah, you're a thief.

A holstered firearm is not a danger to your life. You left because your delicate sensibilities were offended, not because you were in any danger.

You're terrible at spin, btw.

Why are you trying to bully people into risking their lives?


Why are you accusing me of something I'm not doing?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to beevul (Reply #52)

Thu May 5, 2016, 02:11 PM

55. Labeling us as thieves for running away is a form of bullying. (nt)

 

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to stone space (Reply #55)

Thu May 5, 2016, 02:17 PM

62. Running w/o paying, from an eatery where no danger is present, is a form of thieving N/T

 

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to beevul (Reply #62)

Thu May 5, 2016, 02:20 PM

63. She murdered two people. How many times do I have to say it before you understand?

 

Running w/o paying, from an eatery where no danger is present, is a form of thieving N/T


It's not thievery to run away from them and their guns.

Calling us thieves is just an attempt by ammosexual internet lawyers to bully and intimidate us into risking our lives.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to stone space (Reply #63)

Thu May 5, 2016, 02:29 PM

65. Did someone say she didn't?

 

She murdered two people. How many times do I have to say it before you understand?


Did someone say she didn't? Maybe you should take it up with that poster then, huh? How many times do I have to say it before you understand?

It's not thievery to run away from them and their guns.


If there is no legitimate danger, running out of an eatery without paying is theft. PERIOD. How many times do I have to say it before you understand?

Calling us thieves is just an attempt by ammosexual internet lawyers to bully and intimidate us into risking our lives.


Round and round we go. A holstered weapon poses no danger.

How many times have you run from police, seeing as they have the same "holstered weapon"?

Did the judge buy your explanation of "deadly threat" about the officers sidearm?








Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to stone space (Reply #8)

Thu May 5, 2016, 10:10 AM

23. The difference: One of them is paranoid, the other is having lunch

 

Besides, you've probably already had lunch in a restaurant surrounded by people with guns.

You just didn't know it, so you didn't have an excuse to dine and dash and probably paid your bill.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to stone space (Reply #8)

Thu May 5, 2016, 10:31 AM

24. Doubt that

 

"I stole because I was scared of someone legally exercising their constitutional right" would get much sympathy from a court.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to stone space (Reply #8)

Thu May 5, 2016, 12:56 PM

29. Irrational fear

 

Chances of an acual shooting are miniscule

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to stone space (Reply #2)

Thu May 5, 2016, 01:34 PM

41. Please cease using allusions to bigoted expressions.

 

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Eleanors38 (Reply #41)

Thu May 5, 2016, 02:52 PM

71. No allusions here. I call ammosexuals "ammosexuals" quote openly.

 

Please cease using allusions to bigoted expressions.


Would you prefer "gunhumper".

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to stone space (Reply #71)

Thu May 5, 2016, 04:04 PM

76. Would you prefer to be called a "hoplaphobe"? n/t

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to oneshooter (Reply #76)

Thu May 5, 2016, 04:14 PM

77. That's a made-up word.

 

Would you prefer to be called a "hoplaphobe"? n/t


It arouses ammosexuals to think about scaring innocient people with their guns.

It's easy for an armed bully to make fun of his victims.


Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to stone space (Reply #77)

Thu May 5, 2016, 04:47 PM

79. LOL...thread winner reply.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to stone space (Reply #77)

Thu May 5, 2016, 05:02 PM

80. As opposed to "Ammosexuals" which is from what, Shakespeare?

 

You really are a laugh riot for so many, many reasons.

By all means, keep up the good work on gun control.

I rely on some of your posts, among others, for my concealed carry classes for illustrative purposes and comedy relief.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to DonP (Reply #80)

Thu May 5, 2016, 06:21 PM

83. Well done...

 




This was me when I read that.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to beevul (Reply #83)

Thu May 5, 2016, 06:27 PM

86. I know

 

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to stone space (Reply #77)

Thu May 5, 2016, 06:26 PM

85. Like ammosexual

 

Wow, such hypocrisy. Does not surprise me a bit that you champion made up words and condemn others for the same thing.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Puha Ekapi (Reply #1)

Thu May 5, 2016, 01:03 PM

34. Maybe they mean oxygen theif...

 

which really means something else as anyone knows how hateful the people are that use that term be.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to stone space (Original post)

Thu May 5, 2016, 07:22 AM

3. Doesn't look like her handling was so bad-she clearly shot in the air. That said,

her decision to fire was also clearly not the right one. That bullet has to come down somewhere.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to jmg257 (Reply #3)

Thu May 5, 2016, 12:53 PM

28. She didn't have a CCL, and has been charged a felony for that shot.

 

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to braddy (Reply #28)

Thu May 5, 2016, 01:07 PM

36. Good

 

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Press Virginia (Reply #36)

Thu May 5, 2016, 01:09 PM

37. I agree, she is the wrong type for carry, and this will probably prevent her from doing so again.

 

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to stone space (Original post)

Thu May 5, 2016, 07:31 AM

6. Damn guns are burning holes in their pockets

You know, they got that shiny new toy that makes them feel all righteous and powerful and stuff, they naturally want to use it.

So...

Thieves piss me off, too, but I'd rather put them in the joint where they have ample time to consider alternative career moves.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to stone space (Original post)

Thu May 5, 2016, 07:34 AM

7. ifyouonly....LOL

At least the thief didn't get away this time...

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to ileus (Reply #7)

Thu May 5, 2016, 08:30 AM

12. Ammosexuals find it funny when their fellow ammosexuals shoot at people.

 

ifyouonly....LOL

At least the thief didn't get away this time...


Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to stone space (Reply #12)

Thu May 5, 2016, 08:38 AM

13. those hateful bastards!

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to ileus (Reply #13)

Thu May 5, 2016, 08:41 AM

15. Ammosexuals also like to label people who run away from them as "thieves".

 

those hateful bastards!


Any idea why that is?

What's in it for them?



Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to stone space (Reply #15)

Thu May 5, 2016, 09:02 AM

18. So I've read....I have no answers, may they rot in hell.

thieves are people too.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to stone space (Reply #15)

Thu May 5, 2016, 01:01 PM

32. Ammophobes also like to label people as ammosexuals, as they're running for the door.

 

Any idea why that is?

What's in it for them?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to stone space (Original post)

Thu May 5, 2016, 07:58 AM

9. Can anti's write....

 

or just cut and paste?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to CompanyFirstSergeant (Reply #9)

Thu May 5, 2016, 08:22 AM

10. Well, OP's do tend to get censored here in the gungeon, so why bother writing poetry?

 

Besides, I'm a mathematician, not a poet.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to stone space (Reply #10)

Thu May 5, 2016, 08:24 AM

11. "I have not been censored.

 

You have not been censored.

We all have not been censored."

- Gyp Rossetti, DU Empire, Season 3

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to CompanyFirstSergeant (Reply #11)

Thu May 5, 2016, 03:42 PM

72. Just don't mention John Lennon.

 

http://www.democraticunderground.com/1172156873

And don't mention mentioning John Lennon, either.

http://www.democraticunderground.com/1172156936

Some things are unmentionable here.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to stone space (Reply #72)

Thu May 5, 2016, 03:47 PM

73. Read the Group ToS and try again with something relevant

 

Post that OP in the True Crime Group where it belongs.

I know from your posts that language isn't your strong suit, but try to read slowly and carefully and you'll figure out what the ToS actually says. Not what you'd like it to say.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to DonP (Reply #73)

Thu May 5, 2016, 03:56 PM

74. FAIL. It was posted on the aniversary of his assassination.

 

It didn't get censored anywhere on DU except the gungeon, because folks here hate gun victims with a passion.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to stone space (Reply #74)

Thu May 5, 2016, 04:00 PM

75. Don't care if it was the frickin 4th of July, not relevant in any way to the ToS of this group

 

Which I doubt you've even bothered to read.

So why didn't you just post it everywhere else, instead of whining again and again about how everybody picks on you?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to stone space (Reply #74)

Thu May 5, 2016, 06:31 PM

87. It was not censored

 

Do you even know what that means? The posts are still there, your post was just locked properly for being off topic. You are still posting, YOU were and are not censored.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to stone space (Reply #10)

Thu May 5, 2016, 08:42 AM

16. Only when they are irrelevant or obviously violate the ToS here

 

You have to really work at being obnoxious and ignorant to get an OP locked by our genial host.

In over a decade I've never had that problem, how about you?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to stone space (Reply #10)

Thu May 5, 2016, 01:01 PM

33. No they do not

 

Hell, the host from bansalot has almost 1000 OPs and most generally do not follow the SOP. he does Google Drive by posts without comment. The host here alows all viewpoints, including yours. How many are blocked in this group.

So please quit with the outright lies!!

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to stone space (Reply #10)

Thu May 5, 2016, 06:25 PM

84. LOL.

 

Get back to me when our list of blocked people gets to be 1/4 of the number in bansalot, and when those people are blocked for ideology rather than crossing clearly established behavioral lines.

You have a lot of nerve, I'll grant you that, for playing the censorship card, knowing the policies in bansalot.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to beevul (Reply #84)

Thu May 5, 2016, 07:52 PM

94. I expect he will not answer

 

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to stone space (Original post)

Thu May 5, 2016, 09:08 AM

20. Thank you for all you do to damage the gun control effort

 

Your posts are exactly what motivates gun owners to get out and vote.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to stone space (Original post)

Thu May 5, 2016, 09:57 AM

21. Good news, the "thief"* in this case went to jail, and the alleged "ammosexual" was indicted

"Andre Dawson, 27, was arrested at the scene, Bellmead police Detective Kory Martin said. Dawson remained in the McLennan County Jail Monday in lieu of $2,000 bond, charged with theft of less than $100."

"A McLennan County grand jury indicted Emma Cotten, 28, on a deadly conduct charge in a Nov. 20 incident in the parking lot of a Bellmead Wal-Mart, sources familiar with the case said Wednesday."



*Hope it is OK to NOT be an "ammosexual" and still call the guy who stole the pocketbook a "thief"...he is referred to that way in most of the news reports.





Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to jmg257 (Reply #21)

Thu May 5, 2016, 12:59 PM

31. Here ay DU, the ammosexuals consider anybody who runs from guns in a resturant a "thief".

 

*Hope it is OK to NOT be an "ammosexual" and still call the guy who stole the pocketbook a "thief"...he is referred to that way in most of the news reports.


They know that some of their fellow ammosexuals believe in murdering people identified as "thieves".

It's coded speech directed towards potential restaurant customers as well as their fellow ammosexuals, which appears to have two main purposes:

(1) Intimidate innocent victims in restaurants where ammosexuals bring their AR-15s out on a date with them to eat, hoping to inhibit potential victims and their families from running away quickly, so that the ammosexual has more time to get a better shot, should he so desire. This labeling of innocent victims as "thieves" is often combined with legal threats of arrest for running away from deadly weapons, as well as legal threats of arrest.

(2) Encourage ammosexuals out on a date with their AR-15s to treat fleeing customers running for their lives as "thieves", rather than as gun victims running from a dangerous weapon. The nature of that treatment varies form ammosexual to ammosexual (the story in the OP is one possible reaction).

The demonization of fleeing restaurant customers as "thieves" is intended to make the situation more dangerous for potential gun victims, and is a form of Stochastic Terrorism on the part of ammosexals.

It's bullying.

The ammosexuals doing it know full well about stories like the one in the OP.





Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to stone space (Reply #31)

Thu May 5, 2016, 01:05 PM

35. Here in America, the law considers anyone that doesn't pay their bill, a thief.

 

Don't blame the law on "ammosexuals", it makes you look like an "ammophobe".

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to beevul (Reply #35)

Thu May 5, 2016, 01:16 PM

38. You can't intimidate us into risking our lives for you.

 

Here in America, the law considers anyone that doesn't pay their bill, a thief.


Not even by labeling us as "thieves".

Your legal threats aren't nearly as scary as the very real threat from these guys.



Your internet bullying isn't going to work on us.

We are not going to sacrifice ourselves just because of some legal threats from some ammosexual internet lawyer.

Not even if you try to target us by telling the ammosexual that we are "thieves".













Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to stone space (Reply #38)

Thu May 5, 2016, 01:32 PM

40. Its a good thing I never tried to then, huh?

 

You can't intimidate us into risking our lives for you.


Its a good thing I never tried to then, huh?

Not even by labeling us as "thieves".


Its society and the law which label people as thieves for not paying your bill, stoney.

Your legal threats aren't nearly as scary as the very real threat from these guys.


The two women and the child make you scared, do they?

Your internet bullying isn't going to work on us.


Your implication that I'm bullying you isn't going to stick on me, since I haven't.

We are not going to sacrifice ourselves just because of some legal threats from some ammosexual internet lawyer.


The ramblings of a ammophobe internet mathematician.

Not even if you try to target us by telling the ammosexual that we are "thieves".


And yet more ramblings.

Crude. Ineffective. Counterproductive.


Its safe to assume you're a better math teacher than a debater (My 5 year old nephew does better at math than debates too.)

Don't quit your day job.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to beevul (Reply #40)

Thu May 5, 2016, 01:40 PM

43. Not society in general. Just ammosexual internet lawyers.

 

Its society and the law which label people as thieves for not paying your bill, stoney.


The saner parts of society understand why folks mighty run from guns.

The two women and the child make you scared, do they?


One of them murdered two people. She now blames easy access to guns for the double murder.

The child is probably still grieving.

Why do ammosexuals want us to risk our lives for them?

Why are you trying to bully us onto not running?

And why did you claim that she was safe when she murdered two people?

Were you trying to convince folks to risk their lives?










Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to stone space (Reply #43)

Thu May 5, 2016, 01:50 PM

45. Nope. The law.

 


The saner parts of society understand why folks mighty run from guns.


Only a thieving ammophobe runs from paying his bill because of a peaceable carried holstered firearm, and only an ammophobe thinks that doing so is sane.

One of them murdered two people. She now blames easy access to guns for the double murder.


I guess all women scare you then then, right?

Oh I forgot, to the ammophobe that logic only applies to guns.

Why do ammosexuals want us to risk our lives for them?


Why do ammophobes blame their own choices and the resulting consequence on others?

Why are you trying to bully us onto not running?


Why do ammophobes who seek to dictate everyone elses behavior call others bullies?

Projection Your Honor! (just playing my part as an amateur internet lawyer, dontchaknow)



(you really aren't good at this)

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to beevul (Reply #45)

Thu May 5, 2016, 01:55 PM

47. She murdered two people. Why should we allow ourselves to be murdered for you? (nt)

 

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to stone space (Reply #47)

Thu May 5, 2016, 02:01 PM

50. Remind me where I said you should, genius.

 

Or is the math too difficult for you.

I guess all women scare you then then, right?

Oh I forgot, to the ammophobe that logic only applies to guns.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to beevul (Reply #50)

Thu May 5, 2016, 02:10 PM

54. You label folks who run for their lives as "thieves".

 

That sort of ammosexual internet lawyering is intended to intimidate folks into just sitting there meekly and risking their lives in the face of a deadly threat.

It is also intended as a coded green light for other unstable ammosexuals to shoot folks who run for their lives.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to stone space (Reply #54)

Thu May 5, 2016, 02:16 PM

59. WRONG.

 

You label folks who run for their lives as "thieves".


WRONG. Nobody is "running for their lives" from a holstered weapon. They're "running because of their delicate sensibilities".

Delicate flowers, those.



That sort of ammosexual internet lawyering is intended to intimidate folks into just sitting there meekly and risking their lives in the face of a deadly threat.


The "deadly threat" of a holstered weapon. How many times have you run from police, seeing as they have the same "holstered weapon"?

Did the judge buy your explanation of "deadly threat" about the officers sidearm?


It is also intended as a coded green light for other unstable ammosexuals to shoot folks who run for their lives.


Some time I would like to visit your world and take pictures of the sky, as long as I can get back to this one afterwards.

I wouldn't want to be stuck in backwardsville permanently.


Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to stone space (Reply #47)

Thu May 5, 2016, 02:12 PM

56. Interesting.

She murdered two people. Why should we allow ourselves to be murdered for you? (nt)

Yet in the picture, she has no visible weapon, and the people she murdered were family members.

I think your fear is misplaced.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Straw Man (Reply #56)

Thu May 5, 2016, 02:13 PM

57. Why do we have to assume that she loves us more than she loves her own family?

 

Why does it bother you if we run away?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to stone space (Reply #57)

Thu May 5, 2016, 02:17 PM

60. Obviously you know nothing about domestic violence.

Why do we have to assume that she loves us more than she loves her own family?

Roughly one quarter of murder victims were killed by a family member. Roughly half were killed by someone they know.

As a random stranger, the odds are in your favor.

Why does it bother you if we run away?

It doesn't bother me in the least. It does make you look foolish, however. Why would you run from open carry when you probably encounter people carrying concealed on a regular basis?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to stone space (Reply #38)

Thu May 5, 2016, 01:53 PM

46. That picture really upsets me....

 

.....really bothers me.

How could anyone....

....not use a flash indoors?

So I can see the rifles better.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to CompanyFirstSergeant (Reply #46)

Thu May 5, 2016, 01:56 PM

48. One of them murdered two people. (nt)

 

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to stone space (Reply #48)

Thu May 5, 2016, 01:57 PM

49. Link?

 

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to CompanyFirstSergeant (Reply #49)

Thu May 5, 2016, 02:02 PM

51. Link here:

 

Veronica Dunnachie’s attorney said she thinks her easy access to firearms, the pressure of the divorce and the possibility of losing the children influenced Veronica.


http://crimeblog.dallasnews.com/2016/02/arlington-woman-gets-life-in-prison-for-killing-husband-stepdaughter.html/

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to stone space (Reply #51)

Thu May 5, 2016, 02:13 PM

58. In other words ...

Veronica Dunnachie’s attorney said she thinks her easy access to firearms, the pressure of the divorce and the possibility of losing the children influenced Veronica.

The crime she committed had nothing to do with open carry, despite her attorney's desperate attempt to link the two.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Straw Man (Reply #58)

Thu May 5, 2016, 02:17 PM

61. "It's a magazine, not a clip!"

 


The crime she committed had nothing to do with open carry


The ammosexual habit of hairsplitting minutia doesn't impress normal folks.

There's always some technicality for ammosexuals to latch onto in their defense of their fellow ammosexuals.

But both of her victims are still just as dead, minutia or no minutia.

Your hairsplitting technicalities won't bring them back to life.



Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to stone space (Reply #61)

Thu May 5, 2016, 02:23 PM

64. Right from the manual.

 

The ammosexual habit of hairsplitting minutia doesn't impress normal folks.


That's a fancy way of saying details don't matter. Do you also take this tack with mathematics, that details don't matter?

There's always some technicality for ammosexuals to latch onto in their defense of their fellow ammosexuals.


Theres always some detail for ammophobes to ignore, to latch onto their hatred of guns.

But both of her victims are still just as dead, minutia or no minutia.

Your hairsplitting technicalities won't bring them back to life.


Yes, and you're responsible. What? You didn't do it? Well gosh, neither did we.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to stone space (Reply #61)

Thu May 5, 2016, 11:43 PM

96. Missed the point by a mile, as usual.

There's always some technicality for ammosexuals to latch onto in their defense of their fellow ammosexuals.

Would you mind showing me where I defended this woman or her heinous crime?

But both of her victims are still just as dead, minutia or no minutia.

The topic was why you should fear her. Remember? Running from your life from open carry?

She killed a domestic partner in a crime of passion. Is there anyone in your personal life that might give you cause for concern?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Straw Man (Reply #96)

Fri May 6, 2016, 12:23 AM

97. I'm running. (nt)

 

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to stone space (Reply #97)

Fri May 6, 2016, 12:38 AM

98. From whom?

Or what?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to stone space (Reply #31)

Thu May 5, 2016, 01:19 PM

39. Ah - gotcha. Yes - bringing an AR into a restaurant - on a date or otherwise,

would definitely give us cause for concern.

A good example of why we like sitting with our backs to the wall whenever possible.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to stone space (Reply #31)

Thu May 5, 2016, 01:36 PM

42. Let's get this straight ...

Apparently it is your contention that open carry activists are carrying their weapons in restaurants in the hope that people will run from them in fear so that they may shoot such people as they flee. Is that what you are suggesting?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to stone space (Original post)

Thu May 5, 2016, 10:09 AM

22. Why do thieves pretend stealing food is about safety? What in it for them (besides free food)?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Nuclear Unicorn (Reply #22)

Thu May 5, 2016, 06:59 PM

88. This question is too logical

 

To get a response from the OP. Logic and facts confuse him, but insults are right up his alley. He and I had a discussion a few days ago and when I confronted him with factual issues he bailed.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to TeddyR (Reply #88)

Thu May 5, 2016, 08:21 PM

95. Yes he tends to do that

 

But one time he did stalk me with PMs. I had to block PMs from him and notify Skinner.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to stone space (Original post)

Thu May 5, 2016, 12:17 PM

26. Was she using geometry and the rotation of the earth to kill him by

 

firing into the air and not directly at him?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to stone space (Original post)

Thu May 5, 2016, 12:50 PM

27. The woman did not have a CCL and was charged with "deadly conduct" for discharging into the air.

 

The robber had just robbed an 84 year old woman.

"According to Texas law, a person commits deadly conduct if he or she “recklessly engages in conduct that places another in imminent danger of serious bodily injury” or if she “discharges a firearm at or in the direction of one or more individuals, or a habitation, building or vehicle.”
Deadly conduct can be a Class A misdemeanor or a third-degree felony, depending on how it is alleged."
http://www.wacotrib.com/news/courts_and_trials/robinson-woman-indicted-in-wal-mart-purse-snatching-shooting/article_f79a3fb3-a6f5-5b60-bfb1-96a3df953fbc.html

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to stone space (Original post)

Thu May 5, 2016, 02:07 PM

53. Just for the record....

 

I do not condone long gun open carry.

I can take a photo of people in a bar....

....and use the line 'one of them murdered two people' also.

By drinking and driving.


This is not a very nice world.

Many, many bad things happen in it.

People who intend to murder, will most likely find a way to at least try to murder.


The presence of a weapon does not equal the intent to use it. As far as perceiving a threat is concerned, there are two types of lead-ins to an event. One in which the aggressor 'telegraphed' the intent, and one in which they did not, or no one noticed the signals leading to the event.

One could argue that having one's hands on a firearm is a sign of 'telegraphing' intent. That is why so many open carriers do not condone long gun open carry. Your hands are all over the rifle. Getting out of the car, opening the door to the restaurant, adjusting it while seating.


With a holstered handgun, one can go decades without ever touching the holstered handgun while carrying it. The only time I put my hand on the grips is when there is a possibility of slipping and falling on a hiking trail.


I an not from a culture in which people LGOC except for hunting season, when it is all around.

I would not feel comfortable seeing the individuals in the photo above, as they are depicted, with rifles.

Handguns are a totally different conversation.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to stone space (Original post)

Thu May 5, 2016, 02:29 PM

66. Also....

 

Could we stop using terminology that ends in '.....sexual' Please...?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to CompanyFirstSergeant (Reply #66)

Thu May 5, 2016, 02:32 PM

67. No.

 

Also....

Could we stop using terminology that ends in '.....sexual' Please...?


What else do you call it when folks take their AR-15s out on dinner dates?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to stone space (Reply #67)

Thu May 5, 2016, 02:39 PM

68. What do sex and gun ownership have to do with one another...?

 

My wife and I have had a very healthy 25 year marriage - and still going strong.

We went shooting together once.

She did not like the noise, even with hearing protection.

That was 24 years ago.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to CompanyFirstSergeant (Reply #68)

Thu May 5, 2016, 02:45 PM

69. Not much unless you go out on dinner dates with your gun.

 

What do sex and gun ownership have to do with one another...?




My wife and I have had a very healthy 25 year marriage - and still going strong.


Congratulations! You got us beat by 6 years!

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to stone space (Reply #69)

Thu May 5, 2016, 02:48 PM

70. I don't date my gun, no.

 

I take my wife and family to dinner and I carry discreetly, sometimes.

K frame Smith, 2.5 inch barrel - it's a big, real gun but it hides well under a shirt tail.


Getting married is the best thing I ever did.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to CompanyFirstSergeant (Reply #70)

Thu May 5, 2016, 07:01 PM

89. Some people just have problems

 

and should seek help for their paranoia. The childish sexual insults really just make them look sad.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Duckhunter935 (Reply #89)

Thu May 5, 2016, 07:18 PM

93. Reminds me of watching too much...

 

'Family Guy.'

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to CompanyFirstSergeant (Reply #68)

Thu May 5, 2016, 07:03 PM

91. He simply wants to toss insults

 

Not have a legitimate discussion.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to stone space (Original post)

Thu May 5, 2016, 04:45 PM

78. Should anyone be allowed to call a thief a thief?

Maybe we could come up with a more progressive label for those who steal.


misunderstood-possessor perhaps?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to ileus (Reply #78)

Thu May 5, 2016, 05:59 PM

81. Whereas...

a liar will often say, after he was caught, that he "misspoke". A politically correct term for the actions of a thief might be to say that he "mis-took"

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to stone space (Original post)

Thu May 5, 2016, 06:03 PM

82. "What's in it for them?"

 

Why do ammosexuals call people "thieves"? What's in it for them?



In the case of someone that rushes out of an eatery without paying, because their oh-so-delicate sensibilities were violated by the mere sight of a holstered firearm?


Accuracy is "whats in it for them".


So glad you asked.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to beevul (Reply #82)

Thu May 5, 2016, 07:02 PM

90. Yep, the truth hurts, I guess

 

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to beevul (Reply #82)

Thu May 5, 2016, 07:09 PM

92. Wait!

 

You don't get to rush out of a restaurant without paying your bill because someone acting legally scared you? I thought that restaurants would be ok with you eating and not paying for your food. What about the server who needs tips to pay the bills and buy food? Certainly he/she won't mind.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink

Reply to this thread