Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

OKIsItJustMe

(19,937 posts)
Wed Oct 5, 2016, 12:47 AM Oct 2016

GM and the US Army have developed a monster hydrogen fuel cell truck

http://arstechnica.com/cars/2016/10/this-beast-of-a-chevy-colorado-is-hydrogen-powered-will-be-tested-by-the-army/
[font face=Serif][font size=5]GM and the US Army have developed a monster hydrogen fuel cell truck[/font]

[font size=4]At six-and-a-half feet tall and seven feet wide, the Chevy ZH₂ is no regular truck.[/font]

Megan Geuss - 10/4/2016, 1:50 PM

[font size=3]Late last year, we got news that General Motors would work with the US Army to develop a hydrogen-fuel-cell-powered pickup truck. On Monday at an annual US Army association meeting, GM took the wraps off the beast, which the Army will test in Michigan over the next year.

The US Army’s tank research center collaborated with GM to build the Chevy Colorado ZH₂, which has a reinforced body that’s six-and-a-half feet tall and seven feet wide. The truck will chew up terrain with 37-inch tires and a special suspension built for off-road handling.

The ZH₂ has a single motor that’s powered by a hydrogen fuel cell and a battery. The advantage of that hydrogen fuel cell is that the only byproduct is water, and the electricity-powered engine is quieter than a traditional combustion engine. It also gives off less heat, which GM said would help the car in stealth situations, where the Army would want to reduce acoustic and thermal signatures. According to Wired, the ZH₂’s hydrogen fuel cell produces two gallons of water an hour.



Clearly, hydrogen supply issues aren’t stopping GM from building research vehicles. The Colorado ZH₂ follows GM’s announcement of an unmanned undersea vehicle (UUV), which it built in partnership with the US Navy. That UUV is currently being tested in a pool for “weeks if not months of endurance” in underwater environments.

…[/font][/font]
4 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
GM and the US Army have developed a monster hydrogen fuel cell truck (Original Post) OKIsItJustMe Oct 2016 OP
The only thing I can think of is we bailed out GMs stupid ass. rusty quoin Oct 2016 #1
Are you sure about that? OKIsItJustMe Oct 2016 #4
Fuel Cell Power= nationalize the fed Oct 2016 #2
I generally think that the virtues of electric cars are overstated OKIsItJustMe Oct 2016 #3

nationalize the fed

(2,169 posts)
2. Fuel Cell Power=
Wed Oct 5, 2016, 03:02 AM
Oct 2016

no plugs
no carb
no radiator
no distributor
no pistons
no valves
no tuneups
no oil

yet it produces power- and the fuel can be made anywhere there is water and electricity.



Not many superchargers off the main interstates. If it was battery only, the battery would have to weigh more than a ton. And one day that battery would end up in a landfill. And even if there were superchargers in the bush, imagine a few soldiers waiting around 45 minutes for a 75% charge- every ~200 miles.

OKIsItJustMe

(19,937 posts)
3. I generally think that the virtues of electric cars are overstated
Wed Oct 5, 2016, 12:18 PM
Oct 2016

Your list includes carburetor and distributor. What cars are sold today with a carburetor or a distributor? Today, fuel injectors and electronic ignition are the norm.

Yes, there will be routine maintenance which is eliminated, but there will still be necessary routine maintenance. Tires, brakes, shocks/struts, body work…

There will even be maintenance necessary with an electric car which is not necessary with a conventional car, since, currently, storage batteries and fuel cell stacks both have limited lifespans when compared to a well-maintained internal combustion engine.

And just because the car is driven by an electric motor, or even expensive does not guarantee it is well made.

http://www.greencarreports.com/news/1102878_consumer-reports-avoid-buying-used-2014-bmw-i3-electric-cars

[font face=Serif][font size=5]Consumer Reports: avoid buying used 2014 BMW i3 electric cars[/font]

Mar 16, 2016

[font size=3]…

The magazine recently released its list of "Used Cars to Avoid Buying," and the 2014 BMW i3 was among the dishonorable mentions.



The 2012, 2013, and 2015 versions of the Tesla Model S all have "much-worse-than-average" reliability, according to the magazine.

Despite heaping praise on the Model S when it was new, Consumer Reports last year pulled its coveted "recommended" rating for the car, owing to that increasing evidence of that below-average reliability.

Another used electric car to avoid is the 2013 Nissan Leaf, staffers say.

…[/font][/font]
Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Environment & Energy»GM and the US Army have d...