Israel/Palestine
Related: About this forumU.S. Jewish leader: Release of convicted Israeli spy Jonathan Pollard is 'inevitable'
Speaking to Haaretz, Obama supporter Jack Rosen says 'it looks like he'll be released in the next few years shortly'; this is despite the Obama administration's stated refusal to discuss Pollard's release.<snip>
"The release of Jonathan Pollard, the convicted Israeli spy serving a life sentence in a U.S. prison, is "inevitable" and could take place shortly on "technical grounds," a a prominent Jewish leader and supporter of U.S. President Obama told Haaretz.
The comment, made by Jack Rosen, chairman of the Council for World Jewry, who is in Jerusalem to chair the International Conference of Mayors, came in an apparent contradiction to the Obama administration's staunch refusal to discuss Pollard's release.
Notably, late last year the New York Times quoted U.S. Vice President Joe Biden as telling Jewish leaders that the convicted spy would be released "over my dead body."
While later Biden denied he used that exact phrase, he did, however, confirm that the sentiment expressed in that rejection was indeed his own.
Speaking to Haaretz, Rosen, however, said: "Right now, it looks like he'll be released in the next few years shortly," he said. "There are some technical reasons, I'm told, why he'll be released. I think there's an inevitability to that happening."
http://www.haaretz.com/news/diplomacy-defense/u-s-jewish-leader-release-of-convicted-israeli-spy-jonathan-pollard-is-inevitable-1.428769
atreides1
(16,066 posts)As soon as the traitor succumbs to his illness, and then he can leave feet first That way he'll have his own private seat in the cargo hold of a 747.
LiberalEsto
(22,845 posts)Peregrine
(992 posts)He didn't wage war against the US. And he didn't give aid and comfort to the enemy. Oh right, this is DU, Israel is the enemy.
LiberalEsto
(22,845 posts)and stole US government secrets and provided them to the foreign nation.
I don't know why Israel considers itself a friend of the US when it actively spies on our government.
aranthus
(3,385 posts)Ken Burch
(50,254 posts)that they'd be treated exactly the same.
cali
(114,904 posts)and we don't spy on our allies? Get a grip. Go find an old cop of Mad Magazine and peruse Spy v Spy.
Everyone spies on everyone else.
azurnoir
(45,850 posts)why did we make them resort to these kind of tactics wouldn't you say?
so glad to see you back on board
eta Mr Pollard will be as others have pointed out eligible for parole in 2015 which is IMO soon enough
cali
(114,904 posts)What it does say is that contrary to what the poster implied, Israel is hardly the only nation spying on allies.
And I don't think Pollard should be let out.
And of course I didn't say anything about anyone making anyone else use these tactics.
I see you're still employing your old tactics with abandon.
azurnoir
(45,850 posts)I did not say you were wrong about countries spying on each other, or Pollard for that matter but I'm not too sure what you meant by tactics the poster was wrong and that was already pointed out which was the reason for my post
but really I thought Spy vs Spy was kind of a cold war thing or maybe its been that long since I've seen MAD
shaayecanaan
(6,068 posts)(the UK, Canada, Britain, Australia and New Zealand) back in the seventies after the Church committee report was published. They also abandoned the practice of recruiting religious figures (Mormon missionaries were always a favourite) and curtailed the practice of recruiting journalists.
As far as anyone knows, I believe, they have stuck to this rule, although of course each of the countries to the UKUSA alliance more or less consents to all of the other countries invigilating each others citizens in a way that amounts to spying. And of course, no one can stop a diplomat from having a quiet chat with one of his hosts.
bemildred
(90,061 posts)2. a violation of allegiance to one's sovereign or to one's state.
http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/treason
Clearly Pollard rises to that level of disloyalty.
On the other hand the Constitutional bar is high:
You will find "reasonable" disagreement as to whether Pollard met that criteria.
LiberalEsto
(22,845 posts)This is a link to a declassified statement by Weinberger made to the court on the day before Pollard was sentenced.
"I respectfully submit that any U.S. citizen, and in particular a trusted government official, who sells U.S. secrets to any foreign nation should not be punished merely as a common criminal. Rather, the punishment imposed should reflect the perfidy of the individuals actions, the magnitude of the treason committed, and the needs of national security. Here, although the defendant had executed an oath to protect and safeguard classified information, he betrayed the public trust and the security of the United States in exchange for money. I believe these facts should be weighed heavily in fashioning the sentence to be imposed in order to protect the public confidence in our law, and restore the publics confidence in our ability and commitment to protect U.S. security."
From Wikipedia:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jonathan_Pollard
In response to one of Netanyahu's demands that Pollard be freed: "Four past directors of Naval Intelligence, William Studeman, Sumner Shapiro, John L. Butts, and Thomas Brooks, authored a response to the talk of clemency and what they termed "the myths that have arisen from this clever public relations campaign... aimed at transforming Pollard from greedy, arrogant betrayer of the American national trust into Pollard, committed Israeli patriot".[79] They asserted that Pollard passed information to three other countries before engaging in espionage activity on behalf of Israel, and that he had offered his services to a fourth country while he was spying for Israel."
In addition to passing tens of thousands of classified documents to Israel in exchange for money, he sold information to Australia and South Africa and tried to sell information to Pakistan on multiple occasions, according to the Wikipedia article.
Pollard could have applied for parole in 1995 or 1996 after serving 8.5 years in prison, but chose not to, the Wiki article says.
Wiki: "As President Bush was about to leave office in 2009, Pollard himself requested clemency for the first time. In an interview in Newsweek former CIA director James Woolsey endorsed Pollard's release on two conditions: that he show contrition and decline any profits from books or other projects linked to the case. Bush did not pardon him."
Pollard is not going to end up serving a full life sentence; according to the Wiki article: "The Bureau of Prisons (BOP) projects his release date as November 21, 2015," a little more than three years from now.
bemildred
(90,061 posts)I think he's a self-serving crook, and lucky to be alive. I also think it better to re-iterate his crimes as they are, rather than worry about proving such a slippery charge as "treason".
shaayecanaan
(6,068 posts)nothing particularly technical about that.
Ken Burch
(50,254 posts)Our government was ALREADY sharing everything with them.