Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Warren DeMontague

(80,708 posts)
Thu Apr 5, 2012, 08:45 PM Apr 2012

This message was self-deleted by its author

This message was self-deleted by its author (Warren DeMontague) on Sat Apr 7, 2012, 01:33 PM. When the original post in a discussion thread is self-deleted, the entire discussion thread is automatically locked so new replies cannot be posted.

8 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

ProudToBeBlueInRhody

(16,399 posts)
1. Clearly, "Milton Diamond" is a tool of the patriarchy
Thu Apr 5, 2012, 08:57 PM
Apr 2012

As well as a porn producer.

All I know is that every relationship I've been in, when porn has been watched it was at the full suggestion of my partner. And no, I'm not giving out their names so you creeps can look them up, or so the matriarchy can have them sent to re-education camp.

Warren DeMontague

(80,708 posts)
3. A lot of couples enjoy it together, and a lot of women enjoy it.
Fri Apr 6, 2012, 03:03 AM
Apr 2012

Another interesting reference was the Milwaukee, I think, study where they couldn't end up having it because they couldn't find ANY men who never watched porn.


OOOO NOOOOEEEEEESSSSSS!!!!!!!!!!

Rowdyboy

(22,057 posts)
2. Both being gay, my partner and I have similar tastes and find some porn downright er....
Fri Apr 6, 2012, 01:01 AM
Apr 2012

Stimulating, so to speak. Its a pleasant diversion for a lazy Monday....

Warren DeMontague

(80,708 posts)
4. I think this is one of the big issues some so-called "2nd wave" feminists have with LGBT people.
Fri Apr 6, 2012, 03:12 AM
Apr 2012

They don't conveniently fit the narrative,

they enjoy sex (something that is considered, at best, "problematic" in many of these circles, certainly a minefield full of doom and shame and horrible oppression)

...and WORST of all, many gay men engage in these allegedly "programmed by the patriarchy" male sex behaviors, ranging from "objectification" (whatever that means) to the watching of smut, which going by some of the polemical outbursts in radfem-land, is not just one of the worst acts of oppression in human history, but it would seem that the looking at pictures of consenting adults fucking by other consenting adults is THE singularly most oppressive atrocity atrocious oppression act in the history of life on Earth, in the history of sentient life anywhere, hell, in anything that's ever happened or could be imagined to happen.

Upton

(9,709 posts)
5. Study doesn't surprise me at all..
Fri Apr 6, 2012, 10:43 AM
Apr 2012

My SO and I have always enjoyed porn together....I guess the radical feminists would say she doesn't know what's good for her and needs to go to a special Andrea Dworkin memorial retraining camp.

Actually, we have a good laugh at them, for their goals are much the same as those of RW fundies. IMO, the anti sex radfems have given all feminists a bad name..

 

seabeyond

(110,159 posts)
6. Researchers find legalizing child porn may lead to fewer rates of child sex abuse
Fri Apr 6, 2012, 11:39 AM
Apr 2012

According to a study headed by Professor Milton Diamond, from the University of Hawaii, in countries where child porn has been legalized the rate of child sex abuse has fallen significantly.

Milton told Honolulu news station KITV.com, he is not advocating legalizing using kids to make pornography.

“The can do it artificially and if that reduces child sex crimes, I think that is a plus,” he said. We think the perpetrator is more likely to use pornography to masturbate and not go after kids, so we think it’s better for kids.”

Currently computer-generated, or “virtual” child pornography, is banned in the United States when that image is indistinguishable from that of an actual minor.

http://blog.chron.com/momhouston/2010/12/researchers-find-legalizing-child-porn-may-lead-to-fewer-rates-of-child-sex-abuse/
________________________

Warren DeMontague

(80,708 posts)
7. Off topic. If you want a discussion into material involving non-adults, start a new thread.
Fri Apr 6, 2012, 11:44 AM
Apr 2012

When agenda-driven people desperately try to conflate material by and for adults with material involving non-adults, they enable child abuse IMHO.

Similarly to how when people try to muddy the definition of consent, they make it easier for rapists.

We are talking, here, about material by and for ADULTS, which is what constitutes legal porn in this world. That is completely different from anything involving non-adults, similar to the way that driving on the freeway is different from taking your car and driving over grandpa on purpose.

Response to Warren DeMontague (Original post)

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»Men's Group»This message was self-del...