Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

theHandpuppet

(19,964 posts)
Thu Jul 31, 2014, 09:34 PM Jul 2014

Federal Appeals Court Trolls Scalia In Virginia Gay Marriage Case

Interesting. Will Scalia be hoisted by his own petard?

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/07/28/scalia-trolled-gay-marriage_n_5627653.html
Ryan J. Reilly
Federal Appeals Court Trolls Scalia In Virginia Gay Marriage Case
07/28/2014

A federal appeals court based in Virginia cited the words of conservative Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia when it struck down the state's ban on same-sex marriage on Monday. In its ruling, the court embraced the language of a dissent Scalia authored in the Supreme Court case that struck down state sodomy laws.

In a 2-1 ruling upholding the ruling of a lower court, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 4th Circuit ruled that Virginia's same-sex marriage ban was unconstitutional, in part, because history and tradition were not justification for infringing on the rights of gay citizens.

The appeals court pointed to Scalia's dissent in the Lawrence v. Texas case in 2003, in which he warned that striking down the anti-sodomy law would only call into question laws that are based on moral choices. In ruling that the "historical and traditional status quo is therefore not a compelling interest that justifies the Virginia Marriage Laws," the court pointed to Scalia's Lawrence dissent, in which he admitted that "'preserving the traditional institution of marriage’ is just a kinder way of describing the State’s moral disapproval of same-sex couples.”...

...The U.S. Court of Appeals for the 10th Circuit in Denver also cited Scalia's dissent in the Lawrence case when striking down Utah's gay marriage ban last month, pointing out that he said there couldn't be a justification for banning same-sex marriage based on inability to procreate, given that "the sterile and the elderly are allowed to marry."

MORE at link provided above.

5 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Federal Appeals Court Trolls Scalia In Virginia Gay Marriage Case (Original Post) theHandpuppet Jul 2014 OP
Serves that prick right. William769 Jul 2014 #1
That would truly be delicious irony theHandpuppet Jul 2014 #3
Hey! No fair to pricks! Pricks are useful and fun. n/t TygrBright Jul 2014 #4
Speak for yourself. theHandpuppet Jul 2014 #5
Down with Scalia Law! xfundy Jul 2014 #2

TygrBright

(20,756 posts)
4. Hey! No fair to pricks! Pricks are useful and fun. n/t
Thu Jul 31, 2014, 11:40 PM
Jul 2014

A better word for "Big Tony" might be "santorum."

Serves that santorum right.

helpfully,
Bright

Latest Discussions»Alliance Forums»LGBT»Federal Appeals Court Tro...