Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

Ghost Dog

(16,881 posts)
Thu Sep 20, 2012, 11:22 AM Sep 2012

A Comparison of the Effects of Three GM Corn Varieties on Mammalian Health

Abstract

We present for the first time a comparative analysis of blood and organ system data from trials with rats fed three main commercialized genetically modified (GM) maize (NK 603, MON 810, MON 863), which are present in food and feed in the world. NK 603 has been modified to be tolerant to the broad spectrum herbicide Roundup and thus contains residues of this formulation.

...

Our analysis clearly reveals for the 3 GMOs new side effects linked with GM maize consumption, which were sex- and often dose-dependent. Effects were mostly associated with the kidney and liver, the dietary detoxifying organs, although different between the 3 GMOs. Other effects were also noticed in the heart, adrenal glands, spleen and haematopoietic system. We conclude that these data highlight signs of hepatorenal toxicity, possibly due to the new pesticides specific to each GM corn.

...

We investigated three different GM corn namely NK 603, MON 810 and MON 863, which were fed to rats for 90 days. The raw data have been obtained by European governments and made publically available for scrutiny and counter-evaluation. These studies constitute a model to investigate possible subchronic toxicological effects of these GM cereals in mammals and humans. These are the longest in vivo tests performed with mammals consuming these GMOs. The animals were monitored for numerous blood and organ parameters. One corn (NK 603) has been genetically engineered to tolerate the broad spectrum herbicide Roundup and thus contains residues of this formulation. The two other types of GM maize studied produce two different new insecticides namely modified versions of Cry1Ab (MON 810) and Cry3Bb1 (MON 863) Bacillus thuringiensis-derived proteins. Therefore, all these three GM maize contain novel pesticide residues that will be present in food and feed. As a result, the potential effects on physiological parameters, due either to the recognized mutagenic effects of the GM transformation process or to the presence of the above mentioned novel pesticides within these plants can be evaluated in animal feeding studies.

...

Patho-physiological profiles are unique for each GM crop/food, underlining the necessity for a case-by-case evaluation of their safety, as is largely admitted and agreed by regulators. It is not possible to make comments concerning any general, similar subchronic toxic effect for all GM foods. However, in the three GM maize varieties that formed the basis of this investigation, new side effects linked to the consumption of these cereals were revealed, which were sex- and often dose-dependent. Effects were mostly concentrated in kidney and liver function, the two major diet detoxification organs, but in detail differed with each GM type. In addition, some effects on heart, adrenal, spleen and blood cells were also frequently noted. As there normally exists sex differences in liver and kidney metabolism, the highly statistically significant disturbances in the function of these organs, seen between male and female rats, cannot be dismissed as biologically insignificant as has been proposed by others [4]. We therefore conclude that our data strongly suggests that these GM maize varieties induce a state of hepatorenal toxicity. This can be due to the new pesticides (herbicide or insecticide) present specifically in each type of GM maize, although unintended metabolic effects due to the mutagenic properties of the GM transformation process cannot be excluded [42]. All three GM maize varieties contain a distinctly different pesticide residue associated with their particular GM event (glyphosate and AMPA in NK 603, modified Cry1Ab in MON 810, modified Cry3Bb1 in MON 863). These substances have never before been an integral part of the human or animal diet and therefore their health consequences for those who consume them, especially over long time periods are currently unknown. Furthermore, any side effect linked to the GM event will be unique in each case as the site of transgene insertion and the spectrum of genome wide mutations will differ between the three modified maize types. In conclusion, our data presented here strongly recommend that additional long-term (up to 2 years) animal feeding studies be performed in at least three species, preferably also multi-generational, to provide true scientifically valid data on the acute and chronic toxic effects of GM crops, feed and foods. Our analysis highlights that the kidneys and liver as particularly important on which to focus such research as there was a clear negative impact on the function of these organs in rats consuming GM maize varieties for just 90 days.

/... http://www.biolsci.org/v05p0706.htm

5 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
A Comparison of the Effects of Three GM Corn Varieties on Mammalian Health (Original Post) Ghost Dog Sep 2012 OP
Oh, but GM corn is just as nutritious as organic!!!!!! djean111 Sep 2012 #1
Just as nutritious, but it destroys your liver and kidneys. bananas Sep 2012 #3
See also, in the "popular press": Ghost Dog Sep 2012 #2
This is why that "study" about nutritional value of GM vs organic was a steaming pile of pointless. djean111 Sep 2012 #4
Exactly! Nihil Sep 2012 #5
 

djean111

(14,255 posts)
1. Oh, but GM corn is just as nutritious as organic!!!!!!
Thu Sep 20, 2012, 11:31 AM
Sep 2012

Right.
I don't confuse "nutritious" with "good for you".

bananas

(27,509 posts)
3. Just as nutritious, but it destroys your liver and kidneys.
Thu Sep 20, 2012, 12:00 PM
Sep 2012

Same amount as vitamins, but with added poisons.

 

djean111

(14,255 posts)
4. This is why that "study" about nutritional value of GM vs organic was a steaming pile of pointless.
Thu Sep 20, 2012, 02:17 PM
Sep 2012

Last edited Thu Sep 20, 2012, 04:20 PM - Edit history (1)

Buying organic is the best shot at not eating poison.
I have never met anyone who felt that buying organic was solely for the nutritional value - the emphasis is always on lack of pesticides and GM stock.
Also find it a bit weird when buying organic gets such harsh treatment from some posters. After all, everyone is free to buy the GM stuff if they want to - it is just good and useful to know when something is not organic. Why be upset about that?

 

Nihil

(13,508 posts)
5. Exactly!
Fri Sep 21, 2012, 04:09 AM
Sep 2012

> After all, everyone is free to buy the GM stuff if they want to - it is just good
> and useful to know when something is not organic. Why be upset about that?

The big issue with GM labelling is that it would allow people to choose.

They could still choose to buy GM food (e.g., if it's their usual brand or simply
because it's cheaper) but they would be in a position of information, not of
ignorance - especially not of ignorance being enforced by the secretive, lawyered-up
corporations that make & distribute thecontaminated food.

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Environment & Energy»A Comparison of the Effec...