Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

R. Daneel Olivaw

(12,606 posts)
Sun Jan 18, 2015, 09:02 AM Jan 2015

This election, Liberman's racism is going mainstream

http://972mag.com/this-election-libermans-racism-is-going-mainstream/101456/

Liberman launched his election campaign under the slogan ‘Ariel to Israel, Umm al-Fahm to Palestine,’ once again signaling his willingness to expel Palestinian citizens from the country. The only difference? This time around he is being flagged as a moderate.

Every time Avigdor Liberman opens his mouth to speak, one can smell hate and fear-mongering. In a speech during his election campaign launch Thursday morning, Liberman went a step further in his racist and inciting speech against Israel’s Arab citizens.

While his Yisrael Beiteinu party is being investigated for a major corruption scandal, Liberman is pulling out his most powerful weapon – one that always works in catching the attention of both the Left and the Right (assuming there is such a thing in Israel): attacking the Arabs, threatening in the most obscene way to harm their lives, security and rights to their land.

Once again he pulls the rabbit out of the hat: “population exchange.” Again? Yes, again and again. And this time, like all the other times, the idea that once seemed so out of touch is beginning to permeate into the political “center.” It goes something like this: Liberman lets fly another crazy idea into the political ether, repeats it at any given opportunity, forcing citizens and the media alike to play around with it. At a certain point they start to discuss it as a serious possibility. “Moving Umm al-Fahm to Palestine.” Slowly but surely the idea sounds like it is becoming more acceptable and possible. It is a classically racist plan whose goal is to erase, demonize and take whatever rights are left to the oppressed minority. Time after time it’s the same message: transfer, population exchange, expelling the local population, loyalty oaths and more.
8 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
This election, Liberman's racism is going mainstream (Original Post) R. Daneel Olivaw Jan 2015 OP
And why this is complete overt racism and bigotry. R. Daneel Olivaw Jan 2015 #1
Lieberman is Racist scum, Mondoweiss is a vanity site that is not taken seriously King_David Jan 2015 #3
The OP sources 972mag, dear king. R. Daneel Olivaw Jan 2015 #4
Reread your own rambling post. King_David Jan 2015 #5
But, king. It seems you were getting confused with the source. R. Daneel Olivaw Jan 2015 #6
No I don't think I was ... King_David Jan 2015 #7
Whatever you say, king... R. Daneel Olivaw Jan 2015 #8
Liberman is racist scum, all right; and his party a dangerous group LeftishBrit Jan 2015 #2
 

R. Daneel Olivaw

(12,606 posts)
1. And why this is complete overt racism and bigotry.
Sun Jan 18, 2015, 09:06 AM
Jan 2015

Let’s put aside the worrying fact that a party like Yisrael Beiteinu even exists in Israel. Any party in France or Germany, whose main goal was to throw out all the Jews to Israel in a population exchange, or even to segregate all the Jews in one big city (a ghetto, perhaps), would not survive the tidal wave of condemnations from both the Jewish and international community.



So the Bigots sin Israel keep pushing this shit, and their bigot apologists keep on pushing it on the internet.

I'm glad for outlets like 972mag, Middle East Monitor, Mondoweiss and others who will not sit idly by while Israel uses the Palestinians as their private doormat.

But there are plenty of others, My fellow DUers, who would wish to silence dissent by censoring what they don't want you to read.


Peace.

King_David

(14,851 posts)
3. Lieberman is Racist scum, Mondoweiss is a vanity site that is not taken seriously
Sun Jan 18, 2015, 09:50 AM
Jan 2015

By anyone except for 6 to 10 people in this group.

 

R. Daneel Olivaw

(12,606 posts)
4. The OP sources 972mag, dear king.
Sun Jan 18, 2015, 09:59 AM
Jan 2015


Can you even get the source article right before your denunciations begin?

 

R. Daneel Olivaw

(12,606 posts)
6. But, king. It seems you were getting confused with the source.
Sun Jan 18, 2015, 12:38 PM
Jan 2015

Lieberman is Racist scum, Mondoweiss is a vanity site that is not taken seriously


You were conflating the two when the source for Lieberman was 972...

LeftishBrit

(41,203 posts)
2. Liberman is racist scum, all right; and his party a dangerous group
Sun Jan 18, 2015, 09:41 AM
Jan 2015

But it's not true that racist parties would attract overwhelming rejection in Europe. In most countries they'd lose, but would attract a clientele You mention France; LePen's party is worryingly popular there; and are strongly against immigrants of all sorts; they used to be in favour of repatriating all immigrants, though they are a little more ambiguous about it now. Jobbik in Hungary is even more radically against immigrants, and against Jews; one party high-up proposed that the country should 'tally up people of Jewish ancestry who live here, especially in the Hungarian Parliament and the Hungarian government, who, indeed, pose a national security risk to Hungary'. Golden Dawn in Greece have expressed a desire to get rid of Muslims, Jews and minorities in general; and have committed blatant acts of violence and terrorism.

Golden Dawn, the violent blatantly neo-Nazi party, gets about 7% of the vote; Jobbik and the French National Front, close to 20%.

Lieberman gets about 13% of the vote. There are other blatantly racist parties in Israel, and indeed I'd say that Bennett and his 'Jewish Home' are even worse than the Lieberman lot.

So it seems that Israel, like quite a few other countries, has a core vote of about 15 to 20 per cent of voters who are blatantly racist and hard-right. It should be opposed wherever it is found.

Maybe I have just sufficient of the almost-universal Europaean anti-immigrant bigotry myself to feel that it is even worse for an immigrant to attempt to get rid of people indigenous to his country (as is the case with Lieberman) than the other way round. Apart from that, Lieberman is just another LePen or Pat Buchanan or Nigel Farage as far as I'm concerned. And they're all scum!!!

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Israel/Palestine»This election, Liberman's...