Tue Apr 5, 2016, 02:23 PM
Her Sister (6,444 posts)
Bernie’s Campaign Manager Throws a Bomb About Hillary and Young Voters
http://bluenationreview.com/bernies-campaign-manager-throws-a-bomb-about-hillary-and-young-voters/
As we explained, the NYT article is peppered with concessions that Bernie has, indeed, gone negative—but it is this paragraph that contains a stunning admission about his own view of his 2016 strategy:
Mr. Sanders’s advisers urged him to challenge Mrs. Clinton over accepting $675,000 from Goldman Sachs for delivering three speeches, according to two Sanders advisers. Mr. Sanders, hunched over a U-shaped conference table, rejected it as a personal attack on Mrs. Clinton’s income — the sort of character assault he has long opposed. She has the right to make money, he offered. Let that sink in. Bernie Sanders, according to the New York Times, agrees with what we’ve been saying for months: His Wall Street dog whistle is a direct assault on Hillary’s integrity. So when he insinuates that she is not trustworthy to the Daily News and then pretends it isn’t a character attack, he is being disingenuous — to be charitable. Bernie is not alone of course. His campaign and surrogates are out there blasting away at Hillary and her endorsers, even when those endorsers are civil rights heroes. And now we have this cheap shot from Jeff Weaver: "I'm not so confident about that." Jeff Weaver on whether Bernie's young supporters would come out for Hillary. You can see video of Weaver here: https://twitter.com/AlanKestrel750/status/717380357218283520?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw BTW that twitter account is interesting. Alan Kestrel @AlanKestrel750
#ImWithHer | I'm a white male Millennial who early voted for Hillary Clinton in Ohio after campaigning for Bernie Sanders for months. Ask me why.
|
21 replies, 1377 views
![]() |
Author | Time | Post |
![]() |
Her Sister | Apr 2016 | OP |
fun n serious | Apr 2016 | #1 | |
JSup | Apr 2016 | #10 | |
fun n serious | Apr 2016 | #12 | |
JSup | Apr 2016 | #16 | |
fun n serious | Apr 2016 | #18 | |
yallerdawg | Apr 2016 | #17 | |
fun n serious | Apr 2016 | #20 | |
liberal N proud | Apr 2016 | #2 | |
Tanuki | Apr 2016 | #3 | |
Koinos | Apr 2016 | #6 | |
Koinos | Apr 2016 | #4 | |
SaschaHM | Apr 2016 | #5 | |
Koinos | Apr 2016 | #7 | |
Tanuki | Apr 2016 | #9 | |
CalvinballPro | Apr 2016 | #19 | |
otohara | Apr 2016 | #8 | |
Her Sister | Apr 2016 | #11 | |
fun n serious | Apr 2016 | #14 | |
Her Sister | Apr 2016 | #13 | |
cosmicone | Apr 2016 | #15 | |
Lucinda | Apr 2016 | #21 |
Response to Her Sister (Original post)
Tue Apr 5, 2016, 02:32 PM
fun n serious (4,451 posts)
1. We don't need them. Tad wants you to worry so
he can make a case on convention floor to GIVE the election to Sanders for free.. NO! We will be fine and we need to make that case.
|
Response to fun n serious (Reply #1)
Tue Apr 5, 2016, 02:47 PM
JSup (740 posts)
10. "We don't need them"...
...sounds so cold, though; it makes it sound as though we don't care about them and, at least in my opinion, we should.
We should be wondering why they believe all of these lies and how to fix it (not that I'm sure that's possible). |
Response to JSup (Reply #10)
Tue Apr 5, 2016, 02:54 PM
fun n serious (4,451 posts)
12. Have you been on twitter today?
New Yorkers are in shock over the interview Bernie gave. They seem very concerned and worried. I say, lets do that NY debate so people can see the contrast in regards to policy and plans
|
Response to fun n serious (Reply #12)
Tue Apr 5, 2016, 03:28 PM
JSup (740 posts)
16. No, I don't have...
...(or want) a phone. Does that make me old?
And yeah, that interview was telling. |
Response to JSup (Reply #16)
Tue Apr 5, 2016, 03:48 PM
fun n serious (4,451 posts)
18. New Yorkers
I think a debate in New York will be really good for Hill.. Can you imagine?
![]() |
Response to JSup (Reply #10)
Tue Apr 5, 2016, 03:32 PM
yallerdawg (16,104 posts)
17. Hillary will do her best for everyone.
That's what Democrats do.
We don't need everyone to vote for Hillary. Just a majority. Obviously, Bernie or Bust supporters are not any kind of majority. We don't need them to win the general election. We have Republicans quite prepared to annoy the shit out of us - don't need any 'others' to join in (like they are allowed to do now). |
Response to yallerdawg (Reply #17)
Tue Apr 5, 2016, 03:49 PM
fun n serious (4,451 posts)
20. I agree! I can't wait for the GENERAL.
![]() |
Response to Her Sister (Original post)
Tue Apr 5, 2016, 02:34 PM
liberal N proud (59,667 posts)
2. I have noticed that he always tries to claim the high ground while taking the low road
We could talk about Hillary's **** but we don't want to go negative bullshit is so transparent.
|
Response to Her Sister (Original post)
Tue Apr 5, 2016, 02:37 PM
Tanuki (14,220 posts)
3. My prediction: Jeff and Tad will be working for the Koch brothers
next election cycle, if they aren't already.
|
Response to Tanuki (Reply #3)
Tue Apr 5, 2016, 02:40 PM
Koinos (2,789 posts)
6. Tad certainly won't get a job working for a Democrat.
How many losses will that have been?
|
Response to Her Sister (Original post)
Tue Apr 5, 2016, 02:38 PM
Koinos (2,789 posts)
4. After this campaign...
Jeff Weaver will go back to selling comic books. I wonder if comic books affected his reality/fantasy meter. Maybe he thinks that Sanders is a superhero.
|
Response to Her Sister (Original post)
Tue Apr 5, 2016, 02:39 PM
SaschaHM (2,897 posts)
5. Reason #8679 why I'm not voting for Bernie in the primary.
I don't want Jeff Weaver, Tad Devine, Nina Turner or Tulsi Gabbard anywhere near the White House or the Cabinet.
|
Response to SaschaHM (Reply #5)
Tue Apr 5, 2016, 02:44 PM
Koinos (2,789 posts)
7. I don't want them near the House or Senate either.
They are like house guests who break things and then complain about the accommodations.
|
Response to SaschaHM (Reply #5)
Tue Apr 5, 2016, 02:44 PM
Tanuki (14,220 posts)
9. He's done such a poor job of appointing surrogates,
why would anyone trust him to make good cabinet picks?
|
Response to SaschaHM (Reply #5)
Tue Apr 5, 2016, 03:48 PM
CalvinballPro (1,019 posts)
19. +(all the pluses!)
Response to Her Sister (Original post)
Tue Apr 5, 2016, 02:44 PM
otohara (24,135 posts)
8. Guess He Wants Millennials To Be
known as the generation who ushered in Donald Trump as POTUS.
If I were a Millennial I wouldn't want that dubious title. |
Response to Her Sister (Original post)
Tue Apr 5, 2016, 02:49 PM
Her Sister (6,444 posts)
11. Threats and blackmail and condescension and smugness and smears and hate!
and insults and name calling and hit-lists and stalking and man-splaining and white-splaining and insinuating and ordering and blocking and complaining and whining and finger-waving and censoring (here) ...
Those are the special tools being used by all these surrogates/endorsers and supporters. They really want us to HATE the best candidate! FUN!!! I PASS!! HRC GROUP READY |
Response to Her Sister (Reply #11)
Tue Apr 5, 2016, 02:58 PM
fun n serious (4,451 posts)
14. You nailed it exactly.
![]() |
Response to Her Sister (Original post)
Tue Apr 5, 2016, 02:57 PM
Her Sister (6,444 posts)
13. You'd think. The only surrogate that hasn't totally screwed things up was that damn bird.
Andrew Killjoy
@AndrewKilljoy Andrew Killjoy Retweeted Jim White You'd think. The only surrogate that hasn't totally screwed things up was that damn bird. https://twitter.com/AndrewKilljoy/status/717234991311106048 lol!!!!! ![]() |
Response to Her Sister (Original post)
Tue Apr 5, 2016, 02:59 PM
cosmicone (11,014 posts)
15. The most unethical and disingenuous democratic primary ever
and Bernie made it that way.
|
Response to Her Sister (Original post)
Tue Apr 5, 2016, 04:29 PM
Lucinda (30,876 posts)