HomeLatest ThreadsGreatest ThreadsForums & GroupsMy SubscriptionsMy Posts
DU Home » Latest Threads » Forums & Groups » Topics » Justice & Public Safety » Gun Control & RKBA (Group) » SCOTUS Ruling On Same-Sex...

Sat Jun 27, 2015, 09:51 AM

SCOTUS Ruling On Same-Sex Marriage Mandates Nationwide Concealed Carry Reciprocity

quote from link;

The Court used Section 1 of the Fourteen Amendment to justify their argument, which reads:

Amendment XIV
Section 1.

"All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the state wherein they reside. No state shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws."

By using the Constitution in such a manner, the Court argues that the Due Process Clause extends “certain personal choices central to individual dignity and autonomy” accepted in a majority of states across the state lines of a handful of states that still banned the practice.

The vast majority of states are “shall issue” on the matter of issuing concealed carry permits, and enjoy reciprocity with a large number of other states.

- See more at: http://constitutionalrightspac.com/articles/scotus-ruling-on-same-sex-marriage-mandates-nationwide-concealed-carry-reciprocity#sthash.Na6LTmxe.ccroN4TF.dpuf

http://constitutionalrightspac.com/articles/scotus-ruling-on-same-sex-marriage-mandates-nationwide-concealed-carry-reciprocity

10 replies, 2192 views

Reply to this thread

Back to top Alert abuse

Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum
Replies to this discussion thread
Arrow 10 replies Author Time Post
Reply SCOTUS Ruling On Same-Sex Marriage Mandates Nationwide Concealed Carry Reciprocity (Original post)
Daninmo Jun 2015 OP
Warren Stupidity Jun 2015 #1
Nuclear Unicorn Jun 2015 #2
Warren Stupidity Jun 2015 #3
Nuclear Unicorn Jun 2015 #4
Daninmo Jun 2015 #5
collinsrent Jun 2015 #6
Daninmo Jun 2015 #7
collinsrent Jun 2015 #8
gejohnston Jun 2015 #9
collinsrent Jun 2015 #10

Response to Daninmo (Original post)

Sat Jun 27, 2015, 10:18 AM

1. Horseshit. There is no fundamental right to conceal

 

a weapon.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Warren Stupidity (Reply #1)

Sat Jun 27, 2015, 10:22 AM

2. There is a fundamental right to bear arms.

Concealed, open or both -- pick one.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Nuclear Unicorn (Reply #2)

Sat Jun 27, 2015, 10:28 AM

3. There is no right to carry a concealed weapon.

 

The "right to bear" is a phrase that means openly carry, and always has meant that. Regulation of concealed carry has been and is the rule. There is no right to carry a concealed weapon.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Warren Stupidity (Reply #3)

Sat Jun 27, 2015, 11:05 AM

4. Okay, then open carry it is.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Daninmo (Original post)

Sat Jun 27, 2015, 11:43 AM

5. perhaps

Perhaps open carry is just the most common sense, right thing to do. Looking forward to display the right in all 50 states and perhaps US territories.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Daninmo (Original post)

Sat Jun 27, 2015, 12:04 PM

6. interesting

 

either way this was a wonderful/emotional moment

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to collinsrent (Reply #6)

Sat Jun 27, 2015, 12:17 PM

7. yes

I'm sure many are rejoicing.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Daninmo (Original post)

Sat Jun 27, 2015, 12:31 PM

8. wasn't the Heller

 

decision split 5-4 as well?

im surprised the 14th was cited in influencing the decision for marriage equality. i figured it would have been the 9th or 10th.

my bad two separate thoughts occurring at the same time.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to collinsrent (Reply #8)

Sat Jun 27, 2015, 01:54 PM

9. the 9th, 10th and the full faith and credit clause

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to gejohnston (Reply #9)

Sat Jun 27, 2015, 01:57 PM

10. my bad

 



i think i may have answered my own question.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink

Reply to this thread