Latin America
Related: About this forumHonduras: Now Open for Political Murder
October 09, 2012
Return of the Nightmare
Honduras: Now Open for Political Murder
by NICK ALEXANDROV
Last Wednesdays presidential debate, and the flurry of fact-checking that followed, helped sustain the illusion that Republicans and Democrats are bitter rivals. Reporters and analysts obsessed over the accuracy of each candidates claims, ignoring the two parties broadly similar goals, which mainstream political scientists now take for granted. Governmentboth parties are implicatedhas had a huge hand in nurturing Americas winner-take-all economy, Jacob S. Hacker and Paul Pierson write in Winner-Take-All Politics, their study of the massive transfer of wealth to the richest Americans since the 1970s. George Farahs research has shown how cross-party collaboration extends from economic issues to the debates structure. The Commission on Presidential Debates, a private corporation both parties created, ensures independent candidates will be excluded, and more generally that the events will remain the sterile, predictable spectacles familiar to viewers.
No doubt the foreign policy debate in a few weeks will offer much of the same. In the real world, meanwhile, Obama embraced and extended Bushs foreign policy, as the case of Honduras illustrates especially well. After the Honduran military staged a coup against democratically-elected President Manuel Zelaya on June 28, 2009, Obama and Secretary of State Clinton backed the ensuing fraudulent elections the Organization of American States and European Union refused to observe. Porfirio Lobo won the phony contest, and now holds power. The conclusion from the Honduras episode, British scholar Julia Brixton wrote in Latin American Perspectives, was that the Obama administration had as weak a commitment to democracy, human rights, and the rule of law as the preceding U.S. presidency.
The coups plotters, it should be emphasized, knew exactly what they were doing. Colonel Bayardo Inestroza, a military lawyer who advised them on legal issues, was very open about it, informing the Salvadoran newspaper El Faro, We committed a crime, but we had to do it. U.S. officials seem to have taken slightly longer to recognize the obvious, but Wikileaks documents indicate that, by late July, they understood that what had transpired was an illegal and unconstitutional coup. Obamas legal training, cosmopolitan background and cabinet stuffed with intellectuals were all irrelevant in this situation, like so many others. A different set of factors drives U.S. foreign policy, which is precisely why, to cite just one example, Matt Bais analysis of Obamas Enthusiasm Gap is featured prominently on the New York Times homepage as I write, below the Ralph Lauren ads and feature about a Pennsylvanian high schools underdog football team. In determining whats fit to print, triviality seems to be one of the crucial considerations.
A more serious analysis of Obama might start, for example, by observing that his enthusiasm gap failed to materialize as he drafted lists of people to murder. It also was mysteriously absent when he stood firmly behind the Honduran coups leaders, two of whom graduated from the School of the Americas (SOA) at Fort Benning, Georgia. Renamed the Western Hemisphere for Security Cooperation (WHINSEC) in 2001, the name-change was, predictably, just a rebranding. Nico Udu-Gama, one of the leading activists working to close the institution, emphasized recently on Al Jazeera that the schools graduates have continued to violate human rights over the past decade. This is the main reason why Udu-Gama and others organize for School of the Americas Watch, and currently are gearing up for its annual demonstrations at Fort Benning the weekend of November 16-18.
More:
http://www.counterpunch.org/2012/10/09/honduras-now-open-for-political-murder/