HomeLatest ThreadsGreatest ThreadsForums & GroupsMy SubscriptionsMy Posts
DU Home » Latest Threads » Forums & Groups » Topics » Economy & Education » Economy (Group) » STOCK MARKET WATCH -- Wed...

Tue Dec 4, 2012, 07:21 PM

STOCK MARKET WATCH -- Wednesday, 5 December 2012

[font size=3]STOCK MARKET WATCH, Wednesday, 5 December 2012[font color=black][/font]

SMW for 4 December 2012

AT THE CLOSING BELL ON 4 December 2012
[center][font color=red]
Dow Jones 12,951.78 -13.82 (-0.11%)
S&P 500 1,407.05 -2.41 (-0.17%)
Nasdaq 2,996.69 -5.51 (-0.18%)

[font color=green]10 Year 1.60% -0.01 (-0.62%)
30 Year 2.77% -0.02 (-0.72%) [font color=black]


[HR width=85%]

[font size=2]Market Conditions During Trading Hours[/font]


[font size=2]Euro, Yen, Loonie, Silver and Gold[center]




[HR width=95%]

[font color=black][font size=2]Handy Links - Market Data and News:[/font][/font]
Economic Calendar
Marketwatch Data
Bloomberg Economic News
Yahoo Finance
Google Finance
Bank Tracker
Credit Union Tracker
Daily Job Cuts

[font color=black][font size=2]Handy Links - Government Issues:[/font][/font]
Open Government
Earmark Database
USA spending.gov

[font color=red]Partial List of Financial Sector Officials Convicted since 1/20/09 [/font][font color=red]
2/2/12 David Higgs and Salmaan Siddiqui, Credit Suisse, plead guilty to conspiracy involving valuation of MBS
3/6/12 Allen Stanford, former Caribbean billionaire and general schmuck, convicted on 13 of 14 counts in $2.2B Ponzi scheme, faces 20+ years in prison
6/4/12 Matthew Kluger, lawyer, sentenced to 12 years in prison, along with co-conspirator stock trader Garrett Bauer (9 years) and co-conspirator Kenneth Robinson (not yet sentenced) for 17 year insider trading scheme.
6/14/12 Allen Stanford sentenced to 110 years without parole.
6/15/12 Rajat Gupta, former Goldman Sachs director, found guilty of insider trading. Could face a decade in prison when sentenced later this year.
6/22/12 Timothy S. Durham, 49, former CEO of Fair Financial Company, convicted of one count conspiracy to commit wire and securities fraud, 10 counts of wire fraud, and one count of securities fraud.
6/22/12 James F. Cochran, 56, former chairman of the board of Fair, convicted of one count of conspiracy to commit wire and securities fraud, one count of securities fraud, and six counts of wire fraud.
6/22/12 Rick D. Snow, 48, former CFO of Fair, convicted of one count of conspiracy to commit wire and securities fraud, one count of securities fraud, and three counts of wire fraud.
7/13/12 Russell Wassendorf Sr., CEO of collapsed brokerage firm Peregrine Financial Group Inc. arrested and charged with lying to regulators after admitting to authorities he embezzled "millions of dollars" and forged bank statements for "nearly twenty years."
8/22/12 Doug Whitman, Whitman Capital LLC hedge fund founder, convicted of insider trading following a trial in which he spent more than two days on the stand telling jurors he was innocent
10/26/12 UPDATE: Former Goldman Sachs director Rajat Gupta sentenced to two years in federal prison. He will, of course, appeal. . .
11/20/12 Hedge fund manager Matthew Martoma charged with insider trading at SAC Capital Advisors, and prosecutors are looking at Martoma's boss, Steven Cohen, for possible involvement.

[HR width=95%]

[HR width=95%]
[font size=3][font color=red]This thread contains opinions and observations. Individuals may post their experiences, inferences and opinions on this thread. However, it should not be construed as advice. It is unethical (and probably illegal) for financial recommendations to be given here.[/font][/font][/font color=red][font color=black]

48 replies, 5499 views

Reply to this thread

Back to top Alert abuse

Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum
Replies to this discussion thread
Arrow 48 replies Author Time Post
Reply STOCK MARKET WATCH -- Wednesday, 5 December 2012 (Original post)
Tansy_Gold Dec 2012 OP
Demeter Dec 2012 #1
Demeter Dec 2012 #2
Demeter Dec 2012 #3
Demeter Dec 2012 #4
Demeter Dec 2012 #5
AnneD Dec 2012 #44
Demeter Dec 2012 #45
AnneD Dec 2012 #47
Demeter Dec 2012 #6
Demeter Dec 2012 #7
Demeter Dec 2012 #8
jtuck004 Dec 2012 #9
Demeter Dec 2012 #27
Demeter Dec 2012 #10
Demeter Dec 2012 #11
Demeter Dec 2012 #12
Demeter Dec 2012 #13
Demeter Dec 2012 #14
Demeter Dec 2012 #15
Demeter Dec 2012 #16
Demeter Dec 2012 #17
Demeter Dec 2012 #18
Demeter Dec 2012 #19
Demeter Dec 2012 #20
Demeter Dec 2012 #21
Demeter Dec 2012 #22
Demeter Dec 2012 #26
Demeter Dec 2012 #23
Demeter Dec 2012 #24
Demeter Dec 2012 #25
Demeter Dec 2012 #28
xchrom Dec 2012 #29
xchrom Dec 2012 #30
xchrom Dec 2012 #31
xchrom Dec 2012 #32
Demeter Dec 2012 #43
xchrom Dec 2012 #33
xchrom Dec 2012 #34
xchrom Dec 2012 #35
xchrom Dec 2012 #36
xchrom Dec 2012 #37
xchrom Dec 2012 #38
xchrom Dec 2012 #39
xchrom Dec 2012 #40
Roland99 Dec 2012 #41
Demeter Dec 2012 #46
Roland99 Dec 2012 #48
DemReadingDU Dec 2012 #42

Response to Tansy_Gold (Original post)

Tue Dec 4, 2012, 07:35 PM

1. Good Heavens! He's in Tansy's Back Yard!


Have you got some rat repellent, Tansy?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink

Response to Tansy_Gold (Original post)

Tue Dec 4, 2012, 07:45 PM

2. The Obscenely Rich Men Bent on Shredding the Safety Net



The Campaign to Fix the Debt is a huge, and growing, coalition of powerful CEOs, politicians and policy makers on a mission to lower taxes for the rich and cut Social Security, Medicare and Medicaid under the cover of concern about the national debt. The group was spawned in July 2012 by Erskine Bowles and Alan Simpson, architects of a misguided deficit reduction scheme in Washington back in 2010. By now, the "fixers" have collected a war chest of $43 million. Private equity billionaire Peter G. Peterson, longtime enemy of the social safety net, is a major supporter.

This new Wall Street movement, which includes Republicans and plenty of Democrats, is hitting the airwaves, hosting roundtables, gathering at lavish fundraising fêtes, hiring public relations experts, and traveling around the country to push their agenda. They aim to seize the moment of the so-called "fiscal cliff" debate to pressure President Obama to concede to House Republicans and continue the Bush income tax cuts for the rich while shredding the social safety net. The group includes Goldman Sachs’ Lloyd Blankfein, JPMorgan Chase’s Jamie Dimon, Honeywell’s David Cote, Aetna’s Mark Bertolini, Delta Airlines’ Richard Anderson, Boeing’s W. James McNerney, and over 100 other influential business honchos and their supporters. Corporations represented by the fixers have collected massive bailouts from taxpayers and gigantic subsidies from the government, and they enjoy tax loopholes that in many cases bring their tax bills down to zero. Sometimes their creative accountants even manage to get money back from Uncle Sam. For instance, according to Citizens for Tax Justice, Boeing has paid a negative 6.5 percent tax rate for the last decade, even though it was profitable every year from 2002 through 2011.

These CEOs talk about shared sacrifice, but it seems that they don’t intend to share anything but your retirement money with their wealthy friends. As New York mag reports:

“Most on-the-record comments are a mishmash of platitudes about shared sacrifice and working together for the good of the country. But interviews with a number of organizers and CEO council members point to a massive networking effort among one-percenters — one that relies on strategically exploiting existing business relationships and appealing to patriotic and economic instincts."

As the Fix the Debt gang moves around the country spreading their message, they are starting to attract public protests. On November 27, they were greeted in North Carolina with a rally from NC Progress, which called for an end to the Bush tax cuts for the wealthiest 2 percent and told the group to keep its hands off the middle-class wallet. The fixers are often vague about their mission, and they tend to speak in coded language that conceals their actual goals. Let’s have some blunt talk about what the fixers want to do and why they want to do it – talk you're unlikely to hear in mainstream media supported by corporate advertising.

1. “Fix” means cut: When they say “fix” Social Security, they mean cut Social Security. Fixers want to convince the public that a well-managed, hugely popular program that does not add to the deficit (it’s self-funded) is somehow in crisis and requires intervention in the form of various cutting schemes. They seek this because many of the rich do not want to pay taxes for Social Security, and financiers want very much to move toward privitization of retirement accounts so they can collect fees on such accounts.

2. “Reform” means rob. When the say “reform” the tax code, they mean “make taxes even lower for the rich.” The wealthy do not pay their fair share of taxes in the United States, which is a major reason there is a large deficit in the first place. When the very wealthy pay lower tax rates than ordinary working people, the result is an increasing redistribution of income upward that puts the U.S. in the top 30 percent in income inequality out of 140 nations, according to the Central Intelligence Agency. We’re a shameful #42. Income inequality is not only unfair, it’s dangerous and makes society unstable.

3.“Bipartisan” means all of the rich. Fix the Debt is a pro-business ideological movement pretending to be a bipartisan group of concerned citizens. But the group is really just a coalition for the greedy, unpatriotic rich. There are plenty of financiers and other 1 percenters in the Democratic Party, and some of them have decided to join forces with their GOP counterparts to work toward a goal that means a great deal to all of them: Making the rich even richer.

4. “Concern” means covet. There was a time, a couple of generations ago, when business leaders would not dare to go public with their desire to increase income inequality and stick it to hard-working Americans. When Owen D. Young, CEO of General Electric in the '20s and '40s, spoke to an audience at Harvard Business School in 1927, he emphasized that the purpose of a corporation was to provide a good life not only to owners, but also to employees. Corporations, he said, were meant to serve the larger goals of the nation:

“Here in America, we have raised the standard of political equality. Shall we be able to add to that, full equality of economic opportunity? No man is wholly free unless he is both politically and economically free.”

Fast forward to 2012: Jeffrey Immelt, the current CEO of GE, is a member of the Fix the Debt Campaign, which is designed to lower the expectations of hard-working Americans people. Goldman Sachs honcho Lloyd Blankfein explained this recently in a CBS interview:

“You’re going to have to do something, undoubtedly, to lower people’s expectations of what they’re going to get, the entitlements, and what people think they’re going to get, because you’re not going to get it.”

5. “Fiscal conservative” means economically confused. Longtime Wall Street executive Steve Rattner, one of Obama’s auto bailout czars, has been using his influence to attract tycoons from the financial industry to the Fix the Debt movement. Over the last year, Rattner has been on a crusade to convince Americans that they should put aside their worries about real crises like unemployment to focus on the deficit. Rattner, like many of his cohorts, poses as a moderate whose thinking is needed to counter the advice of respected economists like Nobel Prize-winners Paul Krugman and Joseph Stiglitz, who have long been warning that defict hysteria is not only counterproductive, but based on a lack of understanding of how the economy actually works...

6. "Strip-mining is not leadership."
Fixers present themselves as magnanimous, responsible leaders doing what they believe is best for the country. But that’s a tough sell when you’re advocating policies that mainly benefit…yourself. Economist Rob Johnson, director of the Institute for New Economic Thinking, shared his view of the Campaign to Fix the Debt in an email. As he put it, "strip-mining is not leadership":

“I believe that a convincing argument depends upon the demonstrated self-sacrifice of the leader offering a vision. This group does not appear to be doing something for the nation. They are doing something for their own self-interest (tax liability). There is confusion between: 1) what is good for business and therefore jobs, something we all should be concerned about; and 2) the personal benefit of CEOs based on who bears the burden of the debt reduction plan. This group does not seem to gain the credibility that comes from generous contribution through self sacrifice. As a result they will arouse great suspicion rather than inspire us as 'leaders' who are guiding the design of a just, productive and coherent society.

With all of the suspicion of leadership in America, business, media, scholars and politicians have to lead in a credible way. This just looks like guys defending their self-interest in a dysfunctional period of our nation's history because elites take so much for themselves.”



Lynn Parramore is an AlterNet senior editor. She is cofounder of Recessionwire, founding editor of New Deal 2.0, and author of 'Reading the Sphinx: Ancient Egypt in Nineteenth-Century Literary Culture.' She received her Ph.d in English and Cultural Theory from NYU, where she has taught essay writing and semiotics. She is the Director of AlterNet's New Economic Dialogue Project. Follow her on Twitter @LynnParramore.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink

Response to Tansy_Gold (Original post)

Tue Dec 4, 2012, 07:52 PM

3. The Rich Create Bubbles, Not Jobs By Hugh, who is a long-time commenter at Naked Capitalism



On June 7, 2001, HR 1836 the Economic Growth and Tax Relief Reconciliation Act was signed into law. This was the first and largest of several tax cut bills passed during the Bush Administration. It was estimated to cost $1.35 trillion with most of its benefits going to rich. So this should have spurred job creation. Give money to the “job creators” and they will create jobs, no?

The graph below (from the BLS’ Establishment survey) covering the Bush and Obama years shows, in fact, what happened.

The blue line represents all nonfarm public and private jobs. The red line, jobs in the private sector. The difference between the two lines is public jobs. Though the scale is large, it is easily seen that public sector job number remained fairly stable during the period. It is the private sector which drove the overall changes in jobs numbers. For those interested, the slight notch in the blue line in 2010 represents hiring for the Census.

What we see is that the Bush tax cuts had little effect on the trajectory of job losses from the 2001 recession. We also see the effects of the housing bubble taking off in mid-2003 and its collapse into recession (December 2007) and meltdown (September 2008) with jobs falling below their 2003 lows. Here you could argue that the rich do create jobs, but these bubble jobs aren’t stable or permanent and are created at great cost to the non-rich. And while there is a recovery in private jobs from 2010 onward, we need to keep two things in mind. First, the quality of these post-bubble created jobs is generally poor. One sign of this comes from the Household survey where the growth in involuntary part time employment has increased from 3.332 million in January 2001 to 8.613 million in September 2012. Second, after 10 years of turning our economy over to the “job creating” rich, we are only just back to the level of private jobs we had in January 2001. In other words, the job creators in exchange for their trillion dollar tax cuts gifted the rest of us with a lost decade.

Actually, it is worse than a lost decade. Jobs are not people, and the chart above does not reflect 10 years of growth in the US working age population. To see this, we must look at people, the employed (from the BLS’ Household survey).

The blue line is the number of employed and is similar to the blue jobs line in the previous graph. The green line is the labor force (employed + unemployed as defined by the BLS) seasonally adjusted. The red line is my calculation of where the labor force should be, i.e. 67% of the working age population (non-institutional population over 16). This is based on the participation rate from October 1996 to June 2000 which for 44 of 45 months was at or above 67%. Notches in the red line come from annual revisions applied in January.

The difference between the green line (current labor force) and the blue line (current employed) represents the unemployed. We can see this has increased markedly after the onset of the 2007 recession. Also from this time, the green line of the current labor force went flat. The difference between the green line and the red line represents the increasing failure of the labor force to keep up with population growth. This area of the graph represents people who are defined out of the labor force by the BLS’ restrictive definition of unemployment but who would, from our experience from 1996 to 2000, work if jobs were available to them.

This graph shows the true magnitude of the failure of the “jobs creators”: bubble job formation, no growth in the labor force, and a 20.352 million gap in September 2012 between the employed and those who would work if work was available. Add in the poor quality of the jobs being created and the increased number of involuntary part time workers, and we have fail upon fail upon fail. It is Orwellian that after a decade of trillion dollar tax cuts and bailouts of the rich, and a steadily worsening jobs and employment picture for American workers, we are told to be kind to the rich and give them even more money because they are the “jobs creators”. With job creators like these, we are better off without them.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink

Response to Tansy_Gold (Original post)

Tue Dec 4, 2012, 07:56 PM

4. No Mitt Romney, Private Charity Is Not Enough



Ever since President George H.W. Bush proclaimed a need for “a thousand points of light,” Americans have been enthralled by the idea that private charity is all that is needed to help those in crisis. In this view, there is no point in using government money to pay for services as varied as the Federal Emergency Management Agency to food stamps, not at all, not when there are millions of Americans standing at the ready to give time, money and stuff. So that’s how you get events like Mitt Romney’s Ohio rally on Monday, when he packed a bunch of food up for the Hurricane Sandy stricken areas of the United States, all the while reminiscing about the time he and a bunch of friends cleaned up a football field of “rubbish” after a big game. As for his previously announced plans to shut down FEMA and turn its functions over to the states should he be elected president, Romney didn’t say a word.

The problems with private charity for all with government aid for none are so many, that it is hard to know where to start. On a relatively minor level, there is the known fact that many millionaires and billionaires tend to give their money to causes close to their hearts, not those most in need. (See John Paulson and Central Park).But that’s the least of it when it comes to catastrophes like Hurricane Sandy, which left several dozen people dead, New York City almost shut down, millions of people without electricity, and numerous towns and cities with serious structural damage. A few willing volunteers aren’t going to cut it in these circumstances, and shame on Mitt Romeny for even pretending otherwise. It doesn’t, to quote Noam Scheiber at The New Republic, “scale.” There is simply no way to privately coordinate and make sure all that help — if even exists, which I would highly doubt — can get to the right people and organizations in the right way. That’s why we have government aid.

Don’t believe me? Let’s take a look at that soup. Mitt Romeny proclaimed it destined for New Jersey. ”There’s a site we’ve identified where we can take these goods and distribute them to people who need them,” Romney announced. Never mind the trashed homes, and the dozens of dead people. Mitt Romney is going to make sure those people in New Jersey get themselves some soup. He was so excited by this charitable opportunity, he didn’t even realize that the recipients would likely be sipping that soup cold. More than one million households in New Jersey currently lack electricity, making heating soup up difficult indeed.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink

Response to Tansy_Gold (Original post)

Tue Dec 4, 2012, 08:08 PM

5. Sen. Graham: Obama move on defense layoff notices 'patently illegal' OCTOBER 1



Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.) says that he will do anything he can to block the Obama administration from reimbursing defense contractors for severance costs if the firms don’t send layoff notices to employees.

The Obama administration issued guidance Friday that said defense firms’ costs would be covered if they have to layoff workers due to canceled contracts under the across-the-board cuts set to take effect Jan. 2....The layoff notices have become a politically charged issue because they could have come just four days ahead of the election because of a 60-day notice required by federal law for mass layoffs.

Graham and other Republicans were livid after the Obama administration issued the guidance on Friday telling contractors that their legal costs would be covered due to canceled contracts under sequestration, but only if they did not issue layoff notices before sequestration occurs — and before the November election.

“I will do everything in my power to make sure not one taxpayer dollar is spent reimbursing companies for failure to comply with WARN Act,” Graham told The Hill in a phone interview Monday. “That is so beyond the pale — I think it’s patently illegal.”


Legislator seeks answers on layoff notices from defense contractors


The chairman of the House Oversight and Government reform committee sent a letter to the heads of 10 defense companies asking about the legal justification for not issuing notices of potential layoffs due to sequestration.

Across-the-board defense cuts, known as sequestration, are set to go into effect Jan. 2, but the Obama administration has told defense companies there's no need to issue advance notice generally required under the Worker Adjustment and Retraining Notification Act.

U.S. Rep. Darrel Issa, R-Calif., who chairs the House committee, wants to know if the companies have sought legal advice, Federal News Radio reports. Republican legislators say the White House doesn't have the legal authority to ask companies not to comply with the WARN Act.




Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink

Response to Demeter (Reply #5)

Wed Dec 5, 2012, 12:03 PM

44. Maybe Obama...

plays chess after all. The election helped him, but I like the way the GOP was painted into a corner on this one.

The more they protest, the worse they look to the general public.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink

Response to AnneD (Reply #44)

Wed Dec 5, 2012, 12:49 PM

45. I'm reserving opinon until we have verifiable results


I've been burned before.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink

Response to Demeter (Reply #45)

Wed Dec 5, 2012, 01:28 PM

47. Agree...

but he seems to be fighting more this time around, so I have a sliver of hope.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink

Response to Tansy_Gold (Original post)

Tue Dec 4, 2012, 08:16 PM

6. GOP leaders remove 4 from plum House committees




House Speaker John Boehner's decision to take plum committee assignments away from four conservative Republican lawmakers after they bucked party leaders on key votes isn't going over well with advocacy groups that viewed them as role models. Reps. Tim Huelskamp of Kansas and Justin Amash of Michigan will lose their seats on the House Budget Committee chaired by Rep. Paul Ryan next year. And Reps. Walter Jones of North Carolina and David Schweikert of Arizona are losing their seats on the House Financial Services Committee. The move is underscoring a divide in the Republican Party between tea party-supported conservatives and the House GOP leadership.

"This is a clear attempt on the part of Republican leadership to punish those in Washington who vote the way they promised their constituents they would — on principle — instead of mindlessly rubber-stamping trillion dollar deficits and the bankrupting of America," said Matt Kibbe, president of the tea party group FreedomWorks.



"The GOP leadership might think they have silenced conservatives, but removing me and others from key committees only confirms our conservative convictions," Huelskamp said in a statement Tuesday. "This is clearly a vindictive move and a sure sign that the GOP establishment cannot handle disagreement."



All four lawmakers had voted against the summer 2011 deal negotiated between Republican leaders and President Barack Obama for extending the government's ability to borrow money in exchange for $1 trillion in spending cuts and the promise of another $1 trillion in reduced deficits. Three of the four, the exception being Schweikert, voted against the Ryan-written GOP budget blueprint that the House passed last March. Their removal from key committees with jurisdiction over the two issues was viewed by some as a signal to other Republican lawmakers to look favorably on whatever final deal Boehner and Obama put together to avert a "fiscal cliff" combination of automatic tax increases and spending cuts in January.



Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink

Response to Tansy_Gold (Original post)

Tue Dec 4, 2012, 08:22 PM

7. Bet the Farm: Six Questions for Frederick Kaufman By Jeffery Gleaves



There is enough food grown in the world to feed its entire population, yet approximately 1 billion people go hungry every year. With this in mind, food journalist and Harper’s Magazine contributing editor Frederick Kaufman went searching for the variables that make a slice of pizza cost so little. Demystifying the complex system of wheat futures, he traveled to farms, labs, manufacturing facilities, and Wall Street, where he uncovered who cornered the wheat market in 2008 and created the food bubble. I hungrily asked him six questions about his new book, Bet the Farm: How Food Stopped Being Food....

...Paul Ryan’s 2013 budget proposal recommends cuts to major welfare programs like food stamps and unemployment. He claims that the war on poverty should fix the causes, not the symptoms. At the same time, he would cut federal farm support by 300 million over ten years and reform the “open-ended nature of government support for crop insurance.” What might severe cuts in these areas mean for American society? What risks could this run, historically speaking?

The history of hunger shows that the cause of starvation is not lack of food. People starve because they cannot afford food. Food stamps are a very effective way of stopping hunger, as is unemployment insurance and social security. More Americans than ever are relying on food stamps. So who is Paul Ryan kidding? What kind of effect does he foresee when 17 million American households experience food insecurity? A middle-class mom or dad is not, by nature, a revolutionary. But $20 a pound hamburger and $10 a quart milk will make them so. Everyone in the military and the CIA knows that the best way to foment unrest in a country is to increase food inflation and food insecurity. And since 2008, we have seen more than sixty food riots across the world, and more than one regime change. Would Paul Ryan like to lead the charge?

When it comes to crop insurance and other supports, we have to separate the farmer from agribusiness. One reason agribusiness has not been vertically integrated is that industrialists do not want to bother with the risk of putting seeds in the ground and praying for rain. And while farming may be for gamblers, national security rests on a steady and reliable food supply. Historically, American has understood the need to support farmers. The country has enjoyed years of prosperous harvests of inexpensive wheat because of federal dollars spent on agricultural education and outreach. Washington is right to support those in a high-risk business essential to our national security and international trade. History has shown that when farmers go belly-up, the effects reverberate throughout society. The last thing we want in these days of drought, flood, and climate change is for this country to become dependent on Argentina, Brazil, and Russia for our daily bread. The import costs will dwarf Ryan’s paltry $300 million...


Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink

Response to Tansy_Gold (Original post)

Tue Dec 4, 2012, 08:25 PM

8. I'm calling it a night


The Kid is sick, and she's infecting me...

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink

Response to Tansy_Gold (Original post)

Wed Dec 5, 2012, 04:03 AM

9. The Flat Tax the U.S. Effectively Already Has


The Congressional Budget Office has a new study of effective federal marginal tax rates for low and moderate income workers (those below 450 percent of the poverty line). The study looks at the effects of income taxes, payroll taxes, and SNAP (the program formerly known as Food Stamps). The bottom line is that the average household now faces an effective marginal tax rate of 30 percent. In 2014, after various temporary tax provisions have expired and the newly passed health insurance subsidies go into effect, the average effective marginal tax rate will rise to 35 percent.
But what can we do with Mankiw's observation? Mankiw offered the following idea:

What struck me is how close these marginal tax rates are to the marginal tax rates at the top of the income distribution. This means that we could repeal all these taxes and transfer programs, replace them with a flat tax along with a universal lump-sum grant, and achieve approximately the same overall degree of progressivity.

In our tool below, enter the flat tax income tax rate that you might like to see as well as the amount of a universal lump sum grant that might apply per person.Then enter the unique data that might apply for your household and we'll do the rest, calculating what the data you input would mean for you and for the U.S. Treasury's coffers, outputting the data in the tables below!...
What that means is that the the U.S. federal government's current income tax rates are more than capable of collecting higher amounts of taxes in a healthier economy. That many in the federal government are so actively pursuing higher effective marginal income tax rates today is really an indication that they don't believe the economy is going to be getting healthier any time soon!


It also means that a jobs program would let people feed their spirit, as well as their families and communities. Perhaps more-so than the tinkle-down policy of continuing to enrich billionaires with direct taxpayer dollars. And, and, we would increase the amount of taken in taxes without hurting the most vulnerable. More. And if we cut off the $40 billion a month we are paying to support the investments of wealthy people in their mortgage-backed assets, housing and the dollar might just fall in value and make Chinese goods more expensive? The shelves of Walmart would go up in price, then empty, and we would have pent-up demand, which is the only thing that has EVER created a job, (the owner, among other things, recognizes the demand, does the paperwork, but the demand creates the job), and thus a real need for new employment.

And a little freedom from the tyrants. People will scream in agony.

Or we could continue on our current path, with an effective rate of 30%, unless you get your income of $245,000 a week from investments...

-And while some might think that a downward pressure on housing is bad, is it better to keep it inflated, along with the fees and tens or hundreds of thousands of dollars of extra interest people pay on their mortgage? How many people of the 5 million plus families that were removed from their home in the fraud crisis we are in could get another one at a reasonable price, along with all the new working poor we are creating?

-There are 10+ million working poor now, along with 47 million people on food stamps. (A new record! We should be proud!!). While one might think my scenario would bring them terrible hardship, they already live with deprivation every day. It's entirely possible that it will be harder on the people who don't already have to survive on insufficient food stamps every month.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink

Response to jtuck004 (Reply #9)

Wed Dec 5, 2012, 08:55 AM

27. That's so messed up. n/t


Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink

Response to Tansy_Gold (Original post)

Wed Dec 5, 2012, 07:38 AM

10. It's gone from high 50's to high 20's


and they wonder why everyone is sick. Our weather is a yo-yo.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink

Response to Tansy_Gold (Original post)

Wed Dec 5, 2012, 07:43 AM

11. Is A Recess Appointment Valid If The Senate Says It's Not Really Gone?



The White House says it was forced to install three new members of the National Labor Relations Board in January because of inaction by Senate Republicans. But those lawmakers argue the Senate wasn't really in a recess at the time....Let's go back to that period nearly one year ago: It's Jan. 6, 2012. An aide is talking in a nearly empty chamber. She's reading a couple of lines that put Virginia Sen. Jim Webb, a Democrat, in charge. Webb steps up, saying, "Under the previous order, the Senate stands adjourned until 11 a.m. on Tuesday, Jan. 10, 2012." And then, he pounds the gavel. No votes. No legislation. No nominations. And 30 seconds later, no more Senate.

Whether that day in January and 19 more like it constituted legitimate business in Congress is a question for the federal appeals court...The U.S. Constitution says the president needs to get advice and consent from the Senate before filling certain jobs, unless the openings come up during a recess. It's who defines recess that's the problem.

White House counsel Kathryn Ruemmler:

"Our view is that a pro forma session at which the Senate, by its own definition, is not conducting any business and is unavailable to provide advice and consent on the president's nominees is, for all practical and functional purposes, in recess"

The issue is being litigated in more than a dozen cases in federal courts all over the country. But Wednesday's case comes from a Washington state company, Noel Canning, which bottles and distributes Pepsi-Cola products. The company is challenging an unfavorable decision by the National Labor Relations Board this year. Noel Canning argues that the labor board can't force it to sign off on a collective bargaining agreement with the Teamsters union. In fact, the company says, the NLRB wasn't really fit to do business because three of its members were not appointed properly under the law.

The case is being closely watched by Lily Fu Claffee, the top lawyer at the U.S. Chamber of Commerce.

"The issue of whether the president's recess appointments are valid was going to get litigated one way or another, and we, on behalf of the business community, wanted to make sure that it got litigated as soon as possible and that we had certainty as soon as possible," Claffee says.

...The appeals court ruling could have big consequences for labor and business. The NLRB has acted in more than 200 cases since its new members arrived in January. All of those decisions — and dozens more that the three new members of the NLRB make before their terms expire late in 2013 — will be under a cloud of uncertainty until the federal courts weigh in.


Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink

Response to Demeter (Reply #11)

Wed Dec 5, 2012, 07:48 AM

12. BASTARDS PART 2: Milk Producers Peer Over The Dairy Cliff



There's more than one cliff drawing controversy this month. The federal farm bill is one of many items caught in congressional gridlock. The bill resets U.S. agriculture policy every four years, and most farmers are still covered by crop insurance and other programs until next planting season. But there's one exception: dairy.

Dairy farmers now have no safety net if milk prices fall. And with feed prices soaring, many feel they're falling off a cliff of their own....In a cramped barn in northern New York State, Bob Andrews is lugging hay to his heifers. He says the dairy business is upside down. "Do you realize that feed is more valuable right now than it is puttin' it through a cow?" says Andrews. In other words, his raw materials – the hay, and the corn and soy he feeds his 70 milkers – are worth more than his final product: the milk. Last summer's drought is a big reason why....dairy farmers are price takers, not price makers. The federal government sets a minimum price for milk, but it hasn't kept pace lately with increased prices for feed or energy or the cost of repairing farm equipment.
...A program called the Milk Income Loss Contract (MILC) helped with the bottom line. It paid farmers when the milk price went too low or feed prices went too high. But it expired as a part of the 2008 Farm Bill in October...

If the lame duck Congress fails to pass a new farm bill or extend the old one, a 1949 law would take effect in January that would almost double the milk price. If that happens, experts warn of $6 to $8 gallons of milk at the store. Galen says it's like the "fiscal cliff": it's supposed to make Congress avoid it, "so that Congress actually passes a new farm bill as opposed to reverting back to this decades old law."


Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink

Response to Demeter (Reply #12)

Wed Dec 5, 2012, 07:49 AM

13. Senate passes $631 billion defense bill



The Senate overwhelmingly approved a sweeping, $631 billion defense bill Tuesday that sends a clear signal to President Barack Obama to move quickly to get U.S. combat troops out of Afghanistan, tightens sanctions on Iran and limits the president's authority in handling terror suspects.

Ignoring a veto threat, the Senate voted 98-0 for the legislation that authorizes money for weapons, aircraft and ships and provides a 1.7 percent pay raise for military personnel. After a decade of increasing Pentagon budgets, the vote came against the backdrop of significant reductions in projected military spending and the threat of deeper cuts from the looming "fiscal cliff" of automatic spending cuts and tax increases.

The bill reflects the nation's war-weariness after more than a decade of fighting in Afghanistan, the messy uncertainty about new threats to U.S. security and Washington belt-tightening in times of trillion-dollar-plus deficits. Spending solely on the base defense budget has nearly doubled in the past 10 years, but the latest blueprint reins in the projected growth in military dollars.

The bill would provide some $526 billion for the base defense budget, $17 billion for defense programs in the Energy Department and about $88 billion for the war in Afghanistan. House and Senate negotiators must reconcile their competing versions of the bill in the next few weeks...

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink

Response to Demeter (Reply #13)

Wed Dec 5, 2012, 07:51 AM

14. The Affordable Housing Crisis



The precious few federal programs that provide rental assistance to the nation’s poorest and most vulnerable families are already underfinanced. These programs provide decent housing for about only a quarter of the low-income families who qualify for them. And with nearly nine million households teetering on the verge of homelessness, the country clearly needs more support for affordable housing, not less.

The main federal programs are traditional public housing, for which the government provides operating expenses, plus two different programs under Section 8 of the housing law, in which rents are subsidized in privately owned properties. Federal housing programs provide a lifeline for about five million low-income households that would otherwise be unable to afford livable housing at all.

More than half of these households are headed by elderly or disabled people and more than a third are families that include children. These families are overwhelmingly “extremely low income,” which means they earn less than a third of the median income in the areas where they live.

Congress has not treated these housing programs kindly in recent years. Between 2010 and 2012, financing fell by about $2.5 billion, or nearly 6 percent, although some of this was mitigated by one-time measures, like spending from reserves. President Obama’s budget for the 2013 fiscal year is not much of an improvement; given inflation, Congress would have to increase appropriations just to keep treading water, when, in fact, what the poor in this country need is a significant jump....

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink

Response to Demeter (Reply #14)

Wed Dec 5, 2012, 07:52 AM

15. Drug coverage to vary under health law



A new study says basic prescription drug coverage could vary dramatically from state to state under President Barack Obama's health care overhaul.

That's because states get to set benefits for private health plans that will be offered starting in 2014 through new insurance exchanges.

The study out Tuesday from the market analysis firm Avalere Health found that some states will require coverage of virtually all FDA-approved drugs, while others will only require coverage of about half of medications.

Consumers will still have access to essential medications, but some may not have as much choice.

Connecticut, Virginia and Arizona will be among the states with the most generous coverage, while California, Minnesota and North Carolina will be among states with the most limited.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink

Response to Demeter (Reply #15)

Wed Dec 5, 2012, 07:53 AM



Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink

Response to Tansy_Gold (Original post)

Wed Dec 5, 2012, 07:57 AM



Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink

Response to Tansy_Gold (Original post)

Wed Dec 5, 2012, 08:18 AM

18. The German bloc will have to take its bitter medicine in Greece OCTOBER



...The cumulative error is colossal....The IMF simply lost its political way in Greece. It knew – or should have known from dozens on rescue operations around the world – that Greece would crash into a self-feeding spiral without a rapid debt restructuring and a devaluation. Both channels were blocked because of the sanctity of the EMU Project. (Though default would come later, in a capricious fashion, singling out pension funds, insurers, and private creditors only). The policy never had any chance of working for Greece. The IMF under Strauss-Kahn went along with the EMU agenda, pretending all was well, sacrificing the Greeks to gain time for the European financial system to build up safety buffers...


...creditor countries are trying to maintain a ridiculous illusion for their own internal political reasons. Greece cannot claw its way out of a 190pc of GDP debt load. The official haircut is coming sooner or later, and it will be an explosive political moment.

Chancellor Angela Merkel will have to account for direct losses to the Bundestag. A line will have to be written into the German budget covering the X billions of euros. Other line items may have to be cut. Welfare support for Germans, perhaps. Having insisted for over two years that German taxpayers face no risk of loss on the Club Med rescue packages – and having indeed told them it generated a profit – she will have to explain why this has gone horribly wrong.

No doubt she will try to delay this awful moment until after the German elections late next year. But the calendar of simmering revolt in Greece is not in her hands. One of the three parties in the pro-Memorandum coalition has already refused to go along with the budget plans. The Government majority is thinning fast. My guess is that Mrs Merkel will be forced to admit to the German nation that contingent liabilities are turning into real liabilities long before her elections.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink

Response to Demeter (Reply #18)

Wed Dec 5, 2012, 08:21 AM

19. The euro is heading for a permanent state of depression



A year ago, monetary union looked as if it was heading for certain death, with the European banking system in apparent meltdown and extreme divergence in monetary conditions across the single currency area. In all but name, monetary union had already ceased to exist.

Action by the ECB, first with the cash-for-debt Long Term Refinancing Operation and, more recently, the promise of unlimited bond purchases, has succeeded in stilling the waters, at least to some degree. Even a Greek exit seems, for the time being, to be off the table. With more austerity, Berlin seems minded to give Greeks another chance – until the next bail-out, in any case.

But, though the single currency may have been saved from imminent death on the operating table, it seems now to be heading for a scarcely more appetising alternative – a condition of chronic, long-term illness where still very tight monetary conditions in many parts of the eurozone in combination with lockstep austerity threaten to induce a virtually permanent state of depression. Even Germany shows every sign of slipping back into economic contraction.... Without bail-outs at least three eurozone countries would already be completely bust, and several others would fast be heading in the same direction. Deprived of access to the capital markets, these countries would be forced into a degree of fiscal austerity that would make present programmes look like a stroll in the park. Fiscal stimulus, or even the normal operation of automatic stabilisers, is not an option for some eurozone countries.

In any case, the growth problem in Europe is not so much one of too much austerity as the straitjacket of the euro itself. This has prevented both the natural corrective of exchange-rate adjustment and the application of appropriate monetary policy to counteract the fiscal contraction. It has also prevented the sort of burden sharing between creditor and debtor nations that has to take place if the crisis is ever to be resolved...

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink

Response to Tansy_Gold (Original post)

Wed Dec 5, 2012, 08:22 AM

20. Eliot Spitzer: Tax the Traders! It Would Solve Economic Crisis and Stop Reckless Activity



...it has been around for a long time, supported by a wide range of economists, including Nobel laureate James Tobin, as well as advocates, including Ralph Nader in the Washington Post this weekend, and elected officials: a tax on financial transactions. It will give us gobs of revenue. It will fall on a sector that has generated enormous and unwarranted profits for a very few, who at the same time have benefited from huge bailouts and regulatory help and largely escaped any responsibility for their central role in creating the financial cataclysm that we are still struggling with.

Here is the idea: A tax of less than half a percent on every $100 of stock sales or sales of other financial instruments including bonds, derivatives, and options. The tax could raise anywhere from $170 billion to $350 billion per year depending how it was applied. Extend that over 10 years, and we are raising almost what the White House and Republicans agree needs to be raised in order to accomplish the objectives of a grand bargain.

But there is an added benefit here: Trading in the equity and debt markets has gone wild over the past few years. High-speed trading and speculation have overtaken the economically legitimate reasons for our desire to have highly liquid markets: the capacity to raise capital and then allocate it efficiently among sectors and companies. The trading that has emerged over the past few years is not serving that purpose—it is a casino enterprise driven by hidden pools and computer algorithms that do not seek to hold capital for longer than an instant.

To the extent that a financial-transfer tax drove some of those trading practices out of the marketplace, that would be another good outcome....

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink

Response to Tansy_Gold (Original post)

Wed Dec 5, 2012, 08:31 AM

21. Entitlements Scare Tactics



A friend asked me about last week’s WSJ op-ed by Christopher Cox and Bill Archer claiming that the government’s true liabilities exceed $86 trillion—not the $16 trillion national debt that people usually talk about. There’s something to it, but there’s also a huge scary story in there that’s purely meant to frighten people. $16 trillion is the amount of Treasury debt outstanding at the moment. The more relevant figure is the amount of debt the federal government owes to people and institutions other than itself. If, for some reason, I lent money to my wife and she promised to pay it back to me, we wouldn’t count that as part of the debt owed by our household. The debt owed to the public is about $10 trillion these days.

So where do Cox and Archer get $86 trillion? They are counting the present value of future unfunded liabilities. To take one example, if you add up all the money that Medicare Part A is expected to pay out over the next 75 years and figure out how much it would be worth today, you get a total of $21.2 trillion. If you add up all the money that Medicare Part A will bring in from payroll taxes and do the same, you get $15.6 trillion. So to make Medicare Part A balance over seventy-five years, the government would have to have $5.6 trillion that it doesn’t have today. Do the same for all of Medicare and you get a total of $38.6 trillion. This is all from Table V.F2 on page 238 of the latest trustees’ report on the Medicare trust funds. (Cox and Archer, who claim to be citing the same source, have $42.8 trillion in their op-ed; maybe they’re using an infinite time horizon instead of a 75-year timeframe.)

Now, this is a meaningful exercise. It provides information that isn’t captured in the annual deficit figures and the current national debt, neither of which says anything about how spending and tax revenues are likely to evolve in the future. When we make decisions about taxes and spending, we should consider what we know about the future. In this case, we know that Medicare spending, under current law, is likely to increase faster than tax revenues because of demographic changes and health care inflation. But what does $86 trillion mean? Is it a lot or a little? And this is where Cox and Archer start telling silly stories meant to scare people. They claim that “to collect enough tax revenue just to avoid going deeper into debt would require over $8 trillion in tax collections annually.” This is wrong on two levels....First, if you did your calculations properly, you don’t “go deeper into debt” each year. You already estimated the amount that you will have to pay out and the amount that you will collect. The present value of your future unfunded liabilities shouldn’t be changing significantly from year to year unless those estimates change. For example, your discount rate might change, or your estimate of health care inflation might go up, or something like that. But these estimates can change in either direction.*

Second, the source they cite already tells us how much we would have to raise taxes (p. 239):

“From the 75-year budget perspective, the present value of the additional resources that would be necessary to meet projected expenditures, at current-law levels for the three programs combined, is $38.6 trillion. To put this very large figure in perspective, it would represent 4.3 percent of the present value of projected GDP over the same period ($907 trillion).”

The appropriate number to compare $86 trillion to is the present value of all future GDP. The Medicare trustees give us the present value of GDP over the next seventy-five years, which is $907 trillion. So $86 trillion is a big number (and I’m still not sure where Cox and Archer got it), but $907 trillion is a much bigger number. Looking just at Medicare, we would need to increase taxes by 4.3 percent of GDP over the levels set by current law. Today, it would be about $600 billion. That is a lot, but it is certainly doable—and it’s a lot less than $8 trillion...


Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink

Response to Tansy_Gold (Original post)

Wed Dec 5, 2012, 08:33 AM

22. 8 Things Democrats Must Do in Washington Showdown Over "Fiscal Cliff" ROBERT REICH



ONE: HOLD YOUR GROUND. The wealthy have to pay their fair share of taxes. That's what the election was all about, and we won. It's only fair they pay more. They're taking home record share of national income and wealth, and have lowest effective tax rate in living memory.

TWO: NO DEAL IS BETTER THAN A BAD DEAL. You're in a strong bargaining position. If you do nothing, the Bush tax cuts automatically expire in January, and we go back to rates during Clinton administration. Which isn't such a bad thing. As I recall we had a pretty good economy during the Clinton years.

THREE: MAKE REPUBLICANS VOTE ON EXTENDING THE TAX CUTS JUST FOR THE MIDDLE CLASS. After all the Bush tax cuts expire, have Republicans vote on an extending the Bush tax cut just for the middle-class. If they refuse and try to hold those tax cuts hostage to tax cuts for the wealthy, it will show whose side they're on. They'll pay the price in 2014.

FOUR: DEMAND HIGHER TAX RATES ON WEALTHY, NOT JUST LIMITS ON DEDUCTIONS. Don't fall for Republican offers to limit some tax deductions on the wealthy. Demand we go back to higher tax rates on the wealthy and eliminate their unfair tax loopholes, so they truly start paying their fair share.

FIVE: DON'T CUT SAFETY NETS. Don't sacrifice Medicare or Social Security, or programs for the poor. Americans depend on these safety nets and can't afford any benefit cuts.

SIX: DON'T CUT INVESTMENTS IN OUR FUTURE PRODUCTIVITY. Education, basic R&D, and infrastructure aren't spending; they're investments in our future prosperity. If the return on these investments is greater than the cost, they ought to be made, period.

SEVEN: CUT SPENDING ON MILITARY AND CORPORATE WELFARE. You want to cut, cut spending on the military -- which now exceeds the military spending of the next 13 largest military spenders in the world combined. And cut corporate welfare -- support to agribusiness, oil and gas, Big Pharma, big insurance and Wall Street.

EIGHT: PUT JOBS BEFORE DEFICIT REDUCTION. Finally, Don't cut the budget deficit as long as unemployment remains high. Otherwise you'll cause the economy to contract, making the deficit even larger in proportion. That's the austerity trap Europe has fallen into. We need to create American prosperity, not European austerity.

Remember: Jobs come first.


ROBERT B. REICH, Chancellor's Professor of Public Policy at the University of California at Berkeley, was Secretary of Labor in the Clinton administration. Time Magazine named him one of the ten most effective cabinet secretaries of the last century. He has written thirteen books, including the best sellers "Aftershock" and "The Work of Nations." His latest is an e-book, "Beyond Outrage," now available in paperback. He is also a founding editor of the American Prospect magazine and chairman of Common Cause.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink

Response to Demeter (Reply #22)

Wed Dec 5, 2012, 08:46 AM




Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink

Response to Tansy_Gold (Original post)

Wed Dec 5, 2012, 08:37 AM

23. Most Accurate Forecaster Sees Lethargic U.S. Expansion



Joshua Shapiro, 54, chief U.S. economist at New York-based forecasting firm Maria Fiorini Ramirez Inc.,... has scored the top spot among forecasters of the U.S. economy for the two-year period ended on Sept. 30, according to data compiled for the annual Bloomberg Markets ranking of global forecasters.

When Shapiro started his career in the early 1980s, the U.S. was emerging from crisis and suffering from the same symptoms it is now -- slow growth and high unemployment. What Shapiro saw two years ago, and other economists didn’t, is that the healing this time would be slower. He and his firm have been among the more pessimistic forecasters of a U.S. recovery, citing data that show slow growth and relatively high joblessness persisting through 2013. Shapiro predicts the U.S. economy will grow next year by about 1.5 percent.

Shapiro sees monetary policy, with the Federal Reserve benchmark interest rate at almost zero, as having a limited near-term impact on growth. And he considers the $1 trillion U.S. fiscal deficit an important drag on future expansion...


Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink

Response to Tansy_Gold (Original post)

Wed Dec 5, 2012, 08:40 AM

24. Employees at Billion Dollar Companies Fight for a Living Wage



Fast food workers in New York City are back on the job after a strike that attracted national attention and “scared the heck out of the bosses,” as labor journalist Sarah Jaffe put it in an interview with Ed Schultz. The strike is one among a recent string of labor actions conducted by low-wage workers in the U.S. to fight for fair pay as well as better working conditions. Walmart workers notably took action on Black Friday, historically one of the biggest retail days of the year, while the Retail Action Project has been organizing on behalf of workers affected by wage theft, on-call shift scheduling and other labor abuses. Meanwhile, the union UNITE HERE has been working with hotel workers at chains like Hyatt to address poor working conditions.

One in four workers in the United States is employed in a low-wage job. That includes many people in the food service industry, retail employees, janitors, hotel workers, agricultural laborers, and many others who make the U.S. economy tick; notably, many of these workers are also women and people of color, and the workers’ educational level tends to be lower than that of the general population. While this underclass labors, large companies like their employers profit, often immensely so. Growth is up for firms like Walmart, despite economic problems, indicating that their business strategy is effective.

A key part of that strategy involves underpaying their workers. With a federal minimum wage set at $7.25, far too low for the cost of living in many areas, low-wage workers are often forced to work multiple jobs while still struggling to pay the bills. In addition, they are rarely entitled to benefits like health care, retirement accounts, paid sick days, and paid time off. U.S. workers are working harder and longer than ever before, but that’s not balanced by greater productivity, just more profits for their employers.

Writing for The Atlantic, Jaffe notes that these signs of rebellion are occurring at a time when labor unions are in decline, with fewer workers protected by union membership than ever before. As workers grow frustrated with poor conditions and low wages, walkouts and similar acts of protest become an effective communication method that doesn’t just help them organize. It also helps them attract the attention of society in general, pushing people to support their cause. The series of walkouts and other labor actions across the nation in 2012 may be laying the blueprint for more aggressive labor organizing, including a push for a higher federal minimum wage...

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink

Response to Demeter (Reply #24)

Wed Dec 5, 2012, 08:42 AM

25. Hostess CEO Cuts Worker Pay, but Leaves Own Salary Untouched



After failed Twinkies-maker Hostess filed for bankruptcy in November, acting chief executive Gregory Rayburn imposed an 8 percent across-the-board pay cut on the company’s workers. Despite those cuts, Rayburn, who took the company over after its second bankruptcy filing in March, will not be subject to the pay cut because he is not technically a company employee, the Huffington Post’s Bonnie Kavoussi reports:

Though he imposed an 8 percent pay cut for all Hostess workers, Gregory Rayburn’s monthly $125,000 pay — or $1.5 million a year — will remain unchanged, a company spokesman told The Huffington Post on Monday. Rayburn is not on the Hostess payroll and therefore isn’t subject to the imposed pay cut, the spokesman explained.

Earlier this year, Hostess’ former CEO received a pay increase from $750,000 to nearly $2.5 million even as the company was struggling. The pay package was later reduced to $1.5 million, and Rayburn reduced the salaries of four other senior executives who received bonuses to just $1 until the company emerges from bankruptcy, according to a company spokesperson. Four other executives who received raises, the spokesperson said, had their salaries reduced to pre-raise levels.

Still, the company asked a judge to approve $1.75 million in bonuses for 19 executives after it filed for bankruptcy in November. The judge approved the bonuses this week, making Hostess the latest company to dole out big pay packages to executives even as their firms were failing.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink

Response to Tansy_Gold (Original post)

Wed Dec 5, 2012, 08:56 AM

28. Can't take any more good news...see you all later


maybe even tomorrow late....

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink

Response to Tansy_Gold (Original post)

Wed Dec 5, 2012, 09:00 AM

29. a little background music for your day

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink

Response to Tansy_Gold (Original post)

Wed Dec 5, 2012, 09:01 AM

30. French Borrowing Costs Fall To Record Low Yields, Making Tons Of People Look Like Fools


French borrowing costs have just fallen to record lows.
10-year debt now has a yield of just 2%.
The bond market is mocking everyone who has freaked out about Hollande, higher taxes, socialism, and the downgrade.
And in particular it's mocking The Economist.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink

Response to Tansy_Gold (Original post)

Wed Dec 5, 2012, 09:03 AM

31. The Bottom Falls Out Of The European Consumer -


There are green shoots in Europe.
Financial markets are doing well both on the equity and debt front. Germany's engine is revving again. PMI data hit its lowest level in 8 months.
But as always, the biggest risk in Europe is, well, how long will the people tolerate recession? How long can they handle dismal growth.
New data from Eurostat provides a really depressing snapshot of the state of the consumer, at least as of October.
In October 2012 compared with September 2012, the volume of retail trade fell by 1.2% in the euro area (EA17) and by 1.1% in the EU272, according to estimates from Eurostat, the statistical office of the European Union. In September, retail trade decreased by 0.6% and 0.2% respectively. In October 2012, compared with October 2011, the retail sales index fell by 3.6% in the euro area and by 2.4% in the EU27.

Read more: http://www.businessinsider.com/horrendous-european-retail-sales-2012-12#ixzz2EBMODHPt

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink

Response to Tansy_Gold (Original post)

Wed Dec 5, 2012, 09:07 AM

32. AND THE SCROOGE AWARD GOES TO... Corporate America!


The first chart shows that big American companies now have the highest profit margins in history.

The second chart shows that the companies are now paying the lowest wages in history as a percent of the economy.

If you happen to be an owner of a big American corporation, these charts could be construed as good news: You're coining it!
If you happen to be a rank-and-file employee, however--or someone hoping to be such an employee--this is bad news: You're sharing less than ever before in the success of American industry.

Read more: http://www.businessinsider.com/companies-need-to-share-more-profits-with-employees-2012-12#ixzz2EBNFbuvu

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink

Response to xchrom (Reply #32)

Wed Dec 5, 2012, 11:45 AM

43. That's something that cannot continue


I feel sick (not just from germs)

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink

Response to Tansy_Gold (Original post)

Wed Dec 5, 2012, 09:43 AM

33. Ireland budget: Tax hikes and spending cuts expected


The Irish government will present its sixth hard-hitting budget since the collapse of the country's Celtic Tiger economy on Wednesday.

More tax rises and spending cuts will be announced as the government hopes to save another 3.5bn euro (£2.8bn).

After four years of austerity, all of the economic "low-hanging fruit" has already gone.

Consequently, a new property tax is expected, along with cuts to the health and social welfare budgets.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink

Response to Tansy_Gold (Original post)

Wed Dec 5, 2012, 09:46 AM

34. Eurozone recession to continue into 2013, survey suggests


The rate of contraction in the eurozone economy eased slightly in November, according to a closely-watched survey.

But the region is still in line for another quarter of recession with further contraction likely in early 2013, according to Markit, who produced the survey.

Its Eurozone Composite Purchasing Managers' Index (PMI), which measures business activity, rose to 46.5 in November from 45.7 the month before.

A score below 50 indicates contraction.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink

Response to Tansy_Gold (Original post)

Wed Dec 5, 2012, 09:48 AM

35. UK economy 'to contract this year'


The UK economy will contract by 0.1% this year, according to the Office for Budget Responsibility (OBR), the independent body that makes economic forecasts for the government.

It is a big revision from the time of the Budget in March, when it said that the economy would grow 0.8% this year.

Chancellor George Osborne announced the changes to the forecast in his Autumn Statement.

Growth forecasts for the next five years were also cut.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink

Response to Tansy_Gold (Original post)

Wed Dec 5, 2012, 09:50 AM



WASHINGTON (AP) -- U.S. workers were more productive this summer than initially thought, while costing their companies less.

The Labor Department says productivity grew at an annual rate of 2.9 percent from July through September. That's the fastest pace in two years and up from an initial estimate of 1.9 percent. Labor costs dropped at a rate of 1.9 percent, more than the 0.1 percent dip initially estimated.

Productivity was revised higher because economic growth was faster in the third quarter than first estimated, while hours worked were unchanged. Productivity is the amount of output per hour of work.

The report suggests companies are finding ways to squeeze more out of their existing workers, a bad sign for hiring. Still, productivity is up a weak 1.7 percent compared with a year ago.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink

Response to Tansy_Gold (Original post)

Wed Dec 5, 2012, 09:55 AM



WASHINGTON (AP) -- A private survey shows that U.S. businesses added fewer workers in November, in part because Superstorm Sandy shut down factories, retail stores, and other companies.

Payroll processor ADP says employers added 118,000 jobs last month. That's below October's total of 157,000, which was revised lower.

Mark Zandi, chief economist at Moody's Analytics, says the storm cut payrolls by 86,000 jobs. Excluding the effects of the storm, "the job market turned in a good performance during the month."

ADP is calculating job gains with a different methodology than it had previously used. The new report covers more businesses.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink

Response to Tansy_Gold (Original post)

Wed Dec 5, 2012, 09:59 AM



LONDON (AP) -- Retail sales across the 17 European Union countries that use the euro slumped far more than anticipated in October, largely due to a huge drop in Germany, in a development that will put more pressure on the European Central Bank to cut borrowing rates soon.

Eurostat, the EU's statistics office, said Wednesday that eurozone retail sales fell 1.2 percent in October from the previous month, double September's decline and substantially more than the 0.2 percent drop expected in the markets

The figures provide further evidence that households across the eurozone remain gloomy over the economy and are reluctant to spend more than they have to - non-food sales were particularly weak during October. The eurozone is back in recession, officially defined as two straight quarters of falling output, and unemployment is up at a record high of 11.7 percent with 18.7 million people out of work.

"The prospects for consumer spending in the eurozone look troubling in the near term at least given very low consumer confidence, high and rising unemployment, generally muted wage growth and tightening fiscal policy in many countries," said Howard Archer, chief European economist at IHS Global Insight.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink

Response to Tansy_Gold (Original post)

Wed Dec 5, 2012, 10:33 AM



NEW YORK (AP) -- Citigroup says it will eliminate more than 11,000 jobs.

The bank says it's looking to cut expenses and improve efficiency.

The company said Wednesday that the cuts will result in about $1 billion in charges in the fourth quarter and about $100 million in charges during the first half of next year.

It expects about $900 million in expense savings in 2013 and annual expense savings of more than $1.1 billion starting in 2014.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink

Response to Tansy_Gold (Original post)

Wed Dec 5, 2012, 10:43 AM

40. Stocks, Commodities Rise as China Gains; Spain Bonds Fall


Stocks (MXWD) gained for the first time in three days and commodities rose as China eased restrictions on investing in banks and its new leaders backed urban development. Spain’s bonds extended losses after the government missed its maximum sales target at a debt sale. The yen weakened.

The MSCI All-Country World Index advanced 0.2 percent at 9:33 a.m. in New York and the Standard & Poor’s 500 Index increased 0.1 percent. China’s stocks rallied the most in three months. The yen weakened against 15 of its 16 major peers. Spain’s 10-year yield jumped 18 basis points to 5.43 percent, while European bank creditworthiness climbed to the highest in 18 months. The S&P GSCI gauge of 24 raw materials added 0.1 percent and zinc gained 0.3 percent.

China’s regulators abolished a rule limiting insurers’ investments in commercial banks and Xinhua news agency said yesterday after a meeting of top party leaders that China will actively promote urbanization and expand domestic demand. Spain sold 4.25 billion euros ($5.6 billion) of debt due between 2015 and 2022, less than the 4.5 billion-euro target.

“There’s a lot of talk about potential policy support for China’s economy,” said Tim Leung, a fund manager who helps manage about $1.5 billion at IG Investment Ltd. in Hong Kong. “While urbanization is not new, people will probably focusing on that trend. There’s a lot of positive benefit from urbanization, like infrastructure spending.”

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink

Response to xchrom (Reply #40)

Wed Dec 5, 2012, 10:50 AM

41. DJIA topped 13,000 but slipping back under.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink

Response to Roland99 (Reply #41)

Wed Dec 5, 2012, 12:50 PM

46. And there it goes again


Evidently, we are scheduled for a miracle.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink

Response to Demeter (Reply #46)

Wed Dec 5, 2012, 01:58 PM

48. Triple Sec for the Triple Digits!

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink

Response to Tansy_Gold (Original post)

Wed Dec 5, 2012, 11:37 AM

42. Video - Senator Alan Simpson has a message for the Millennial generation

Senator Alan Simpson has a message for the Millennial generation: use those cool social media tools to spread the word and sign up new people for The Can Kicks Back campaign. Learn more about The Can Kicks Back and the "Three-A-Week" recruitment challenge at www.TheCanKicksBack.org/3

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink

Reply to this thread