Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Health
Related: About this forumJournal retracts study linking a virus to ME {chronic fatigue syndrome}
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/health-16306646A study linking a virus to chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS), also known as ME, has been withdrawn by the journal which published it.
The 2009 study, in Science, suggested a mouse virus, XMRV, was linked to the illness.
But in September this year, the study's authors withdrew some of their findings, saying they were based on "contaminated data".
The journal said it had "lost confidence" in the study.
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
4 replies, 938 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (2)
ReplyReply to this post
4 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Journal retracts study linking a virus to ME {chronic fatigue syndrome} (Original Post)
xchrom
Dec 2011
OP
kdmorris
(5,649 posts)1. Huh... I so rarely see retractions on studies
(though you do see other studies that are unable replicate initial studies).
Though I still wish I knew what caused it.
Chemisse
(30,803 posts)2. Maybe they discovered it was literally contaminated.
If so, it would have proved to be quite an embarrassment to the researchers, (one would assume) and a retraction would be the only honorable thing to do.
kdmorris
(5,649 posts)3. It sounds like it was literally contaminated.
Still, it's good to see them doing the honorable thing. I wish others would, too.
MineralMan
(146,262 posts)4. A triumph of peer-reviewed, evidence-based research.
Every time this happens, it demonstrates that science is willing to deal with erroneous information publicly. That the authors, themselves, revealed the flaws in their research is even more meaningful.
This is why science makes progress and demonstrates the ethical standards that all research should follow.