Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

xchrom

(108,903 posts)
Sat Dec 24, 2011, 01:29 PM Dec 2011

Journal retracts study linking a virus to ME {chronic fatigue syndrome}

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/health-16306646

A study linking a virus to chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS), also known as ME, has been withdrawn by the journal which published it.

The 2009 study, in Science, suggested a mouse virus, XMRV, was linked to the illness.

But in September this year, the study's authors withdrew some of their findings, saying they were based on "contaminated data".

The journal said it had "lost confidence" in the study.
4 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Journal retracts study linking a virus to ME {chronic fatigue syndrome} (Original Post) xchrom Dec 2011 OP
Huh... I so rarely see retractions on studies kdmorris Dec 2011 #1
Maybe they discovered it was literally contaminated. Chemisse Dec 2011 #2
It sounds like it was literally contaminated. kdmorris Dec 2011 #3
A triumph of peer-reviewed, evidence-based research. MineralMan Dec 2011 #4

kdmorris

(5,649 posts)
1. Huh... I so rarely see retractions on studies
Sat Dec 24, 2011, 01:48 PM
Dec 2011

(though you do see other studies that are unable replicate initial studies).

Though I still wish I knew what caused it.

Chemisse

(30,803 posts)
2. Maybe they discovered it was literally contaminated.
Sat Dec 24, 2011, 11:15 PM
Dec 2011

If so, it would have proved to be quite an embarrassment to the researchers, (one would assume) and a retraction would be the only honorable thing to do.

kdmorris

(5,649 posts)
3. It sounds like it was literally contaminated.
Sun Dec 25, 2011, 01:28 AM
Dec 2011

Still, it's good to see them doing the honorable thing. I wish others would, too.

MineralMan

(146,262 posts)
4. A triumph of peer-reviewed, evidence-based research.
Wed Dec 28, 2011, 10:53 AM
Dec 2011

Every time this happens, it demonstrates that science is willing to deal with erroneous information publicly. That the authors, themselves, revealed the flaws in their research is even more meaningful.

This is why science makes progress and demonstrates the ethical standards that all research should follow.

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Health»Journal retracts study li...