Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

hatrack

(59,553 posts)
Fri Sep 6, 2013, 05:49 PM Sep 2013

Freedumb! GOP Strategists Gather To Debate What To Do (If Anything) About Climate Breakdown

Earlier this summer, conservatives and libertarians packed Washington, D.C.’s Globe Theatre for a debate on how — or whether, even — Republicans should fight climate change. On one side were analysts from the Heartland Institute and Heritage Foundation, two climate skepticism groups convinced the Right should never support a tax on the carbon dioxide Americans emit for free.

Theirs is also the position of the Republican Party, whose leaders openly question the science behind global warming, and argue a carbon tax “would devastate an already struggling American economy.” Which is why Andrew Moylan, from a national think tank called the R Street Institute, wasn’t certain how the right-leaning Globe Theatre crowd would react to his debate position: that a carbon tax could in fact make the U.S. more prosperous.

EDIT

Some green thinkers are also skeptical. Even if conservatives like Inglis and Moylan are successful in getting Republicans to embrace a B.C.-style carbon tax, Grist writer David Roberts is unsure how much good it would do for the climate. “It’s just a fantasy that we can limit global temperature rise to 2 degrees with nothing but a [carbon] tax,” he recently wrote. In his opinion fixing the climate demands a massive societal shift akin to wartime mobilization.

But the “large-scale government intervention” needed to enable that shift is anathema to the current Republican worldview. “It is today’s hyper-conservatism,” Roberts believes, “that is ultimately going to have to change.” Moylan from the R Street Institute agrees that a carbon tax “isn’t going to do a tremendous amount in and of itself to reduce global emissions.” Even so, he argues, adopting the policy would be an “important symbolic gesture.”

EDIT

http://www.salon.com/2013/09/05/climate_change_is_tearing_gop_apart_partner/singleton/

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Environment & Energy»Freedumb! GOP Strategist...