Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

douglas9

(4,358 posts)
Mon Oct 7, 2019, 12:52 PM Oct 2019

U.S. Supreme Court rejects Amazon warehouse worker wage appeal

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The U.S. Supreme Court on Monday declined to hear Amazon.com’s bid to avoid a lawsuit seeking to ensure that warehouse workers for the e-commerce giant get paid for the time it takes them to go through extensive post-shift security screenings.

The justices, on the first day of their new term, turned away an appeal by Amazon and a contractor of a lower court ruling reviving the workers’ claims under Nevada state law. The decision comes five years after the Supreme Court issued a ruling in the case that barred similar claims under federal law.

A group of Amazon warehouse workers who package and ship merchandise filed a proposed class action lawsuit in 2010 against the contractor, Integrity Staffing Solutions, which provides some of the hourly employees for Amazon.

The workers sought compensation for submitting to what they called mandatory “post-9/11 type of airport security” screenings that are aimed at preventing employee theft. The workers have said the screening takes around 25 minutes to complete.

https://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-court-amazon-com/u-s-supreme-court-rejects-amazon-warehouse-worker-wage-appeal-idUSKBN1WM1FI?feedType=RSS&feedName=domesticNews

3 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
U.S. Supreme Court rejects Amazon warehouse worker wage appeal (Original Post) douglas9 Oct 2019 OP
I'm trying to unravel all the double negatives, but I think this is a good thing? LisaM Oct 2019 #1
It's a horribly written article, but what I finally figured out was The Velveteen Ocelot Oct 2019 #3
Showup pay.... Historic NY Oct 2019 #2

LisaM

(27,800 posts)
1. I'm trying to unravel all the double negatives, but I think this is a good thing?
Mon Oct 7, 2019, 01:03 PM
Oct 2019

In other words, it appears that workers want to get paid for the time they spend in mandatory screening, and the Supreme Court is allowing this claim to move forward?

If Amazon doesn't want to pay workers for the time they spend in mandatory screening (and I don't care if it's an outsourced company that has this requirement), this is reason number bajillion for DUers not to use Amazon.

In related news, this is one poorly-worded article.

The Velveteen Ocelot

(115,661 posts)
3. It's a horribly written article, but what I finally figured out was
Mon Oct 7, 2019, 01:17 PM
Oct 2019

that the workers can bring their case under state law even though it would be rejected under federal law.

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Omaha Steve's Labor Group»U.S. Supreme Court reject...