Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

marmar

(76,982 posts)
Mon Sep 3, 2012, 12:01 PM Sep 2012

Big Banks Are Hazardous to U.S. Financial Health


By Simon Johnson Sep 2, 2012 6:30 PM ET


(Bloomberg) The debate over whether the U.S.’s largest banks are too big is heating up. Since the 2008 financial crisis, the perception has taken hold among some analysts and economists that certain U.S. institutions are too big to fail, meaning they would have to be bailed out to protect the financial system in the event of another calamity.

The recent trading losses at JPMorgan Chase & Co. and scandals over money laundering at HSBC Holdings Plc and Standard Chartered Plc have prompted even financial-industry insiders to ask whether these complex global organizations are too big to manage.

The continued downward spiral in Europe raises a similar question: Are some banks too big to save, meaning their collapse could dramatically worsen the euro crisis (as happened in Ireland in the fall of 2008 and is happening now in Spain and Greece)?

The critics must be gaining converts because, in recent weeks, the defenders of large banks have started to push back. William B. Harrison Jr., the former chairman of JPMorgan, and Wayne Abernathy, the executive vice president of the American Bankers Association, both wrote op-eds that argue against breaking up banks. The Financial Services Roundtable, a large- bank lobby group, has circulated two e-mails insisting that the critics’ arguments are based entirely on myths. ..................(more)

The complete piece is at: http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2012-09-02/big-banks-are-hazardous-to-u-s-financial-health.html



3 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Big Banks Are Hazardous to U.S. Financial Health (Original Post) marmar Sep 2012 OP
Take them over Navl Sep 2012 #1
banks honestgrifter Sep 2012 #2
Banks are completely unnecessary in the world. mbperrin Sep 2012 #3
 

Navl

(18 posts)
1. Take them over
Tue Sep 4, 2012, 02:02 PM
Sep 2012

Instead of "bailing them out" why not just take them over, or at least take a large enough stake to exert significant control over the salaries that are paid there?

The government still owns about 500 million shares, or about 32% of GM stock. It controls salaries at the company, and their CEO "only" made about 8 million last year in salary, stock, and benefits. That's a lot of money to most people, but Ford's CEO made about $29.5 mil.

By taking significant control of these companies can't we then distribute the wages in a more equitable manner? Isn't that what we all want?

mbperrin

(7,672 posts)
3. Banks are completely unnecessary in the world.
Sun Sep 9, 2012, 12:08 PM
Sep 2012

They have done the biggest con in the world by convincing people that having it NOW is worth paying many times the price for it, whatever IT is.

Haven't used or needed a bank, credit union, or other financial account since 1978, and I figure I have literally saved a million dollars in fees, interest, overhead, fines, waste, and other money right out of my pocket.

Banks are only good for themselves, just like any criminal enterprise.

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Economy»Big Banks Are Hazardous t...