HomeLatest ThreadsGreatest ThreadsForums & GroupsMy SubscriptionsMy Posts
DU Home » Latest Threads » Forums & Groups » Topics » Justice & Public Safety » Gun Control & RKBA (Group) » Why the NRA wins. (3)

Thu Jan 30, 2014, 03:23 AM

Why the NRA wins. (3)

Last edited Thu Feb 6, 2014, 02:39 PM - Edit history (1)

Part 1
Part 2
Part 4


Human beings arenít perfect. Some are a lot less perfect than others. Approximately 1% of the population, about three million people in this country, is sociopathic. Add to this reality the disparity of resources, opportunity, and history in an imperfect world and violence between people in even a wealthy and peaceful country is unavoidable.

One especially tragic form of violence is the mass shooting of people by a disturbed individual. There are few things more terrifying for the public than the possibility of a formerly safe place turned into a shooting gallery. Given the already ubiquitous presence of guns and the reality of disturbed individuals to wield them, mass shootings are a certainty for the foreseeable future. Itís only a question of where and when.

Solutions for this problem have been offered from both sides of the political aisle. The right seems to favor arming as many people as possible for reasons related to economics and the ideology of self sufficiency. The political left tends to favor the restriction of access to firearms to reduce the chances of such a tragedy. Such policy positions follow the underlying morality of authority and nurture respectively.

If the political left had achieved every policy initiative attempted after Sandy Hook, there would still be approximately one gun for every man, woman, and child in this country. And many deadly weapons would have gone unregulated. The most those initiatives would have done is to reduce the frequency of gun violence in general and mass shootings in particular somewhat. Eventually. Maybe.

So sooner or later there will be another mass shooting and the media will be overwhelmed with images of people fleeing the scene, terrified and weeping survivors and family members, impromptu memorials to the fallen and disturbing profiles of some individual that might be typical of someone from our personal experience. And the most that the left could say after a string of difficult and politically expensive legislative victories is, ďIf not for us this tragedy might have happened a little sooner. MaybeĒ. Such solutions that suggest a corrosive effect on civil liberties to problems that may affect any given individual with about the same chance as being struck by lightning offer at most a pyrrhic legislative victory. Such a victory might well result in a one way bus ticket to the political wilderness for any political party responsible for it.

While conservatives with the NRA in the vanguard can point to an actual object that can be acquired by individuals to empower them in the absence of any help from society at large, liberals are left fighting for an abstracted percentage and the hope that legislation will result in a fractional uptick in the odds of oneís survival from assault and the notion that some homicidal maniac will be slightly less efficient. Thatís because the political left is attempting to redefine the problem to conform to an ideology that overlooks a rare albeit important facet of the human experience: sometimes in the real world people have to fight.

2 replies, 2563 views

Reply to this thread

Back to top Alert abuse

Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum
Replies to this discussion thread
Arrow 2 replies Author Time Post
Reply Why the NRA wins. (3) (Original post)
rrneck Jan 2014 OP
Eleanors38 Jan 2014 #1
NYC_SKP Mar 2014 #2

Response to rrneck (Original post)

Thu Jan 30, 2014, 10:40 AM

1. Confusing the murmur of nightly murders with mass shootings

 

results in the blunt force trauma of social solutions: Prohibition. Here in DU, attention is given to sociopathic mass shootings, and not so much to drive-bys, robberies gone violent or even domestic fights, unless they serve the purpose of attack & smear of gun-owners, which happens to be the same purpose for posting of mass shootings. Therein is the lesson: Second Amendment defenders are CONSTANTLY reminded of the visceral hatred of a comparatively small number of gun-control advocates, and act accordingly with SUSTAINED and UNDIMINISHED resistance to virtually any proposal to diminish acts of violence.

If ever there was a vanguard for NRA activism, it is the withering animosity of these keyboard prohibitionists and their counterparts in legislative bodies and MSM. They operate as virtual free-consultants. The NRA "wins," the Democratic Party gets smash-mouthed, and what measures which could address the routine violence and schoolyard spectacular remain in deep freeze.

The NRA have got these extreme prohibitionists right where they want, doing what they want.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to rrneck (Original post)

Sat Mar 29, 2014, 04:29 PM

2. Kick! (nt)

 

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink

Reply to this thread