Gun Control & RKBA
Related: About this forumX-post:Stop NRA-backed lawmakers from exploiting campus sexual assault
I'm only going to quote a single line, because that's all that it will take to vaporize the irony meter:
"This grotesque display of opportunism is beyond the pale."
http://www.democraticunderground.com/12628265
Bloombergs astroturf group (whatever nametag its wearing today) has had the market cornered on grotesque opportunism.
Me, I think folks in the article contained in the post I linked to, took a page out of the gun control talking point manual, and bloombergs astroturf folks don't like it being turned against them:
#1: ALWAYS FOCUS ON EMOTIONAL AND VALUE-DRIVEN
ARGUMENTS ...
NYC_SKP
(68,644 posts)Oh, wait, there's no such thing.
AND, there's really no need for one, the anti-gun groups pretty much sink their own boat everytime they make a statement.
ileus
(15,396 posts)Tis better to be assaulted than to pollute society with mean ole guns.
Duckhunter935
(16,974 posts)Boston Marathon bombing suspect Tamerlan Tsarnaev, who was run over by his brother after a gunfight with police, was named as a victim of gun violence during an event held by Mayors Against Illegal Guns, the anti-gun violence group run by New York City Mayor Michael Bloomberg.
http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/2013/06/bloomberg-gun-group-apologizes-for-honoring-marathon-bombing-suspect/
Things like that happen when you try and push an emotional narrative without checking for facts fiirst. That group seems to be quite loose with the facts anyway.
I find it very interesting that the people over their in that group are against the choice of an individual for self protecting if they so desire. I am for as much choice as possible and they seem to be anti-choice.
The comments are very telling and once again seem to be not adhering to their own SOP.
Funny since the NRA does not get much money from gun companies but individual dues and purchase round ups. That is unlike Bloomberg's group that needs a billionaire to fund it and pass off that astroturf as grassroots.
Actually I am glad the NRA has a robust gun safety program and can separate that from some of the crazy legislative agendas that I can object to. I am sure they do not associate with all of the mayors that are now in jail that were part of MAIG.
stone space
(6,498 posts)Duckhunter935
(16,974 posts)you will never know and possibly already have.
stone space
(6,498 posts)In addition, I will kick you out of class and you will receive an "F" as your grade.
Duckhunter935
(16,974 posts)You will never know if done correctly
stone space
(6,498 posts)How dishonest would you be?
Duckhunter935
(16,974 posts)I do risk assessments.
In normal circumstances, I would never even think of carrying in a school unless permitted. If I were a young lady or small man and had been threatened, I might think differently.
I have a CCW but do not normally carry. I sometimes speed. I have not fully stopped before proceeding at a stop sign.
stone space
(6,498 posts)Duckhunter935
(16,974 posts)if properly concealed.
stone space
(6,498 posts)Duckhunter935
(16,974 posts)As you stated it is illegal in your state and as I have not been threatened, I would not carry anyway. As I have also stated, I do not normally carry. I have only carried a couple of times ever.
discntnt_irny_srcsm
(18,479 posts)Well do ya punk?
Duckhunter935
(16,974 posts)oneshooter
(8,614 posts)then you are opening yourself to a massive lawsuit.
stone space
(6,498 posts)GGJohn
(9,951 posts)so what's illegal about it?
stone space
(6,498 posts)It really is that simple.
Nuclear Unicorn
(19,497 posts)And if your college receives public funding that funding should be withdrawn for civil rights violations.
stone space
(6,498 posts)Nuclear Unicorn
(19,497 posts)blueridge3210
(1,401 posts)would you have someone arrested if they were lawfully carrying a weapon? And, under what authority would you have them kicked out of class and awarded a failing grade?
stone space
(6,498 posts)Try me.
GGJohn
(9,951 posts)then, no, no one will be going to jail.
stone space
(6,498 posts)GGJohn
(9,951 posts)blueridge3210
(1,401 posts)stone space
(6,498 posts)I am well within my authority to kick out students who create a hostile environment and disruption in my calculus class.
If it's past the drop date, the "F" is automatic.
There's nothing you can do about it.
Want a better grade in calculus? Then stop being disruptive in the classroom.
GGJohn
(9,951 posts)stone space
(6,498 posts)GGJohn
(9,951 posts)If the college allows for concealed carry, how would you know if there are firearms in the classroom?
stone space
(6,498 posts)Bring one to my classroom and you're going to jail.
It's as simple as that.
GGJohn
(9,951 posts)then no one will be going to jail and you could very well be in trouble for calling the cops.
It's as simple as that.
A teacher tried that in CO. where it's legal, he was rebuked by the college.
stone space
(6,498 posts)GGJohn
(9,951 posts)to call the cops and have the offender arrested and removed.
petronius
(26,602 posts)all in all, I don't think a public campus should be treated any differently than anywhere else.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/1172135441
That said, the "hot little girls" comment is nasty in several ways...
Electric Monk
(13,869 posts)virginia mountainman
(5,046 posts)Sara Brady (R) Founder of the Brady Campaign..
For the next ten years, she worked actively in various capacities within the Republican Party. She served as Assistant to the Campaign Director at the National Republican Congressional Committee from 1968 to 1970. Sarah joined the staff of U.S. Representative Mike McKevitt (R-CO) as an Administrative Aide. She held the same position in Congressman Joseph J. Maraziti's office (R-NJ) from 1972-1974. During the next four years, Sarah was Director of Administration and Coordinator of Field Services for the Republican National Committee.
Paul Helmke, Former President of the Brady Campaign, he is a Republican.
Michael Bloomberg, 1% who won many elections as a Republican...
Caroline McCarthy, Who became a Democrat, so she could win the election in a (D) district..
I could go on...But no need too, the point is well made....
Nuclear Unicorn
(19,497 posts)stone space
(6,498 posts)We have disagreements, sometimes very vigorous disagreements, but we work out our differences with mathematical proofs, not with gunplay.
Duckhunter935
(16,974 posts)If I ever get robbed or mugged, I will whip out some math to protect me.
stone space
(6,498 posts)...being robbed or mugged in a calculus class?
Duckhunter935
(16,974 posts)depending on the area, I would be more concerned about getting to and from that class and at what hour that class is would be part of my assessment.
Nuclear Unicorn
(19,497 posts)Your class is only a fraction of a student's academic career, let alone their entire life and despite pretentions you possess no autocratic authority.
Duckhunter935
(16,974 posts)beevul
(12,194 posts)All they want to do is have a conversation.
beevul
(12,194 posts)Says the guy that hosts the group which embraces bloombergs gun control astroturf groups, and intends to block anyone that openly disagrees with them in any forum.
Duckhunter935
(16,974 posts)Electric Monk
(13,869 posts)Duckhunter935
(16,974 posts)just pointing out facts. Makes me feel better to show others how you will not answer a simple question on sensible gun control laws. Just proves the point that most here have been saying for a long time and now other people that read my posts also know.
Electric Monk
(13,869 posts)It's not my fault if you have reading comprehension difficulties.
Duckhunter935
(16,974 posts)so its a good reasonable law that could have been enforced without a SWAT raid?
You just do not want to say if the law was reasonable or not, YES or NO. Seems to me you are worried that one of your few posters in your group seeing that you might agree with us.
Duckhunter935
(16,974 posts)Duckhunter935
(16,974 posts)You seem to be against the option for people that have been screened and trained and have passed a background check to have a choice.
stone space
(6,498 posts)kcci
(35 posts)Duckhunter935
(16,974 posts)maybe he can answer it for us?
Duckhunter935
(16,974 posts)you are forcing others to not have a choice to carry one if they passed all of the legal requirements. Yes sir, you are taking the choice away from others. They will not have that choice in your state until the law is changed.
beevul
(12,194 posts)Let me guess:
"That's different".