HomeLatest ThreadsGreatest ThreadsForums & GroupsMy SubscriptionsMy Posts
DU Home » Latest Threads » Forums & Groups » Topics » Gender & Orientation » LGBT (Group) » Obama’s Shifts May Affect...

Tue Feb 5, 2013, 09:22 AM

Obama’s Shifts May Affect U.S. Legal Plan on Gay Marriage

WASHINGTON — The practice of law would be much more pleasant, many lawyers will tell you over a second Scotch, if it did not require clients. It is one thing to construct an airtight legal argument and quite another to deal with the demands of inconstant human beings.

Consider Solicitor General Donald B. Verrilli Jr.’s most prominent client, President Obama. In May, in announcing his support for same-sex marriage, Mr. Obama said the issue should be decided state by state. In his Inaugural Address last month, Mr. Obama seemed to make a case for a more national approach.

The timing was awkward. Mr. Verrilli is in the midst of considering what to tell the Supreme Court in a pair of momentous same-sex marriage cases to be argued in March. Just days before the inauguration, he met with lawyers challenging California’s ban on same-sex marriage, who urged him to weigh in on their side. He was noncommittal, but his client’s public marching orders until then had suggested that he should sit that one out.

Here is what Mr. Obama told Robin Roberts of ABC News in May: “What you’re seeing is, I think, states working through this issue in fits and starts, all across the country. Different communities are arriving at different conclusions, at different times. And I think that’s a healthy process and a healthy debate. And I continue to believe that this is an issue that is going be worked out at the local level, because historically, this has not been a federal issue, what’s recognized as a marriage.”

That reasoning fits tolerably well with the Justice Department’s position in one of the two cases before the Supreme Court, United States v. Windsor, No. 12-307. That case is a challenge to the constitutionality of the federal Defense of Marriage Act, a 1996 law that defined marriage as the union of a man and a woman in connection with federal benefits. The Defense of Marriage Act, Mr. Obama explained in May, “tried to federalize what has historically been state law.”



3 replies, 826 views

Reply to this thread

Back to top Alert abuse

Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum
Replies to this discussion thread
Arrow 3 replies Author Time Post
Reply Obama’s Shifts May Affect U.S. Legal Plan on Gay Marriage (Original post)
DonViejo Feb 2013 OP
MNBrewer Feb 2013 #1
RetiredTrotskyite Feb 2013 #2
Vanje Feb 2013 #3

Response to DonViejo (Original post)

Tue Feb 5, 2013, 07:49 PM

1. I personally WANT to see it federalized

a la Loving v. Virginia.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink

Response to MNBrewer (Reply #1)

Fri Feb 8, 2013, 05:46 PM

2. Agreed...

I hoestly can't see this coutnry getting marriage equality any other way than to have it federalized.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink

Response to DonViejo (Original post)

Fri Feb 8, 2013, 08:32 PM

3. States Rights

Doesn't work for civil rights issues.

Its got to go to the Supreme Court eventually....and Please God, I hope they're up to it.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink

Reply to this thread