Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

ileus

(15,396 posts)
Sun Feb 5, 2012, 05:16 PM Feb 2012

Man shot twice with 45 while breaking in

http://www.currentargus.com/ci_19897299


DEMING -- A home intruder was shot on the evening of Thursday, Feb. 2 as he attempted to charge the home owner. Authorities were tipped off when the failed home intruder called Central Dispatch with his cellular phone seeking help for his two gunshot wounds

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

odd story....confusing to say the least.
9 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Man shot twice with 45 while breaking in (Original Post) ileus Feb 2012 OP
Very, very poor marksmanship, one shot with a .45 should have been more than enough. nt jody Feb 2012 #1
According to Hollywood anyway. ManiacJoe Feb 2012 #6
If he was shot outside, bad juju Warpy Feb 2012 #2
Good point, states vary but see NM law from wikipedia below jody Feb 2012 #5
Sounds like maybe he wasn't living there? BiggJawn Feb 2012 #3
That's a 50BMG you're thinking of... ileus Feb 2012 #7
Yeah... BiggJawn Feb 2012 #8
May well have been FMJ ammo ProgressiveProfessor Feb 2012 #9
Seems pretty straight forward to me. bluedigger Feb 2012 #4

Warpy

(111,124 posts)
2. If he was shot outside, bad juju
Sun Feb 5, 2012, 05:19 PM
Feb 2012

They needed to wait until he got in.

In any case, they're remarkably bad shots if there is anything left after two shots with that cannon.

 

jody

(26,624 posts)
5. Good point, states vary but see NM law from wikipedia below
Sun Feb 5, 2012, 05:37 PM
Feb 2012

New Mexico

Section 30-2-7A NMSA 1978 provides that a homicide is justifiable when committed in the necessary defense of property. Although this statute has been a part of New Mexico law since 1907, the New Mexico appellate courts have never given the statute a broad interpretation. The New Mexico courts have consistently held, not always referring to the statute, that one cannot defend his property, other than his habitation, from a mere trespass to the extent of killing the aggressor. State v. McCracken, 22 N.M. 588, 166 P. 1174 (1917); State v. Martinez, 34 N.M. 112, 278 P. 210 (1929); State v. Couch, 52 N.M. 127, 193 P.2d 405 (1946).

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Castle_doctrine#New_Mexico

BiggJawn

(23,051 posts)
3. Sounds like maybe he wasn't living there?
Sun Feb 5, 2012, 05:23 PM
Feb 2012

Owned the place, had furnishings, but wasn't living there? That might explain the lack of functional utilities.

I thought 2 hits from a 45 was supposed to blow body parts off?

BiggJawn

(23,051 posts)
8. Yeah...
Sun Feb 5, 2012, 09:19 PM
Feb 2012

I dunno, took one in the leg, kept it, took one in the belly, lived to be arrested...

Are they sure it wasn't a 9 and not a .45?

bluedigger

(17,085 posts)
4. Seems pretty straight forward to me.
Sun Feb 5, 2012, 05:29 PM
Feb 2012

Property owner uncovers evidence of a crime in progress. Police investigate and leave. Property owner waits for criminal to proceed and ambushes him when he does. Simple.

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Gun Control & RKBA»Man shot twice with 45 wh...