Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
10 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Firearm bans (Original Post) discntnt_irny_srcsm May 2014 OP
Nope. rrneck May 2014 #1
I'd agree discntnt_irny_srcsm May 2014 #2
Size/concealability? DonP May 2014 #3
It's also the basis for laws targeting 3d printed guns Erich Bloodaxe BSN May 2014 #5
In spite of Die Hard 2... discntnt_irny_srcsm May 2014 #10
How small is too small? n/t discntnt_irny_srcsm May 2014 #6
IIRC, there were no specific parameters on size DonP May 2014 #8
Rate of fire is the only one I could support. blueridge3210 May 2014 #4
Currently... discntnt_irny_srcsm May 2014 #7
Sounds good. (nt) blueridge3210 May 2014 #9

rrneck

(17,671 posts)
1. Nope.
Tue May 20, 2014, 02:42 PM
May 2014

And I'm not too sure about your second example. Come to think of it, I'm not too sure about any of them. Firearms laws are about as good as they can get unless I see something I haven't seen before.

Erich Bloodaxe BSN

(14,733 posts)
5. It's also the basis for laws targeting 3d printed guns
Tue May 20, 2014, 03:34 PM
May 2014

that can be made without enough metal to set off metal detectors.

discntnt_irny_srcsm

(18,476 posts)
10. In spite of Die Hard 2...
Tue May 20, 2014, 06:47 PM
May 2014

...the Glock 7 is entirely fictional. It is no simpler to make a firearm of sufficiently minimal metallic content that would not show up on a TSA scanner via 3D printing than by regular fabrication means. Accepting for the sake of discussion that this was possible and that composite materials of sufficient strength existed such that said firearm would be reliable, the ammo (lead, copper and brass) would be hard to miss. In addition, the TSA generally is using, or quickly moving to use in all airports, the millimeter wave scanners for all lanes except crews, TSA employees and trusted travelers. Both the standard metal detectors and the millimeter wave scanners incorporate sniffers that detect chemicals such as gun powder in bullets and traces of it that would remain on a firearm metallic or not.

Aside from all of that, my watch sets off metal detectors and is much smaller than any useful gun.

These laws sound like solutions in search of a problem.

 

DonP

(6,185 posts)
8. IIRC, there were no specific parameters on size
Tue May 20, 2014, 04:20 PM
May 2014

Just things like; "small, cheap and easy to hide" definitions.

That was where the HCI people got their start, trying to ban small handguns.

With the crop of small and pocket pistols like 3 inch barreled .45 ACP 1911s, single stack 9mms, Kel Tecs and a the whole crop of .380s everybody keeps cranking out, it'd be hard to keep up with banning them.

But I'm sure they'd try again in a heartbeat if they thought they could pull it off.

 

blueridge3210

(1,401 posts)
4. Rate of fire is the only one I could support.
Tue May 20, 2014, 03:17 PM
May 2014

And that only because it is currently enforced and everyone is basically up to speed. Ammo capacity has no discernable impact on crime and if caliber is a reference to .50 rifles the same would apply.

discntnt_irny_srcsm

(18,476 posts)
7. Currently...
Tue May 20, 2014, 04:07 PM
May 2014

...full auto and calibers over .50 are not generally available. I'm okay with keeping that. I'd also be okay with a mag limit of whatever the police and government have, if the FOPA of '86 was updated to allow new firearms.

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Gun Control & RKBA»Firearm bans